The significance of reduced glutathione and glutathione S-transferase during chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer
article
OA: gold
CC0
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine changes in reduced glutathione (GSH) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation for patients with stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer, and to evaluate their significance to the efficacy of the treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: According to the prospective phase II study protocol, 36 patients with stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer were enrolled. A short course of intensive weekly neoadjuvant cisplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy followed by concurrent weekly cisplatin and gemcitabine-based chemoradiation was administered. Blood samples for GSH, GST analysis were collected and analyzed before the start of the treatment, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and after the end of the chemoradiation. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in the concentration of GSH after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was identified. After chemoradiation, values of this rate significantly decreased in contrast with GSH concentration after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cases of stage IIB, regional metastases negative patients group, patients with a positive response to treatment, and patients who had no progression of the disease during the first 2 years after treatment. Statistically significant changes in GST during the treatment were not identified; the GST concentration after chemoradiation showed a statistically significant difference in GST concentrations in terms of the progression of the disease and disease without progression. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that changes in the concentration of GSH during the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer might be important for the prediction of the efficacy of the treatment. Statistically significant changes in GST concentration levels during the treatment were not observed.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (30)
- doi:10.1134/s0006297906090033 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00017-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/igc.0b013e3181ca1dfc via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2004.04.001 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/bf00225878 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/1471-2407-5-78 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/igc.0b013e3181dedeb5 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/ijc.21172 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.014 via openalex
- doi:10.3892/or.2011.1405 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)90664-o via openalex
- W177776831 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/030089161109700306 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s11010-010-0437-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/030089161109700306 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19940301)73:5<1377::aid-cncr2820730511>3.0.co;2-n via openalex
- W2115620468 via openalex
- doi:10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2007.05.11 via openalex
- W2265262367 via openalex
- W2403794103 via openalex
- W6607312768 via openalex
- W6634168188 via openalex
- W6657660617 via openalex
- W6692967517 via openalex
- doi:10.3322/caac.20107 via openalex
- doi:10.1200/jco.2008.16.4368 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/09674845.2007.11732751 via openalex
- doi:10.1021/bi047810y via openalex
- doi:10.1002/ijc.25525 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/bf02893050 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:03:29.626429+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK