Male mice heterozygous for Protamine-1 and Protamine-2 are infertile displaying sperm damage and retention of Protamine-2 precursors, transition proteins and histones

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,096 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

BACKGROUND During spermiogenesis, histones are exchanged by protamines (PRMs) in spermatids, which results in DNA hypercondensation and protection. Rodents and primates express two PRMs (PRM1 and PRM2) in a species-specific ratio. Maintaining this ratio is necessary for functional chromatin reorganization and alteration is associated with sub- or infertility in mice and humans. Prm1 and Prm2 deficient mice are infertile, while Prm1+/- males are subfertile showing a severely altered PRM ratio. Prm2+/- males are fertile and display a protamine ratio comparable to WT.

Objectives

Here, we addressed the question whether loss of one allele of Prm1 and one allele of Prm2 affects fertility.

Material and methods

Double heterozygous (dHET) mice lacking one allele of Prm1 and one allele of Prm2 were generated and analyzed

Results

dHET males were infertile with sperm showing retention of histones and TNPs, high levels of PRM2 precursor and decreased levels of mature PRM2. In mature sperm the PRM ratio and the total PRM content was not altered. However, CMA3 staining revealed incomplete protamination and sperm nuclei appeared more rounded and slightly bigger, suggesting impaired DNA-hypercondensation. In dHET sperm, DNA degradation was apparent, but to a lower level compared to sperm from Prm1 and Prm2 deficient males. Increased 8-OHdG levels suggested oxidative stress in the epididymis of dHET mice. However, a fraction of dHET sperm were capable of fertilization, with embryonic development up to 8-cell stage.

Discussion

AND CONCLUSION These results suggest, that male factor infertility might not be reliably detected by measuring PRM1/PRM2 ratio but rather by determining the level of protamination by e.g. CMA3 analysis and pre-PRM2 retention. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Email: G.E.M., merges{at}uni-bonn.de; C.W., c.wiesejahn{at}web.de; M.D.L., Mar.Domingo-Lopez{at}ukbonn.de; S.S., Simon.Schneider{at}ukbonn.de; A.K., kovacevic{at}uni-bonn.de; L.A., lena.arevalo{at}inia.csic.es; H.S., schorle{at}uni-bonn.de

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00