Genomic characterization of type I-E* CRISPR-Cas systems in Klebsiella pneumoniae : association of spacer diversity and antimicrobial resistance

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,831 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Klebsiella pneumoniae, known to acquire antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) through horizontal gene transfer, possess type I CRISPR-Cas systems. This study investigated the association of multidrug resistance (MDR) and CRISPR-Cas in septicemic K. pneumoniae, along with comparative analysis of CRISPR-positive global K. pneumoniae.

Methods

Archived K. pneumoniae from septicemic neonates (2008-2020) were assessed for CRISPR-Cas system, cas gene expression and correlation with ARG carriage. Whole-genome sequencing was performed and diversity of spacers, protospacers adjacent motifs (PAMs), targeted plasmids, were evaluated. Comparative analyses were performed for CRISPR-positive global K. pneumoniae.

Results

Twenty-five percent of study K. pneumoniae possessed complete type I-E* CRISPR-Cas comparable to 22% of global K. pneumoniae, which were distributed equally to type I-E & I-E*. CRISPR-positive study strains (83%) were MDR, and exhibited no significant association of CRISPR-Cas with MDR phenotype. Spacers noted in non-MDRs were diverse, showed increased average count and identified more diverse PAMs compared to spacers from MDR strains. Plasmids harboring ARGs such as blaNDM, blaCTX-M, qnrS1, mcr-8, etc. were frequently targeted by spacers from non-MDRs. Presence of CRISPR-Cas system in epidemic MDR clones such as ST14/15/23 in I-E* (local, global) and ST147 in I-E (global), indicated a lineage-specific association with CRISPR-Cas subtypes.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the co-existence of CRISPR-Cas systems within both MDR and non-MDR K. pneumoniae, with no significant correlation with either group. However, presence of diverse spacers in non-MDR strains that identified more PAMs and targeted ARG-bearing plasmid implied role of CRISPR-Cas system in limiting ARG acquisition.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00