Experiment-free learning of exoskeleton assistance remains an unsolved problem

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,645 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract In "Experiment-free exoskeleton assistance via learning in simulation", Luo et al. [1] present an ambitious framework for developing exoskeleton controllers through reinforcement learning exclusively in computer simulation. The authors report that a control policy trained on a small dataset from one subject was directly transferred to physical hardware, reducing human metabolic cost during walking, running, and stair climbing by more than any prior device. If confirmed, this would represent a major breakthrough for the field of wearable robotics and their clinical applications. However, a close examination of the published materials casts doubt on these claims. The reported experimental results violate physiological limits on the relationship between mechanical power and muscle energy use during gait2,3,4. The algorithmic claims are surprising and cannot be verified; in contrast with established replicability standards in machine learning5,6, executable code has not been made available. We conclude that the goals of this study have not yet been verifiably achieved and make recommendations for avoiding publication errors of this type in the future. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes * Authors listed in alphabetical order by surname; roles described in Author Contributions. https://drive.google.com/file/d/151lRiICb3l5aFLpr8_oSydGSqZtqlYEr/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1owzTcuJ3z3gKpB5aBmTVrjdyr4g0HYKt/view?usp=sharing Data availability All study data necessary to replicate this work are available in the Source Data included with this paper.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00