Cracking the Capsid Code: A Computationally-Feasible Approach for Investigating Virus-Excipient Interactions in Biologics Design

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,720 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The efficacy and equitable distribution of viral biologics, including vaccines and virus-like particles, is hindered due to their inherently low shelf life. To increase the longevity of such products, formulations are typically developed with small molecule additives known as excipients. Finding the correct excipients for a biological formulation is a costly and time-consuming process due to the large excipient design space and unknown mechanisms underlying excipient-virus interactions. Molecular dynamics simulations are, in theory, well-equipped to efficiently investigate these mechanisms. However, the massive size of fully assembled viral capsids, the protein shell that encapsulates the viral genome, demands computational resources well beyond the requirements of conventional simulations. There exists a need for a novel method that enables high-throughput investigations of virus-excipient interactions at the molecular level and at atomistic resolution. Here, we introduce CapSACIN — a computational framework for Capsid Surface Abstraction and Computationally-Induced Nanofragmentation. We demonstrate the applicability of this workflow to a model non-enveloped virus, porcine parvovirus (PPV). Through simulations of PPV surface models, we observe that the 2-fold axis of symmetry is significantly weaker at the molecular level than the 3- or 5-fold axes of symmetry. Further, we present results demonstrating excellent agreement with experimentally determined excipient effects on PPV thermal stability. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Updated author affiliations, introduced Section 4 to highlight potential applications and limitations

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00