Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound combined with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis under deep learning
Deep learning models, VGG-GAP for ultrasound and IC3D for MRI, achieved high classification accuracies (96.5% and 99.2%) and diagnostic values (90.68% and 92.37%) for deep pelvic endometriosis, with MRI showing higher diagnostic value.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (29)
- Abdominal wall endometriosis: differentiation from other masses using CT features via openalex
- Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of deeply infiltrating endometriosis via openalex
- Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance‐colonography for the presurgical staging of deep infiltrating endometriosis via openalex
- Current Status of Transvaginal Ultrasound Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Before Surgery via openalex
- [Deep infiltrating endometriosis-diagnosis and principles of surgical treatment]. via openalex
- Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic-Assisted Bowel Segmental Resection for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Description of Technique via openalex
- MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Imaging for Diagnosis of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis – A Critical Appraisal via openalex
- Recurrences and fertility after endometrioma ablation in women with and without colorectal endometriosis: a prospective cohort study† via openalex
- Transvaginal sonography vs. clinical examination in the preoperative diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis via openalex
- W2924661000 via openalex
- W2962967183 via openalex
- W2963446989 via openalex
- W2982092517 via openalex
- W2999108204 via openalex
- W3018913999 via openalex
- W3035333819 via openalex
- W3077024599 via openalex
- W3084391106 via openalex
- W3100143300 via openalex
- W1857542984 via openalex
- W4205232656 via openalex
- W1967201009 via openalex
- W2332506823 via openalex
- W2553155685 via openalex
- W2553380950 via openalex
- W2794977498 via openalex
- W2797461271 via openalex
- W2808750812 via openalex
- W2923827338 via openalex
Cited by (8)
- Artificial Intelligence in Endometriosis Imaging: A Scoping Review 2026
- Unpaired multi-modal training and single-modal testing for detecting signs of endometriosis 2025
- Identification and validation of a novel machine learning model for predicting severe pelvic endometriosis: A retrospective study 2025
- Recent advancements of artificial intelligence in minimally invasive surgery for endometriosis 2025
- Distilling Missing Modality Knowledge from Ultrasound for Endometriosis Diagnosis with Magnetic Resonance Images 2023
- Abordagem Computacional Baseada em Deep Learning para o Diagnóstico de Endometriose Profunda através de Imagens de Ressonância Magnética 2023
- Distilling Missing Modality Knowledge from Ultrasound for Endometriosis Diagnosis with Magnetic Resonance Images 2023
- The Effectiveness of Self-supervised Pre-training for Multi-modal Endometriosis Classification*† 2023
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00