XAI-ecDNA: A Proof-of-Concept Framework for Explainable Multi-Modal Extrachromosomal DNA Detection Using Synthetic FISH and Genomics

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,945 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) is a key contributor to aggressive tumor evolution and drug resistance across multiple cancer types. Yet detection methods suffer from limited performance and lack interpretability. Moreover, paired fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and genomic datasets necessary for developing multi-modal artificial intelligence tools remain unavailable in public repositories. We developed an explainable multi-modal framework combining genomic copy number profiles from 500 samples (TCGA, CytoCellDB) with synthetic FISH images generated via StyleGAN2-ADA trained on 247 published images. The framework employs early fusion of ResNet-50 image features and multi-layer perceptron processed genomic data through gated attention. A Biological Rationale Score (BRS) provides SHAP-based explanations with stability quantification and uncertainty estimates. Expert cytogeneticists validated synthetic image biological plausibility. Twelve clinical experts evaluated predictions in a crossover study. On synthetic images, our framework achieved AUROC 0.87, significantly outperforming genomic-only (0.72), image-only (0.79), and late fusion (0.84) baselines (all p<0.001). BRS identified MYC amplification (76% of cases), nuclear morphology (68%), and spatial clustering (56%) as top predictive features, aligning with known biology. Explanation stability reached Kendall’s τ=0.74. Expert diagnostic confidence improved by 0.9 points (Cohen’s d=1.26, p<0.001) with explanations. Model calibration was excellent (ECE=0.042). This proof-of-concept demonstrates multi-modal explainable ecDNA detection potential. However, all results are on synthetic images; validation with real clinical FISH data is essential before deployment. The methodology provides a transparent template for interpretable AI development in data-scarce medical domains. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00