The economic risk of the losses in pest control as frogs decline

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Crop pests threaten agricultural productivity, causing significant economic losses and food security issues. Although various control methods exist, pesticide reliance raises health and environmental concerns. In this sense, the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a favored approach that minimizes pesticide use while incorporating diverse pest control methods. A key aspect of IPM is biological control, which employs organisms to mitigate pests. However, the potential of certain groups like amphibians in pest suppression is understudied. Our study in Brazil estimates the annual pest control value provided by anurans by combining empirical data, allometric estimates, and spatial analysis. We estimate the value of natural control of native pests in Brazilian crops to be 23.6 billion dollars annually, with the value of natural control attributable to anurans to be $1.18 billion annually for all crops and nearly half a million only for soybean cultivated in Central Brazil. Frogs alone have the potential to reduce the population of invertebrates that may be considered harmful to crops by nearly 300 million individuals annually. Despite this biodiversity-driven biological control being crucial for ecosystem health and agricultural productivity, land use changes and climate change pose threats to these vital functions, leading to the increase of economic losses and food insecurity.
Full text 2,227 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Crop pests threaten agricultural productivity, causing significant economic losses and food security issues. Although various control methods exist, pesticide reliance raises health and environmental concerns. In this sense, the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a favored approach that minimizes pesticide use while incorporating diverse pest control methods. A key aspect of IPM is biological control, which employs organisms to mitigate pests. However, the potential of certain groups like amphibians in pest suppression is understudied. Our study in Brazil estimates the annual pest control value provided by anurans by combining empirical data, allometric estimates, and spatial analysis. We estimate the value of natural control of native pests in Brazilian crops to be 23.6 billion dollars annually, with the value of natural control attributable to anurans to be $1.18 billion annually for all crops and nearly half a million only for soybean cultivated in Central Brazil. Frogs alone have the potential to reduce the population of invertebrates that may be considered harmful to crops by nearly 300 million individuals annually. Despite this biodiversity-driven biological control being crucial for ecosystem health and agricultural productivity, land use changes and climate change pose threats to these vital functions, leading to the increase of economic losses and food insecurity. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2SP79 Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Amphibians, biological control, crops, Integrated Pest Management., Integrated pest management Published: 2024-07-04 17:10 Last Updated: 2024-07-08 16:02 CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Not applicable Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00