Results
The study found that of 38 patients with uterine fibroids and
infertility, 24 women (63%) became pregnant within 2 years after laparoscopic
myomectomy. Of these, 13 (54.1%) were delivered by cesarean section, and 11
(45.9%) were delivered naturally. Of the 5 women with subserous fibroid nodes
(FIGO type 7), 5 (100%) became pregnant. Of the 19 patients with intramural
subserous nodes (FIGO types 5 and 6), 11 (58%) became pregnant. Of the 24
women with intramural nodes (FIGO type 4), 8 (33%) became pregnant. In 5
(100%) women who became pregnant after removal of the subserous node (FIGO
type 7), vaginal delivery was performed. In 7 (63.6%) patients who became
pregnant after removal of an intramural-subserous node (FIGO types 5 and 6),
delivery was performed by cesarean section, in 4 (36.4%) by natural delivery. In 6
(75%) women who became pregnant after removal of an intramural node (FIGO
type 4), delivery was performed by cesarean section, in 2 (35%) by natural
delivery. Of 14 women suffering from infertility and having only 1 fibroid node,
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
11 became pregnant (78.5%), of 19 patients with 2 fibroids, 11 (58%) became
pregnant, of 5 women who had 3 or more fibroid nodes became pregnant 2 (40%).
Of the 11 women who became pregnant after myomectomy of 1 node, 5 (45.4%)
had a cesarean section and 6 (54.6%) had a natural delivery. Of the 11 women who
became pregnant after removal of 2 fibroids, 6 (54.5%) had a cesarean section, 5
(45.5%) had a vaginal delivery, of 2 women who became pregnant after removal of
3 or more fibroids, 2 (100%) were performed by caesarean section. In addition, we
found that out of 4 women who had fibroids measuring less than 3 cm, only 1
(25%) became pregnant; out of 9 patients with fibroids from 3 to 5 cm, 7 (29%)
became pregnant; out of 25 patients with 16 (67%) became pregnant with fibroids
larger than 5 cm. In the only woman who became pregnant after myomectomy of a
node less than 3 cm, delivery was performed by cesarean section. 4 (57%) patients
who became pregnant after removal of fibroids measuring 3 to 5 cm had a cesarean
section delivery, and 3 (43%) had a natural delivery. In 8 (50%) patients who
became pregnant after removal of a node measuring more than 5 cm, delivery was
performed by cesarean section, in 8 (50%) by natural delivery.
Conclusions
Depending on the size, number and location, uterine fibroids
can cause infertility. Our study demonstrates that laparoscopic myomectomy
improves reproductive outcomes in women with subserosal, intramural-subserosal,
and intramural myomatous nodules. After removal of nodes larger than 5 cm, the
pregnancy rate was significantly higher than after removal of nodes smaller than 5
cm. In addition, the pregnancy rate in this observation period was higher in patients
after removal of a single uterine fibroid, compared with women with 2 and more
myomatous nodes. After removal of the subserous nodes, delivery was carried out
naturally; after removal of the intramural and subserosal-intramural nodes, in most
cases the tactics of delivery by cesarean section were chosen. In the groups of
women who became pregnant after removal of a node from 3 to 5 cm and more
than 5 cm, the rate of delivery by cesarean section and vaginally was
approximately equal. After myomectomy of a node less than 3 cm, delivery was
carried out naturally. In the groups of women who became pregnant after removal
of 1 and 2 nodes, the rate of surgical and natural delivery was approximately the
same, and in the group of patients with 3 or more nodes, a cesarean section was
performed in all cases.
Key words: uterine fibroids, myomectomy, infertility.
Introduction
Uterine fibroids are a benign monoclonal tumor arising from smooth muscle
cells of the cervix or uterine body [50]. The incidence of the disease among women
of reproductive age reaches 70% [2,34,36]. Most women are asymptomatic,
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
making it difficult to estimate the true prevalence. Symptoms and their severity
may vary depending on the size and location of the fibroids. The most common
symptom is abnormal uterine bleeding, which can lead to anemia. Other possible
symptoms include lower abdominal pain of varying nature and intensity, painful
and heavy menstruation, dyspareunia, dysfunction of adjacent organs (dysuric
disorders, constipation) [21]. Risk factors for the development of fibroids include
early menarche, no history of childbirth, increased BMI, smoking, and vitamin D
deficiency [16,42,50]. The average age of detection of uterine fibroids is 32- 34
years [36]. Currently, there is an increase in the incidence of fibroids in young
women under 30 years of age who have not achieved reproductive function.
Depending on their size, number and location in the uterus, fibroids can cause both
infertility and recurrent miscarriage [30,46,49]. The location of fibroids in the
uterus can be classified using the International Federation of Gynecology and
Obstetrics (FIGO) system. In women who need fertility preservation, fibroids can
be removed surgically (myomectomy) by laparotomy, laparoscopy, or
hysteroscopy, depending on the size, location, and type of fibroids. However,
myomectomy is an operation that is not without risks and can lead to serious
complications. Therefore, it is important to determine whether myomectomy can
lead to improved reproductive outcomes and, if so, to identify the optimal surgical
approach.Although there are many studies evaluating the relationship between
uterine fibroids and infertility, the mechanisms by which fibroids negatively
impact reproductive function remain largely unknown. Many hypotheses have
been proposed to explain how fibroids can cause infertility, such as increased
uterine contractility, abnormal cytokine profile, abnormal vascularization, and
chronic inflammation [19]. The tumor can disrupt the anatomy of the uterine
cavity, causing obstruction of the proximal openings of the fallopian tubes and the
anatomy of the pelvic organs, pushing the fallopian tube away from the ovary [20].
It is likely that the displacement of the cervix towards the symphysis by large
myomatous nodes makes it difficult for sperm to enter it, and an enlargement or
deformation of the uterine cavity may interfere with the normal transport of sperm
[19]. Myomatous nodes, especially with a submucosal location, disrupt blood flow
in the endometrium and cause an excessive inflammatory reaction, which
negatively affects implantation [17]. Patients with fibroids also have low levels of
interleukin 10 and glycodelin. These cytokines are involved in the implantation
process and their decrease can have a negative impact on conception [22].
It is known that fibroids are more common in women with a history of
infertility. Fibroids may be the only cause of infertility in 2-3% of women. It is
also found in up to 23% of cases of primary and secondary infertility. This is also
supported by a recent large cohort study that showed an increase in time to first
and subsequent pregnancies in patients with uterine fibroids compared with
controls without fibroids [18]. In some cases, uterine fibroids do not prevent
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
pregnancy and fetal development, but increase the incidence of complications of
pregnancy and childbirth [17,30,46,49].
Although there are many studies evaluating the relationship between uterine
fibroids and infertility, the mechanisms by which fibroids negatively impact
reproductive function remain largely unknown. Many hypotheses have been
proposed to explain how fibroids may cause infertility, such as increased uterine
contractility, abnormal cytokine profiles, abnormal vascularization, and chronic
inflammation. The tumor can disrupt the anatomy of the uterine cavity, causing
obstruction of the proximal openings of the fallopian tubes and the anatomy of the
pelvic organs, pushing the fallopian tube away from the ovary [27]. It is likely that
the displacement of the cervix towards the symphysis by large myomatous nodes
makes it difficult for sperm to enter it, and an enlargement or deformation of the
uterine cavity may interfere with the normal transport of sperm. Myomatous nodes,
especially with a submucosal location, disrupt blood flow in the endometrium and
cause an excessive inflammatory reaction, which negatively affects implantation
[17]. The negative effects of intramural fibroids may also be mediated by signaling
molecules produced by the fibroids that are able to reach the endometrial cavity,
causing adverse effects on endometrial homeostasis and receptivity [17,49].
The location of the fibroid nodes obviously determines the degree of
influence on the reproductive outcome. Previous studies have shown that women
with submucosal fibroids that deform the uterine cavity, compared with women
without fibroids, have a higher incidence of infertility, miscarriage, placental
insufficiency, placenta previa, premature placental abruption and fetal malposition,
and a lower incidence of implantation and childbirth The incidence of cesarean
section and preterm birth is also likely to increase in the presence of submucosal
fibroids [6,12]. On the other hand, subserosal fibroids do not have a significant
impact on reproductive outcome, while the impact of intramural fibroids remains
controversial due to conflicting study results [33,37,40].
There is evidence that fibroid size and proximity to the uterine cavity are
important for the effect of intramural fibroids on fertility. Accordingly, fibroids as
small as 2 cm located close to the endometrial mucosa (FIGO type 3) will have a
detrimental effect on reproductive outcome. In the case of intramural fibroids that
are not in contact with the underlying endometrium (type 4, 5), 3 cm is the
minimum size that negatively affects a woman’s fertility [8]. Women with fibroids
may also experience higher rates of fetal growth restriction and stillbirth [23].
However, a recent large study of more than 5,500 women found no statistically
significant increase in the risk of spontaneous abortion among women with and
without fibroids [15].
The effect of fibroid number on fertility has not been well studied, although
fewer fibroids have been reported to be associated with improved reproductive
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
outcomes after fibroid removal [29]. However, some studies have not found a
relationship between fibroid size and pregnancy rates [20].
Studies comparing the results of IVF cycles in women with intramural
fibroids and women without fibroids demonstrate a significant negative impact of
intramural fibroids on fertility and recommend surgical removal of fibroids before
IVF [1,11,32,33,45,47]. Studies confirm that surgery is indicated for intramural
fibroids affecting the cavity, but not for subserous fibroids. Intramural nodes larger
than 4 cm in size that do not deform the uterine cavity are recommended to be
removed before IVF. On the other hand, the role in the genesis of infertility and the
benefits of myomectomy on reproductive outcomes in intramural fibroids (FIGO)
types 3–5 are less clear [13,25]. However, some authors were unable to detect a
negative effect on IVF outcomes in the presence of fibroids less than 5 cm in size
and without disruption of the structure of the uterine cavity [3,35].
There is currently insufficient evidence that the specific size, number or
location of fibroids (excluding submucosal fibroids or intramural fibroids affecting
the structure of the uterine cavity) is associated with a decreased likelihood of
pregnancy or an increased risk of early pregnancy loss [32].
The choice of management tactics for patients with infertility and intramural
or subserous fibroids depends on the clinical symptoms, as well as the size and
location of the fibroids. If significant symptoms associated with fibroids occur,
such as heavy menstrual bleeding or severe pain, fibroid removal is usually
recommended to relieve symptoms. However, when women experience infertility
or recurrent miscarriage in the absence of fibroid-related symptoms, treatment
recommendations are less clear.
Drug treatment may be used in the presence of abnormal uterine bleeding,
although this approach has no more than a temporary effect on fibroids. In certain
cases, GnRH agonists can be used preoperatively to reduce fibroid size and restore
hemoglobin levels in symptomatic patients [14,26].
Myomectomy is the leading method of restoring fertility in patients with
infertility or miscarriage. Studies have shown that myomectomy significantly
increases pregnancy rates in women with fibroid-related infertility. The incidence
of miscarriage decreases after myomectomy, although overall rates of spontaneous
pregnancy loss remain higher than in the general population. Fibroids affect 0.1 –
3.9% of pregnant women, and a number of complications occurring during the
prenatal and postpartum period are believed to be directly related to the presence of
these benign tumors [17]. The positive effect of myomectomy on reproductive
prognosis is also proven by a study in which 52.2% of women became pregnant
after myomectomy [17]. In another study, women who underwent myomectomy
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
had higher birth rates compared with women with fibroids who did not undergo
surgery (42% versus 11%, respectively) [32].
Myomectomy improved reproductive outcome in women with fibroids that
distort the uterine cavity [48]. Improved reproductive outcomes after myomectomy
were also observed in a group of women who had at least one fibroid with a
diameter of more than 5 cm that did not distort the uterine cavity [13].
Myomectomy was not associated with improved pregnancy rates in women with
intramural or subserous fibroids smaller than 4 cm [26]. Most scientists agree that
subserous fibroids do not affect the incidence of implantation, clinical pregnancy,
childbirth and early pregnancy termination, and its removal is not beneficial in the
absence of special indications for surgical treatment (torsion of the node leg, poor
circulation in the node, symptoms compression of adjacent organs, rapid growth of
the node) [31,32].
Some authors report no clear benefit from surgery and do not recommend
this approach. However, a limitation of these studies is that they do not provide
clear information on the size, number and location of fibroids [7,23,26].
Don E et al. (2022) compared reproductive outcomes in patients after
myomectomy and patients with fibroids. The study found no significant difference
in time to live birth after myomectomy compared with expectant management in
women with fibroids who want to become pregnant. However, the majority of
conceptions in the myomectomy group occurred naturally (67%), while IVF/ICSI
(45%) was the most common method of conception in the fibroid group. After a
woman has had a myomectomy, she has a recovery period of up to 6 months,
during which she is advised not to become pregnant. Therefore, the recovery
period after surgery may have been offset by the possible beneficial effect of
myomectomy, which, in addition to the reduction of symptoms, provides an
argument in favor of performing myomectomy.
Most authors concluded that there is insufficient evidence regarding the
effect of removal of intramural fibroids on reproductive outcomes in infertile
women [32].
Intramural and subserous myomatous nodes can be removed using
laparoscopic, laparotomic access, as well as by performing a mini-laparotomy.
Laparoscopic myomec tomy is the “gold standard” in the absence of
contraindications. It has some advantages over laparotomy: less postoperative pain,
shorter hospitalization time, less blood loss and faster recovery [24,27].
In a study conducted by Morales H. et al. (2022) the pregnancy rate was
statistically significantly higher with laparoscopic surgery compared with
laparotomy and expectant management. Tsiampa E et al. (2023) proved that
laparoscopic myomectomy provides better results compared to minilaparotomy.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
Some studies have reported no differences between laparoscopic and
laparotomic approaches in terms of pregnancy rates and early pregnancy loss rates
[9,19,26].
The most common intraoperative complications of laparoscopic
myomectomy include myometrial hematoma, excessive blood loss, and accidental
morcellation [39]. Contraindications to laparoscopic myomectomy are multiple
fibroids (> 4) in different parts of the uterus, requiring multiple incisions, and the
presence of intramural fibroids larger than 10-12 cm or suspected leiomyosarcoma
[9].
The laparotomy approach is preferable in patients with multiple fibroids, as
it reduces operative time [38].
Unfortunately, myomectomy is a fairly adhesive surgical procedure, and
postoperative adhesions can have a significant impact on fertility [25].
Myomectomy itself, being a serious invasive procedure, carries a risk of damage to
the uterine myometrium and endometrium, as well as the formation of adhesions in
the pelvic cavity. Additionally, the direct cause-and-effect relationship between the
presence of fibroids and infertility and the actual benefit of myomectomy has not
yet been determined. Thus, in women with unexplained infertility or requiring
treatment of symptomatic fibroids, the surgeon must balance the benefits of such
surgery in terms of improving fertility on the one hand, and the consequences
associated with the development of adhesions, on the other, while avoiding
unnecessary myomectomies and involuntary iatrogenic injuries. This approach is
especially relevant in the case of large fibroids located on the posterior wall. It is
therefore important to determine when myomectomy should be considered
beneficial and, if so, to take all available measures to avoid postoperative infertility
[25].
Currently, hysteroscopic myomectomy is the gold standard for surgical
treatment of submucosal fibroids (FIGO 0 and 1 fibroids) [28]. In approximately
70% of cases, submucosal uterine fibroids lead to abnormal uterine bleeding,
which is the most common indication for hysteroscopic myomectomy [44]. Other
indications include infertility, recurrent miscarriage, dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain
[22, 28]. Complications during the intervention are rare, but uterine perforation and
bleeding are possible [4,12,22].
There is reliable evidence that hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal
fibroids that deform the uterine cavity improves clinical pregnancy rates and
reduces the risk of early pregnancy loss, especially when fibroids are the only
cause of infertility [12,32,22].
There is evidence that damage to the pseudocapsule during myomectomy
can lead to a decrease in the content of neuropeptides and neurofibers at the site of
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
hysterotomy, impaired physiological healing of the myometrium with increased
fibrosis due to hypoxia, ischemia and necrosis. These pathophysiological
phenomena cause a deficiency of neurotransmission in the myometrium, muscle
impulses and contractility, which ultimately leads to dysfunction of the uterine
muscles during pregnancy and childbirth. Tinelli et al. (2019) recommended
preservation of the pseudocapsule during myomectomy. Hysteroscopic cold snare
myomectomy appears to reduce thermal injury and preserve the integrity of the
fibroid pseudocapsule.
Results
The study found that of 38 patients with uterine fibroids and infertility, 24
women (63%) became pregnant within 2 years after laparoscopic myomectomy
(Tab. 1). Of these, 13 (54.1%) were delivered by cesarean section, and 11 (45.9%)
were delivered naturally. Of 38 women planning pregnancy, 5 (13%) had
pedunculated subserous fibroids (FIGO type 7), 19 (50%) had intramural-
subserous fibroids (FIGO type 5 or 6), 14 (37%) had intramural (FIGO type 4).
Of the 38 women planning pregnancy, 14 (37%) had a single fibroid, 19
(50%) had 2 fibroids, and 5 (13%) had 3 or more.
When assessing the size of fibroids, it was found that in 4 (10.5%) patients
out of 38, the size of fibroids was less than 3 cm, in 9 (23.5%) out of 38 from 3 to
5 cm, in 25 (66%) there was fibroids more than 5 cm.
Table 1. Distribution of patients by type, number of uterine fibroids and
reproductive outcomes
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
Patient Size Type FIGO Number of fibroids Pregnancy yes\no
1 less than 3 cm 7 1 yes
2 more than 5
cm
4 2 yes
3 more than 5
cm
4 2 yes
4 from 3 to 5 cm 5 3 no
5 more than 5
cm
5 1 no
6 from 3 to 5 cm 5 2 no
7 more than 5
cm
7 1 yes
8 less than 3 cm 5 2 no
9 more than 5
cm
4 3 yes
10 more than 5
cm
4 1 yes
11 from 3 to 5 cm 7 1 yes
12 less than 3 cm 4 2 no
13 more than 5
cm
5 2 yes
14 more than 5
cm
4 2 yes
15 from 3 to 5 cm 7 1 yes
16 more than 5
cm
6 2 yes
17 more than 5
cm
4 1 yes
18 less than 3 cm 4 1 no
19 more than 5
cm
5 2 yes
20 from 3 to 5 cm 4 2 yes
21 more than 5
cm
4 1 no
22 more than 5 6 2 no
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
cm
23 more than 5
cm
5 1 yes
24 more than 5
cm
5 2 no
25 more than 5
cm
4 5 no
26 more than 5
cm
4 2 no
27 more than 5
cm
6 2 no
28 from 3 to 5 cm 5 2 yes
29 more than 5
cm
7 1 yes
30 more than 5
cm
5 3 no
31 from 3 to 5 cm 4 2 yes
32 more than 5
cm
6 4 yes
33 more than 5
cm
6 1 yes
34 more than 5
cm
5 2 да
35 from 3 to 5 cm 5 2 да
36 more than 5
cm
6 1 да
37 from 3 to 5 cm 5 1 да
38 more than 5
cm
4 2 нет
Of the 5 women with subserous fibroids (FIGO type 7), 5 (100%) became
pregnant. After laparoscopic removal of fibroids of this location, patients could
plan pregnancy within 3-4 months. Of the 19 patients with intramural subserous
nodule (FIGO types 5 and 6), 11 (58%) became pregnant. Of the 24 women with
an intramural node (FIGO type 4), 8 (33%) became pregnant. After a woman has
had a myomectomy, she has a recovery period of up to a year, during which time
she is advised not to become pregnant. This factor could also influence the
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
frequency of conception among patients with this type of fibroid. In 5 (100%)
women who became pregnant after removal of the subserous node (FIGO type 7),
vaginal delivery was performed. In 7 (63.6%) patients who became pregnant after
removal of an intramural-subserous node (FIGO types 5 and 6), delivery was
performed by cesarean section, in 4 (36.4%) by natural delivery. In 6 (75%)
women who became pregnant after removal of an intramural node (FIGO type 4),
delivery was performed by cesarean section, in 2 (35%) by natural delivery.
Of 14 women suffering from infertility and having a single fibroid, 11
became pregnant (78.5%), of 19 patients with 2 fibroids, 11 (58%) became
pregnant, of 5 women who had more than 3 fibroids, 2 became pregnant (40% ).
Of the 11 women who became pregnant after myomectomy of 1 node, 5 (45.4%)
had a cesarean section and 6 (54.6%) had a natural delivery. Of the 11 women who
became pregnant after the removal of 2 fibroids, 6 (54.5%) had a cesarean section,
5 (45.5%) had a natural delivery, of 2 women who became pregnant after the
removal of 3 or more fibroids, 2 (100%) were performed by caesarean section.
In addition, we found that out of 4 women who had fibroids measuring less
than 3 cm, only 1 (25%) became pregnant; out of 9 patients with fibroids from 3 to
5 cm, 7 (29%) became pregnant; out of 25 patients with 16 (67%) became pregnant
with fibroids larger than 5 cm. In the only woman who became pregnant after
myomectomy of a node less than 3 cm, delivery was performed by cesarean
section. 4 (57%) patients who became pregnant after removal of fibroids
measuring 3 to 5 cm had a cesarean section delivery, and 3 (43%) had a natural
delivery. In 8 (50%) patients who became pregnant after removal of a node
measuring more than 5 cm, delivery was performed by cesarean section, in 8
(50%) by natural delivery. The delivery tactics were determined by the obstetrician
of the maternity hospital. In Table 2 we described the distribution by size of uterine
fibroids.
Table 2. The distribution by size of uterine fibroids
Patient size in mm
1 23х25х20
2 62х74х70 и 55х60х64
3 102х91х95 и 72х70х75
4 38х47х48 и 31х42х45 и 40х43х46
5 55х58х60
6 44х48х45 и 40х46х49
7 51х60х74
8 13х9х11 и 15х20х24
9 85х87х71 и 62х63х74 и 49х51х53
10 87х89х92
11 30х35х42
12 8х8х10 и 20х26х28
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
13 93х66х64 и 62х93х75
14 77х79х85 и 90х93х95
15 34х38х45
16 88х85х83 и 74х71х68
17 51х64х72
18 10х15х17
19 76х71х75 и 65х60х71
20 33х37х39 и 41х45х48
21 65х69х71 и 86хх89х94
22 50х53х55 и 77х74х75
23 51х53х55
24 59х58х54
25 90х94х97 и 54х58х57 и 50х51х54 и 35х30х31 и 45х35х50
26 64х68х69 и 71х75х76
27 54х58х59 и 60х62х65
28 41х45х47 и 31х36х43
29 66х70х72
30 51х60х58 и 66х68х74 и 70х75х76
31 45х40х39 и 31х35х34
32 54х57х62 и 50х53х54 и 90х84х86 и 47х52х53
33 69х75х79
34 70х62х65 и 77х74х80
35 44х47х48 и 30х35х37
36 55х59х62
37 30х34х40
38 95х93х90 и 85х89х86
Conclusions
Depending on the size, number and location, uterine fibroids can cause
infertility. Our study demonstrates that laparoscopic myomectomy improves
reproductive outcomes in women with subserosal, intramural-subserosal, and
intramural myomatous nodules. In addition to the problem of infertility, potential
symptoms such as abnormal uterine bleeding and pain should be assessed and
included in the indications for surgery. After removal of nodes larger than 5 cm,
the pregnancy rate was significantly higher than after removal of nodes smaller
than 5 cm. In addition, the pregnancy rate in this observation period was higher in
patients after removal of a single uterine fibroid, compared with women with 2 and
more myomatous nodes. After removal of the subserous nodes, delivery was
carried out naturally; after removal of the intramural and subserosal-intramural
nodes, in most cases the tactics of delivery by cesarean section were chosen. In the
groups of women who became pregnant after removal of a node from 3 to 5 cm
and more than 5 cm, the rate of delivery by cesarean section and vaginally was
approximately equal. After myomectomy of a node less than 3 cm, delivery was
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
carried out naturally. In the groups of women who became pregnant after removal
of 1 and 2 nodes, the rate of surgical and natural delivery was approximately the
same, and in the group of patients with 3 or more nodes, a cesarean section was
performed in all cases.
Ethic committee:
Decision 14-h from 12 Feb. 2024. Protocols for research study supervised by
professor Ruhliada N.N. were approved (Approval no. 1478/2022) in Compliance
with National Institutes of Health guidelines for human studies. Along with that
medical records used for this study were anonymized before access.
References
1. Clinical guidelines - Uterine fibroids - 2020. "Russian Society of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists"
2. Chiaffarino F. et al. Alcohol consumption and risk of uterine myoma: A
systematic review and meta analysis//PloS one. – 2017 – Т. 12 – N. 11 –
С. e0188355.
3. SOGC clinical practice guideline, The Management of Uterine
Leiomyomas, No. 318
4. Stewart EA, Cookson CL, Gandolfo RA, Schulze-Rath R. Epidemiology
of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017 Sep;124(10):1501-
1512. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14640. Epub 2017 May 13. PMID:
28296146.
5. Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Stewart EA. Moving Toward Individualized
Medicine for Uterine Leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. 2018
Oct;132(4):961-971. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002785. PMID:
30130343; PMCID: PMC6153058
6. Monleón J, Cañete ML, Caballer o V, et al. Epidemiology of uterine
myomas and clinical practice in Spain: An observational study. Eur J
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;226:59-65.
doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.05.026
7. Al-Hendy A, Lukes AS, Poindexter AN 3rd, Venturella R, Villarroel C,
Critchley HOD, Li Y, McKain L, Arjona Ferreira JC, Langenberg AGM,
Wagman RB, Stewart EA. Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with
Relugolix Combination Therapy. N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb
18;384(7):630-642. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2008283. PMID: 33596357;
PMCID: PMC8262231
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
8. Islam M.S., Akhtar M.M., Segars J.H. Vitamin D deficiency and uterine
fibroids: An opportunity for treatment or prevention? Fertil. Steril.
2021;115:1175–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.040.
9. Tinelli A., Vinciguerra M., Malvasi A., Andjić M., Babović I., Sparić R.
Uterine Fibroids and Diet. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health.
2021;18:1066. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031066.
10. Arutyunova E.E., Katkova A.S., Buralkina N.A. Ethnogeography of
uterine fibroids: epidemiology, age and racial differences, types of
surgical interventions. Consilium Medicum. 2018; 20 (6): 26 –30. DOI:
10.26442/2075-1753_2018.6.26-30
11. Parazzini F., Tozzi L., Bianchi S. Pregnancy outcome and uterine
fibroids//Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. –
2016 – Т. 3
4 – С. 74-84.
12. Whynott R.M., Vaught K.C.C., Segars J.H. The Effect of Uterine
Fibroids on Infertility: A Systematic Review. Semin. Reprod. Med.
2017;35:523–532. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607295.
13. Zepiridis L. I., Grimbizis G. F., Tarlatzis B. C. Infertility and uterine
fibroids//Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. –
2016 – Т. 34 – С. 66-73.
14. Somigliana E, Reschini M, Bonanni V, Busnelli A, Li Piani L, Vercellini
P. Fibroids and natural fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43(1):100-110.
doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.03.013
15. Freytag D, Günther V, Maass N, Alkatout I. Uterine Fibroids and
Infertility. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(8):1455. Published 2021 Aug 12.
doi:10.3390/diagnostics11081455
16. Kamilla Karlsen, Ole Mogensen, Peter Humaidana, Ulrik S. Kesmodel &
Pernille Ravn (2020) Uterine fibroids increase time to pregnancy: a
cohort study, The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive
Health Care, 25:1, 37-42, DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1699047).
17. Jeldu M, Asres T, Arusi T, Gutulo MG. Pregnancy Rate after
Myomectomy and Associated Factors among Reproductive Age Women
Who Had Myomectomy at Saint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical
College, Addis Ababa: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Reprod
Med. 2021 Nov 28;2021:6680112. doi: 10.1155/2021/6680112. PMID:
34877352; PMCID: PMC8645378
18. Parazzini F., Tozzi L., Bianchi S. Pregnancy outcome and uterine
fibroids//Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. –
2016 – Т. 34 – С. 74-84.
19. Don EE, Mijatovic V, Huirne JAF. Infertility in patients with uterine
fibroids: a debate about the hypothetical mechanisms. Hum Reprod. 2023
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint
Nov 2;38(11):2045-2054. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead194. PMID:
37771247; PMCID: PMC10628498.
20. Morales HSG, López RR, López GGP, Mondragón PJC, Cortés DV,
Hernández HS, Guiot ML, Camacho FMR. Surgical approach to uterine
myomatosis in patients with infertility: open, laparoscopic, and robotic
surgery; results according to the quantity of fibroids. JBRA Assist
Reprod. 2022 Jan 17;26(1):44-49. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210049.
PMID: 34415690; PMCID: PMC8769192
21. Purohit P, Vigneswaran K. Fibroids and Infertility. Curr Obstet Gynecol
Rep. 2016;5:81-88. doi: 10.1007/s13669-016-0162-2. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
PMID: 27217980; PMCID: PMC4859843.
Information about authors
Nikolai Ruhliada , Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical
University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, +7(911)913- 20-20,
[email protected], https:// orcid.org/0000-0002-3548-0468, 194100, Russia, St.
Petersburg, Litovskaya st., 2.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted June 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.24308110doi: medRxiv preprint