Taking facial expression recognition outside the lab and into the wild by using challenging datasets and improved performance metrics
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Background: Facial expression recognition is a challenging field, evident by the ineffectiveness of current state-of-the-art techniques that aim to classify facial expressions. Despite showing high levels of accuracy, these methods perform poorly in real-life implementation. This poor performance is because the training sets used are usually simple, limited, and in a controlled lab environment. Methods: : This paper explores newer datasets that consist of images taken in challenging conditions with many variations. Using such datasets improves the accuracy of classification because it exposes the model to a variety of samples. In addition, we used new performance metrics to reflect the challenging conditions for classification. We reviewed the current best techniques for expression recognition and laid out a method to design an improved deep neural network using AffectNet, a newer and more challenging dataset. The implementation method is an iterative process that trains a convolutional neural network on challenging datasets, evaluates the result, and improves the model by tweaking its parameters. The models are also evaluated with new metrics like cross-dataset accuracy and mean accuracy drop. Results: : We found that the best performing model was the Visual Geometry Group 16 layer (VGG16) model, with a training accuracy of 81.05%, an improvement of 9.05% compared to AlexNet, the next best model trained on the same dataset, and testing accuracy of 70.69%, compared to 64% for AlexNet. The proposed model configuration was also assessed with cross-dataset accuracy scoring 42.02% and outperforming Inception V3, the next best model with a score of 28.96%, on the same metric. Conclusions: : The research resulted in improved accuracy of classifying expressions due to a better, more challenging dataset. In addition, we used new metrics that give us a better picture of the model’s robustness.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00