Unlocking the Power of CXCR2 Inhibition to Overcome Gemcitabine Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,911 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality, characterized by intrinsic resistance to conventional therapies and limited effective treatment options. In this study, we investigated the role of the CXCR2 axis in PDAC therapy resistance. CXCR2, a chemokine receptor, is actively involved in inflammation, tumor angiogenesis, and metastasis. Our working hypothesis is that CXCR2 contributes to PDAC chemotherapy resistance. To test this, we generated gemcitabine-resistant (GemR) lines using T3M4 and CD18/HPAF (CD18) cell lines. Baseline expression of CXCL1, CXCL5, and CXCL8 ligands were higher in GemR cells compared to parental cells. Upon gemcitabine treatment, parental cells exhibited a greater increase in CXCL1 and CXCL8 expression than GemR cells. Further analysis in T3M4 cells revealed a dose- and time-dependent increase in CXCL1 and CXCL8 expression following gemcitabine exposure. Next, we assessed whether targeting CXCR2 could enhance the therapeutic response. We treated parental and GemR cell lines with gemcitabine in combination with the CXCR2 antagonist SCH 479833 (SCH 47). Notably, lower concentrations of gemcitabine combined with SCH 47 were more effective than higher concentrations of gemcitabine alone in GemR cell lines. In both parental and GemR xenograft models, combination therapy with Navarixin (a CXCR2 antagonist) and gemcitabine demonstrated superior antitumor and antimetastatic activity compared to either treatment alone. In conclusion, these findings highlight the critical role of the CXCR2 axis in PDAC therapy resistance. Targeting CXCR2 enhances gemcitabine efficacy, offering a potential therapeutic strategy to overcome resistance in PDAC. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00