Divergent realized ecological niches of sister species of the Antarctic amphipod genusCharcotia

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,077 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Climate change and resource exploitation in the Southern Ocean are important Anthro-pogenic pressure on Antarctic food webs. Understanding the eco-functional roles of Antarctic communities is essential for ecosystem management and conservation. Amphipods are among the most dominant and ecologically important benthic taxa in the Southern Ocean. The amphipod genus Charcotia is part of the scavenger guild playing a dominant role in nutrient recycling. To study the trophic habits of two sister species, C. amundseni and C. obesa, stable isotope ratios of carbon and nitrogen were investigated along geographical and bathymetrical gradients. Charcotia obesa belongs to the fourth and C. amundseni to the fifth trophic level, based on significant differences in δ15N. Benthic primary producers dominate the diet in both species as derived from their δ13C values. Charcotia obesa, the species with the narrowest depth range, did not show a depth-related pattern in isotopic ratios. An increasing geographic gradient of both δ15N and δ13C values was observed for C. obesa, ranging from the northern most tip of the Western Antarctic Peninsula to the southwestern most part of the Bellings-hausen Sea. This might be linked to nutrient rich glacial meltwater in the latter part of the Southern Ocean. Nitrogen stable isotope ratios of C. amundseni showed a significant difference between Crown Bay and the other locations; this might be explained by the close location of the Filchner Area to nutrient rich upwelling in the Weddell Sea Gyre. Our study provides evidence for niche differentiation between two closely related amphipod species. Incorporation of additional samples from other locations and depth ranges in combination with isotope analysis and DNA-based prey identification might clarify the trophic position of benthic amphipods. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵* co-first authors E-mail addresses: aaronkolder{at}live.nl, g.lepoint{at}uliege.be, loic.michel{at}uliege.be, ischoen{at}naturalsciences.be

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00