ISUOG Practice Guidelines: point-of-care ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
This paper presents the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) practice guidelines for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) applications in obstetrics and gynecology.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This ISUOG practice guideline paper addresses the use of point-of-care ultrasound across obstetrics and gynecology, outlining how such scanning should be implemented and standardized in relevant clinical contexts. It synthesizes guideline recommendations from the ISUOG framework and related evidence, providing high-level statements about appropriate applications, operator-related considerations, and quality assurance for point-of-care use. The paper’s main limitation is that, as a practice guideline, it does not present new primary experimental data and may not resolve uncertainty for every specific indication or setting. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper is included in the corpus because it covers point-of-care ultrasound in gynecology where pelvic pain and related diagnostic scenarios (including conditions such as endometriosis/adenomyosis) may be evaluated, though it is not specifically centered on endometriosis or adenomyosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
664 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-01T06:07:04.264727+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-08-01T06:03:19.349803+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-15T02:00:00.661756+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine