Sample barcoding-associated technical variation in probe-based single-cell RNA sequencing

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,611 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Probe-based single cell RNA sequencing approaches are increasingly becoming a technology of choice for profiling gene expression at scale and in archival tissues. The 10x Genomics Flex v1 assay enables cost-effective and high-sensitivity single-cell RNA sequencing by splitting samples across up to 16 uniquely barcoded probe sets before pooling and loading onto a single lane of a microfluidic chip. A natural consequence of this design is to leverage probe set barcoding as a sample barcoding strategy for case-control experiments. However, we observed that Flex v1 probe set barcode identity drives substantial technical variation between probe set barcodes, an effect that is reproducible across lanes and independent datasets. When Flex v1 probe set barcodes are confounded with biological sample identity, a concerning number of differentially expressed genes at standard thresholds are false positives. The Flex v2 assay, which decouples sample barcoding from probe set hybridization, significantly reduces this artifact. As the field continues to expand adoption of probe-based assays, our findings introduce probe set barcoding as an underappreciated source of technical variation in single-cell assays and emphasize the importance of experimental design when using probe-based sequencing technologies. Competing Interest Statement F.C. is an academic founder of Curio Bioscience, Doppler Biosciences, and Alive Molecular Technologies, and scientific advisor for Amber Bio. F.C. interests were reviewed and managed by the Broad Institute in accordance with their conflict-of-interest policies.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00