Abstract
Allosteric regulation in proteins arises from collective dynamics distributed over networks of residue contacts, but how multiple communication pathways contribute to signal transmission and noise suppression remains unclear. Here we develop a spanning-tree–based framework to quantify allosteric communication as an ensemble of interacting pathways in protein contact networks. We introduce a dynamic distance measure linking local perturbations of residue interactions to global changes in network entropy, establishing a local-to-global scaling between local dynamics and global sensitivity. Using spanning-tree calculus, we derive exact probabilities for all simple paths connecting pre-specified functional residue pairs. This enables a comparison between an approximate description based on uniform path usage and a topology-aware description in which path probabilities are determined by the Burton-Pemantle theorem and reflect network dependencies. From these path ensembles, we define corresponding signal-to-noise ratios and quantify how pathway multiplicity and statistical weighting shape noise suppression. Applied to KRAS and to 20 additional allosteric proteins spanning diverse functional classes, the analysis shows large variability in path usage, entropy reduction, and signal-to-noise enhancement, while consistently demonstrating that topology-aware weighting concentrates signal transmission onto dominant short pathways. This suggests that the robustness of allosteric signaling is a fundamental emergent property of protein contact topology. These results provide a quantitative framework linking protein structure, dynamics, and information flow, and show that robustness in allosteric communication, manifested as noise suppression through pathway redundancy, can be interpreted as an intrinsic error-correction or noise averaging mechanism arising from network topology.
Full text
1,984 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Allosteric regulation in proteins arises from collective dynamics distributed over networks of residue contacts, but how multiple communication pathways contribute to signal transmission and noise suppression remains unclear. Here we develop a spanning-tree–based framework to quantify allosteric communication as an ensemble of interacting pathways in protein contact networks.
We introduce a dynamic distance measure linking local perturbations of residue interactions to global changes in network entropy, establishing a local-to-global scaling between local dynamics and global sensitivity. Using spanning-tree calculus, we derive exact probabilities for all simple paths connecting pre-specified functional residue pairs. This enables a comparison between an approximate description based on uniform path usage and a topology-aware description in which path probabilities are determined by the Burton-Pemantle theorem and reflect network dependencies.
From these path ensembles, we define corresponding signal-to-noise ratios and quantify how pathway multiplicity and statistical weighting shape noise suppression. Applied to KRAS and to 20 additional allosteric proteins spanning diverse functional classes, the analysis shows large variability in path usage, entropy reduction, and signal-to-noise enhancement, while consistently demonstrating that topology-aware weighting concentrates signal transmission onto dominant short pathways. This suggests that the robustness of allosteric signaling is a fundamental emergent property of protein contact topology.
These results provide a quantitative framework linking protein structure, dynamics, and information flow, and show that robustness in allosteric communication, manifested as noise suppression through pathway redundancy, can be interpreted as an intrinsic error-correction or noise averaging mechanism arising from network topology.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.