Behavior Outpaces Form when Linking Traits to Ecological Responses within Populations: A Meta-Analysis

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,753 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Intraspecific variability is fundamental to ecology, yet we still know remarkably little about what governs the strength of the associations between traits expressed by individuals and ecological dynamics. To explore this overlooked aspect of diversity, we asked whether the strength of correlations between traits and a wide spectrum of ecological responses could differ (i) between intraspecific levels (among vs. within populations), (ii) among ecological responses across levels of biological organization (from ecological performance to ecosystem functioning), and (iii) among trait types (morphology, physiology, and behavior). We performed a meta-analysis synthesizing over a thousand effect sizes from nearly two hundred studies spanning approximately a hundred animal species across a broad range of traits and ecological responses. The average effect size was |r| = 0.26 (95% confidence interval: 0.21 – 0.30). At the individual level, effect sizes were larger for ecological performance (foraging, diet) than for fitness (reproduction), and tended to be larger for community responses (e.g., community composition of surrounding organisms). Physiology and behavior showed larger effect sizes than morphology. Our meta-analysis not only confirms that intraspecific trait variability is central to ecological dynamics, but also highlights physiology and behavior as key traits for unraveling the ecological consequences of individual variability. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes We revised substantially all analyses (e.g., adding an ad hoc test for the strength of correlations between body size and various ecological responses) and the text in response to reviewers' comments.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00