NGFR/Ngfr–marked basal duct progenitors drive ductal—acinar regeneration in injured salivary glands

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,777 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Severe salivary gland injury can cause chronic xerostomia and persistent secretory dysfunction, yet the epithelial populations that support repair remain poorly defined. Here, we identify NGFR/Ngfr as a conserved surface marker for isolating organoid-forming epithelial stem/progenitor cells from human and mouse salivary glands and show that mouse Ngfr-lineage cells contribute to ductal–acinar regeneration after injury. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of human salivary gland tissue identified a restricted NGFR-expressing basal duct epithelial subpopulation with progenitor-like features and early positions along inferred epithelial differentiation trajectories. Functionally, NGFR-expressing cells showed enhanced primary and secondary organoid-forming capacity, and NGFR-enriched human organoids engrafted after transplantation into injured salivary glands of immunodeficient mice. In mouse salivary glands, isolated Ngfr-expressing cells showed enriched organoid-forming activity, and Ngfr expression localized to injury-associated ductal regions after duct ligation and local inflammatory injury. Ngfr-CreERT2 lineage tracing further showed that Ngfr-lineage cells contribute to ductal and acinar compartments during post-injury regeneration. Together, these findings establish NGFR/Ngfr as a conserved surface marker for prospectively isolating basal duct epithelial stem/progenitor populations with organoid-forming activity and injury-responsive ductal–acinar regenerative potential. Competing Interest Statement Organoid Sciences Ltd. has filed a patent application covering the use of NGFR as a marker for salivary gland stem/progenitor cells, with S.G.J., D.H.B., and K.J.L. listed as inventors. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00