A Mechanistic Model of Oncolytic Virus–CAR T Therapy Identifies Memory-Dependent Control of Solid Tumors

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,880 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can induce durable remissions in hematologic malignancies, yet its efficacy in solid tumors remains limited by antigen heterogeneity, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and poor T-cell persistence. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) provide a complementary therapeutic strategy by directly lysing tumor cells and reshaping local immune responses. Motivated by emerging evidence that OVs can also induce dual-specific, memory-like CAR T cells, we develop a unified mathematical framework that integrates these interacting modalities. The model distinguishes antigen-positive and antigen-negative tumor populations, tracks key viral and immune compartments, and incorporates OV-mediated microenvironmental activation alongside CAR T-cell stimulation. This baseline formulation provides a platform for assessing whether additional mechanisms—such as OV-induced CAR T-cell memory—are necessary for durable tumor control. Sensitivity analysis of the memory-free system using partial rank correlation coefficients (PRCCs) identifies four dominant drivers of therapeutic outcome: antigen-negative tumor dynamics, viral kinetics, CAR T-cell cytotoxic effectiveness, and PD-1/PD-L1–mediated T-cell exhaustion. While these mechanisms can generate strong early responses, they are insufficient to prevent late relapse driven by antigen-negative tumor regrowth. Introducing a reduced memory variable to represent OV-driven CAR T recall fundamentally alters this behavior: enhanced memory induction and CAR T responsiveness sustain effector T-cell levels and enable long-term control of antigen-negative tumor populations. Together, these results highlight OV-induced CAR T-cell memory as a critical determinant of durable therapeutic efficacy in solid tumors. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00