Effectiveness Evaluation of Emergency Communication Networks Based on Combined Weighting - Cloud Model - TOPSIS Method | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Effectiveness Evaluation of Emergency Communication Networks Based on Combined Weighting - Cloud Model - TOPSIS Method Xiangchen Wang, Wei Zhu, Chenzhe Zhong This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9031387/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Emergency communication support serves as the cornerstone of emergency response actions. In the context of modern emergency communication scenarios, issues such as unreasonable weighting of evaluation indicators for emergency communication network effectiveness and difficulties in evaluating qualitative indicators have emerged. To address these challenges, this study proposes an evaluation method for the effectiveness of emergency communication networks.By analyzing the fundamental principles underlying the construction and operation of emergency communication networks, an evaluation indicator system is established. Secondly, a combined weighting approach integrating the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the entropy weight method is adopted. Thirdly, the cloud model is employed to facilitate the quantitative processing of qualitative indicators across different emergency communication plans. Finally, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of emergency communication networks, and a comparative analysis is conducted to assess the performance of different indicator weighting methods. The scientific validity and effectiveness of the proposed evaluation method are verified through practical case studies. Physical sciences/Engineering Health sciences/Health care Physical sciences/Mathematics and computing Emergency communication network Combined weighting Cloud model TOPSIS Effectiveness evaluation Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9031387","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":625706443,"identity":"5f5388d9-a182-4f01-b03e-6f3772c24afc","order_by":0,"name":"Xiangchen Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National University of Defense Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xiangchen","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":625706444,"identity":"1d31015f-6d1a-4cff-9f17-97421a47ecdf","order_by":1,"name":"Wei Zhu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National University of Defense Technology","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Wei","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhu","suffix":""},{"id":625706445,"identity":"d436da3b-b332-4dc7-a765-c6c6d5b0c3c6","order_by":2,"name":"Chenzhe Zhong","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National University of Defense Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chenzhe","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhong","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-03-04 14:26:08","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9031387/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9031387/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":108942843,"identity":"9b9f20db-37e9-41d1-bda2-7e515f6d2cfc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-05-11 05:42:49","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":621493,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"EffectivenessEvaluationofEmergencyCommunicationNetworksBasedonCombinedWeightingCloudModelTOPSISMethod.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9031387/v1_covered_6ac42c75-552c-4fa9-bab1-8e2ee688b284.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Effectiveness Evaluation of Emergency Communication Networks Based on Combined Weighting - Cloud Model - TOPSIS Method","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Emergency communication network, Combined weighting, Cloud model, TOPSIS, Effectiveness evaluation","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9031387/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9031387/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eEmergency communication support serves as the cornerstone of emergency response actions. In the context of modern emergency communication scenarios, issues such as unreasonable weighting of evaluation indicators for emergency communication network effectiveness and difficulties in evaluating qualitative indicators have emerged. To address these challenges, this study proposes an evaluation method for the effectiveness of emergency communication networks.By analyzing the fundamental principles underlying the construction and operation of emergency communication networks, an evaluation indicator system is established. Secondly, a combined weighting approach integrating the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the entropy weight method is adopted. Thirdly, the cloud model is employed to facilitate the quantitative processing of qualitative indicators across different emergency communication plans. Finally, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of emergency communication networks, and a comparative analysis is conducted to assess the performance of different indicator weighting methods. The scientific validity and effectiveness of the proposed evaluation method are verified through practical case studies.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Effectiveness Evaluation of Emergency Communication Networks Based on Combined Weighting - Cloud Model - TOPSIS Method","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-04-21 16:11:32","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9031387/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"7c70c5b0-67b1-4bca-84ca-5b6f07618898","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 21st, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[{"type":"decision","content":"Rejected","date":"2026-05-11T05:27:52+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-05-10T23:03:08+00:00","index":107,"fulltext":""}],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":66596875,"name":"Physical sciences/Engineering"},{"id":66596876,"name":"Health sciences/Health care"},{"id":66596877,"name":"Physical sciences/Mathematics and computing"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-05-11T05:42:00+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-04-21 16:11:32","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9031387","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9031387","identity":"rs-9031387","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.