Intracortical Microstimulation Induces Rapid Microglia Process Convergence

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) has demonstrated the potential to restore vision and hearing by stimulating relevant cortical regions in both animals and humans, offering significant clinical promise for sensory restoration. While the neuronal response to ICMS has been extensively studied at the cellular level through electrophysiology and two-photon (2P) imaging, the response of non-neuronal cells, particularly microglia, as well as the effects of ICMS on blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity remain poorly understood. In this study, we applied ICMS under 2P imaging in dual-reporter mice, with green fluorescent protein labeling microglia and a red fluorescent Ca 2+ indicator labeling neurons. We also monitored vascular dye leakage to assess BBB integrity throughout the experiment. Using clinically relevant waveform parameters, we tested a range of current amplitudes. Surprisingly, we found that microglia responded rapidly, within 15 minutes of stimulation, by converging their processes (MPC) on areas of high neural activity. The prevalence of MPC increased with higher current amplitudes, but intriguingly, it did not correlate with the strength of the local electric field. Additionally, vascular dye penetration into brain tissue was higher in stimulated animals than in controls and increased with current amplitude. This study reveals a rapid microglia and BBB response to ICMS that has not been reported previously, underscoring the need for further research to fully characterize the biological response to ICMS and establish improved safety standards.
Full text 1,783 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) has demonstrated the potential to restore vision and hearing by stimulating relevant cortical regions in both animals and humans, offering significant clinical promise for sensory restoration. While the neuronal response to ICMS has been extensively studied at the cellular level through electrophysiology and two-photon (2P) imaging, the response of non-neuronal cells, particularly microglia, as well as the effects of ICMS on blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity remain poorly understood. In this study, we applied ICMS under 2P imaging in dual-reporter mice, with green fluorescent protein labeling microglia and a red fluorescent Ca2+ indicator labeling neurons. We also monitored vascular dye leakage to assess BBB integrity throughout the experiment. Using clinically relevant waveform parameters, we tested a range of current amplitudes. Surprisingly, we found that microglia responded rapidly, within 15 minutes of stimulation, by converging their processes (MPC) on areas of high neural activity. The prevalence of MPC increased with higher current amplitudes, but intriguingly, it did not correlate with the strength of the local electric field. Additionally, vascular dye penetration into brain tissue was higher in stimulated animals than in controls and increased with current amplitude. This study reveals a rapid microglia and BBB response to ICMS that has not been reported previously, underscoring the need for further research to fully characterize the biological response to ICMS and establish improved safety standards. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes

Introduction

updated to discuss safety limits in more detail; Figures updated to include missing scale bars.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00