High-frequency sampling rate reduces TMS-pulse artifact duration but not decay artifact: implications for immediate TMS-EEG responses

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,533 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract In studies combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG), two artifacts appear instantly after the TMS pulse, i.e., the TMS-pulse Artifact and the Decay Artifact, and limit the possibility to measure immediate cortical excitability responses. High-frequency sampling rates in EEG recordings have shown promise in reducing artifact duration, allowing more rapid signal recovery, which is crucial for developing biomarkers for neuropsychiatric conditions. However, the features of early TMS-induced artifacts for sampling rates above 5000 Hz are still unclear. Here, we explored the duration of TMS artifacts in the first milliseconds after TMS to understand how they can be further reduced in future studies. We recorded from a phantom head model and from a simple electrical circuit with a sampling rate of 4800 Hz, 9600 Hz, and 19200 Hz and at three TMS intensities (40%, 70%, 100% of maximum stimulator output) in two commercial stimulators. Results showed an initial sharp TMS-pulse Artifact lasting less than 1 ms and decreasing in duration at higher sampling rates. However, the signal was back to baseline at about 2-3 ms due to the presence of a decay artifact that was evident even in optimal conditions of low impedance and mostly dependent on stimulation intensity. These results highlight the need to develop efficient ways to eliminate the decay artifact in order to measure immediate TMS responses. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00