How to do a 3D uterus ultrasound?

OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-29

This paper describes a straightforward method for assessing the uterine coronal plane using basic three-dimensional ultrasound to improve upon traditional two-dimensional techniques in everyday gynecological practice.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-29 · read from full text

This technical article outlines a standardized four-step protocol for acquiring three-dimensional ultrasound images of the uterus, specifically focusing on obtaining an accurate coronal view of the endometrial cavity. The authors detail methods such as the Z-rotation technique to overcome limitations of traditional two-dimensional imaging, noting that underlying conditions like leiomyomata or adenomyosis can compromise the evaluation of the endometrial contour. The paper also reviews conflicting classification criteria from major societies regarding congenital uterine anomalies and advises practitioners to adopt a single consistent framework for diagnosis. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound is an invaluable tool in the detection and evaluation of many uterine anomalies and improves upon the traditional approach of two-dimensional (2D) ultrasonography. We aim to describe an easy way of assessing the uterine coronal plane using the basic three-dimensional ultrasound in everyday gynecological practice.
Full text 7,542 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 1 sections · click to expand

What

This study shows an easy way for using three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound in the detection and evaluation of many uterine anomalies in everyday clinical work. A coronal plane view, which encompasses the entire endometrial cavity is usually impossible to obtain using a traditional 2D ultrasound. However, it can be easily displayed using 3D ultrasound reconstruction. Many uterine anomalies are initially suspected on 2D ultrasound. 3D ultrasound reconstruction can then be used to define the lesion much more accurately and is recognized as the standard method for the diagnosis of congenital uterine malformations. Several publications have demonstrated the high level of accuracy in diagnosing and defining uterine anomalies using such a standardized approach. In the hands of an experienced sonographer, the diagnosis of uterine anomalies by 3D ultrasound has been shown be as accurate as an MRI [ 1 ]. Additionally, 3D ultrasound performs better than routine 2D ultrasound in diagnosing and defining endometrial pathologies, leiomyomata uteri, and is better in localization of an IUD [ 2 , 3 ]. The Ultrasound Societies of German speaking countries have based their latest guidelines and quality requirements with these realities in mind [ 4 , 5 ]. An additional benefit of having a stored 3D volume available is that it can be reviewed offline by other experts to provide a second opinion. This increases the diagnostic value of the examination [ 6 ]. The goal of the following presentation is to summarize the best method for obtaining a uterine volume for diagnostic purposes in an everyday gynecological practice. The focus is on reconstruction of the coronal view of the entire endometrial cavity as this allows for the best assessment of the presence and the type of a congenital uterine malformation. Optimally, the endometrial thickness should be at least 5 mm, or the timing of the examination should fall between day 17–25 of the menstrual cycle [ 6 , 7 ]. Underlying conditions such as leiomyomata or adenomyosis and the presence of an IUD may compromise the evaluation of the endometrial contour. Examination of the endometrial cavity during pregnancy or menstrual bleeding should be avoided for the same reason (Tables 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 and 5 ). Step 1: Obtaining uterus midsagittal plane in 2D (Table 1 ; Figure 1 ) Table 1 Requirements for optimal plane Requirements for optimal plane Sufficient magnification Continuity of endometrium in midsagittal plane Fig. 1 Midsagittal plane of the uterus Requirements for optimal plane Midsagittal plane of the uterus Step 2: Acquisition of standardized multi-planar view. (Table 2 , Figure 2 ) Table 2 Suggestions for an optimal acquisition Suggestions for an optimal acquisition Patient should hold breath and do not move during the process Maximum sweep angle of 180° Fig. 2 Multi-planar view contains four separate planes: midsagittal ( A ), transversal ( B ), coronal ( C ) and 3D view of the uterus Suggestions for an optimal acquisition Multi-planar view contains four separate planes: midsagittal ( A ), transversal ( B ), coronal ( C ) and 3D view of the uterus Step 3: Adjusting the multi-planar view using the “Z rotation” technique [ 8 ]. (Table 3 , Figure 3 ) Table 3 Steps for the Application of the Z Technique Steps for the Application of the Z Technique Step 1. Place the reference/rotational point in the midlevel of the endometrial stripe in the sagittal plane Step 2. Use the Z rotation to align the long axis of the endometrial stripe along the horizontal axis in the sagittal plane of the uterus Step 3. Place the reference/rotational point in the midlevel of the endometrial stripe in the transverse plane Step 4. Use the Z rotation to align the endometrial stripe with the horizontal axis in the transverse plane of the uterus Step 5. After step 4, the midcoronal plane of the uterus will be displayed in coronal plane, apply Z rotation on coronal plane to display the midcoronal plane in the traditional orientation Fig. 3 Multi-planar view of the uterus Steps for the Application of the Z Technique Multi-planar view of the uterus Step 4: Obtaining correct coronal plane of the uterus. (Table 4 , Figures 4 , 5 , 6 ) Table 4 Suggestions for an optimal coronal plane Suggestions for an optimal coronal plane Visualization of endometrial-myometrial junction zone If possible, visualization of tubal insertion Fig. 4 Coronal view of the uterus Fig. 5 Coronal view of the uterus using trace line in “omni view” function Fig. 6 Coronal view of a septate uterus using trace line in “omni view” function Suggestions for an optimal coronal plane Coronal view of the uterus Coronal view of the uterus using trace line in “omni view” function Coronal view of a septate uterus using trace line in “omni view” function In case of extreme retroflexion or other untypical positions of the uterus you can also use the “omni view” function with a trace line. This is a means to optimize the view of uterine cavity including the cervix. Using these steps, you will easily obtain the basic three-dimensional ultrasound of the uterus coronal plane. Currently, there is no clear consensus among three leading societies (ASRM [ 9 ], ESHRE/ESGE [ 10 ], CUME [ 11 ]) on the classification of congenital uterine anomalies, in particular, of a septate vs. normal uterus. Due to the lack of a consensus it is advised to choose one of the classifications and apply it in everyday gynaecological practice. Following table (Table 5 and Figure 7 ) shows overview of the societies on the definition of a septate uterus. Table 5 Classification of congenital uterine anomalies among three leading societies (ASRM [ 9 ], ESHRE/ESGE [ 10 ], CUME [ 11 ]) Society Criteria for septate uterus ASRM-2016 [ 9 ] Internal fundal indentation depth ≥ 1.5 cm Indentation angle < 90° External fundal indentation depth  50% of uterine-wall thickness External fundal indentation depth < 50% of uterine-wall thickness When uterine-wall thickness measured above interostial/intercornual line CUME-2018 [ 11 ] Internal fundal indentation depth ≥ 1 cm Indentation angle < 140° External fundal indentation depth < 1 cm Fig. 7 Septate uterus according to the three different societies ASRM american society for reproductive medicine, CUME congenital uterine malformation by experts, ESHRE/ESGE European society of human reproduction and embryology/European society for gynecological endoscopy a intercornual line b internal fundal indentation c indentation angle d uterine-wall thickness Classification of congenital uterine anomalies among three leading societies (ASRM [ 9 ], ESHRE/ESGE [ 10 ], CUME [ 11 ]) Internal fundal indentation depth ≥ 1.5 cm Indentation angle < 90° External fundal indentation depth  50% of uterine-wall thickness External fundal indentation depth < 50% of uterine-wall thickness When uterine-wall thickness measured above interostial/intercornual line Internal fundal indentation depth ≥ 1 cm Indentation angle < 140° External fundal indentation depth < 1 cm Septate uterus according to the three different societies ASRM american society for reproductive medicine, CUME congenital uterine malformation by experts, ESHRE/ESGE European society of human reproduction and embryology/European society for gynecological endoscopy a intercornual line b internal fundal indentation c indentation angle d uterine-wall thickness

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-06T09:34:12.023084+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0