The Responsible Use of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Remote Areas of Brazil: Feasibility and Safety of a Temporary Gynecologic Operative Expedition
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
A temporary surgical expedition provided minimally invasive gynecologic procedures to 30 women in a remote Brazilian area, demonstrating feasibility and safety with 6% significant complications and 100% patient satisfaction.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel model for providing minimally invasive surgical (MIS) care to underserved populations. Design: A prospective pilot study with patients affected by diverse benign pathologies of the female urogenital tract undergoing MIS in the context of a temporary expedition. Methods: In 2013, the Bandeira Científica Project implemented the use of MIS in one of the most underserved areas of Brazil. Results: During 4 days, 54 different procedures were performed on a cohort of 30 selected women. The mean age of the patients was 44.5 years (SD 8.3), while body mass index averaged 28.4 kg/m2 (SD 4.3). The primary indications for surgery were as follows: 14 symptomatic uterine leiomyomatosis/adenomyosis, 6 stress urinary incontinence, 6 endometriosis, and 4 pelvic floor defects. Forty percent of the patients underwent laparoscopy, 53% vaginal surgery, and 7% combined procedures. The mean estimated blood loss and operative time were 148 cc (0–1000) and 94 (24–180) minutes, respectively. No casualty or conversion to laparotomy occurred. The median hospital stay was 1 day (1–2). Significant complications occurred in two cases (6%); one postoperative bleeding and one pelvic infection. A satisfaction survey revealed that 100% of the participants were very satisfied. Conclusion: This series demonstrates that it may be feasible and secure to establish temporary MIS services in remote/distant locations. The correct selection of local facilities allied to the provision of modern equipment and experienced surgeons is essential to guarantee safety for patients. (J GYNECOL SURG 31:255)
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (11)
- Nationwide Use of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Compared With Abdominal and Vaginal Approaches via openalex
- W1980107270 via openalex
- W1985010312 via openalex
- W1991301503 via openalex
- W1993482827 via openalex
- W1979337810 via openalex
- W2049780001 via openalex
- W2053630918 via openalex
- W2096998881 via openalex
- W2099020549 via openalex
- W2024580135 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK