Clinical and functional outcomes associated with quality of life in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a cross-sectional study

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 75,855 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Clinical and functional outcomes associated with quality of life in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a cross-sectional study | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Clinical and functional outcomes associated with quality of life in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a cross-sectional study Douglas Silva Queiroz, Cibele Cristine Berto Marques da Silva, and 6 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4714749/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 14 Oct, 2024 Read the published version in Lung → Version 1 posted 7 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare (twenty-one per million female inhabitants) neoplastic cystic lung disease that impairs health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, the factors associated with impaired quality of life in patients with LAM are poorly understood. Objective: To assess the clinical, psychosocial, and functional characteristics associated with impaired quality of life in patients with LAM. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study performed on two nonconsecutive days. HRQoL (SF-36 and CRQ), lung function tests, anxiety and depression symptoms (HADS), maximal (CPET and ISWT), and submaximal exercise capacity (6MWT) were assessed. Linear associations among outcomes were assessed using Pearson's correlation and multivariate tests. Results: Forty-five women with LAM (46±10.years; FEV 1, 74%pred) were evaluated. The lowest SF-36 scores were observed for general health and vitality and the highest for the physical and social domains. The lowest CRQ scores were observed for dyspnoea and fatigue, and the highest were for the emotional function and self-control domains. Sixteen (35%) women had anxiety, and 8 (17%) had depression symptoms. Most of the SF-36 and CRQ domains were associated with anxiety and depression symptoms (from r=0.4 to r=0.7; p<0.05) and exercise capacity (from r=0.3 to r=0.5; p<0.05). Lung function parameters were weakly or not associated with quality of life domains. After multiple linear regression, HRQoL was independently associated with depression symptoms and physical capacity but not with lung function. Conclusion : Our results show that aerobic capacity and depression symptoms are the main factors, rather than lung function, related to quality of life in patients with LAM. Cystic lung disease Exercise Quality of life Psychosocial aspects Lung function Figures Figure 1 Introduction Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare neoplastic cystic lung disease (twenty-one per million female inhabitants) that mainly affects women of reproductive age 1 . LAM is characterized by the abnormal proliferation of smooth muscle-like LAM cells, resulting in vascular and airway obstruction and cyst formation 1,2 . The main clinical characteristics include progressive dyspnoea, pneumothorax, and chylothorax 3 which limit exercise and reduce health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Although mTOR inhibitors have modified the prognosis of patients with LAM, there is no cure for LAM, and improving quality of life is an essential goal for these patients 4 . Some studies have assessed the quality of life in this population; since there is no specific questionnaire for LAM, they have primarily used the Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) 5 or the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) 6,7 . Regardless of the instrument used, all studies demonstrated a significant impairment in patient's HRQoL. Specific and generic questionnaires are used to assess the quality of life. Generic questionnaires are considered best for including general aspects of chronic disease, but their use reduces the number of items that refer to specific clinical conditions. On the other hand, disease-specific questionnaires were developed to assess symptoms and limitations, and they have the strong advantage of being able to detect small variations during the course of the disease 8 . The SF-36 is the generic HRQoL questionnaire most commonly used in clinical practice and is used to assess patients with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 9 and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) 10 . In addition, the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) is a respiratory-specific questionnaire widely used to assess the health status of patients with CRDs. Although the SGRQ is also used for patients with CRDs, the CRQ has been demonstrated to be superior since it is more responsive to interventions, such as pulmonary rehabilitation programs 11 . A previous study compared the generic (SF-36) and the specific (SGRQ) HRQoL questionnaires in patients with IPF 10 , and the authors demonstrated that the specific tool better expressed the HRQoL in this population. Another study 12 also compared the same questionnaires (SF-36 and SGRQ) in COPD patients and reported that the SGRQ had better discriminative ability than the SF-36, especially in the symptoms domain. The authors concluded that the SF-36 is not an appropriate instrument for determining the affective state of COPD patients. There is no validated questionnaire for assessing HRQoL in LAM patients, and different instruments have been used, such as SF-36 7 , SGRQ 5,7,13 , and COPD Assessment Test 14 . Oliveira and coworkers 13 demonstrated that patients with tuberous sclerosis complex-LAM presented lower scores in the emotional health and vitality domains than did those with sporadic-LAM. Previous studies have also shown that LAM patients have worse scores in the physical and emotional domains 7,15 . Nonetheless, the factors associated with quality of life in LAM patients have not yet been established. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the clinical, psychosocial, and functional factors associated with impaired quality of life in LAM patients. Methods Participants This cross-sectional single-center study was conducted from September 2018 to March 2021 and included a cohort of women with LAM from a tertiary university hospital. The diagnosis of LAM was based on the current guidelines 3,16 . The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee (90196617.1.0000.0068), and all included patients provided written consent. The patients were clinically stable (no exacerbation and/or pneumothorax for the last six weeks) 3,16 and had a peripheral resting oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) ≥ 89% at room air. The exclusion criteria were supplemental oxygen use, other CRDs, uncontrolled heart disease, pregnancy, or any limiting condition to performing the exercise tests. Assessments Individuals with LAM were assessed for clinical, exercise capacity, and psychosocial outcomes. The assessments included pulmonary function tests (Spirometry and body plethysmography to quantify the lung volumes, capacities, and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide; dyspnoea and leg fatigue perception during exercise; exercise capacity (cardiopulmonary exercise testing, incremental shuttle, and six-minute walking tests); health-related quality of life (Short form-36 (SF-36) and chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ); and, anxiety and depression symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and depression scale (HADS), All outcomes were assessed according to international guidelines and further details for each assessment are in the online supplement due to words limit. Study Design Patients were assessed during two nonconsecutive visits within one-week intervals. During the first hospital visit, clinical characteristics, quality of life, psychosocial questionnaires, and anthropometric data were obtained. The participants also performed PFTs and two 6-minute walking tests (6MWTs) with a 30-min. of recovery between tests. After the second 6MWT and 30 min of recovery, patients were randomly assigned ( http://www.randomization.com ) to either the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) or the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) by an investigator not involved in the study. The remaining assessments were performed during the second visit (Fig. 1 ). Statistical Analysis The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to assess data normality. Data was reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median and 25–75% interquartile range (IQ25-75%), according to normality. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the linear association between the scores of the quality of life questionnaires (CRQ or SF36) (dependent variables) with psychosocial scale (HADS) scores, exercise tests (CPET, ISWT, and 6MWT) and lung function (PFTs) parameters (independent variables). The linear correlation (r) was considered weak (< 0.29), moderate (from 0.3 to 0.49), or strong (≥ 0.5) 17 . Multiple linear forward regression analysis was performed when the independent variables had a linear correlation (p < 0.2). The best predictive models were constructed using the best independent coefficient since there was no multicollinearity assessing the variance inflation factor (VIF < 2). The level of significance was set at 5% (p < 0.05). The data were analysed using Sigma Stat version 3.5 (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA). Results Sixty women were eligible and invited to participate, and 15 declined because they lived far from the hospital and could not attend the second appointment (Figure 1). Therefore, 45 women were included, and their clinical, anthropometric, and functional data are presented in Table 1. Only one woman was older than sixty-five years old. On average, the women were overweight and had good exercise capacity as assessed by 6MWT and ISWT (510 and 429 meters, 90% and 78% of the predicted, respectively). However, when exercise capacity was assessed by the CPET, 36 patients (86%) reached the peak VO 2 below 84% of the predicted value. Patients presented the lowest SF-36 scores in the general health and vitality domains and the highest in the physical and social role domains. Regarding the CRQ, the lowest scores were for dyspnoea and fatigue and the highest for the emotional function and self-control domains. Sixteen (35%) patients had anxiety, and 8 (17%) also had depression symptoms. Moreover, the obstructive pattern, air trapping, and reduced DLco were observed in 60%, 57%, and 15% of the patients, respectively (Table 1). The associations of the generic and specific questionnaire results with the outcomes of physical capacity, PFTs, anxiety, and depression symptoms are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Regarding the generic questionnaire (SF-36), a strong association was observed between the physical functioning (r=0.53, p<0.001) and vitality (r=0.50, p<0.01) domains and physical capacity (peak VO 2 in ml.kg -1 .min -1 ). The mental health domain also showed a strong association with anxiety and depression symptoms (r=-0.65, p≤0.0001 and r=-0.70, p<0.001, respectively). Moreover, symptoms of depression presented a moderate to strong association (ranging from r=0.30to r=0.70, p<0.05) with all the SF-36 domains. The DLco was the functional parameter that presented the strongest association with the physical functioning domain (r=0.43, p<0.003), whereas there was no association with FEV 1 or the RV/TLC. Regarding the specific questionnaire (CRQ), there was a moderate association between the dyspnoea (r=0.41, p=0.007) and fatigue (r=0.40, p=0.01) domains and physical capacity (peakVO 2 , in ml.kg -1 .min -1 ). The fatigue, emotional function, and self-control domains showed the strongest associations with the anxiety and depression domains (HADS A [r=-0.50, r=-0.62, and r=-0.60, respectively; p<0.001 for all the correlations] and HADS D [r=-0.55, r=-0.65 and r=-0.64; p<0.001 for all the correlations]). Air trapping (RV/TLC in % of predicted) was the functional parameter with better, although weak, association with the fatigue domain (r=-0.32, p=0.03). The DLco and FEV 1 variables, both in % of predicted, had no association with HRQoL and were not included in the regression models. The associations between the SF-36 and CRQ domains and the symptoms of depression were very clear. All domains of the generic and specific questionnaires were correlated with physical capacity outcomes, anxiety, and depression symptoms, while only some were associated with lung function (p<0.2). All the data from the generic and specific questionnaires that were used for multiple linear regression modeling are presented in Table 4. Discussion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the factors associated with HRQoL in LAM patients. Our results showed that general health and vitality were the most highly impacted domains assessed by the generic questionnaire (SF-36). Additionally, dyspnoea and fatigue were the most highly impacted domains assessed by the specific questionnaire (CRQ). Furthermore, physical capacity, anxiety, and depression symptoms were strongly associated with HRQoL. Finally, lung function parameters were weakly associated with HRQoL. In the current study, we observed that general health and vitality were the most strongly impaired SF-36 domains. Interestingly, our observations are similar to those reported by Baldi and coworkers 6 (general health: 56 ± 19 vs. 65 ± 25; vitality: 56 ± 20 vs. 64 ± 23). The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute provides the largest registry, enrolling 230 patients with LAM, and the physical component domain of the SF-36 was lower than the mental component score (39.7 ± 0.82 and 50.2 ± 0.66, respectively) 18 . These results emphasize that LAM patients have impaired quality of life, with worse scores in the physical and emotional domains when assessed using SF-36. According to the HRQoL, as determined by a specific questionnaire (CRQ), dyspnoea and fatigue are the most strongly impaired domains. Our results are partially supported by a previous study demonstrating that dyspnoea and fatigue are reported by the vast majority of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) 19 . In addition, a CRQ validation study of Brazilian patients with COPD obtained scores similar to those of our LAM patients in all domains (fatigue 4.5 ± 1.2 vs. 4.3 ± 1.2; emotional function 4.8 ± 1.0 vs. 4.4 ± 1; self-control 5.1 ± 1.3 vs. 5.1 ± 1.1 score; respectively), except for the dyspnoea domain, which was worse in LAM patients than in patients with COPD (4.6 ± 1.3 vs. 3.8 ± 1.4 score, respectively). Given that a < 0.5-point difference in each domain is the minimum clinically important difference, we can assume that the quality of life of patients with LAM is quite similar to that of patients with severe to very severe COPD in most CRQ domains, despite the large difference in lung function between the two groups of patients 20 . The discrepancy in the dyspnoea domain scores between LAM and COPD patients might be explained by the specific characteristics of each population, such as age and physical activity levels, as well as disease severity and the subjective aspects related to the perception of dyspnoea. Martinez and coworkers 21 reported that the general health and vitality domains assessed by the SF-36 had a good relationship with dyspnoea scores in patients with IPF. However, the outcomes associated with HRQoL in LAM patients remain poorly known, mainly because the disease is quite rare. Our results showed an association between the domains of generic and specific questionnaires and the physical capacity parameters as assessed by laboratory or field tests. The CPET is the gold standard for quantifying exercise capacity and evaluating the pathophysiological mechanisms of dyspnoea and exercise limitations in people with CRDs. In patients with COPD and IPF, aerobic capacity (VO 2 , in kg/min) is a marker of mortality and induced hypoxemia and also an important marker to assess the response to pulmonary rehabilitation 22 . Our results clearly demonstrated that aerobic capacity (peak VO 2 ) and depression symptoms were the main variables independently associated with almost all SF-36 and CRQ domains. However, since this was a cross-sectional study, it is not possible to infer causality. Most women receive a diagnosis during a productive and reproductive period of life, and such a diagnosis may affect them, increasing the risk of developing anxiety and depression symptoms. Most likely, the increase in those symptoms may reduce their physical activity, impacting their aerobic capacity. As a consequence, it seems reasonable to assume that anxiety and depression symptoms and physical capacity are the most relevant features to LAM patient's quality of life. We also observed that lung function variables were associated with few HRQoL domains, suggesting that treatments to improve patient's quality of life should be more focused on reducing anxiety and depression symptoms and improving exercise capacity than PFTs. In contrast to our results, previous studies have shown that PFTs are associated with quality of life as assessed by the SF-36 or CRQ in COPD patients 23 . Moua and coworkers 24 also reported an association between FVC% pred and CRQ domains in patients with ILDs. However, it is difficult to compare these results appropriately because respiratory diseases differ due to their unique characteristics. In a systematic review that evaluated features associated with HRQoL in patients with ILDs, the strongest correlation was observed between dyspnoea and the domains that concern physical health. On the other hand, the correlations between lung function parameters (FVC and DL CO ) or oxygenation and HRQoL domains were weaker 25 . Based on our findings in which anxiety and depression symptoms remained independent outcomes associated with all HRQoL domains, we suggest that physicians should pay more attention to patients' psychosocial assessment. Moreover, anxiety and depression symptoms occur in approximately 25% of patients with ILDs, and the percentages of these patients with clinically meaningful depression range from 7 to 49%, and with anxiety from 9 to 12% 26,27 , however, the percentage of patients with those symptoms is even greater among LAM patients, reaching 53% 26,28 . Depression and anxiety symptoms are not only essential in predicting the HRQoL of ILD patients but can also be associated with breathlessness levels 28 . Therefore, routine screening for depression and other underlying symptoms that can increase psychological stress and may decrease patients' HRQoL should be performed 45 . The present study showed that symptoms of anxiety and depression were present in LAM patients, which may lead to a vicious cycle because the greater their levels, the more physically limited patients may become, impacting the quality of life of even more individuals. Our study had several limitations. First, it was performed in a single centre. However, our centre is the primary for treating LAM in Latin America and we assist patients from all regions of Brazil with different severities of disease. In addition, 45 participants can be considered a significant sample size due to the rarity of the disease Second, we excluded patients using continuous oxygen because their mobility is usually reduced. Therefore, our results cannot be extrapolated to this subgroup with worse disease severity. Third, there is no specific validated HRQoL questionnaire for LAM, and the CRQ, which is the most used disease-specific tool for assessing HRQoL in patients with CRDs 11 , was used for this study. Conclusion Our results showed that aerobic capacity and depression symptoms are the principal factors associated with the quality of life of LAM patients; however, lung function parameters were poorly associated. These findings might alert clinicians to the need to conduct frequent psychosocial and physical exercise assessments for future intervention to improve the quality of life of LAM patients. Further studies are required to identify a questionnaire that better assesses the quality of life of this population. Declarations Funding information The study was supported by grants 312279/2018-3 from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and grants 2018/17788-3 from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de São Paulo (FAPESP) Author Contribution DQ promoted the development of the study design, the scheduling of patient appointments, data collection and analysis, and interpreting the data, as well as writing the article. CS assisted in their search, helping develop the study design, scheduling patient appointments, collecting, analyzing, and interpreting the data, and improving and developing the article. MO and AA promoted the development of the study design and the scheduling of patient appointments. CRRC greatly contributed to developing the study design, analyzing and interpreting the data, and helping with the elaboration of the article. JMS promoted the development of the study design and the scheduling of patient appointments. BB supported us by developing the study design, scheduling patient appointments, analyzing and interpreting the data, and helping with the later elaboration of the article. CRFC conducted our research and provided insight and expertise in all stages of the study, from the concept to the design, data collection and analysis, data interpretation, improvements, and the development of the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the version he submitted. Data Availability Sequence data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Zenodo with the primary accession code md5:166d8ecdbfd8d5c566b4b3bc07d2f995 References Lynn E, Forde SH, Franciosi AN, Bendstrup E, Veltkamp M, Wind AE, Van Moorsel CHM, Lund TK, Durheim MT, Peeters EFHI, Keane MP, McCarthy C; and Northern European LAM Prevalence Consortium. Updated Prevalence of Lymphangioleiomyomatosis in Europe. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 15;209(4):456-459. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202310-1736LE. PMID: 38060201. Taveira-DaSilva AM, Moss J. Clinical features, epidemiology, and therapy of lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr 7;7:249-57. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S50780. McCormack FX, Gupta N, Finlay GR, Young LR, Taveira-DaSilva AM, Glasgow CG, Steagall WK, Johnson SR, Sahn SA, Ryu JH, Strange C, Seyama K, Sullivan EJ, Kotloff RM, Downey GP, Chapman JT, Han MK, D'Armiento JM, Inoue Y, Henske EP, Bissler JJ, Colby TV, Kinder BW, Wikenheiser-Brokamp KA, Brown KK, Cordier JF, Meyer C, Cottin V, Brozek JL, Smith K, Wilson KC, Moss J. Official American Thoracic Society/Japanese Respiratory Society Clinical Practice Guidelines: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Diagnosis and Management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 194(6):748–61. doi:10.1164/rccm.201607-1384ST. Cotin V. Treatment of lymphangioleiomyomatosis: building evidence in orphan diseases. ERJ 2014 43: 966-969 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00025314 Araujo MS, Baldi BG, Freitas CS, Albuquerque AL, Marques da Silva CC, Kairalla RA, Carvalho CR, Carvalho CR. Pulmonary rehabilitation in lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a controlled clinical trial. Eur Respir J. 2016 May;47(5):1452-60. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01683-2015. Epub 2016 Feb 25. PMID: 26917604. Baldi BG, Freitas CS, Araujo MS, Dias OM, Pereira DA, Pimenta SP, Kairalla RA, Carvalho CR. Clinical course and characterisation of lymphangioleiomyomatosis in a Brazilian reference centre. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2014 Jul 8;31(2):129-35. PMID: 25078640. Baldi BG, Albuquerque AL, Pimenta SP, Salge JM, Kairalla RA, Carvalho CRR. Exercise performance and dynamic hyperinflation in lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 186(4):341-8. doi:10.1164/rccm.201203-0372OC. Sousa TC, Jardim JR, Jones P. Validação do Questionário do Hospital Saint George na Doença Respiratória (SGRQ) em pacientes portadores de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica no Brasil. J Pneumol. 2000;26(3):119-28. Ware JE, Jr and Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483. Zimmermann CS, Carvalho CR, Silveira KR, Yamaguti WP, Moderno EV, Salge JM, Kairalla RA, Carvalho CR. Comparison of two questionnaires which measure the health-related quality of life of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2007 40: 179–87. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2007000200004. Singh SJ, Sodergren SC, Hyland ME, Williams J, Morgan MD. A comparison of three disease-specific and two generic health-status measures to evaluate the outcome of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD. Respir Med. 2001;95(1):71-7. Buss AS, Silva LMC. Comparative study of two quality of life questionnaires in patients with COPD. J Bras Pneumol . 2009 ; 35 ( 4):318-324 . DOI: 10.1590/s1806-37132009000400005 Oliveira MR, Wanderley M, Freitas CSG, Kairalla RA, Chate RC, Amaral AF, Arimura FE, Samorano LP, Watanabe EH, Carvalho CRR, Baldi BG. Clinical, tomographic and functional comparison of sporadic and tuberous sclerosis complex-associated forms of lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a retrospective cohort study. ERJ Open Res. 2024 Mar 4;10(2):00759-2023. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00759-2023 Kato M, Kanehiro Y, Yoshimi K, Kodama Y, Sekiya M, Sato T, Takahashi K, Seyama K; Multicenter Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Sirolimus Trial for Safety Study Group. COPD assessment test as a possible tool for evaluating health-related quality of life in lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Respir Investig. 2018 Nov;56(6):480-488. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 22. PMID: 30143460. Silva Queiroz D, Marques da Silva CCB, Franco Amaral A, Rodrigues Oliveira M, Salge JM, Ribeiro Carvalho CR, Guedes Baldi B, Carvalho CRF. Evaluation of maximal exercise capacity through the incremental shuttle walking test in lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Pulmonology. 2022 Jul 15:S2531-0437(22)00117-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.04.009. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35851263. Johnson SR, Cordier JF, Lazor R, Cottin V, Costabel U, Harari S, Reynaud-Gaubert M, Boehler A, Brauner M, Popper H, Bonetti F, Kingswood C; Review Panel of the ERS LAM Task Force. European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis and management of lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Eur Respir J. 2010 Jan;35(1):14-26. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00076209. PMID: 20044458. Schober, P., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763e1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 Ryu JH, Moss J, Beck GJ, Lee JC, Brown KK, Chapman JT, Finlay GA, Olson EJ, Ruoss SJ, Maurer JR, Raffin TA, Peavy HH, McCarthy K, Taveira-Dasilva A, McCormack FX, Avila NA, Decastro RM, Jacobs SS, Stylianou M, Fanburg BL; NHLBI LAM Registry Group. The NHLBI lymphangioleiomyomatosis registry: characteristics of 230 patients at enrollment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jan 1;173(1):105-11. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1298OC. Epub 2005 Oct 6. PMID: 16210669; PMCID: PMC2662978. Aronson KI, Martin-Schwarze AM, Swigris JJ, Kolenic G, Krishnan JK, Podolanczuk AJ, Kaner RJ, Martinez FJ, Safford MM, Pinheiro LC; Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. Validity and Reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in a Real-World Interstitial Lung Disease Cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Jul 15;208(2):188-195. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202208-1504OC. PMID: 37099412; PMCID: PMC10395489) Guyatt G, Berman L, Townsend M, Pugsley S, Chambers L. A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease. Thorax. 1987;42:773-778. Martinez TY, Pereira CA, dos Santos ML, Ciconelli RM, Guimarães SM, Martinez JA. Evaluation of the short-form 36-item questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2000; 117: 1627-1632. Stickland MK, Neder JA, Guenette JA, O'Donnell DE, Jensen D. Using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing to Understand Dyspnoea and Exercise Intolerance in Respiratory Disease. Chest. 2022 Jun;161(6):1505-1516. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Jan 19. PMID: 35065052. Stöber A, Lutter JI, Schwarzkopf L, Kirsch F, Schramm A, Vogelmeier CF, Leidl R. Impact of Lung Function and Exacerbations on Health-Related Quality of Life in COPD Patients Within One Year: Real-World Analysis Based on Claims Data. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Sep 21;16:2637-2651. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S313711. PMID: 34588773; PMCID: PMC8473986. Moua T, Kubbara A, Novotny P, et al. Patient-reported quality of life in fibrotic interstitial lung disease: novel assessments of self-management ability and affect. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7: 00011-2021 [https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00011-2021. Swigris JJ, Kuschner WG, Jacobs SS, Wilson SR, Gould MK. Health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review. Thorax. 2005 Jul;60(7):588-94. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.035220. PMID: 15994268; PMCID: PMC1747452. Ryerson CJ, Berkeley J, Carrieri-Kohlman VL, et al. Depression and functional status are strongly associated with dyspnoea in interstitial lung disease. Chest 2011b; 139: 609–616. Holland AE, Fiore JF, Jr, Bell EC, et al. Dyspnoea and comorbidity contribute to anxiety and depression in interstitial lung disease. Respirology 2014; 19: 1215–1221. Ryerson CJ, Arean PA, Berkeley J, et al . Depression is a common and chronic comorbidity in patients with interstitial lung disease. Respirology 2012a; 17: 525–532. Tables Tables 1 to 4 are available in the Supplementary Files section. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files Tables.docx QueirozetalOnlineSupplementLUNG09072024.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 14 Oct, 2024 Read the published version in Lung → Version 1 posted Reviewers agreed at journal 21 Jul, 2024 Reviews received at journal 16 Jul, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 15 Jul, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 12 Jul, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 11 Jul, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 11 Jul, 2024 First submitted to journal 09 Jul, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4714749","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":334450243,"identity":"e1d3c1dd-8e8e-476c-90cb-6336b0ffc9c8","order_by":0,"name":"Douglas Silva Queiroz","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sao Paulo","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Douglas","middleName":"Silva","lastName":"Queiroz","suffix":""},{"id":334450244,"identity":"0bb26094-4b44-40b8-9d7f-58bd7bd83f99","order_by":1,"name":"Cibele Cristine Berto Marques da Silva","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sao Paulo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Cibele","middleName":"Cristine Berto Marques da","lastName":"Silva","suffix":""},{"id":334450245,"identity":"507816f2-493d-4cd7-a1f3-10f660a52248","order_by":2,"name":"Martina Rodrigues Oliveira","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sao Paulo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Martina","middleName":"Rodrigues","lastName":"Oliveira","suffix":""},{"id":334450246,"identity":"8fa3398e-0459-4ad1-8d61-ec304bed6d15","order_by":3,"name":"Alexandre Franco Amaral","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sao Paulo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Alexandre","middleName":"Franco","lastName":"Amaral","suffix":""},{"id":334450247,"identity":"6b8da7f9-40fd-477f-8963-1481d145d9e7","order_by":4,"name":"Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sao Paulo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Carlos","middleName":"Roberto Ribeiro","lastName":"Carvalho","suffix":""},{"id":334450248,"identity":"002203bd-a30b-4c92-90fc-e5fc930481f8","order_by":5,"name":"João Marcos Salge","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sao Paulo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"João","middleName":"Marcos","lastName":"Salge","suffix":""},{"id":334450249,"identity":"3d484154-517e-4d01-b329-7112680f77e0","order_by":6,"name":"Bruno Guedes Baldi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sao Paulo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bruno","middleName":"Guedes","lastName":"Baldi","suffix":""},{"id":334450250,"identity":"794398bf-73b8-4c3b-b1da-4a35e84c502f","order_by":7,"name":"Celso R. F. Carvalho","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sao Paulo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Celso","middleName":"R. F.","lastName":"Carvalho","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-07-10 01:08:26","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4714749/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4714749/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00751-w","type":"published","date":"2024-10-14T15:57:14+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":62187424,"identity":"305be729-05e0-46ad-9599-da5ade9c1f13","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-10 12:11:02","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":20150,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSF36, Short-Form-36; CRQ, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; CPET, cardiopulmonary exercise test; 6MWT, 6-minute walk Test; ISWT; Incremental Shuttle Walk Test.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4714749/v1/517166593220015ceee681dc.png"},{"id":67148926,"identity":"5c4d4889-9aa1-43f7-a45d-a3bc06b9d8e1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-21 16:09:58","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":403061,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4714749/v1/6ed4327b-6772-4e24-a942-65bddcd08d5b.pdf"},{"id":62187425,"identity":"9cbca674-7415-4483-8f13-6b774104ce4d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-10 12:11:02","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":34050,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Tables.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4714749/v1/f09facddb7dddcd9681ba4f4.docx"},{"id":62187426,"identity":"98515005-8f90-4384-8db5-94a5f7064b93","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-10 12:11:02","extension":"docx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":23740,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"QueirozetalOnlineSupplementLUNG09072024.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4714749/v1/6b1002a21892d2fda6c712b9.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClinical and functional outcomes associated with quality of life in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a cross-sectional study\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eLymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare neoplastic cystic lung disease (twenty-one per million female inhabitants) that mainly affects women of reproductive age\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e. LAM is characterized by the abnormal proliferation of smooth muscle-like LAM cells, resulting in vascular and airway obstruction and cyst formation\u003csup\u003e1,2\u003c/sup\u003e. The main clinical characteristics include progressive dyspnoea, pneumothorax, and chylothorax\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e which limit exercise and reduce health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Although mTOR inhibitors have modified the prognosis of patients with LAM, there is no cure for LAM, and improving quality of life is an essential goal for these patients\u003csup\u003e4\u003c/sup\u003e. Some studies have assessed the quality of life in this population; since there is no specific questionnaire for LAM, they have primarily used the Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)\u003csup\u003e5\u003c/sup\u003e or the Short-Form-36 (SF-36)\u003csup\u003e6,7\u003c/sup\u003e. Regardless of the instrument used, all studies demonstrated a significant impairment in patient's HRQoL.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpecific and generic questionnaires are used to assess the quality of life. Generic questionnaires are considered best for including general aspects of chronic disease, but their use reduces the number of items that refer to specific clinical conditions. On the other hand, disease-specific questionnaires were developed to assess symptoms and limitations, and they have the strong advantage of being able to detect small variations during the course of the disease\u003csup\u003e8\u003c/sup\u003e. The SF-36 is the generic HRQoL questionnaire most commonly used in clinical practice and is used to assess patients with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)\u003csup\u003e10\u003c/sup\u003e. In addition, the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) is a respiratory-specific questionnaire widely used to assess the health status of patients with CRDs. Although the SGRQ is also used for patients with CRDs, the CRQ has been demonstrated to be superior since it is more responsive to interventions, such as pulmonary rehabilitation programs\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA previous study compared the generic (SF-36) and the specific (SGRQ) HRQoL questionnaires in patients with IPF\u003csup\u003e10\u003c/sup\u003e, and the authors demonstrated that the specific tool better expressed the HRQoL in this population. Another study\u003csup\u003e12\u003c/sup\u003e also compared the same questionnaires (SF-36 and SGRQ) in COPD patients and reported that the SGRQ had better discriminative ability than the SF-36, especially in the symptoms domain. The authors concluded that the SF-36 is not an appropriate instrument for determining the affective state of COPD patients.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere is no validated questionnaire for assessing HRQoL in LAM patients, and different instruments have been used, such as SF-36\u003csup\u003e7\u003c/sup\u003e, SGRQ\u003csup\u003e5,7,13\u003c/sup\u003e, and COPD Assessment Test\u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003e. Oliveira and coworkers\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003e demonstrated that patients with tuberous sclerosis complex-LAM presented lower scores in the emotional health and vitality domains than did those with sporadic-LAM. Previous studies have also shown that LAM patients have worse scores in the physical and emotional domains\u003csup\u003e7,15\u003c/sup\u003e. Nonetheless, the factors associated with quality of life in LAM patients have not yet been established. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the clinical, psychosocial, and functional factors associated with impaired quality of life in LAM patients.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eParticipants\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis cross-sectional single-center study was conducted from September 2018 to March 2021 and included a cohort of women with LAM from a tertiary university hospital. The diagnosis of LAM was based on the current guidelines\u003csup\u003e3,16\u003c/sup\u003e. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee (90196617.1.0000.0068), and all included patients provided written consent. The patients were clinically stable (no exacerbation and/or pneumothorax for the last six weeks)\u003csup\u003e3,16\u003c/sup\u003e and had a peripheral resting oxygen saturation (SpO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e)\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;89% at room air. The exclusion criteria were supplemental oxygen use, other CRDs, uncontrolled heart disease, pregnancy, or any limiting condition to performing the exercise tests.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eAssessments\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIndividuals with LAM were assessed for clinical, exercise capacity, and psychosocial outcomes. The assessments included \u003cb\u003epulmonary function tests\u003c/b\u003e (Spirometry and body plethysmography to quantify the lung volumes, capacities, and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide; \u003cb\u003edyspnoea and leg fatigue perception\u003c/b\u003e during exercise; \u003cb\u003eexercise capacity\u003c/b\u003e (cardiopulmonary exercise testing, incremental shuttle, and six-minute walking tests); \u003cb\u003ehealth-related quality of life\u003c/b\u003e (Short form-36 (SF-36) and chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ); and, \u003cb\u003eanxiety and depression symptoms\u003c/b\u003e (Hospital Anxiety and depression scale (HADS), All outcomes were assessed according to international guidelines and further details for each assessment are in the online supplement due to words limit.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStudy Design\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePatients were assessed during two nonconsecutive visits within one-week intervals. During the first hospital visit, clinical characteristics, quality of life, psychosocial questionnaires, and anthropometric data were obtained. The participants also performed PFTs and two 6-minute walking tests (6MWTs) with a 30-min. of recovery between tests. After the second 6MWT and 30 min of recovery, patients were randomly assigned (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.randomization.com\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.randomization.com\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) to either the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) or the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) by an investigator not involved in the study. The remaining assessments were performed during the second visit (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Kolmogorov\u0026ndash;Smirnov test was used to assess data normality. Data was reported as the mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;standard deviation (SD) or median and 25\u0026ndash;75% interquartile range (IQ25-75%), according to normality. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the linear association between the scores of the quality of life questionnaires (CRQ or SF36) (dependent variables) with psychosocial scale (HADS) scores, exercise tests (CPET, ISWT, and 6MWT) and lung function (PFTs) parameters (independent variables). The linear correlation (r) was considered weak (\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.29), moderate (from 0.3 to 0.49), or strong (\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;0.5)\u003csup\u003e17\u003c/sup\u003e. Multiple linear forward regression analysis was performed when the independent variables had a linear correlation (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.2). The best predictive models were constructed using the best independent coefficient since there was no multicollinearity assessing the variance inflation factor (VIF\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;2). The level of significance was set at 5% (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). The data were analysed using Sigma Stat version 3.5 (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eSixty women were eligible and invited to participate, and 15 declined because they lived far from the hospital and could not attend the second appointment (Figure 1). Therefore, 45 women were included, and their clinical, anthropometric, and functional data are presented in Table 1. Only one woman was older than sixty-five years old. On average, the women were overweight and had good exercise capacity as assessed by 6MWT and ISWT (510 and 429 meters, 90% and 78% of the predicted, respectively). However, when exercise capacity was assessed by the CPET, 36 patients (86%) reached the peak VO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e below 84% of the predicted value. Patients presented the lowest SF-36 scores in the general health and vitality domains and the highest in the physical and social role domains. Regarding the CRQ, the lowest scores were for dyspnoea and fatigue and the highest for the emotional function and self-control domains. Sixteen (35%) patients had anxiety, and 8 (17%) also had depression symptoms. Moreover, the obstructive pattern, air trapping, and reduced DLco were observed in 60%, 57%, and 15% of the patients, respectively (Table 1).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe\u0026nbsp;associations\u0026nbsp;of the generic and specific questionnaire results with the outcomes of physical capacity, PFTs, anxiety, and depression symptoms are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Regarding the\u0026nbsp;generic questionnaire (SF-36), a strong association\u0026nbsp;was observed\u0026nbsp;between the physical functioning (r=0.53, p\u0026lt;0.001) and vitality (r=0.50, p\u0026lt;0.01) domains\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;physical capacity (peak VO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e in ml.kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e.min\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e). The mental health domain also showed a strong association with anxiety and depression symptoms (r=-0.65,\u0026nbsp;p\u0026le;0.0001 and r=-0.70, p\u0026lt;0.001,\u0026nbsp;respectively).\u0026nbsp;Moreover,\u0026nbsp;symptoms of depression presented a moderate to strong association (ranging from r=0.30to r=0.70, p\u0026lt;0.05) with all\u0026nbsp;the\u0026nbsp;SF-36 domains. The DLco was the functional parameter that presented the strongest association with the physical functioning domain (r=0.43, p\u0026lt;0.003), whereas\u0026nbsp;there was no association with FEV\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e or the RV/TLC. Regarding the specific questionnaire (CRQ), there was a moderate association\u0026nbsp;between the dyspnoea\u0026nbsp;(r=0.41, p=0.007) and fatigue (r=0.40, p=0.01) domains\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;physical capacity (peakVO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, in ml.kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e.min\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e). The fatigue, emotional function, and self-control domains showed the strongest\u0026nbsp;associations\u0026nbsp;with\u0026nbsp;the\u0026nbsp;anxiety and depression domains (HADS A [r=-0.50, r=-0.62, and r=-0.60, respectively; p\u0026lt;0.001 for all the correlations] and HADS D [r=-0.55, r=-0.65 and r=-0.64; p\u0026lt;0.001 for all the correlations]).\u0026nbsp;Air\u0026nbsp;trapping (RV/TLC in %\u0026nbsp;of predicted) was the functional parameter with better, although weak, association with the fatigue domain (r=-0.32, p=0.03).\u0026nbsp;The DLco and FEV\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e variables, both\u0026nbsp;in %\u0026nbsp;of predicted, had no association with HRQoL and were not included in the regression models.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe associations between the SF-36 and CRQ domains and the symptoms of depression were very clear. All domains of the generic and specific questionnaires were correlated with physical capacity outcomes, anxiety, and depression symptoms, while only some were associated with lung function (p\u0026lt;0.2). All the data from the generic and specific questionnaires that were used for multiple linear regression modeling are presented in Table 4.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the factors associated with HRQoL in LAM patients. Our results showed that general health and vitality were the most highly impacted domains assessed by the generic questionnaire (SF-36). Additionally, dyspnoea and fatigue were the most highly impacted domains assessed by the specific questionnaire (CRQ). Furthermore, physical capacity, anxiety, and depression symptoms were strongly associated with HRQoL. Finally, lung function parameters were weakly associated with HRQoL.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the current study, we observed that general health and vitality were the most strongly impaired SF-36 domains. Interestingly, our observations are similar to those reported by Baldi and coworkers\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003e (general health: 56\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;19 vs. 65\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;25; vitality: 56\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;20 vs. 64\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;23). The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute provides the largest registry, enrolling 230 patients with LAM, and the physical component domain of the SF-36 was lower than the mental component score (39.7\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.82 and 50.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.66, respectively)\u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003e. These results emphasize that LAM patients have impaired quality of life, with worse scores in the physical and emotional domains when assessed using SF-36.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to the HRQoL, as determined by a specific questionnaire (CRQ), dyspnoea and fatigue are the most strongly impaired domains. Our results are partially supported by a previous study demonstrating that dyspnoea and fatigue are reported by the vast majority of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD)\u003csup\u003e19\u003c/sup\u003e. In addition, a CRQ validation study of Brazilian patients with COPD obtained scores similar to those of our LAM patients in all domains (fatigue 4.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.2 vs. 4.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.2; emotional function 4.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.0 vs. 4.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1; self-control 5.1\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.3 vs. 5.1\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.1 score; respectively), except for the dyspnoea domain, which was worse in LAM patients than in patients with COPD (4.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.3 vs. 3.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.4 score, respectively). Given that a\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.5-point difference in each domain is the minimum clinically important difference, we can assume that the quality of life of patients with LAM is quite similar to that of patients with severe to very severe COPD in most CRQ domains, despite the large difference in lung function between the two groups of patients\u003csup\u003e20\u003c/sup\u003e. The discrepancy in the dyspnoea domain scores between LAM and COPD patients might be explained by the specific characteristics of each population, such as age and physical activity levels, as well as disease severity and the subjective aspects related to the perception of dyspnoea.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMartinez and coworkers\u003csup\u003e21\u003c/sup\u003e reported that the general health and vitality domains assessed by the SF-36 had a good relationship with dyspnoea scores in patients with IPF. However, the outcomes associated with HRQoL in LAM patients remain poorly known, mainly because the disease is quite rare. Our results showed an association between the domains of generic and specific questionnaires and the physical capacity parameters as assessed by laboratory or field tests. The CPET is the gold standard for quantifying exercise capacity and evaluating the pathophysiological mechanisms of dyspnoea and exercise limitations in people with CRDs. In patients with COPD and IPF, aerobic capacity (VO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, in kg/min) is a marker of mortality and induced hypoxemia and also an important marker to assess the response to pulmonary rehabilitation\u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e. Our results clearly demonstrated that aerobic capacity (peak VO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e) and depression symptoms were the main variables independently associated with almost all SF-36 and CRQ domains. However, since this was a cross-sectional study, it is not possible to infer causality. Most women receive a diagnosis during a productive and reproductive period of life, and such a diagnosis may affect them, increasing the risk of developing anxiety and depression symptoms. Most likely, the increase in those symptoms may reduce their physical activity, impacting their aerobic capacity. As a consequence, it seems reasonable to assume that anxiety and depression symptoms and physical capacity are the most relevant features to LAM patient's quality of life.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe also observed that lung function variables were associated with few HRQoL domains, suggesting that treatments to improve patient's quality of life should be more focused on reducing anxiety and depression symptoms and improving exercise capacity than PFTs. In contrast to our results, previous studies have shown that PFTs are associated with quality of life as assessed by the SF-36 or CRQ in COPD patients\u003csup\u003e23\u003c/sup\u003e. Moua and coworkers\u003csup\u003e24\u003c/sup\u003e also reported an association between FVC% pred and CRQ domains in patients with ILDs. However, it is difficult to compare these results appropriately because respiratory diseases differ due to their unique characteristics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn a systematic review that evaluated features associated with HRQoL in patients with ILDs, the strongest correlation was observed between dyspnoea and the domains that concern physical health. On the other hand, the correlations between lung function parameters (FVC and DL\u003csub\u003eCO\u003c/sub\u003e) or oxygenation and HRQoL domains were weaker\u003csup\u003e25\u003c/sup\u003e. Based on our findings in which anxiety and depression symptoms remained independent outcomes associated with all HRQoL domains, we suggest that physicians should pay more attention to patients' psychosocial assessment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoreover, anxiety and depression symptoms occur in approximately 25% of patients with ILDs, and the percentages of these patients with clinically meaningful depression range from 7 to 49%, and with anxiety from 9 to 12%\u003csup\u003e26,27\u003c/sup\u003e, however, the percentage of patients with those symptoms is even greater among LAM patients, reaching 53%\u003csup\u003e26,28\u003c/sup\u003e. Depression and anxiety symptoms are not only essential in predicting the HRQoL of ILD patients but can also be associated with breathlessness levels\u003csup\u003e28\u003c/sup\u003e. Therefore, routine screening for depression and other underlying symptoms that can increase psychological stress and may decrease patients' HRQoL should be performed\u003csup\u003e45\u003c/sup\u003e. The present study showed that symptoms of anxiety and depression were present in LAM patients, which may lead to a vicious cycle because the greater their levels, the more physically limited patients may become, impacting the quality of life of even more individuals.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur study had several limitations. First, it was performed in a single centre. However, our centre is the primary for treating LAM in Latin America and we assist patients from all regions of Brazil with different severities of disease. In addition, 45 participants can be considered a significant sample size due to the rarity of the disease Second, we excluded patients using continuous oxygen because their mobility is usually reduced. Therefore, our results cannot be extrapolated to this subgroup with worse disease severity. Third, there is no specific validated HRQoL questionnaire for LAM, and the CRQ, which is the most used disease-specific tool for assessing HRQoL in patients with CRDs\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003e, was used for this study.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOur results showed that aerobic capacity and depression symptoms are the principal factors associated with the quality of life of LAM patients; however, lung function parameters were poorly associated. These findings might alert clinicians to the need to conduct frequent psychosocial and physical exercise assessments for future intervention to improve the quality of life of LAM patients. Further studies are required to identify a questionnaire that better assesses the quality of life of this population.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eFunding information\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study was supported by grants 312279/2018-3 from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient\u0026iacute;fico e Tecnol\u0026oacute;gico (CNPq) and grants 2018/17788-3 from Funda\u0026ccedil;\u0026atilde;o de Amparo \u0026agrave; Pesquisa de S\u0026atilde;o Paulo (FAPESP)\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eDQ promoted the development of the study design, the scheduling of patient appointments, data collection and analysis, and interpreting the data, as well as writing the article. CS assisted in their search, helping develop the study design, scheduling patient appointments, collecting, analyzing, and interpreting the data, and improving and developing the article. MO and AA promoted the development of the study design and the scheduling of patient appointments. CRRC greatly contributed to developing the study design, analyzing and interpreting the data, and helping with the elaboration of the article. JMS promoted the development of the study design and the scheduling of patient appointments. BB supported us by developing the study design, scheduling patient appointments, analyzing and interpreting the data, and helping with the later elaboration of the article. CRFC conducted our research and provided insight and expertise in all stages of the study, from the concept to the design, data collection and analysis, data interpretation, improvements, and the development of the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the version he submitted.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData Availability\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eSequence data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Zenodo with the primary accession code md5:166d8ecdbfd8d5c566b4b3bc07d2f995\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLynn E, Forde SH, Franciosi AN, Bendstrup E, Veltkamp M, Wind AE, Van Moorsel CHM, Lund TK, Durheim MT, Peeters EFHI, Keane MP, McCarthy C; and Northern European LAM Prevalence Consortium. Updated Prevalence of Lymphangioleiomyomatosis in Europe. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 15;209(4):456-459. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202310-1736LE. PMID: 38060201.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTaveira-DaSilva AM, Moss J. Clinical features, epidemiology, and therapy of lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr 7;7:249-57. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S50780.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMcCormack FX, Gupta N, Finlay GR, Young LR, Taveira-DaSilva AM, Glasgow CG, Steagall WK, Johnson SR, Sahn SA, Ryu JH, Strange C, Seyama K, Sullivan EJ, Kotloff RM, Downey GP, Chapman JT, Han MK, D\u0026apos;Armiento JM, Inoue Y, Henske EP, Bissler JJ, Colby TV, Kinder BW, Wikenheiser-Brokamp KA, Brown KK, Cordier JF, Meyer C, Cottin V, Brozek JL, Smith K, Wilson KC, Moss J. Official American Thoracic Society/Japanese Respiratory Society Clinical Practice Guidelines: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Diagnosis and Management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 194(6):748\u0026ndash;61. doi:10.1164/rccm.201607-1384ST.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCotin V. Treatment of lymphangioleiomyomatosis: building evidence in orphan diseases. ERJ 2014 43: 966-969 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00025314\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAraujo MS, Baldi BG, Freitas CS, Albuquerque AL, Marques da Silva CC, Kairalla RA, Carvalho CR, Carvalho CR. Pulmonary rehabilitation in lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a controlled clinical trial. Eur Respir J. 2016 May;47(5):1452-60. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01683-2015. Epub 2016 Feb 25. PMID: 26917604.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBaldi BG, Freitas CS, Araujo MS, Dias OM, Pereira DA, Pimenta SP, Kairalla RA, Carvalho CR. Clinical course and characterisation of lymphangioleiomyomatosis in a Brazilian reference centre. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2014 Jul 8;31(2):129-35. PMID: 25078640.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBaldi BG, Albuquerque AL, Pimenta SP, Salge JM, Kairalla RA, Carvalho CRR. Exercise performance and dynamic hyperinflation in lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 186(4):341-8. doi:10.1164/rccm.201203-0372OC.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSousa TC, Jardim JR, Jones P. Valida\u0026ccedil;\u0026atilde;o do Question\u0026aacute;rio do Hospital Saint George na Doen\u0026ccedil;a Respirat\u0026oacute;ria (SGRQ) em pacientes portadores de doen\u0026ccedil;a pulmonar obstrutiva cr\u0026ocirc;nica no Brasil. J Pneumol. 2000;26(3):119-28.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWare JE, Jr and Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. \u003cem\u003eMed Care \u003c/em\u003e1992; 30: 473\u0026ndash;483.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZimmermann CS, Carvalho CR, Silveira KR, Yamaguti WP, Moderno EV, Salge JM, Kairalla RA, Carvalho CR. Comparison of two questionnaires which measure the health-related quality of life of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2007 40: 179\u0026ndash;87. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2007000200004.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSingh SJ, Sodergren SC, Hyland ME, Williams J, Morgan MD. A comparison of three disease-specific and two generic health-status measures to evaluate the outcome of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD. Respir Med. 2001;95(1):71-7. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBuss AS, Silva LMC. Comparative study of two quality of life questionnaires in patients with COPD. \u003cem\u003eJ Bras Pneumol\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003e2009\u003c/em\u003e;\u003cem\u003e35\u003c/em\u003e(\u003cem\u003e4):318-324\u003c/em\u003e. DOI: 10.1590/s1806-37132009000400005\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOliveira MR, Wanderley M, Freitas CSG, Kairalla RA, Chate RC, Amaral AF, Arimura FE, Samorano LP, Watanabe EH, Carvalho CRR, Baldi BG. Clinical, tomographic and functional comparison of sporadic and tuberous sclerosis complex-associated forms of lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a retrospective cohort study. ERJ Open Res. 2024 Mar 4;10(2):00759-2023. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00759-2023\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKato M, Kanehiro Y, Yoshimi K, Kodama Y, Sekiya M, Sato T, Takahashi K, Seyama K; Multicenter Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Sirolimus Trial for Safety Study Group. COPD assessment test as a possible tool for evaluating health-related quality of life in lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Respir Investig. 2018 Nov;56(6):480-488. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 22. PMID: 30143460.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSilva Queiroz D, Marques da Silva CCB, Franco Amaral A, Rodrigues Oliveira M, Salge JM, Ribeiro Carvalho CR, Guedes Baldi B, Carvalho CRF. Evaluation of maximal exercise capacity through the incremental shuttle walking test in lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Pulmonology. 2022 Jul 15:S2531-0437(22)00117-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.04.009. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35851263.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJohnson SR, Cordier JF, Lazor R, Cottin V, Costabel U, Harari S, Reynaud-Gaubert M, Boehler A, Brauner M, Popper H, Bonetti F, Kingswood C; Review Panel of the ERS LAM Task Force. European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis and management of lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Eur Respir J. 2010 Jan;35(1):14-26. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00076209. PMID: 20044458.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchober, P., \u0026amp; Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763e1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRyu JH, Moss J, Beck GJ, Lee JC, Brown KK, Chapman JT, Finlay GA, Olson EJ, Ruoss SJ, Maurer JR, Raffin TA, Peavy HH, McCarthy K, Taveira-Dasilva A, McCormack FX, Avila NA, Decastro RM, Jacobs SS, Stylianou M, Fanburg BL; NHLBI LAM Registry Group. The NHLBI lymphangioleiomyomatosis registry: characteristics of 230 patients at enrollment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jan 1;173(1):105-11. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1298OC. Epub 2005 Oct 6. PMID: 16210669; PMCID: PMC2662978.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAronson KI, Martin-Schwarze AM, Swigris JJ, Kolenic G, Krishnan JK, Podolanczuk AJ, Kaner RJ, Martinez FJ, Safford MM, Pinheiro LC; Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. Validity and Reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in a Real-World Interstitial Lung Disease Cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Jul 15;208(2):188-195. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202208-1504OC. PMID: 37099412; PMCID: PMC10395489)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuyatt G, Berman L, Townsend M, Pugsley S, Chambers L. A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease. Thorax. 1987;42:773-778.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMartinez TY, Pereira CA, dos Santos ML, Ciconelli RM, Guimar\u0026atilde;es SM, Martinez JA. Evaluation of the short-form 36-item questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2000; 117: 1627-1632.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStickland MK, Neder JA, Guenette JA, O\u0026apos;Donnell DE, Jensen D. Using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing to Understand Dyspnoea and Exercise Intolerance in Respiratory Disease. Chest. 2022 Jun;161(6):1505-1516. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Jan 19. PMID: 35065052.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSt\u0026ouml;ber A, Lutter JI, Schwarzkopf L, Kirsch F, Schramm A, Vogelmeier CF, Leidl R. Impact of Lung Function and Exacerbations on Health-Related Quality of Life in COPD Patients Within One Year: Real-World Analysis Based on Claims Data. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Sep 21;16:2637-2651. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S313711. PMID: 34588773; PMCID: PMC8473986.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMoua T, Kubbara A, Novotny P, et al. Patient-reported quality of life in fibrotic interstitial lung disease: novel assessments of self-management ability and affect. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7: 00011-2021 [https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00011-2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSwigris JJ, Kuschner WG, Jacobs SS, Wilson SR, Gould MK. Health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review. Thorax. 2005 Jul;60(7):588-94. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.035220. PMID: 15994268; PMCID: PMC1747452.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRyerson CJ, Berkeley J, Carrieri-Kohlman VL, et al. Depression and functional status are strongly associated with dyspnoea in interstitial lung disease. Chest 2011b; 139: 609\u0026ndash;616.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHolland AE, Fiore JF, Jr, Bell EC, et al. Dyspnoea and comorbidity contribute to anxiety and depression in interstitial lung disease. Respirology 2014; 19: 1215\u0026ndash;1221.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRyerson CJ, Arean PA, Berkeley J, \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e. Depression is a common and chronic comorbidity in patients with interstitial lung disease. \u003cem\u003eRespirology \u003c/em\u003e2012a; 17: 525\u0026ndash;532.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cp\u003eTables 1 to 4 are available in the Supplementary Files section.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"lung","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"lung","sideBox":"Learn more about [Lung](https://www.springer.com/journal/408)","snPcode":"408","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/408/3","title":"Lung","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Cystic lung disease, Exercise, Quality of life, Psychosocial aspects, Lung function","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4714749/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4714749/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground:\u003c/strong\u003e Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare (twenty-one per million female inhabitants) neoplastic cystic lung disease that impairs health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, the factors associated with impaired quality of life in patients with LAM are poorly understood.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eObjective:\u003c/strong\u003e To assess the clinical, psychosocial, and functional characteristics associated with impaired quality of life in patients with LAM.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods:\u003c/strong\u003e This was a cross-sectional study performed on two nonconsecutive days. HRQoL (SF-36 and CRQ), lung function tests, anxiety and depression symptoms (HADS), maximal (CPET and ISWT), and submaximal exercise capacity (6MWT) were assessed. Linear associations among outcomes were assessed using Pearson's correlation and multivariate tests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults:\u003c/strong\u003e Forty-five women with LAM (46±10.years; FEV\u003csub\u003e1,\u003c/sub\u003e74%pred) were evaluated. The lowest SF-36 scores were observed for general health and vitality and the highest for the physical and social domains. The lowest CRQ scores were observed for dyspnoea and fatigue, and the highest were for the emotional function and self-control domains. Sixteen (35%) women had anxiety, and 8 (17%) had depression symptoms. Most of the SF-36 and CRQ domains were associated with anxiety and depression symptoms (from r=0.4 to r=0.7; p\u0026lt;0.05) and exercise capacity (from r=0.3 to r=0.5; p\u0026lt;0.05). Lung function parameters were weakly or not associated with quality of life domains. After multiple linear regression, HRQoL was independently associated with depression symptoms and physical capacity but not with lung function.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion\u003c/strong\u003e: Our results show that aerobic capacity and depression symptoms are the main factors, rather than lung function, related to quality of life in patients with LAM.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Clinical and functional outcomes associated with quality of life in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a cross-sectional study","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-08-10 12:10:57","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4714749/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"226139304484156063913598608303127001768","date":"2024-07-21T10:17:49+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-07-16T07:28:39+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"1719773453529301462755704544571272529","date":"2024-07-15T06:34:24+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-07-13T02:50:30+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-07-11T12:59:52+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-07-11T12:59:02+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Lung","date":"2024-07-10T01:00:49+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"lung","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"lung","sideBox":"Learn more about [Lung](https://www.springer.com/journal/408)","snPcode":"408","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/408/3","title":"Lung","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"00708cb8-1c06-4d6c-ae2a-77f31a6d17af","owner":[],"postedDate":"August 10th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-10-21T16:00:50+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4714749","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00751-w","journal":{"identity":"lung","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Lung"},"publishedOn":"2024-10-14 15:57:14","publishedOnDateReadable":"October 14th, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-08-10 12:10:57","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s00408-024-00751-w","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00751-w","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4714749","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4714749","identity":"rs-4714749","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00