The role of robotic surgery in the treatment of advanced endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

other OA: hybrid CC-BY-NC-4.0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

Robotic surgery for advanced endometriosis is safe and feasible, showing positive quality of life and fertility outcomes, though comparative data shows no difference from laparoscopy except for longer operative time.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the role of robotic surgery for advanced endometriosis (stage III/IV), focusing primarily on surgical outcomes and pooling comparative data from 36 included studies. Across the evidence base, robotic surgery was reported as safe and feasible with satisfactory surgical outcomes, and improvements were described for endometriosis-related pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and infertility outcomes, including pregnancy rates reported as 25–100% after surgery. When compared with laparoscopy, there were no statistically significant differences in blood loss, hospitalization, or complication-related outcomes, though operative time was significantly longer for robotic surgery; two studies also reported potential advantages for endometriosis-related pain and relative preservation of ovarian reserve. The authors note a major limitation that the absence of randomized studies prevents definitive conclusions. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—specifically advanced endometriosis—and it synthesizes evidence on robotic surgery outcomes versus laparoscopy.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Advanced endometriosis (Stage III/IV) represents a particularly severe variant of endometriosis with more pronounced symptomatology and challenging surgical treatment. This review shall examine the role of robotic surgery, the latest breakthrough in surgical technology, in addressing this challenging condition. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of the literature in peer-reviewed databases was performed, focusing mainly on surgical outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed on comparative studies. Studies included in the meta-analysis were also subjected to risk of bias assessment and sensitivity analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: From the initial study pool, ultimately 36 studies were included, which indicated that robotic surgery was safe and feasible, with satisfactory surgical outcomes. Long-term quality of life and fertility outcomes were also positive, particularly for endometriosis-related pain, gastrointestinal symptoms and infertility, with 25-100% pregnancy rate after surgery. Comparative data versus laparoscopy, indicated no statistically significant differences between the two approaches with regard to blood loss, hospitalization or complications (including transfusion, conversion to open surgery, re-hospitalization and re-operation), although operative time was significantly longer for robotic surgery (WMD: 38.32, 95%CI: 24.14, 52.49, P<0.001). However, Robotic surgery was superior in addressing endometriosis-related pain and was less harmful on ovarian reserve according to two studies. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery for advanced endometriosis is a safe and viable approach. While current data reveal no differences in surgical outcomes compared to laparoscopy, the lack of randomized studies precludes definitive conclusions. Future research should focus on patient randomization and on identifying subgroups that would most benefit from the application of this novel technology.
Full text 4,057 characters · extracted from oa-html · 2 sections · click to expand

Introduction

Advanced endometriosis (Stage III/IV) represents a particularly severe variant of endometriosis with more pronounced symptomatology and challenging surgical treatment. This review shall examine the role of robotic surgery, the latest breakthrough in surgical technology, in addressing this challenging condition. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of the literature in peer-reviewed databases was performed, focusing mainly on surgical outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed on comparative studies. Studies included in the meta-analysis were also subjected to risk of bias assessment and sensitivity analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: From the initial study pool, ultimately 36 studies were included, which indicated that robotic surgery was safe and feasible, with satisfactory surgical outcomes. Long-term quality of life and fertility outcomes were also positive, particularly for endometriosis-related pain, gastrointestinal symptoms and infertility, with 25-100% pregnancy rate after surgery. Comparative data versus laparoscopy, indicated no statistically significant differences between the two approaches with regard to blood loss, hospitalization or complications (including transfusion, conversion to open surgery, re-hospitalization and re-operation), although operative time was significantly longer for robotic surgery (WMD: 38.32, 95%CI: 24.14, 52.49, P<0.001). However, Robotic surgery was superior in addressing endometriosis-related pain and was less harmful on ovarian reserve according to two studies.

Conclusions

Robotic surgery for advanced endometriosis is a safe and viable approach. While current data reveal no differences in surgical outcomes compared to laparoscopy, the lack of randomized studies precludes definitive conclusions. Future research should focus on patient randomization and on identifying subgroups that would most benefit from the application of this novel technology. KEY WORDS: Endometriosis; Robotic surgical procedures; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Quality of life

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-29T00:30:25.729880+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine