The role of robotic surgery in the treatment of advanced endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Robotic surgery for advanced endometriosis is safe and feasible, showing positive quality of life and fertility outcomes, though comparative data shows no difference from laparoscopy except for longer operative time.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the role of robotic surgery for advanced endometriosis (stage III/IV), focusing primarily on surgical outcomes and pooling comparative data from 36 included studies. Across the evidence base, robotic surgery was reported as safe and feasible with satisfactory surgical outcomes, and improvements were described for endometriosis-related pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and infertility outcomes, including pregnancy rates reported as 25–100% after surgery. When compared with laparoscopy, there were no statistically significant differences in blood loss, hospitalization, or complication-related outcomes, though operative time was significantly longer for robotic surgery; two studies also reported potential advantages for endometriosis-related pain and relative preservation of ovarian reserve. The authors note a major limitation that the absence of randomized studies prevents definitive conclusions. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—specifically advanced endometriosis—and it synthesizes evidence on robotic surgery outcomes versus laparoscopy.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
4,057 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Introduction
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-29T00:30:25.729880+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine