Broad epigenetic shifts in the aging Drosophila retina contribute to its altered rhythmic transcriptome

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,815 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Alterations in biological rhythms are a common feature of aging, and disruption of circadian rhythms can exacerbate age-associated pathologies. The retina is critical for detecting light for both vision and for transmitting time-of-day information to the brain, synchronizing rhythms throughout the body. Disruption of circadian rhythms by manipulating the molecular clock leads to premature retinal degeneration in flies and mice, and gene expression rhythms are disrupted in models of age-associated ocular disease. Despite this, it is unknown how or why the gene expression rhythms of the retina change with age. Here, we show that ∼70% of the Drosophila transcriptome is rhythmically expressed throughout the diurnal cycle, with ∼40% of genes showing altered rhythms with age. These transcriptome-wide changes in aging photoreceptors are accompanied by shifts in the rhythmic patterns of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy, histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methylation, and chromatin accessibility, without major changes in occupancy of the circadian clock transcription factors Clock (Clk) and Cycle (Cyc). Instead, aging decreases genome-wide levels of several different histone methyl marks including H3K4 methylation, whose relative levels across the day correlate with the phase of rhythmic gene expression. Moreover, individual knockdown of the three H3K4 methyltransferases in young photoreceptors results in massive disruptions to rhythmic gene expression that resemble those observed during aging. We conclude that there are broad epigenetic shifts in the aging retina, including decreased histone methylation, that contribute to changes in biological rhythms even in the presence of a robust molecular circadian clock. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00