The Indonesian Version of the Chapron’s Screening Method for Endometriosis Diagnosis based on Questionnaire as a Tool for Better Endometriosis Screening in Indonesia

Objective: This study aims to translate, develop, and assess the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of Professor Chapron’s screening method for endometriosis diagnosis based on the questionnaire as a tool for better endometriosis screening in Indonesia.

Development of the questionnaire using 5 steps: translation, synthesis, back translation, expert committee review, and pretesting by involving language expert and subject expert. The analysis includes the validity and reliability of the questionnaire.

A sample of 30 subjects was enrolled. The questionnaire was consist of 3 sections, including characteristic patient questions, yes or no questions (8 questions), and pain scale questions (5 questions). Of the 8 yes or no questions, 7 were valid (r >0.300), and one question was not valid (r0.300) and reliable (Cronbach’s alpha 0.790).

This study represent the Professor Chapron’s questionnaire for endometriosis screening into another language (Bahasa) than the original. It showed that the questionnaire was reliable, and one question was not valid (removed from the questionnaire). The questionnaire can be used in Indonesia for screening method in Indonesia. Versi Indonesia dari Kuesioner Chapron untuk Metode Skrining dalam Diagnosis Endometriosis sebagai Alat Skrining Endometriosis di Indonesia Abstrak Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menerjemahkan, mengembangkan, dan menilai validitas dan reliabilitas versi bahasa Indonesia dari metode Skrining Professor Chapron berdasarkan kuesioner, sebagai alat untuk skrining endometriosis yang lebih baik di Indonesia. Metode: Pengembangan kuesioner menggunakan 5 langkah: penerjemahan, sintesis, penerjemahan balik, telaah komite ahli, dan pra-uji dengan melibatkan ahli bahasa dan ahli subjek. Analisis yang dilakukan yaitu uji validitas dan reliabilitas kuesioner. Hasil: Sampel penelitian sebanyak 30 orang. Kuesioner terdiri atas 3 bagian, yaitu pertanyaan karakteristik pasien, pertanyaan ya atau tidak (8 pertanyaan), dan pertanyaan skala nyeri (5 pertanyaan). Sebanyak 7 pertanyaan ya atau tidak, hasilnya valid (r>0,300) dan 1 pertanyaan tidak valid (r0,300) dan reliabel (Cronbach’s alpha 0,7900). Kesimpulan: Penelitian ini mengembangkan serta menilai validitas dan reliabilitas kuesioner Professor Chapron untuk skrining endometriosis dalam versi bahasa Indonesia. Kuesioner ini reliabel dengan 1 pertanyaan tidak valid (dihilangkan dari kuesioner). Kuesioner ini dapat digunakan di Indonesia untuk metode skrining endometriosis di Indonesia.

Full Text: PDFReferences Davenport S, Smith D, Green DJ. Barriers to a Timely Diagnosis of Endometriosis: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol. 2023;142(3):571-83. Kim MR, Chapron C, Romer T, Aguilar A, Chalermchockcharoenkit A, Chatterjee S, et al. Clinical Diagnosis and Early Medical Management for Endometriosis: Consensus from Asian Expert Group. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(12). Allaire C, Bedaiwy MA, Yong PJ. Diagnosis and management of endometriosis. CMAJ. 2023;195(10):E363-E71. Chauhan S, More A, Chauhan V, Kathane A. Endometriosis: A Review of Clinical Diagnosis, Treatment, and Pathogenesis. Cureus. 2022;14(9):e28864. Quesada J, Harma K, Reid S, Rao T, Lo G, Yang N, et al. Endometriosis: A multimodal imaging review. Eur J Radiol. 2023;158:110610. Muharam R, Amalia T, Pratama G, Harzif AK, Agiananda F, Maidarti M, et al. Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women with Endometriosis is Associated with Psychiatric Disorder and Quality of Life Deterioration. Int J Womens Health. 2022;14:131-8. Ellis K, Munro D, Clarke J. Endometriosis Is Undervalued: A Call to Action. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022;3:902371. Chapron C, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Santulli P. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(11):666-82. Chapron C, Lafay-Pillet MC, Santulli P, Bourdon M, Maignien C, Gaudet-Chardonnet A, et al. A new validated screening method for endometriosis diagnosis based on patient questionnaires. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;44:101263. Kimber-Trojnar Z, Pilszyk A, Niebrzydowska M, Pilszyk Z, Ruszala M, Leszczynska-Gorzelak B. The Potential of Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Patients with Endometriosis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(13). Griffiths MJ, Horne AW, Gibson DA, Roberts N, Saunders PTK. Endometriosis: recent advances that could accelerate diagnosis and improve care. Trends Mol Med. 2024;30(9):875-89. Martire FG, Russo C, Selntigia A, Nocita E, Soreca G, Lazzeri L, et al. Early noninvasive diagnosis of endometriosis: dysmenorrhea and specific ultrasound findings are important indicators in young women. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(3):455-64. Amro B, Ramirez Aristondo ME, Alsuwaidi S, Almaamari B, Hakim Z, Tahlak M, et al. New Understanding of Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Endometriosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(11). Wuest A, Limacher JM, Dingeldein I, Siegenthaler F, Vaineau C, Wilhelm I, et al. Pain Levels of Women Diagnosed with Endometriosis: Is There a Difference in Younger Women? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2023;36(2):140-7. Martire FG, Giorgi M, D'Abate C, Colombi I, Ginetti A, Cannoni A, et al. Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis in Adolescence: Early Diagnosis and Possible Prevention of Disease Progression. J Clin Med. 2024;13(2). van der Zanden M, de Kok L, Nelen W, Braat DDM, Nap AW. Strengths and weaknesses in the diagnostic process of endometriosis from the patients' perspective: a focus group study. Diagnosis (Berl). 2021;8(3):333-9. van der Zanden M, Teunissen DAM, van der Woord IW, Braat DDM, Nelen W, Nap AW. Barriers and facilitators to the timely diagnosis of endometriosis in primary care in the Netherlands. Fam Pract. 2020;37(1):131-6. Fauconnier A, Drioueche H, Huchon C, Du Cheyron J, Indersie E, Candau Y, et al. Early identification of women with endometriosis by means of a simple patient-completed questionnaire screening tool: a diagnostic study. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(6):1580-9. Pascoal E, Wessels JM, Aas-Eng MK, Abrao MS, Condous G, Jurkovic D, et al. Strengths and limitations of diagnostic tools for endometriosis and relevance in diagnostic test accuracy research. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(3):309-27. Bausic A, Coroleuca C, Coroleuca C, Comandasu D, Matasariu R, Manu A, et al. Transvaginal Ultrasound vs. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Value in Endometriosis Diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(7). Nezhat C, Rambhatla A, Miranda-Silva C, Asiaii A, Nguyen K, Eyvazzadeh A, et al. BCL-6 Overexpression as a Predictor for Endometriosis in Patients Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization. JSLS. 2020;24(4). Nezhat C, Agarwal S, Lee DA, Tavallaee M. Can we accurately diagnose endometriosis without a diagnostic laparoscopy? J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2022;23(2):117-9. Huang L, Liu B, Liu Z, Feng W, Liu M, Wang Y, et al. Gut Microbiota Exceeds Cervical Microbiota for Early Diagnosis of Endometriosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:788836. Bendifallah S, Puchar A, Suisse S, Delbos L, Poilblanc M, Descamps P, et al. Machine learning algorithms as new screening approach for patients with endometriosis. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):639. Bendifallah S, Suisse S, Puchar A, Delbos L, Poilblanc M, Descamps P, et al. Salivary MicroRNA Signature for Diagnosis of Endometriosis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24198/obgynia.v8i2.890 Refbacks - There are currently no refbacks. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.