Reply to ‘Critical appraisal of “Comparison of combined oral contraceptives and dienogest for endometriosis-associated pain”’

Salvatore Caruso, Stefano Cianci, Giuseppe Caruso, Marco Iraci Sareri, Ferdinando Antonio Gulino, Marco Palumbo
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2025 · vol. 310 , pp. 113945 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.113945 · PMID:40204584 · W4409099098
letter OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This reply critically appraises a previous paper that compared combined oral contraceptives and dienogest for endometriosis-associated pain, offering a rebuttal to its conclusions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

References (4)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:31:40.118107+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK