Full text
1,865 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Voltage-gated Na+ (Nav) channels, including Nav1.5, are responsible for the initiation of cardiac and neuronal action potentials. Regulation of Nav1.5 inactivation is linked to multiple accessory proteins that bind its C-terminal domain (CTD) including calmodulin (CaM) and intracellular fibroblast growth factors (iFGF). Previous results demonstrate that Ca2+-bound CaM preferentially binds to iFGF12A. The role of intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) in regulating Nav1.5 gating, either directly or via auxiliary proteins like CaM, is controversial. We hypothesize that CaM binding to the Nav1.5 CTD and iFGF12A synergistically alters channel inactivation in a previously unobserved calcium-dependent manner. We performed Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) imaging in live cells to observe the interaction between the Nav1.5 alpha subunit, CaM and iFGF12A. At resting [Ca2+]i, a 2-fold difference between acceptor and donor FRET efficiency was observed, implying that a single CaM acceptor is present on the Nav1.5 CTD even in the presence of FGF12A. After increasing [Ca2+]i, the donor and acceptor FRET efficiencies equalize, suggesting a 2:1:1 ratio between CaM, FGF12A, and the Nav1.5 CTD. We then compared the voltage-dependent gating kinetics of Nav1.5 with FGF12A in the presence/absence of calcium. With low [Ca2+]i, the steady-state inactivation of Nav1.5 with FGF12A was significantly shifted toward hyperpolarized potential compared to resting [Ca2+]i. Thus, the FGF12A:CaM complex confers a Ca2+-dependent mechanism enabling FGF12A modulates the Nav1.5 steady-state inactivation. Additionally, the ability of multiple subunits to bring CaM to the Nav1.5 CTD implies biological redundancy to prevent major alteration to Nav1.5 inactivation in the absence of CaM.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.