Rectosigmoid integrity after excision of nodular endometriotic disease: do we test appropriately?

Simon Gordon, Peter Maher, Martin Healey
In: Gynaecological Endoscopy · 2001 · vol. 10(3) , pp. 147–149 · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00433.x · W2026712616
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 ⓘ

This case report and review highlights the necessity of adequately testing rectosigmoid integrity after endometriosis resection due to potential delayed tissue necrosis and rectal perforation, even with intraoperative testing.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective To highlight the necessity of adequately testing rectosigmoid integrity after resection of infiltrating endometriosis. Subject A 25‐year‐old woman with a past history of ablative treatment for endometriosis, symptoms suggestive of disease progression, and a palpable anterior rectal nodule. Interventions and outcomes Excisional treatment of all visible disease, including the rectal nodule was carried out. Rectal integrity was confirmed intraoperatively via the ‘Betadine’ test. The patient presented again 3 days later with clinical findings suggestive of a bowel perforation. Repair of the defect and a de‐functioning colostomy were performed. Conclusion Although clinical bowel perforation is an uncommon event, the sequelae have far‐reaching consequences for the patient's quality of life. The use of electrosurgical dissection may have contributed to delayed tissue necrosis and the subsequent rectal perforation. Current methods for testing colorectal integrity are reviewed.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (4)

References (8)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK