Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in brain malignant tumors

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 5,617 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Brain malignant tumors is a serious threat to human health and causes heavy economic burden. Enhanced MRI is widely used in the diagnosis of brain tumors. However, false-positive results of enhanced MRI will lead to misdiagnosis and incorrect surgery or treatment, while false-negative results of enhanced MRI will lead to underdiagnosis of malignant tumors and delayed treatment. There is an urgent need to find convenient, cost-effective and non-invasive diagnostic methods to reduce the false-positive and false-negative rates of brain-enhanced MRI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in brain malignant tumors. Patients and methods 233 subjects (malignant group, n=74; benign group, n=159) were finally included in this study. Remaining serum samples from the subjects were collected and tested by applying the YiDiXie™ all-cancer detection kit to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D.

Results

The sensitivity of YiDiXie™ SS was 97.3% (95% CI: 90.7% - 99.5%) and its specificity was 63.5% (95% CI: 55.8% - 70.6%). This means that YiDiXie ™ -SS has a very high sensitivity and specificity in brain tumors.YiDiXie ™ -HS has a sensitivity of 83.8% (95% CI: 73.8% - 90.5%) and a specificity of 84.9% (95% CI: 78.5% - 89.6%). This means that YiDiXie™-HS has high sensitivity and specificity in brain tumors.YiDiXie™-D has a sensitivity of 70.3% (95% CI: 59.1% - 79.5%) and a specificity of 93.7% (95% CI: 88.8% - 96.5%). This means that YiDiXie™-D has high sensitivity and very high specificity in brain tumors. The sensitivity of YiDiXie™ SS in patients with positive enhancement MRI was 98.3% (95% CI: 91.1% - 99.9%) and its specificity was 62.5% (95% CI: 38.6% - 81.5%). This means that the application of YiDiXie ™ -SS reduces the false-positive rate of enhanced MRI by 62.5% (95% CI: 38.6% - 81.5%) with essentially no increase in the leakage of malignant tumors.The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS in patients with negative enhanced MRI was 85.7% (95% CI: 60.1% - 97.5%) and its specificity was 84.6% (95% CI: 77.8% - 89.6%). This means that the application of YiDiXie ™ -HS reduced the false-negative rate of enhanced MRI by 85.7% (95% CI: 60.1% - 97.5%). YiDiXie™-D had a sensitivity of 71.7% (95% CI: 59.2% - 81.5%) and a specificity of 93.8% (95% CI: 71.7% - 99.7%) in patients with positive enhanced MRI. This means that YiDiXie™ -D reduced the false-positive brain enhanced MRI rate by 93.8% (95% CI: 71.7% - 99.7%). YiDiXie™-D had a sensitivity of 64.3% (95% CI: 38.8% - 83.7%) and a specificity of 93.7% (95% CI: 88.5% - 96.7%) in patients with negative enhanced MRI. This means that YiDiXie ™ -D reduces the false-negative rate of enhanced MRI by 64.3% (95% CI: 38.8% - 83.7%) while maintaining high specificity.

Conclusion

YiDiXie ™ -SS has extremely high sensitivity and high specificity in brain tumors.YiDiXie ™ -HS has high sensitivity and high specificity in brain tumors.YiDiXie ™-D has high sensitivity and extremely high specificity in brain tumors.YiDiXie™-SS significantly reduces the false-positive rate of brain-enhanced MRIs with essentially no increase in delayed treatment of malignant tumors. The YiDiXie™-HS significantly reduces the false-negative rate of brain-enhanced MRI. the YiDiXie™-D can significantly reduce the false-positive rate of brain-enhanced MRI or significantly reduce the false-negative rate of brain-enhanced MRI while maintaining a high level of specificity. The YiDiXie™ test has significant diagnostic value in brain tumors, and is expected to solve the problems of “ high false-positive rate “ and “ high false-negative rate” of brain-enhanced MRI. Clinical trial number ChiCTR2200066840. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Clinical Trial ChiCTR2200066840 Funding Statement This work was supported by Shenzhen High-level Hospital Construction Fund, Clinical Research Project of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (LCYJ2020002, LCYJ2020015, LCYJ2020020, LCYJ2017001). Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Ethics committee of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital gave ethical approval for this work. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Footnotes The results were updated. Tabel 2-8 were reviesed. Data Availability All data produced in the present study are contained in the manuscript.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00