Application of the mesh bridging technique in the excision of abdominal endometriosis lesions: Case report and literature review

review OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This case report describes the successful use of a mesh bridging technique with biological and polypropylene meshes for abdominal wall reconstruction following excision of a large abdominal wall endometriosis lesion.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 · read from full text

This paper describes a case report and literature review on abdominal wall scar endometriosis, focusing on surgical resection of abdominal lesions and subsequent abdominal wall reconstruction when large tissue defects require reinforcement. A 34-year-old woman with cyclic low abdominal wall pain after two cesarean sections had a 6×5×3 cm mass above the symphysis pubis, with diagnosis supported by abdominal ultrasound and MRI, and underwent complete excision of endometriosis with reconstruction using a mesh bridging approach combining biological mesh near the peritoneal side and polypropylene mesh over it. The authors report the technique as aiming to limit peritoneal stimulation from polypropylene while improving strength and reducing risk of abdominal wall hernia, and they state the patient achieved good therapeutic results and satisfaction. The paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically presents and reviews a mesh-bridging method for excision and reconstruction in abdominal wall scar endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abdominal wall scar endometriosis (AWE) is a rare endometriosis that usually occurs after gynecological or obstetric surgery and for which surgical resection is the standard treatment. For large tissue defects after resection, abdominal wall reconstruction is needed. Here, we describe a mesh bridging technique using biological and polypropylene meshes for abdominal wall reconstruction. A 34-year-old woman visited the center with complaints of low abdominal wall pain during menstruation for more than 5 years. Her surgical history included undergoing a cesarean section delivery twice. A mass measuring 6 cm × 5 cm × 3 cm was found above the symphysis pubis in the lower part of the abdominal incision. Endometriosis lesion was considered based on abdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings. After a multidisciplinary discussion that included surgical experts and gynecologists, the decision was made to perform abdominal endometrial focus excision plus abdominal wall reconstruction. Two kinds of mesh were skillfully used in the operation of this patient. Biological mesh was used close to the peritoneal side and covered with polypropylene mesh to reduce the stimulation by the polypropylene mesh of the peritoneum, enhance the strength of the biological mesh, and reduce the incidence of abdominal wall hernia. Our case demonstrates that accurate diagnosis of AWE followed by complete resection and reconstruction of the abdominal wall using a combination of biological and polypropylene mesh bridging can achieve good therapeutic results and patient satisfaction.
Full text 1,949 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Application of the mesh bridging technique in the excision of abdominal endometriosis lesions: Case report and literature review Abstract Abdominal wall scar endometriosis (AWE) is a rare endometriosis that usually occurs after gynecological or obstetric surgery and for which surgical resection is the standard treatment. For large tissue defects after resection, abdominal wall reconstruction is needed. Here, we describe a mesh bridging technique using biological and polypropylene meshes for abdominal wall reconstruction. A 34-year-old woman visited the center with complaints of low abdominal wall pain during menstruation for more than 5 years. Her surgical history included undergoing a cesarean section delivery twice. A mass measuring 6 cm × 5 cm × 3 cm was found above the symphysis pubis in the lower part of the abdominal incision. Endometriosis lesion was considered based on abdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings. After a multidisciplinary discussion that included surgical experts and gynecologists, the decision was made to perform abdominal endometrial focus excision plus abdominal wall reconstruction. Two kinds of mesh were skillfully used in the operation of this patient. Biological mesh was used close to the peritoneal side and covered with polypropylene mesh to reduce the stimulation by the polypropylene mesh of the peritoneum, enhance the strength of the biological mesh, and reduce the incidence of abdominal wall hernia. Our case demonstrates that accurate diagnosis of AWE followed by complete resection and reconstruction of the abdominal wall using a combination of biological and polypropylene mesh bridging can achieve good therapeutic results and patient satisfaction. CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-29T00:32:17.006914+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine