Landscape of Endometriosis RCTs 1990-2024
other
OA: green
CC0
AI-generated summary
This analysis characterizes the landscape of endometriosis randomized controlled trials from 1990 to 2024 by classifying themes, primary outcomes, population sizes, power calculations, registration rates, and publication countries.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Research into endometriosis has been historically underfunded, resulting in a dearth of strongly evidence based management options. The limited funding of endometriosis demands that resources be directed toward the most effective and impactful scientific practices. To do this, a clear understanding of the current research landscape, especially for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) must be obtained. We aim to characterise the landscape of endometriosis RCTs between 1990-2024 by classifying RCTs based upon theme and primary outcome, investigating population sizes of RCTs over time and minimum detectable effect sizes based upon power at 80 and 90%, proportion of trials which have been registered and country of publication.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK