Endometriosis and Infertility: Prognostic Value of #Enzian Classification Compared to rASRM and EFI Score

Arrigo Fruscalzo, Arnaud Dayer, Ambrogio P. Londero, Benedetta Guani, Fathi Khomsi, F. Khomsi, Jean-Marc Ayoubi, Anis Féki
Journal of personalized medicine · 2022 · vol. 12(10) , pp. 1623 · doi:10.3390/jpm12101623 · PMID:36294762 · W4303832717
article OA: gold CC0 ⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

This study’s objective was to compare the predictive validity of the three most utilized classification scores for endometriosis, #Enzian, EFI, and rASRM, in achieving a spontaneous pregnancy or pregnancy via assisted reproductive technology (ART) after surgery for endometriosis. The monocentric retrospective study was carried out from January 2012 to December 2021 at the gynaecology department of the cantonal hospital of Fribourg. Patients consulting for infertility and operated on for endometriosis with histological confirmation were included. The predictive value of #Enzian, rASRM, and EFI was evaluated and compared concerning the prediction of fertility after surgery, both spontaneous and ART, during the following 12 months. A total of 58 women (mean age 33.1 ± 4.57 years) were included. Overall, 30 women achieved a pregnancy, seven spontaneously. Among all women who achieved a pregnancy, there was a lower prevalence of rASRM stage III−IV (16.67% vs. 39.29%, p = 0.054). Women achieving a pregnancy had a significantly higher EFI score than others (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed concerning the #Enzian score. In conclusion, the revised #Enzian score is not correlated with pregnancy achievement; EFI score is the only score significantly associated with the pregnancy outcome in women affected by endometriosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

rASRM Enzian

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (19)

Cited by (6)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:34:24.405165+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK