Innovative approaches to operational treatment of women of reproductive eligibility age with hyperplastic processes of the endometrium

In: HEALTH OF WOMAN · 2016 · pp. 41–45 · doi:10.15574/hw.2016.112.41 · W3110439839
article OA: diamond CC0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-27 ⓘ

This study compared hysteroscopic monopolar and radiofrequency endometrial ablation for non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia, finding monopolar ablation to be faster and effective in 87.8% of cases despite specific contraindications like advanced adenomyosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-10 · read from full text ⓘ

This study evaluated two surgical techniques, hysteroscopic monopolar ablation and radiowave endometrial ablation, for treating non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia in women of reproductive age. The researchers compared 41 patients undergoing monopolar ablation with 21 patients receiving radiowave ablation, noting that the latter allowed for local anesthesia while the former required intravenous anesthesia. Results indicated that monopolar ablation had a shorter procedure time but carried a risk of fluid intravasation, whereas radiowave ablation was associated with fewer intraoperative complications. The authors concluded that both methods serve as viable alternatives to hysterectomy, provided there is no severe adenomyosis, and recommended long-term ultrasound monitoring. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The aim of the study: was improvement of results of surgical treatment of patients of reproductive age eligibility with hyperplastic processes of endometrium (HPE) through the introduction of individualized treatment algorithm with the use of monopolar radio wave and hysteroscopic endometrial ablation. Materials and methods. The study included 62 women with non-atypical form of hyperplasia of the endometrium who were treated at the Center of General gynecology of the clinical hospital «Feofania», gynecological Department at the city maternity hospital № 3 of Kyiv. Depending on the age group, nature of the pathological process and method of treatment is randomized, the distribution of women according to groups: group 1 – 41 women's reproductive eligibility age netipichnaya forms of endometrial hyperplasia (PHEBA and KGEB), who were subjected to hysteroscopic monopolar endometrial ablation; group 2 – 21 female reproductive eligibility age netipichnaya forms of endometrial hyperplasia (PHEBA and KGEB), which was held radiowave ablation of the endometrium (RHAE). In the 1st group the age of patients ranged from 42 to 54 years, mean age was 49.9±4.7 years. In the 2nd group the age of patients ranged from 41 to 53 years, mean age of 51.6±4.3 years. Results. A comparative analysis of the techniques for hysteroscopic monopolar ablation and RHEE showed the fact that for RHEE used local anesthesia, while carrying out hysteroscopic monopolar ablation was necessary intravenous anesthesia. The duration of the hysteroscopic monopolar endometrial ablation was 28.6±5.5 min, RAE – according to the standard method – 44.3±0.3 min. When performing hysteroscopic monopolar endometrial ablation in 2 patients (3.7%) patients observed the signs of intravasation of fluid, increased blood pressure and tachycardia. This syndrome was successfully docked, but in the future, women have conducted a thorough examination. When you run RHAE intraoperative complications have been identified. Conclusion. 1. Women with netipichnaya forms of endometrial hyperplasia eligibility and late reproductive age who do not have reproductive plans as an alternative to hysterectomy, in the presence of contraindications or ineffectiveness of hormone treatment may be recommended or radiowave monopolar hysteroscopic ablation of the endometrium. 2. Monopolar hysteroscopic endometrial ablation is indicated for women with netipichnaya forms of endometrial hyperplasia, can be used in the presence of submucous form of uterine fibroids, postoperative scars on the uterus, but in the absence of adenomyosis II–III degree. The effectiveness of monopolar hysteroscopic endometrial ablation in women with non-atypical form of hyperplasia of the endometrium is 87.8%. 3. Women after endometrial ablation should be under observation for two years. The method of choice for dynamic monitoring of the condition of the uterus in women who underwent endometrial ablation is transvaginal ultrasound which should be performed after 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow up. 4. In case of recurrence of hyperplastic process of the endometrium (bleeding, thickening of the M-mode echo according to the ultrasound) shows a hysteroscopy with a mandatory histopathological examination and verification of the diagnosis. Key words: endometrial hyperplasia, women eligibility age, women of reproductive age, ablation of the endometrium.
Full text 5,572 characters · extracted from oa-html · 2 sections · click to expand

Materials

and methods. The study included 62 women with non-atypical form of hyperplasia of the endometrium who were treated at the Center of General gynecology of the clinical hospital «Feofania», gynecological Department at the city maternity hospital № 3 of Kyiv. Depending on the age group, nature of the pathological process and method of treatment is randomized, the distribution of women according to groups: group 1 – 41 women's reproductive eligibility age netipichnaya forms of endometrial hyperplasia (PHEBA and KGEB), who were subjected to hysteroscopic monopolar endometrial ablation; group 2 – 21 female reproductive eligibility age netipichnaya forms of endometrial hyperplasia (PHEBA and KGEB), which was held radiowave ablation of the endometrium (RHAE). In the 1st group the age of patients ranged from 42 to 54 years, mean age was 49.9±4.7 years. In the 2nd group the age of patients ranged from 41 to 53 years, mean age of 51.6±4.3 years. Results. A comparative analysis of the techniques for hysteroscopic monopolar ablation and RHEE showed the fact that for RHEE used local anesthesia, while carrying out hysteroscopic monopolar ablation was necessary intravenous anesthesia. The duration of the hysteroscopic monopolar endometrial ablation was 28.6±5.5 min, RAE – according to the standard method – 44.3±0.3 min. When performing hysteroscopic monopolar endometrial ablation in 2 patients (3.7%) patients observed the signs of intravasation of fluid, increased blood pressure and tachycardia. This syndrome was successfully docked, but in the future, women have conducted a thorough examination. When you run RHAE intraoperative complications have been identified. Conclusion. 1. Women with netipichnaya forms of endometrial hyperplasia eligibility and late reproductive age who do not have reproductive plans as an alternative to hysterectomy, in the presence of contraindications or ineffectiveness of hormone treatment may be recommended or radiowave monopolar hysteroscopic ablation of the endometrium. 2. Monopolar hysteroscopic endometrial ablation is indicated for women with netipichnaya forms of endometrial hyperplasia, can be used in the presence of submucous form of uterine fibroids, postoperative scars on the uterus, but in the absence of adenomyosis II–III degree. The effectiveness of monopolar hysteroscopic endometrial ablation in women with non-atypical form of hyperplasia of the endometrium is 87.8%. 3. Women after endometrial ablation should be under observation for two years. The method of choice for dynamic monitoring of the condition of the uterus in women who underwent endometrial ablation is transvaginal ultrasound which should be performed after 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow up. 4. In case of recurrence of hyperplastic process of the endometrium (bleeding, thickening of the M-mode echo according to the ultrasound) shows a hysteroscopy with a mandatory histopathological examination and verification of the diagnosis. Key words: endometrial hyperplasia, women eligibility age, women of reproductive age, ablation of the endometrium.

References

1. Benyuk VA, Goncharenko VN, Kuvita YuV. 2013. Vnutrimatochnaya patologiya: spravochnik vracha «Ginekolog»: rukovodstvo. Kiev, Biblioteka «Zdorove Ukrainyi»:203. 2. Dubossarskaya ZM, Dubossarskaya YuA. 2009. Giperplaziya endometriya. ZhInochiy lIkar 5:22–29. 3. Dubossarskaya ZM, Dubossarskaya YuA, Goncharenko VN. 2005. Teoriya i praktika ginekologicheskoy endokrinologii. Dnepropetrovsk, ChP «Lira LTD»:412. 4. Zaporozhan VN, Tatarchuk TF, DubInIna VG. 2012. Sovremennaya diagnostika i lechenie giperplasticheskih protsessov endometriya. Reproduktivnaya endokrinologiya 1(3):32–38. 5. Tatarchuk TF, Burlaka EV. 2003. Sovremennyie printsipyi diagnostiki i lecheniya giperplasticheskih protsessov endometriya. Zdorove zhenschinyi 4:107–113. 6. Vasyl O Beniuk, Rostyslav V Bubnov, Olga Melnychuk . Updating personalized management algorithm of endometrial hyperplasia in pre-menopause women. EPMA Journal 2016; 7(Suppl 1): A28. http: //link. springer. com/article/10.1186/s13167-016-0054-6. (16.09.2015) 7. Beniuk V, Goncharenko V, Kalenska O, Demchenko O, Spivak M, Bubnov R. 2013. Predictive diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and personalized therapeutic strategy in women of fertile age. EPMA J. 4:24. Доступен по: http://www.epmajournal.com/content/4/1/24/abstract (01.09.2013) 8. Goncharenko V, Bubnov R. 2014, March. Endometrial hyperplasia in women of fertile age: persolized diagnosis and therapeutic strategy. Conference Paper: 16th World Congress of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology (ISGE), Florence, Italy. 03/2014. http://gest.btcongress.it/viewAbstractPdf.php?id=2048 (15.10.2-14)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK