Pregnancy outcome after pharmacological treatment of adenomyosis of the external myometrium: case report
This case report describes successful pregnancy outcomes following pharmacological treatment for external myometrial adenomyosis, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive evaluation and distinct treatment approaches for internal versus external lesions.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This case report addresses pregnancy outcome following pharmacological treatment of adenomyosis specifically involving the external myometrium, which is defined as a lesion in the outer uterine shell separated from the junction zone with preserved muscular structures. The authors describe using a multimodal evaluation framework including 3D transvaginal ultrasound, MRI for classification of the lesion, and CA-125 as a factor for assessing disease status and changes. The paper’s main limitation is that it provides a single case without the broader comparative data needed to establish generalizability of outcomes. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — specifically pregnancy outcome after pharmacological treatment of adenomyosis of the external myometrium, with imaging (3D-TVUS and MRI) and CA-125 used in evaluation.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,070 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00