Intraspecific variability rivals interspecific differences in root traits of temperate tree seedlings

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-17 · read from full text

This study quantified between-species and intraspecific variation in seven root traits associated with water uptake for seedlings of seven temperate tree species in northeastern North America. Researchers analyzed how abiotic factors like climate and soil, as well as biotic neighbors, influenced this variability across local and regional scales. The results indicated that while some traits were primarily driven by differences between species, others showed substantial intraspecific plasticity, particularly maximum rooting depth and root-to-shoot ratio, though the overall explanatory power of measured environmental drivers was limited. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Global change and associated disturbances are increasing the risk of regeneration failure for tree species in temperate forests. Seedlings are particularly vulnerable to water stress due to their shallow root systems, making belowground plasticity a potentially key component of species adaptive capacity. Quantifying root trait variability and its drivers can improve our understanding of regeneration success under increasingly warm and dry conditions. We quantified between species variation (BTV) and intraspecific variation (ITV) in seven root traits linked to water uptake—root-to-shoot ratio, maximum rooting depth, proportion of absorptive roots, specific root length, root tissue density, average absorptive root diameter, and root branching density—for seedlings of seven common, co-occurring tree species in forests of northeastern North America. We sampled seedlings under contrasting climate and light conditions, and assessed the influence of abiotic (climate, light conditions, soil properties) and biotic drivers (neighboring vegetation) as well as seedling characteristics (species identity, age, spermatophyte type) on root ITV at local and regional scales. Species differed significantly for some traits but differed even more strongly in multivariate trait syndromes, suggesting distinct belowground strategies. ITV was substantial but trait-dependent, with maximum rooting depth and root to shoot ratio being the most variable (coefficient of variation > 45%) and branching density the least variable. BTV was the primary driver of overall trait variation for three traits, explaining more than 60% of variation, whereas within-plot ITV accounted for more than 50% of variation in the remaining four traits. Local drivers did not outweigh regional factors, and the overall explanatory power of measured drivers was limited, suggesting that fine-scale heterogeneity, not captured in our study, may strongly influence root ITV. High ITV in most traits suggests substantial plasticity in roots, which may contribute to the adaptive capacity of seedlings facing climate change. Integrating this plasticity into mechanistic models is critical for predicting regeneration dynamics or root-mediated ecosystem processes. We propose a set of guidelines for integrating root traits into comparative studies and models based on trait measurability and extent of ITV. We further highlight the need to account for the scale- and gradient-intensity dependence of ITV-environment relationships.
Full text 2,587 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract Global change and associated disturbances are increasing the risk of regeneration failure for tree species in temperate forests. Seedlings are particularly vulnerable to water stress due to their shallow root systems, making belowground plasticity a potentially key component of species adaptive capacity. Quantifying root trait variability and its drivers can improve our understanding of regeneration success under increasingly warm and dry conditions. We quantified between species variation (BTV) and intraspecific variation (ITV) in seven root traits linked to water uptake—root-to-shoot ratio, maximum rooting depth, proportion of absorptive roots, specific root length, root tissue density, average absorptive root diameter, and root branching density—for seedlings of seven common, co-occurring tree species in forests of northeastern North America. We sampled seedlings under contrasting climate and light conditions, and assessed the influence of abiotic (climate, light conditions, soil properties) and biotic drivers (neighboring vegetation) as well as seedling characteristics (species identity, age, spermatophyte type) on root ITV at local and regional scales. Species differed significantly for some traits but differed even more strongly in multivariate trait syndromes, suggesting distinct belowground strategies. ITV was substantial but trait-dependent, with maximum rooting depth and root to shoot ratio being the most variable (coefficient of variation > 45%) and branching density the least variable. BTV was the primary driver of overall trait variation for three traits, explaining more than 60% of variation, whereas within-plot ITV accounted for more than 50% of variation in the remaining four traits. Local drivers did not outweigh regional factors, and the overall explanatory power of measured drivers was limited, suggesting that fine-scale heterogeneity, not captured in our study, may strongly influence root ITV. High ITV in most traits suggests substantial plasticity in roots, which may contribute to the adaptive capacity of seedlings facing climate change. Integrating this plasticity into mechanistic models is critical for predicting regeneration dynamics or root-mediated ecosystem processes. We propose a set of guidelines for integrating root traits into comparative studies and models based on trait measurability and extent of ITV. We further highlight the need to account for the scale- and gradient-intensity dependence of ITV-environment relationships. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-14T06:25:32.811723+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0