Pharmacokinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody SA55 injection in healthy participants

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

To explore novel treatment/prevention of COVID-19, a novel broad-spectrum neutralizing antibody injection, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody SA55 Injection (SA55 injection) was developed. Pharmacokinetics (PK) characteristics of SA55 injection were evaluated in a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase □ trial based on healthy participants aged 18-65 years. PK parameters (AUC 0-∞ , AUC 0-t , and C max ) were assessed using one-way ANOVA and the Power model. Results demonstrated that SA55 injection with a T max of 12.6 days and a half-life of 103 days. In conclusion, the SA55 injection demonstrates potential for use in the prevention of COVID-19 infection.
Full text 31,244 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Pharmacokinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody SA55 injection in healthy participants | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Pharmacokinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody SA55 injection in healthy participants Yibo Zhou , Xing Meng , Jianhua Li , Jin Wang , Gang Zeng , Yunlong Cao , Chaoying Hu , Ronghua Jin doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.22.25322730 Yibo Zhou 1 Phase I clinical Research Center, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing 100015, China 2 Public Health Emergency Management Innovation Center , Beijing 100015, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Xing Meng 3 Clinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd. , Beijing, 100085, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jianhua Li 4 Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Public Health Detection and Pathogenesis Research, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Hangzhou, 310051, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jin Wang 1 Phase I clinical Research Center, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing 100015, China 2 Public Health Emergency Management Innovation Center , Beijing 100015, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Gang Zeng 3 Clinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd. , Beijing, 100085, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yunlong Cao 5 Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University , Beijing, People’s Republic of China 6 Changping Laboratory , Beijing, People’s Republic of China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: ronghuajin{at}ccmu.edu.cn Chaoying Hu 1 Phase I clinical Research Center, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing 100015, China 2 Public Health Emergency Management Innovation Center , Beijing 100015, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: ronghuajin{at}ccmu.edu.cn Ronghua Jin 1 Phase I clinical Research Center, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing 100015, China 2 Public Health Emergency Management Innovation Center , Beijing 100015, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: ronghuajin{at}ccmu.edu.cn Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract To explore novel treatment/prevention of COVID-19, a novel broad-spectrum neutralizing antibody injection, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody SA55 Injection (SA55 injection) was developed. Pharmacokinetics (PK) characteristics of SA55 injection were evaluated in a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase □ trial based on healthy participants aged 18-65 years. PK parameters (AUC 0-∞ , AUC 0-t , and C max ) were assessed using one-way ANOVA and the Power model. Results demonstrated that SA55 injection with a T max of 12.6 days and a half-life of 103 days. In conclusion, the SA55 injection demonstrates potential for use in the prevention of COVID-19 infection. Introduction Starting from the end of 2019, a novel acute respiratory infection disease rapidly spread worldwide, affecting multiple countries. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the pneumonia outbreak caused by the novel coronavirus a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) [ 1 ] . On March 11, 2020, the WHO declared that the outbreak had entered a phase of international pandemic [ 2 ] . On February 12, 2020, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) announced the official classification name of the novel coronavirus as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), while the WHO simultaneously announced the official name of the disease caused by this virus as COVID-19 [ 3 ] . During the COVID-19 pandemic, various vaccines and therapies for COVID-19 were widely implemented, making significant contributions to the prevention and control of the disease [ 4 , 5 ] The continuous evolution and emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants pose significant challenges to controlling the global pandemic and raise concerns about the efficacy of monoclonal antibody therapies and vaccines [ 6 , 7 ] . Neutralizing antibody (NAb) drugs against SARS-CoV-2 have shown good efficacy in preventing or treating COVID-19 by directly binding to the virus, thereby inhibiting further infection. According to data published by COVID-NMA, as of October 16, 2022, there are more than 370 investigational drugs for the novel coronavirus globally [ 8 ] . The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized the emergency use of several SARS-CoV-2 antibody therapies during the pandemic, including monotherapies such as tocilizumab (Roche), 1% Propofol-Lipuro injection (B. Braun), bamlanivimab (Lilly) [ 9 ] , and sotrovimab (GSK) [ 10 ] ; as well as combination therapies like Evusheld (Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab) (AstraZeneca) [ 11 ] , REGEN-COV (Regeneron) [ 12 , 13 ] , and bamlanivimab/etesevimab (Lilly) [ 14 , 15 ] . According to incomplete statistics, there are currently over 80 candidate drugs for COVID-19 in China approved to initiate clinical trials, with 12 candidate drugs having entered the clinical stage. Among domestic drugs, the combination therapy of bimagrumab and romlusevimab by Brii Biosciences was conditionally approved for marketing by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in December 2021.6 [ 16 ] . With the continuous mutation of the virus, many of the currently available neutralizing antibodies do not meet the needs for COVID-19 prevention and treatment [ 17 ] . Due to the rapid mutation of the spike protein of the novel coronavirus, and since neutralizing antibodies are designed to target the structure of the virus’s spike protein on cells, the use of neutralizing antibodies is limited by the sensitivity of circulating strains to these antibodies [ 18 ] . This has led to the emergence of many variants, posing new challenges for COVID-19 [ 7 , 19 - 23 ] . With the global prevalence of the Omicron variant, the in vitro activity of various neutralizing antibodies against the Omicron strain has rapidly diminished [ 7 ] . New variants have the ability to evade antibodies obtained through vaccination or previous SARS-CoV-2 infections, as well as neutralizing antibody (NAb) drugs targeting SARS-CoV-2 [ 24 ] . Currently, the monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19 approved for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) target the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Although monoclonal antibody combinations (antibody cocktail therapies [ 25 - 27 ] have been developed to prevent potential neutralization escape by targeting multiple viral epitopes, many neutralizing antibody treatments are still evaded by variants of the novel coronavirus [ 20 , 21 , 23 , 28 ] . Currently, the FDA has revoked all Emergency Use Authorizations for the previously issued COVID-19 neutralizing antibodies. Therefore, developing broad-spectrum neutralizing antibodies has become one of the crucial strategies for the global response to the rapid mutation of the novel coronavirus. The ideal drug for treatment should have characteristics of rapid onset and strong potency, as well as broad-spectrum efficacy to address various variants of the novel coronavirus. To achieve these goals, a novel broad-spectrum neutralizing antibody injection, SA55, has been developed. The SA55 injection can bind to the novel coronavirus, thereby preventing the virus from entering host cells and blocking infection. The SA55 antibody was selected using an innovative high-throughput sequencing technology from a library of approximately 13,000 antibodies, which efficiently binds to conserved sites shared by various coronaviruses that are less prone to mutation [ 24 , 29 ] . It effectively neutralized multiple Omicron variants, including BA.1, BA.2, BA.4/5, BF.7, XBB, BQ.1, and BQ.1.1, and is currently the only reported antibody drug globally that has not been evaded by the novel coronavirus [ 30 - 35 ] . Compared to existing therapies for COVID-19, this product possesses unique advantages and is expected to become an ideal choice for treating the novel coronavirus. In this phase □ clinical trial, safety, tolerability, PK characteristics, immunogenicity, and serum neutralizing activity after intramuscular injection of SA55 injection were evaluated in healthy populations aged 18-65 years ( ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06050460 ). In this article, PK characteristics of SA55 injection with 150mg dosage were reported. Objects and Methods Study Drugs This study employs a placebo-controlled design, with both the investigational drug and placebo developed and produced by Sinovac Life Sciences Co., Ltd. The novel coronavirus broad-spectrum neutralizing antibody SA55 injection (Batch number: KC202301001A, Production date: January 3, 2023. Expiry date: January 2, 2025) contains the main component, the novel coronavirus broad-spectrum neutralizing antibody SA55. The placebo for the novel coronavirus broad-spectrum neutralizing antibody SA55 injection (Batch number: 20221228, Production date: December 29, 2022. Expiry date: December 28, 2022) does not contain neutralizing antibodies. Study Participants The protocol and informed consent form were reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Beijing Ditan Hospital of Capital Medical University (NO. DTEC-YW2023-014-01) and the National Medical Products Administration of China before the start of the study. Each healthy participant gave written informed consent to participate in this study after being told of the objectives, procedures, and possible risks of the research. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice, and the relevant regulatory standards. The researchers screened the participants, including physical examinations, 12-lead electrocardiography, laboratory tests, with medical histories being either normal or only mildly abnormal without clinical significance. The inclusion criteria were as follows: Participants recruited on the day of enrollment were males or females aged 18 to 65 years; male participants weighed ≥50.0 kg; female participants weighed ≥45.0 kg, and had a body mass index (BMI) between 18.0 and 28.0 kg/m 2 (inclusive of boundary values). Exclusion criteria include: individuals with known allergies to the investigational drug or any components of the formulation, or to other similar drugs; potential interference at the target injection site (deltoid muscle of the upper arm) that may affect drug administration or local reaction observation; individuals who have received any marketed or investigational SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody injection prior to screening; individuals with a known history of SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination against COVID-19 within the past three months. Study Design This study employs a randomized, controlled, double-blind design, recruiting healthy participants aged 18 to 65 years. Ten participants were planned to be recruited in 150mg group (lowest dose group). After providing informed consent, participants were screened against the inclusion/exclusion criteria and sequentially enrolled from the lowest to the highest dose group. Participants in the lowest dose group received 150mg of the investigational drug or placebo. In 150mg group, participants were randomly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to receive either the SA55 injection or an equivalent volume of placebo (with 8 participants receiving SA55 injection and 2 receiving placebo), with a “sentinel dosing” setup. Specifically, on the day of dosing, 2 participants were enrolled first and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the SA55 injection or placebo. After monitoring for at least 24 hours and confirming the safety of the drug, the remaining 8 participants (with 7 receiving the SA55 injection and 1 receiving placebo) were then be enrolled and randomly assigned. All participants had blood samples collected at various time points (1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 14, 21, 28, 56, 84, 112, 140, 168, 182 days after administratoin) during the study to measure drug concentrations. The test flowchart of 150mg group is shown in Figure 1 . Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Study flowchart of 150mg group. Outcomes The serum PK parameters of SA55 post-administration include T max , C max , elimination half-life (t 1/2 ), clearance rate (CL), apparent volume of distribution (Vd), area under the drug concentration-time curve (AUC 0-t , AUC 0-∞ ), etc. Statistical Analysis Continuous data were expressed as the means ± standard deviation (SD), and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the dose proportionality of the PK parameters AUC 0-∞ , AUC 0-t , and C max . All statistical analyses were performed using statistical software SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina) or later versions. Results Pharmacokinetic Properties According to study protocol, a total of 10 participants in 150mg dose group completed the trial and were included in the PK analysis. The blood concentrations of SA55 injection were analyzed at various time points after administration based on 8 participants received SA55 injection. The average drug concentration-time plots after administration were shown in Figure 2 . The results indicated that the blood concentrations rapidly increased after administration, with peak values observed on Day 6 post-administration. The peak concentrations for the 150mg groups were 23.75 µg/mL The blood concentrations remained relatively stable within Day 29. By Day 183, the blood concentrations had decreased to 6.918 µg/mL ( Figure 2 ). The half-life of SA55 was 103 days. Table1 summarized the main PK parameters of SA55 injection with 150mg single dose. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Pharmacokinetics characteristics (PKCS). Average drug concentration-time plot after administration of 150mg dose groups (A: linear scale, B: semi-logarithmic scale). View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. Summary of pharmacokinetic parameters (PKPS) Discussion This article reported the serum PK characteristics of the SA55 injection with 150mg single dose in healthy participants. The serum PK characteristics of 150mg group indicated a T max approximately 12.6 days. However, the serum concentration increased rapidly 1 day after the administration of SA55 injection, exceeded half of the Cmax, and reached a level approximating the C max by 3 days after administration. This result indicates that the administration of SA55 injection is capable of rapidly achieving elevated plasma levels, which may confer prophylactic or therapeutic benefits. Furthermore, the half-life of SA55 injection exceeds three months, indicated its potential utility as a pre-exposure prophylactic agent against COVID-19, particularly for special populations who are ineligible for or have contraindications to COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusion The PK results indicated that the blood concentration of SA55 increased rapidly, with a half-life exceeds 3 months, suggesting that SA55 injection can provide rapid and long-term protection against COVID-19. This implied that SA55 injection has the potential to serve as treatment and long-acting preventive antibody against COVID-19. Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors Author Contributions X.M., C.H. and R.J. designed and generated the study protocol. Y.C. provided oversight and supervision. Y.Z., J.W., C.H. and R.J. coordinated the trial and responsible for the field work. J.L. conducted the neutralization assays. Z.Y. and J.W. wrote the original draft of the manuscript. X.M., G.Z., J.L. and Y.C. reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors had access to the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Informed Consent Statement Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study. Conflict of interest No competing interests were reported by any other contributing authors. Funding This work was supported by Sinovac Life Sciences Co., Ltd. Acknowledgements We thank all the participants for their contributions to this study, as well as the doctors and nurses who participated in this study. References [1]. ↵ Liu Q , Xu K , Wang X , et al. From SARS to COVID-19: What lessons have we learned? [J] . Journal of infection and public health , 2020 , 13 ( 11 ): 1611 – 8 . OpenUrl [2]. ↵ WHO announces COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic [Z] . 2020 . https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19-11-march-2020 . [Google Scholar] [3]. ↵ The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2 [J] . Nature microbiology , 2020 , 5 ( 4 ): 536 – 44 . OpenUrl PubMed [4]. ↵ Qu L , Yi Z , Shen Y , et ak . Circular RNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and emerging variants [J] . Cell , 2022 , 185 ( 10 ): 1728 - 44.e16 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [5]. ↵ Li G , Hilgenfeld R , Whitley R , et al. Therapeutic strategies for COVID-19: progress and lessons learned [J] . Nature reviews Drug discovery , 2023 , 22 ( 6 ): 449 – 75 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [6]. ↵ Carreño JM , Alshammary H , Tcheou J , et al. Activity of convalescent and vaccine serum against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron [J] . Nature , 2022 , 602 ( 7898 ): 682 – 8 . OpenUrl PubMed [7]. ↵ Cao Y , Wang J , Jian F , et al. Omicron escapes the majority of existing SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies [J] . Nature , 2022 , 602 ( 7898 ): 657 – 63 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [8]. ↵ The COVID-NMA initiative A living mapping and living systematic review of Covid-19 trials [J] . 2023 . https://covid-nma.com/ [Google Scholar] [9]. ↵ Cao Y , Hao X , Wang X , et al. Humoral immunogenicity and reactogenicity of CoronaVac or ZF2001 booster after two doses of inactivated vaccine [J] . Cell research , 2022 , 32 ( 1 ): 107 – 9 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [10]. ↵ Khoshnood S , Ghanavati R , Shirani M , et al. Viral vector and nucleic acid vaccines against COVID-19: A narrative review [J] . Frontiers in microbiology , 2022 , 13 : 984536 . OpenUrl PubMed [11]. ↵ Cohen M S , Nirula A , Mulligan M J , et al. Effect of Bamlanivimab vs Placebo on Incidence of COVID-19 Among Residents and Staff of Skilled Nursing and Assisted Living Facilities: A Randomized Clinical Trial [J] . Jama , 2021 , 326 ( 1 ): 46 – 55 . OpenUrl PubMed [12]. ↵ Westendorf K , Žentelis S , Wang L , et al. LY-CoV1404 (bebtelovimab) potently neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 variants [J] . Cell reports , 2022 , 39 ( 7 ): 110812 . OpenUrl PubMed [13]. ↵ Pinto D , Park Y J , Beltramello M , et al. Cross-neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by a human monoclonal SARS-CoV antibody [J] . Nature , 2020 , 583 ( 7815 ): 290 – 5 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [14]. ↵ Zost S J , Gilchuk P , Case J B , et al. Potently neutralizing and protective human antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 [J] . Nature , 2020 , 584 ( 7821 ): 443 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed [15]. ↵ Hansen J , Baum A , Pascal K E , et al. Studies in humanized mice and convalescent humans yield a SARS-CoV-2 antibody cocktail [J] . Science (New York, NY) , 2020 , 369 ( 6506 ): 1010 – 4 . OpenUrl [16]. ↵ Baral P K , Yin J , James M N G. Treatment and prevention strategies for the COVID 19 pandemic: A review of immunotherapeutic approaches for neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 [J] . International journal of biological macromolecules , 2021 , 186 : 490 – 500 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [17]. ↵ Li C J , Chang S C. SARS-CoV-2 spike S2-specific neutralizing antibodies [J] . Emerging microbes & infections , 2023 , 12 ( 2 ): 2220582 . OpenUrl PubMed [18]. ↵ Cui J , Li F , Shi Z L. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses [J] . Nature reviews Microbiology , 2019 , 17 ( 3 ): 181 – 92 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [19]. ↵ Shi R , Shan C , Duan X , et al. A human neutralizing antibody targets the receptor-binding site of SARS-CoV-2 [J] . Nature , 2020 , 584 ( 7819 ): 120 – 4 . OpenUrl PubMed [20]. ↵ Cao Y , Su B , Guo X , V. Potent Neutralizing Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Identified by High-Throughput Single-Cell Sequencing of Convalescent Patients’ B Cells [J] . Cell , 2020 , 182 ( 1 ): 73 - 84.e16 . OpenUrl PubMed [21]. ↵ Cao Y , Yisimayi A , Jian F , et al. BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection [J] . Nature , 2022 , 608 ( 7923 ): 593 – 602 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [22]. Cele S , Jackson L , Khoury D S , et al. Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization [J] . Nature , 2022 , 602 ( 7898 ): 654 – 6 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [23]. ↵ Wang Q , Guo Y , Iketani S , Nair M S , Li Z , Mohri H , Wang M , Yu J , Bowen A D , Chang J Y , Shah J G , Nguyen N , Chen Z , Meyers K , Yin M T , Sobieszczyk M E , Sheng Z , Huang Y , Liu L , Ho D D. Antibody evasion by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 [J] . Nature , 2022 , 608 ( 7923 ): 603 – 8 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [24]. ↵ Cao Y , Jian F , Zhang Z , et al. Rational identification of potent and broad sarbecovirus-neutralizing antibody cocktails from SARS convalescents [J] . Cell reports , 2022 , 41 ( 12 ): 111845 . OpenUrl PubMed [25]. ↵ Convertino I , Ferraro S , Cappello E , et al. Tixagevimab + cilgavimab against SARS-CoV-2: the preclinical and clinical development and real-world evidence [J] . Expert opinion on drug discovery , 2023 , 18 ( 3 ): 231 – 45 . OpenUrl PubMed [26]. Baum A , Fulton B O , Wloga E , et al. Antibody cocktail to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein prevents rapid mutational escape seen with individual antibodies [J] . Science (New York, NY) , 2020 , 369 ( 6506 ): 1014 – 8 . OpenUrl [27]. ↵ Nguyen H , Lan P D , Nissley D A , et al. Cocktail of REGN Antibodies Binds More Strongly to SARS-CoV-2 Than Its Components, but the Omicron Variant Reduces Its Neutralizing Ability [J] . The journal of physical chemistry B , 2022 , 126 ( 15 ): 2812 – 23 . OpenUrl PubMed [28]. ↵ Tuekprakhon A , Nutalai R , Dijokaite-Guraliuc A , et al. Antibody escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 from vaccine and BA.1 serum [J] . Cell , 2022 , 185 ( 14 ): 2422 - 33.e13 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [29]. ↵ Cao Y , Jian F , Wang J , et al. Imprinted SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity induces convergent Omicron RBD evolution [J] . Nature , 2023 , 614 ( 7948 ): 521 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed [30]. ↵ Cao Y , Song W , Wang L , et al. Characterization of the enhanced infectivity and antibody evasion of Omicron BA.2.75 [J] . Cell host & microbe , 2022 , 30 ( 11 ): 1527 - 39.e5 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [31]. Yang S , Yu Y , Jian F , et al. Antigenicity and infectivity characterisation of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 [J] . The Lancet Infectious diseases , 2023 , 23 ( 11 ): e457 – e9 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [32]. Yang S , Yu Y , Xu Y , et al. Fast evolution of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 to JN.1 under heavy immune pressure [J] . The Lancet Infectious diseases , 2024 , 24 ( 2 ): e70 – e2 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [33]. Yue C , Song W , Wang L , et al. ACE2 binding and antibody evasion in enhanced transmissibility of XBB.1.5 [J] . The Lancet Infectious diseases , 2023 , 23 ( 3 ): 278 – 80 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [34]. Jian F , Feng L , Yang S , et al. Convergent evolution of SARS-CoV-2 XBB lineages on receptor-binding domain 455-456 synergistically enhances antibody evasion and ACE2 binding [J] . PLoS pathogens , 2023 , 19 ( 12 ): e1011868 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [35]. ↵ Yisimayi A , Song W , Wang J , et al. Repeated Omicron exposures override ancestral SARS-CoV-2 immune imprinting [J] . Nature , 2024 , 625 ( 7993 ): 148 – 56 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted February 24, 2025. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Pharmacokinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody SA55 injection in healthy participants Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Pharmacokinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody SA55 injection in healthy participants Yibo Zhou , Xing Meng , Jianhua Li , Jin Wang , Gang Zeng , Yunlong Cao , Chaoying Hu , Ronghua Jin medRxiv 2025.02.22.25322730; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.22.25322730 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Pharmacokinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody SA55 injection in healthy participants Yibo Zhou , Xing Meng , Jianhua Li , Jin Wang , Gang Zeng , Yunlong Cao , Chaoying Hu , Ronghua Jin medRxiv 2025.02.22.25322730; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.22.25322730 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (300) Cardiovascular Medicine (4440) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (444) Dermatology (383) Emergency Medicine (608) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1510) Epidemiology (15229) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1126) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6605) Geriatric Medicine (668) Health Economics (998) Health Informatics (4541) Health Policy (1369) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1613) Hematology (543) HIV/AIDS (1265) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15923) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (623) Medical Ethics (147) Nephrology (668) Neurology (6604) Nursing (346) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1145) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3334) Ophthalmology (974) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1693) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (692) Primary Care Research (711) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5448) Public and Global Health (9235) Radiology and Imaging (2199) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1370) Respiratory Medicine (1196) Rheumatology (594) Sexual and Reproductive Health (712) Sports Medicine (530) Surgery (712) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a016c3414d02f01f',t:'MTc3OTczNTQxMw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00