⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24
· read from full text
ⓘ
The study examined why male germlines show higher mutation rates than female germlines by testing the damage-induced hypothesis, which predicts greater mutation accumulation in males under equal mutagenic stress due to higher damage susceptibility and/or reduced repair. Male and female mice were exposed to mutagenic chemicals or PBS controls, and de novo mutations were assayed by parent-offspring whole-genome sequencing, with mutational signatures and transcriptome analyses used to assess DNA repair pathway involvement. When mutagens increased mutation rates, they increased more in male germlines, and the pattern differed in association with the base excision repair (BER) pathway; transcriptome data showed higher BER gene expression in ovary than testis, exaggerated after mutagen exposure. A key caveat is that the conclusions are limited to the specific mutagens and mouse experimental context tested, rather than broader mutational mechanisms across all damage types. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
In many vertebrates the male germline mutation rate is higher than that of females, so-called male mutation bias, the causes of which are central to numerous molecular evolution debates including the relationship between life history traits and the mutation rate and the cause of the generation time effect. The male bias was classically considered a consequence of the higher number of cell divisions in the male germline, but recently multiple lines of evidence find this to be an inadequate explanation. The revived damage-induced hypothesis posits that males are either more prone to germline damage or less likely to repair damage, leading to more mutations. The model predicts that, when males and females are treated with approximately equal levels of mutagenic stress, the male germline will accumulate more mutations. Here we provide the first test of the damage hypothesis by exposing male and female mice to mutagenic chemicals with both untreated and a non-mutagenic (PBS) controls, assaying de novo mutations via parent-offspring whole-genome sequencing. As predicted, in the instances where the mutagens caused a net increase to the mutation rate, it went up more in male germline. Comparison with established mutational signatures reveals differential involvement of the base excision repair (BER) pathway. Similarly, transcriptome analysis finds higher expression levels of DNA repair genes in ovary compared to testis for those genes in the BER pathway, a difference that becomes more extreme on administration of mutagens. As parental age, hence number of germline cell divisions, is controlled, we conclude that the male mutation bias is, at least in part, owing to differential damage repair with lower base excision repair in males playing a significant role.
Full text
1,867 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
In many vertebrates the male germline mutation rate is higher than that of females, so-called male mutation bias, the causes of which are central to numerous molecular evolution debates including the relationship between life history traits and the mutation rate and the cause of the generation time effect. The male bias was classically considered a consequence of the higher number of cell divisions in the male germline, but recently multiple lines of evidence find this to be an inadequate explanation. The revived damage-induced hypothesis posits that males are either more prone to germline damage or less likely to repair damage, leading to more mutations. The model predicts that, when males and females are treated with approximately equal levels of mutagenic stress, the male germline will accumulate more mutations. Here we provide the first test of the damage hypothesis by exposing male and female mice to mutagenic chemicals with both untreated and a non-mutagenic (PBS) controls, assaying de novo mutations via parent-offspring whole-genome sequencing. As predicted, in the instances where the mutagens caused a net increase to the mutation rate, it went up more in male germline. Comparison with established mutational signatures reveals differential involvement of the base excision repair (BER) pathway. Similarly, transcriptome analysis finds higher expression levels of DNA repair genes in ovary compared to testis for those genes in the BER pathway, a difference that becomes more extreme on administration of mutagens. As parental age, hence number of germline cell divisions, is controlled, we conclude that the male mutation bias is, at least in part, owing to differential damage repair with lower base excision repair in males playing a significant role.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.