Introduction
Recently, many studies reported that radiofrequency ablation
(RFA) is considered to be a safe, effective and minimal invasive
approach with low complication rates and minimal patient
discomfort in the conservative management of uterine fibroids
in selected woman who desire to retain their uterus [1-3].
However, few studies were conducted regarding the adverse
outcomes and the most reported complications are minor
events such as pain, discharge and adhesion without need
for further intervention. Penetration and burn injuries of the
bowel or bladder have never been reported related with RFA
of uterine fibroids. Although it is safe and effective, several
reports showed that RFA can give rise to severe complica -
tions in other organs such as bronchopleural, bronchobiliary
or renoduodenal fistula [4-6]. An enterouterine fistula occurs
extremely rare, some cases have been reported referring to
Crohn’s disease or diverticulitis where it was difficult to save
the uterus and fertility [7-10]. As in our case, a rectouterine
fistula may occur during RFA of a uterine fibroid. Therefore,
thorough counseling of the potential benefits and risks is es-
sential prior to the procedure and the possibility of conductive
thermal injury to the adjacent organs should be borne in mind
by the surgeon.
We present herein, to our knowledge, the first case involv -
ing a rectouterine fistula after laparoscopic ultrasound-guided
RFA of a uterine fibroid with pelvic endometriosis.
Case report
A 36-year-old, nulligravida, unwanted for pregnancy was
referred to our hospital due to persistent dysmenorrhea and
lower back pain following a bilateral uterine artery emboliza-
tion and intrauterine device (Mirena) insertion at a local clinic.
A pelvic magnetic resonance imaging showed a 5-cm-hetero-
geneous mass on the posterior uterine wall, which appeared
to be an intramural fibroid. After thorough counseling on the
Received: 2014.4.30. Revised: 2014.6.4. Accepted: 2014.6.18.
Corresponding author: Chu Y eop Huh
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University
College of Medicine, 23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul
130-872, Korea
Tel: +82-2-958-8329 Fax: +82-2-958-8328
E-mail:
[email protected]
Rectouterine fistula after laparoscopic ultrasound-
guided radiofrequency ablation of a uterine fibroid
Hyo Joo Jeong, Byung-Su Kwon, Young Joon Choi, Chu Yeop Huh
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
In the conservative management of uterine fibroids is radiofrequency ablation (RFA) considered to be one of the
safe, effective and minimal invasive approaches in selected women who desire to retain their uterus. Few studies
were conducted on its adverse outcomes and most of the reported complications were minor events such as pain,
discharge, adhesion which didn’t require any intervention. However, although safe and effective, the RFA of a uterine
myoma can be the cause for severe complications such as penetration and burn injuries of pelvic organs. In general,
a rectouterine fistula is one of the rarest complications but can lead to serious adverse outcomes. Herein, to our
knowledge, we report the first case involving a rectouterine fistula after laparoscopic ultrasound-guided RFA of a
uterine myoma with pelvic endometriosis. In addition, we provide a brief review of the relevant literature.
Keywords
Myolysis; Radiofrequency catheter ablation; Rectouterine fistula
www.ogscience.org554
Vol. 57, No. 6, 2014
potential risks and benefits of the procedure and the possible
alternative surgical treatments was the laparoscopic ultrasound-
guided RFA performed under general anesthesia. A dense ad-
hesion was found in the right cul-de-sac between uterus and
colon. Adhesiolysis and biopsies were performed of the adhe-
sive band and peritoneum and an endometriosis was later con-
firmed. A 16-gauge RFA needle was percutaneously inserted
and placed within the target fibroid under laparoscopic video
and transvaginal ultrasound guidance. The RF delivery system
(M1004, RF Medical Co., Seoul, Korea) was applied twice with
a maximum power of 120 watt and a maximum temperature
of 85℃ for 5 minutes. The patient was discharged without
any complications. However, she visited the hospital for bloody
anal discharge and vaginal leakage of stool after two weeks
of discharge. During her visit were the vital signs stable, but a
leukocytosis (white blood cell 12,820/μL) and an elevation of C-
reactive protein (1.4 mg/dL) were observed. The colonoscopy
showed a white, marginal protruding mucosal defect about 9
cm above the anal verge (Fig. 1). A pelvic computed tomog -
raphy and a hysterosalpingogram revealed a fistula between
the posterior uterine wall and the rectum (Fig. 2). The patient
underwent a rectal fistula wedge resection and ileostomy and
total abdominal hysterectomy due to severe inflammation and
necrosis in the uterine cavity. Two months later, the fluoroscopic
examination of the pouchgram showed an improved rectouter-
ine fistula and no leakage of contrast media, thus a take-down
of the ileostomy was performed. There was no further clinical
problem afterward for one year of follow-up.
Discussion
RFA has become a widespread technique for achieving local
control of tumors in various organs which are no resection can-
Fig. 1. The colon oscopy shows a white, marginal protruding, mucosal
defect about 9 cm above the anal verge.
Fig. 2. (A) The pelvic computed tomography and (B) hysterosalpingogram reveals a fistula between the posterior uterine wall and the rectum.
A B
www.ogscience.org 555
Hyo Joo Jeong, et al. Rectouterine fistula after myolysis
didates involving the liver, kidney and lungs. Especially, in the
conservative management of uterine fibroids is RFA considered
to be one of the safe, effective and minimal invasive approach-
es for women who desire to retain their uterus [1-3]. Recent
studies showed about 65% to 80% of myoma volume reduc-
tion 6 months after the procedure. The symptoms improvement
rate was about the same [1,2].
Complications after RFA are rare, but Kim et al. [2] presented
lower abdominal pain and vaginal discharge that improved
within 2 weeks and Garza et al. [1] also described abdominal
pain, urinary tract infection and abdominal vascular injury
which were solved without any problem. However, severe ther-
mal injuries and complications can occur during RFA of uterine
fibroids. There was an unusual case where a total abdominal
hysterectomy was performed due to a uterine abscess which
was formed after myolysis [11]. Also there are several case re-
ports on severe complications after RFA in other organs, espe-
cially fistulas, such as bronchopleural, bronchobiliary and reno-
duodenal which were treated by massive antibiotics or surgical
resection [4-6].
Generally, fistulous formation rarely occurs between the
uterus and intestinal tract and it is thought to be related to the
great thickness of the uterine wall. The causes implicated are
traumatic or spontaneous rupture of a gravid uterus, perfora-
tion of the uterine wall and bowel with an intrauterine device,
inflammatory diseases or malignancy of pelvic organs [7-10].
Patchell et al. [7] reported a rectouterine fistula after the mal-
positioned Cu-7 intrauterine contraceptive device with spon-
taneous closure. Stoddard et al. [8] presented a patient with a
rectouterine fistula in Crohn’s disease after the performance of
a transverse colostomy without hysterectomy. Dias et al. [10]
also reported a patient with ileouterine fistula in Crohn’s dis-
ease, which was corrected by an ileocecal resection and surgical
repair of the uterus. Sentilhes et al. [9] reported a colouterine
fistula, secondary to diverticulitis, which was treated with an en
bloc resection of the uterus and sigmoid colon. In the treatment
of an enterouterine fistula, an active surgical treatment is usual-
ly indicated depending upon the etiology, the patient’s age and
the state of lesions, etc. So, each case must be individualized as
soon as it is encountered.
During a RFA, the fibroid should be carefully monitored by
ultrasonography and the duration of ablation should be de -
termined based on the increased echogenicity of the fibroid
to minimize a thermal injury due a RFA. The progression of
ablation is considered to be good if a postechogenic shadow
is observed. The ablation should be discontinued when the
fibroid exhibits high echogenicity during ablation and the area
of high echogenicity reaches 90% of the fibroid. Generally, an
increased echogenicity disappears 20 minutes after ablation.
The complete ablation of a 3-cm-large myoma usually takes
5 minutes, while that of an approximately 5-cm-sized myoma
takes almost 10 minutes. Multiple overlapping ablation cycles
to obtain complete ablation should be carefully performed for
fibroids with a mean diameter greater than 5 cm [12].
In our thought, a uterus related fistula may generally less oc-
cur due to the thickness of the myometrium. However, a fistula
in adjacent organs can occur during RFA of a uterine fibroid by
thermal damage if safe procedure guidelines such as depth of
needle insertion, duration of lysis and monitoring by ultraso -
nography are not kept.
Recently, several studies proved the safety and effectiveness
of RFA for uterine fibroids either by a laparoscopic transabdomi-
nal or transvaginal approach. However, there is no comparative
study between the laparoscopic transabdominal and transvagi-
nal approach. In our opinion, the laparoscopic transabdominal
approach would minimize the thermal damage in cases of sus-
pected severe adhesions or co-existing endometriosis.
Before the RFA of uterine fibroids should be considered
myoma-related symptoms, previous medical treatment, number
of myoma and the plan for future pregnancies [2,3]. Generally,
RFA is not recommended for cases of huge multiple myoma,
current pregnancy, suspected malignancy, abnormal coagula-
tion test, recent pelvic inflammatory disease and so on [1-3]. Up
to now, there has been no complete consensus on its indica-
tions and contraindications.
No safety on RFA in uterine fibroids has established yet in
women with future planned pregnancy. Several adverse out-
comes related to subsequent pregnancies, such as uterine
rupture were reported after RFA [13,14]. However, Phillips et
al. [15] reported cases of uncomplicated full-term pregnancies
indicating that viable pregnancies were possible after laparo-
scopic myolysis and Kim et al. [2] reported three patients that
experienced successful conception and childbirth after RF my-
olysis procedure. Therefore, it is important to carefully select pa-
tients for RFA, considering the number, size and location of the
myoma as well as the age and pregnancy plans of the patients.
In summary, a rectouterine fistula is very rare, but it can pos-
sibly occur during the RFA of a uterine fibroid. In such cases,
it may be difficult to conduct the conservative management
preserving the uterus or fertility due to severe inflammation or
necrosis of the endometrium. Therefore, thorough counseling
of the potential benefits and risks is essential prior to the proce-
www.ogscience.org556
Vol. 57, No. 6, 2014
dure and the possibility of conductive thermal injury to the ad-
jacent organs should be borne in mind by the surgeon in cases
with suspected severe adhesions or co-existing endometriosis.
Herein, to our knowledge, we report the first case involving a
rectouterine fistula after laparoscopic ultrasound-guided RFA of
a uterine fibroid together with a literature review.
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was
reported.
References
1. Garza Leal JG, Hernandez Leon I, Castillo Saenz L, Lee
BB. Laparoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency
volumetric thermal ablation of symptomatic uterine leio -
myomas: feasibility study using the Halt 2000 Ablation
System. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011;18:364-71.
2. Kim CH, Kim SR, Lee HA, Kim SH, Chae HD, Kang BM.
Transvaginal ultrasound-guided radiofrequency myolysis
for uterine myomas. Hum Reprod 2011;26:559-63.
3. Guido RS, Macer JA, Abbott K, Falls JL, Tilley IB, Chud -
noff SG. Radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation
of fibroids: a prospective, clinical analysis of two years’
outcome from the Halt trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes
2013;11:139.
4. Li W, Huang L, Han Y, Zhou Y, Lu Q, Li X. Broncho -
pleural fistula after non small cell lung cancer radiofre -
quency ablation: what it implying to us? Diagn Pathol
2013;8:202.
5. Kim YS, Rhim H, Sung JH, Kim SK, Kim Y, Koh BH, et al.
Bronchobiliary fistula after radiofrequency thermal ablation
of hepatic tumor. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005;16:407-10.
6. De Arruda HO, Goldman S, Andreoni C, Maia RS, Sze -
jnfeld J, Ortiz V. Renoduodenal fistula after renal tumor
ablation with radiofrequency. Surg Laparosc Endosc Per -
cutan Tech 2006;16:342-3.
7. Patchell RD. Rectouterine fistula associated with the
Cu-7 intrauterine contraceptive device. Am J Obstet Gy -
necol 1976;126:292-3.
8. Stoddard CJ, Irvin TT. Rectouterine fistulation in Crohn’s
disease. Br Med J 1977;1:1574-5.
9. Sentilhes L, Foulatier O, Verspyck E, Roman H, Scotte M,
Marpeau L. Colouterine fistula complicating diverticulitis:
a case report and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet
Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;110:107-10.
10. Dias VC, Lago P , Santos M. Ileouterine fistula: an unusual
complication of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis
2008;14:1465-6.
11. Kim HW, Han KH, Cha DS, Kim TH, Kwon MS, Park EY.
Uterine abscess after radiofrequency myolysis of uter -
ine myoma: a case report. Korean J Obstet Gynecol
2007;50:1778-81.
12. Kim JH. Radiofrequency myolysis of uterine myoma. J
Womens Med 2008;1:1-5.
13. Vilos GA, Daly LJ, Tse BM. Pregnancy outcome after lapa-
roscopic electromyolysis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc
1998;5:289-92.
14. Arcangeli S, Pasquarette MM. Gravid uterine rupture af -
ter myolysis. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:857.
15. Phillips DR, Milim SJ, Nathanson HG, Haselkorn JS. Ex -
perience with laparoscopic leiomyoma coagulation and
concomitant operative hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gyne -
col Laparosc 1997;4:425-33.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.