High Diversity of Small Insectivorous Mammals on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and First Description of Karyotype for four Endemics of China

High Diversity of Small Insectivorous Mammals on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and First Description of Karyotype for four Endemics of China | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article High Diversity of Small Insectivorous Mammals on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and First Description of Karyotype for four Endemics of China Svetlana V. Pavlova, Vladimir S. Lebedev, Vasily D. Yakushov, and 4 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-793070/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 01 Dec, 2021 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted 8 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Among seven species of the order Eulipotyphla (from southern Gansu and northern Sichuan Provinces, Central China) studied cytogenetically, karyotypes of one talpid species, Uropsilus aff. soricipes (2n = 36, NF a = 54), and three soricid species, Chodsigoa hypsibia (2n = 65, NF a = 66), Sorex cansulus (2n = 42, NF a = 64) and Sorex thibetanus (2n = 42, NF a = 60), are described cytogenetically for the first time. All four species are endemic to China with distribution ranges restricted to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and adjacent mountain ranges. The Ch. hypsibia karyotype consists of mostly acrocentric autosomes and one metacentric pair of autosomes; besides, a B chromosome was identified. No polymorphism was detected among karyotypes of other species, including shrews Sorex bedfordiae (2n = 26, NF a = 44), Anourosorex squamipes (2n = 48, NF a = 92) and Crocidura suaveolens (2n = 40, NF a = 44). The Chinese shrew mole U. aff. soricipes and three shrew species ( S. bedfordiae , Ch. hypsibia and A. squamipes ) represent autochthonous fauna of Central/Western China, whereas S. thibetanus , S. cansulus and C. suaveolens belong to phylogenetic groups occurring mostly to the north and west from China; therefore, they should be considered relatively recent colonisers. Thus, considering the relationships of the species within phylogenetic groups, our results on karyotypes are in good agreement with molecular genetic data. Scientific Communication Evolutionary Biology chromosome variation banding Chinese shrew mole shrew autochthonous species taxonomy Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Introduction The territory of China is characterised by high species diversity of insectivorous mammals (Eulipotyphla) including 13 genera of shrews (Soricomorpha), seven genera of moles (Talpomorpha) and six genera of hedgehogs and gymnures (Erinaceomorpha) 1 – 6 , some of which are relict representatives of highly divergent ancient lineages (e.g. Uropsilus and Anourosorex ). At the same time, certain genera (e.g. Chodsigoa , Episoriculus and Uropsilus ) have their centres of extensive radiation in southern and central China 2 ; this observation explains high richness and endemism at the species level. In recent years, the rate of new species discovery increased substantially. According to seminal ‘A Guide to the Mammals of China’ (2008) 5 , Chinese fauna includes only 72 eulipotyphlan species (seven species of hedgehogs, 15 species of moles and 50 species of shrews), while ‘The Mammals of the World’ published in 2018 lists as many as 87 species (nine species of hedgehogs, 20 species of moles and 58 shrews) 2 , 3 , 6 , not including two more species of hedgehogs ( Mesechinus miodon and M. wangi ), which were recognised and described in a later revision 4 , and a recently reported new monotypic genus of scalopine moles ( Alpiscaptulus ) 1 . Most of the newly described species have been discovered in China by molecular genetic methods, which continue to play an increasingly important role in the identification of cryptic species 7 – 9 . Nonetheless, variation in other characteristics that can be informative for taxonomic purposes is still studied insufficiently, including parameters of karyotypes. Currently, there are no published cytogenetic data on 40% of species of Chinese shrews (23 species) and moles (nine species), while all species of hedgehogs inhabiting China are already karyotyped 3,10−12 . Chromosomal information on many autochthonous species has been unavailable, including endemics and sub-endemics of China (for example, members of genera Sorex , Uropsilus , Nectogale , Chimarrogale and Euroscaptor ). For cytogenetically analysed species, often only routinely stained sets of chromosomes are reported (for example, for Anourosorex squamipes , Uropsilus andersoni , Scaptonyx fusicaudus and Episoriculus sacratus ); this is certainly not enough to establish relationships between closely related species 13 . It should be emphasised that cytogenetic data have greatly contributed to the progress in the systematics 14 – 16 of many groups of Eulipotyphla (e.g. Sorex ). A high rate of chromosomal rearrangements can facilitate speciation via fixation of incompatible chromosomal variants in geographically isolated populations 17 , 18 . Considering that complex topography and climatic history of the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) have definitely promoted habitat fragmentation and population isolation, one may expect that at least in some groups, there would be high levels of chromosomal variation among otherwise cryptic lineages. Accordingly, the aim of our work was to present new cytogenetic data along with the first description of karyotypes of several insectivores from the eastern edge of the QTP, by focusing on Minshan. Some of these species are narrow-range local endemics ( Sorex cansulus ), while others belong to species complexes occurring throughout Hengduan and adjacent territories ( S. bedfordiae , Uropsilus sp. and A. squamipes ) or even across Eurasia ( Crocidura ex gr. suaveolens ). Results Seven insectivorous species belonging to five genera and two families, Talpidae and Soricidae, were cytogenetically studied. Karyotypes of four endemics of China ( Uropsilus aff. soricipes , Sorex thibetanus , S. cansulus and Chodsigoa hypsibia ) are described for the first time; as for the remaining species, new additional information is provided (Table 1 , Fig. 1 ). Table 1 A summary of karyotypes of the analysed species collected in China. Only a female individual of Sorex thibetanus was karyotyped, and therefore sex chromosomes could not be identified. N, sample size; 2n, diploid chromosomal number; NF a , fundamental number of autosome arms; M/SM, metacentric or submetacentric; ST, subtelocentric; A, acrocentric; B, B chromosome; X and Y, sex chromosome. Species karyotyped for the first time are highlighted in bold. Species N 2n NF a M/SM ST A B X Y Family Talpidae Uropsilus aff. soricipes 1 36 54 2 8 7 - M dot A Family Soricidae Sorex bedfordiae 9 26 44 8 2 2 - A A Sorex thibetanus 1 42 60 9 1 10 - A ? Sorex cansulus 3 42 64 11 2 7 - A dot A Anourosorex squamipes 2 48 92 23 0 0 - M ST Chodsigoa hypsibia 1 65 66 1 0 30 0/1 A A Crocidura suaveolens 1 40 44 2 1 16 - ST A Family Talpidae One male individual of the Chinese shrew mole U. aff. soricipes Milne-Edwards, 1871, endemic to China (G18-213), was collected at site No. 3. The karyotype is presented for the first time: 2n=36, NF a =54 (Figure 2a). The autosomal set consists of 10 bi-armed and seven single-armed chromosomes: one large metacentric pair (chromosome 1) and one mid-size submetacentric pair (chromosome 4), eight large-to-small subtelocentric pairs (chromosomes 2, 3 and 5–10) and seven large-to-small acrocentric pairs (chromosomes 11–17). After the G-banding pattern was assessed, the small metacentric and smallest acrocentric were identified as X and Y chromosomes, respectively (Table 1, Figure 2b). Silver-positive dots were tentatively registered close to centromeres in one mid-size subtelocentric pair, chromosome 4 (Figure 2c). C-positive heterochromatic blocks were found to be located in centromeric regions of all autosomes except for two subtelocentric pairs, chromosomes 2 and 8, which have fully heterochromatic short p-arms. Visible C-blocks were revealed at a terminal position of q-arms in two autosome pairs, chromosomes 4 and 14. Less darkly stained C-bands were visible at interstitial positions of pair number 8. The X chromosome is C-negative, whereas the Y chromosome stains positively throughout the entire chromosome arm (Figure 2d). Family Soricidae As for lesser striped shrews ( Sorex bedfordiae Thomas, 1911), nine specimens (G17-77, G17-81, G17-82, G17-83, G17-86, G17-89, G18-171, G18-172, G18-175 and G18-176) were collected at all sites except No. 3 and 4. The diploid chromosome number in all the karyotypes is 2n=26, NF a =44 (Figure 3a). The autosomal set consists of eight large-to-small meta- or submetacentric pairs (chromosomes 1–8), one small and one large subtelocentric pair (chromosomes 9 and 10) and one large (chromosome 11) and one smallest (chromosome 12) acrocentric pair (Table 1). The X and Y chromosomes are represented by the mid-size and small acrocentrics, respectively. Silver nitrate staining revealed terminal localisation of nucleolus organiser regions (NORs) on short p-arms of the large acrocentric pair (chromosome 11) only (Figure 3b). One female individual of the Tibetan shrew S. thibetanus Kastschenko, 1905 (G18-2), endemic to China, was collected at site No. 2. The karyotype is presented for the first time: 2n=42, NF a =60 (Figure 4a). The autosomal set consists of nine large-to-small meta- or submetacentric pairs (chromosome 1–9), one large subtelocentric pair (chromosome 10) and 10 medium-to-small acrocentric pairs (chromosomes 11–20). Two mid-size acrocentrics were identified as X chromosomes. Silver nitrate staining revealed terminal localisation of NORs on short p-arms of a small acrocentric pair only (Figure 4a, inset). For the Gansu shrew S. cansulus Thomas, 1912, endemic to China, three specimens (G17-72, G18-79 and G18-80) were collected at sites No. 4 and 5. The karyotype is presented for the first time: 2n=42, NF a =64 (Figure 4b). The autosomal set is composed of 20 bi-armed and eight single-armed autosomes. Among them, there are five large metacentric pairs (chromosomes 1–5) and one small metacentric pair (chromosome 6), four large (chromosomes 7–10) and two small (chromosomes 11 and 12) submetacentric pairs and eight medium-to-smallest subtelocentric pairs (chromosomes 13–20). Two large acrocentrics and a dot-like acrocentric are XX and Y chromosomes, respectively (Figure 4b, inset). Silver nitrate staining revealed terminal localisation of NORs on short p-arms of two small bi-armed pairs (Figure 4b, inset). As for De Winton’s shrew Ch. hypsibia (de Winton, 1899), endemic to China, one male (G18-290) was collected at site No. 3. The karyotype is presented for the first time: 2n=65, NF a =66. The autosomal set consists of 30 large-to-small acrocentric pairs (chromosomes 1–30) gradually decreasing in size, one small metacentric pair (chromosome 31) and an unpaired small metacentric chromosome, which apparently is a B chromosome (Figure 5a). C-heterochromatic blocks were revealed in pericentromeric regions of 27 acrocentric pairs (chromosomes 3–29). Two large acrocentric pairs (chromosomes 1 and 2) and one smallest acrocentric pair (chromosome 30) as well as the small metacentric pair are C-negative. Slightly visible blocks of interstitial heterochromatin were noted on the B chromosome. Because one acrocentric chromosome has a large pericentromeric C-block, we identified it as an X chromosome (Figure 5b). The Y chromosome was tentatively identified as an acrocentric chromosome and therefore is marked by an asterisk (as is the B chromosome). Silver nitrate staining uncovered centromeric localisation of NORs in three medium-to-small acrocentrics (Figure 5c). Two specimens of the Chinese mole shrew A. squamipes Milne-Edwards, 1872 (G17-140 and G18-336), were collected at sites No. 1 and 3. The studied male and female karyotypes do not differ from those reported previously 19 : 2n=48, NF a =92. The autosomal set is composed of 23 large-to-small meta- or submetacentric pairs gradually decreasing in size. In a male karyotype, the largest metacentric and small subtelocentric were identified as the X chromosome and Y chromosome, respectively (Figure 6a). A male individual of the lesser white-toothed shrew C. suaveolens Pallas, 1811 (G17-68), was caught at site No. 5. The diploid chromosome number was found to be 2n=40, NF a =44 (Figure 6b). The autosomal set consists of three bi-armed pairs (chromosomes 1–3) and 16 single-armed pairs (chromosomes 4–19). The X chromosome is represented by a medium subtelocentric chromosome, and the Y chromosome by a small acrocentric. Discussion Among the seven studied species of the order Eulipotyphla from southern Gansu and northern Sichuan Provinces, China, four species were analysed cytogenetically for the first time ( U. aff. soricipes , Ch. hypsibia , S. thibetanus and S. cansulus ). In Talpidae, the most primitive subfamily Uropsilinae includes a single genus ( Uropsilus ), which formerly consisted of Uropsilus andersoni , U. gracilis , U. soricipes , U. investigator and U. aequodonenia 20 , 21 ; later, U. nivatus and U. atronates were also recognised as valid species 9 . One more new species, U. dabieshanensis sp. nov., was recently described based on morphological and molecular genetic data 22 ; thus, now the genus is thought to comprise seven species. At least 15 monophyletic lineages of Uropsilus have been recognised using molecular markers, and it seems that the taxonomic diversity of this genus may still be underestimated 9 , 22 . Until now, karyotypes of only two species, U. nivatus and U. andersoni , have been reported. Note that during the description of the karyotype 23 , U. nivatus was regarded as a subspecies of U. gracilis 24 but was later elevated to full species rank 9 . The karyotype was described for an individual from an area inhabited only by U. nivatus ; therefore, we use this name for the species, whose karyotype has been reported by Kawada et al. 23 . Despite the same 2n = 34, these karyotypes differ in chromosomal morphology as evidenced by a difference in NF a , which is 46 and 52 in U. nivatus and U. andersoni , respectively 13 , 23 . This variation is caused by a difference in the number of the subtelo- and acrocentric autosomes. Because only the conventional karyotype is reported for U. andersoni , it is difficult to compare the homologous arms and determine possible rearrangements between these two species. Moreover, the variation in the size of the short arms can be a consequence of some nuances of obtaining the chromosome preparations and then can lead to incorrect determination of NF a . Altogether, the authors 13 concluded that the karyotype of U. andersoni is similar to that of U. nivatus. The U. aff. soricipes karyotype (2n = 36, NF a = 56), described here for the first time, differs from those of the two species mentioned above by smaller numbers of meta- and submetacentric pairs (two pairs instead of four in both U. nivatus and U. andersoni ) and a larger number of subtelo- and acrocentric pairs (in total, 15 pairs instead of 12). The comparison of homologous chromosome arms between the U. nivatus and U. soricipes karyotypes indicates that all chromosome arms match between the two species, judging by the G-band pattern. Two small acrocentric pairs (chromosomes 15 and 16) in U. soricipes correspond to metacentric pair No. 2 in the U. nivatus karyotype. Accordingly, the lower 2n in U. nivatus , and apparently in U. andersoni , can be explained by a single Robertsonian fusion resulting in a new metacentric pair. Moreover, these species show a difference in the size of the acrocentric Y chromosome, which is larger in U. aff. soricipes than in the other two species. The silver nitrate staining performed on U. nivatus and U. soricipes chromosomes did not reveal any differences between the karyotypes (the NOR is located within a secondary constriction in subtelocentric pair No. 3 in both species). Thus, more detailed cytogenetic data are needed to investigate karyotype evolution within the genus Uropsilus. Here we present new findings about the karyotypes of six species of soricids, three of them are described karyotypically for the first time: Ch. hypsibia , S. thibetanus and S. cansulus. S. bedfordiae belongs to the east Tibetan group of striped shrews, which includes S. cylindricauda and S. excelsus 7 , 25 . Previous cytogenetic research has uncovered intraspecific karyotypic variation within S. bedfordiae ; 2n = 24–26 and 28 have been reported (Yunnan 26 ; Sichuan 13 ; southern Gansu 27 ). In the present study, we found no polymorphic variants among the nine karyotyped individuals; all the shrews have equal chromosome sets: 2n = 26, NF = 46. In our previous work, karyotypes of two females from Lianhuashan Natural Reserve (site No. 2) were reported 27 to contain a smaller number of chromosomal arms: 2n = 26, NF = 44. After re-checking of that material, it turned out that those two individuals are characterised by the same karyotype structure (2n = 26, NF = 46) as the three shrews described here. Previously, karyotypes with 2n = 26, NF = 46 were detected in three S. bedfordiae individuals from Mt. Laojun (3900 m a.s.l.), Lijiang District in northern Yunnan province 26 . With the exception of one much larger subtelocentric pair (chromosome 10), those karyotypes were very similar to those described here. The lack of G-banded karyograms for the individuals from Yunnan makes it impossible to compare the homology of chromosomes between them in more detail. Additionally, these authors identified a 2n = 28 karyotype with an additional pair of small metacentrics. Nevertheless, they hypothesised that either it belongs to another species that closely resembles S. bedfordiae , e.g. Sorex cylindricauda , or the additional metacentric pair is the B chromosome. Among the eight S. bedfordiae specimens from Mount Emei (3000 m a.s.l.) in central Sichuan Province 13 , two karyotype variants have been found: ‘2n = 24, NF = 46’ and ‘2n = 25, NF = 48’, which differ from each other by the presence of a supernumerary (B) metacentric chromosome in the latter. Besides a lack of B chromosomes, all the 2n = 26, NF = 46 karyotypes described in our study are characterised by the presence of an additional small acrocentric pair (chromosome 12) and a different length of one subtelocentric pair (chromosome 9, Fig. 7 ). A comparison of homologous chromosome arms between these G-banded karyotypes (2n = 24/25 and 2n = 26 from this study) indicated that they differ by structural rearrangements in three autosome pairs. The chromosomal rearrangements consist of a pericentric inversion and possible centromeric shift in the largest pair No. 1 and a Robertsonian translocation between telocentric pairs No. 11 and 12, which led to the formation of a large subtelocentric pair (chromosome 9). A tandem fusion between a small metacentric (pair No. 8) and a part of the p-arm of large metacentric No. 2 gave rise to a large subtelocentric pair (No. 11) in 2n = 24/25 karyotypes (Fig. 7 ). Molecular genetic studies point to the existence of eight highly divergent mitochondrial lineages among the shrews affiliated with the ‘cylindricauda’ group (five within S. bedfordiae , two in S. excelsus and one in S. cylindricauda ) occurring on the eastern and southeastern edge of the QTP 7 . We did not aim to revise the intraspecific taxonomy of this group; however, it is worth noting that on the basis of the geographic origin and published genetic data 25 , all the karyotyped individuals presented here correspond to clade B, while those that have been reported by Moribe et al. 26 and Motokawa et al. 13 belong to other mitochondrial clades. Therefore, in this case, the molecular genetic differences match the karyotypic ones. According to the recent phylogenetic analysis 25 , the Tibetan shrew belongs to the ‘ minutus s.l.’ group together with S. minutissimus , S. gracillimus and a species endemic to Honshu Island, S. hosonoi . Nonetheless, karyotypic characteristics of S. gracillimus and S. minutissimus are close to those of the ‘caecutiens’ group but not those of the ‘ minutus s.str.’ group 16 , 28 . Among these four species, S. gracillimus has a lower diploid number of chromosomes, 2n = 36, NF a = 60 29 , whereas both S. hosonoi 30 and the S. thibetanus described here are characterised by the same number, 2n = 42, but differ in NF a : at 60 and 66, respectively. The karyotypic status of S. minutissimus is still not clear; 2n = 38 and 42 have been reported for the species from two distinct areas, Finland 31 and Siberia 32 . Despite the absence of a 2n = 42 karyogram, in both cases, those authors reported 33 that the karyotypes consist of mostly bi-armed autosomes and single-armed sex chromosomes with the same NF a , 72. It is worth noting that the S. thibetanus karyotype contains 10 bi-armed autosomes, which is the smallest number of these among the other three species. Except for our results on S. thibetanus , there are no data on the localisation of NORs in these species. On the basis of molecular data, the Tibetan shrew has been estimated to have diverged from other members of ‘ minutus s.l.’ (most likely from S. gracillimus ) 2.0–2.5 million years ago (Mya) 25 . This age corresponds to the earliest possible time of QTP colonisation by the Tibetan shrew. The karyotypic data overall match the data from molecular genetic analysis indicating that S. thibetanus is affiliated with the eastern branch of the ‘ minutus s.l.’ group 25 . The latest multilocus nuclear and mitochondrial phylogeny 25 of the nominal subgenus Sorex s.str. revealed that the ‘ caecutiens ’ species group is composed of five members: S. caecutiens , S. isodon , S. unguiculatus , S. shinto and S. cansulus. Among them, karyotypes of the first four species are known to be very similar (2n = 42, NF a = 64–66) 16,34,35 . The chromosomal set of the Gansu shrew S. cansulus has been unknown; here, for the first time, we demonstrated that this species has the same number of chromosomes, 2n = 42. A conventionally stained S. cansulus karyotype (NF a = 64) turned out to be quite similar in its morphological structure to species with NF a = 64 ( S. isodon , S. unguiculatus and S. shinto). It has been documented that G-banding patterns are very conserved among S. caecutiens , S. shinto and S. unguiculatus karyotypes, which differ from each other by pericentric inversions 29 . The karyotype of S. caecutiens (NF a = 66) differs 35 from these species by an additional pericentric inversion in pair No. 8 and a centromeric shift in pair No. 12. There are no data on differentially stained karyotypes of the other species. In S. cansulus , NORs were detected for the first time in satellite regions of two small telocentric pairs, No. 19 and 20. The same localisation of NORs has been found in S. unguiculatus 29 . As Zima et al. 16 have mentioned, ‘all species of this group with 42 chromosomes possess pronounced satellites in two small autosomal pairs’. Evidently, these autosomes bear NORs in all species, but only S. cansulus and S. unguiculatus karyotypes have been stained. According to molecular data, the Gansu shrew separated from its most probable sister group ( S. caecutiens ) 1.5–2.0 Mya 25 , which is somewhat later in comparison with S. thibetanus . Consequently, one may theorise that the Gansu shrew is a more recent coloniser than the Tibetan shrew. Our karyotypic data overall match the data from molecular genetic analysis suggesting that S. cansulus belongs to the eastern branch of the ‘ caecutiens s.l.’ group 25 . Within the subfamily Soricinae , the tribe Anourosoricini is composed of four species 20 : Anourosorex assamensis Anderson, 1875, A. schmidi Petter, 1963, A. squamipes Milne-Edwards, 1872, and A. yamashinai Kuroda, 1935. Among them, karyotypic data have not been published for A. schmidi . A. yamashinai , endemic to Taiwan, has been studied using a set of differential stains and has 2n = 50, NF a = 96 36 , whereas only conventionally stained karyograms are available for A. squamipes (2n = 48, NF a = 92) collected in Fuleshan, Mianyang-shi, Sichuan Province, China 19 , and for A. assamensis from Tiddim Town of Chin State, western Myanmar (2n = 50, NF a = 96) 37 . Our results show that the structure of the A. squamipes routine karyotype does not differ from that reported previously: 2n = 48, NF a = 92. It has been demonstrated that the A. yamashinai karyotype 19 contains two pairs of the large subtelocentrics that are missing in A. squamipes. Thus, species of the genus Anourosorex share a similarity of the karyotype, even though they are geographically distant from each other, as is the case, for example, for A. yamashinai (Taiwan) and A. assamensis (south-western China, south-eastern Tibet, north-eastern India and west-central Myanmar). The taxonomic status of shrews of the genus Chodsigoa has changed many times. Previously, eight species have been recognised in the genus 5 , 20 , then new species, Chodsigoa hoffmanni sp. nov., was described on the basis of sequencing data from one mitochondrial and two nuclear genes 8 . Now nine species are attributed to the genus. De Winton’s shrew Ch. hypsibia is endemic to China and occurs in central and southern provinces: south-eastern Qinghai, southern Gansu, southern Shaanxi, eastern Tibet, Sichuan, northern Yunnan and southern Anhui 2 . So far, karyotypic data on the genus Chodsigoa have been limited to one chromosome set that is described for a species endemic to Taiwan, Chodsigoa sodalis (2n = 44, NF = 88) 38 . The conventionally stained karyotype of this species consists of all bi-armed chromosomes; sex chromosomes have not been identified. The Ch. hypsibia karyotype stands out because all chromosomes are acrocentrics except one small metacentric pair of autosomes (chromosome 31) and an unpaired metacentric B chromosome (2n = 65, NF a = 66). On the basis of C-banding patterns, the X and Y sex chromosomes in the studied male were identified as a large acrocentric and medium acrocentric, respectively. The large differences between the Ch. hypsibia (almost completely acrocentric) and Ch. sodalis (almost completely metacentric) karyotypes may be explained by the more ancient origin of Ch. hypsibia . To some extent, this notion is confirmed by large molecular genetic differences between Ch. hypsibia and most of other species of this genus. In the genus Episoriculus , closely related to Chodsigoa , there are also large differences in the number of metacentric and acrocentric chromosomes between E. caudatus with 2n = 60, NF = 118 (M + SM = 19, ST = 9, A = 1) and E. soluensis with 2n = 74, NF = 126 (M + SM = 12, ST = 13, A = 11) 39 . Those authors consider E. soluensis a subspecies of E. saсratus soluensis . The lesser white-toothed shrew C. suaveolens inhabits a huge area, from Europe to Asia. The species is characterised by a mostly stable karyotype with 2n = 40, NF = 50, but some authors have reported chromosome sets 2n = 41–42, NF = 52, 54, which result from the presence of supernumerary (B) chromosomes (see review 16 ). In a previous work, a 2n = 40, NF = 50 karyotype was identified in a female individual of C. suaveolens from the vicinity of the Goin Ba village in southern Gansu Province 27 . The specimen described here has 2n = 40 but a smaller number of chromosomal arms, NF = 48, owing to three bi-armed chromosome pairs instead of four. Unfortunately, highly condensed chromosomal arms in a low-quality chromosomal suspension did not allow us to clearly distinguish a possible fourth pair of bi-armed chromosomes. Thus, we cannot be completely sure that this specimen differs by a lower fundamental number of arms from those reported previously. In a previous report, we showed that lesser white-toothed shrews from the QTP are close relatives of Cr. suaveolens s.str. (p-distance ~ 3%) 27 . Therefore, we can assume that this species is a relatively recent coloniser of the QTP and has not managed to achieve considerable genetic differentiation. Conclusion: The Qtp Is A Natural Laboratory Of Speciation The eastern edge of the QTP features high species diversity of small mammals, including insectivores (Eulipotyphla); this phenomenon can be attributed to high habitat richness of this relatively small area. This effect is caused by the alternation of mountain ranges with well-defined high-altitude vegetation belts as well as by low mountains with elements of subtropical vegetation. On the tops of some ridges directly connected to the QTP, there are plateaus with steppe and tundra vegetation, while the high-altitude parts of other remote ridges are isolated and form the so-called sky island 27 , 40 , 41 . On the one hand, the high species diversity is a product of multiple faunal exchange events between the QTP and more northerly areas. In our case, Tibetan and Gansu shrews as well as the lesser white-toothed shrew belong to phyletic lineages that have their centres of origin in Northern Eurasia (Siberia and Amur Oblast). At present, geographic ranges of Tibetan and Gansu shrews are separated from those of their closest sister groups by a gap of 1000–1500 km. It must be pointed out that colonisation from the north can hardly be a one-time event; the exact dispersal routes remain to be elucidated. On the other hand, autochthonous taxa showed high inter- and intraspecific diversity in our study ( Chodsigoa , Uropsilus and the Sorex cylindricauda species group), consistently with long-term persistence of these species at the eastern edge of the QTP resulting in the presence of forms at different stages of speciation. In contrast to autochthonous species, no intraspecific variation was detected among the recent colonisers. This also applies to the Tibetan shrew, whose separation from the ‘ minutus s.l.’ group occurred more than 2 Mya. This observation suggests that autochthonous species have inhabited this area much longer. The mountains at the eastern edge of the QTP can be called a natural laboratory of speciation, where both genetic and chromosomal alterations may promote the formation of new species. Further comprehensive comparative analyses of chromosomal and genetic variation within species groups of this region will enable an investigator to evaluate their contributions to barriers to gene flow. For instance, the genus Anourosorex features stable karyotypes and significantly lower genetic diversity than that in the other groups of species possessing similar geographic ranges, e.g. the ‘ cylindricauda ’ group. Nevertheless, this phenomenon may be explained alternatively as follows: representatives of the genus Anourosorex are more eurytopic, and the boundaries between habitats, including the ‘sky of islands’, are less important for them than for other groups. In any case, we propose that the high species diversity of the QTP derives from the combined effects of genetic and ecological processes. Materials And Methods Compliance with ethical standards The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the Care and Use of Animals were followed. The collection of animals and the trapping method complied with the guidelines of the A.N. Severtsov IEE, RAS (Moscow), and the Institute of Zoology, CAS (Beijing). The experimental protocols were approved by the Bioethical Committee on Animal and Human Research of the A.N. Severtsov IEE, RAS (permission No. 30 issued on February 27, 2019), following all relevant guidelines and regulations. This article does not contain any experiments on human subjects performed by any of the coauthors. Specimen collection and identification Animals were caught alive at seven sites in Gansu and Sichuan Provinces of China during a joint Russian–Chinese scientific expedition conducted as part of scientific project ‘RFBR–NSFC’ in September–October 2017–2018 using home-made live-traps 42 . These traps work well for assessing the species diversity of small mammals 43 . Capture locations were determined via a GPS (Garmin) personal navigation system (Figure 1). Regarding the Chinese shrew mole, on the basis of morphological characteristics and the geographic location, we tentatively assigned the found individual to U. soricipes 5 . Given that recent studies showed that the number of species in the genus Uropsilus may be much larger than is currently known 9 , 22 , we cannot be confident that this individual is a true U. soricipes . In this study, it is referred to as U. aff. soricipes . Further molecular genetic research is needed to clarify its true identity. Cytological preparations Eighteen specimens belonging to seven species were karyotyped. Mitotic chromosome suspensions were made in the field from short-term culture of bone marrow and/or spleen after colchicine treatment in vivo as described previously 44 . For U. aff. soricipes , a chromosome suspension from primary fibroblast culture was prepared following the standard technique 45 . Air-dried chromosome spreads of all the specimens were conventionally stained with 2% Giemsa for 1–2 minutes and sequentially subjected to differential staining. The standard trypsin/Giemsa staining procedure was carried out for the identification of each chromosome arm by G-bands 46 . C-banding was performed by the classic technique 47 . NORs were detected by silver nitrate staining 48 . A Leica DFC-295 CCD camera mounted on a DM1000 (Leica) microscope or a Metasystems CCD (Zeiss) camera mounted on an AxioScope 2 (Zeiss) microscope was employed to capture images using MetaSystems Ikaros ver.5.3 and Leica Application ver.3.2 software packages, respectively. Declarations Acknowledgements The English language was corrected and certified by shevchuk-editing.com. Author Contributions S.V.P. prepared the chromosome suspensions, carried out the banding and microscopy analysis, and wrote the manuscript. V.S.L., V.D.Y., Y.Z., S.V.P. and B.I.S. collected the materials. Y.F. organised the fieldwork in China and determined the most promising sampling sites. B.I.S. and Y.Н.S. designed and supervised the study. V.D.Y. contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. B.I.S. and V.S.L. discussed the results with S.V.P. and revised the manuscript. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. Funding The project was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-RFBR grant No. 32011530077 to Y.H.S) and Russian Foundation for Basic Research grant No. 20-54-53003 GFEN_a. References Chen, Z. Z. et al. Morphology and phylogeny of scalopine moles (Eulipotyphla: Talpidae: Scalopini) from the eastern Himalayas, with descriptions of a new genus and species. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. zlaa172(2021). Burgin, C. et al. Family Soricidae (Shrews). in Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 8. Insectivores, Sloths and Colugos (ed. Wilson, D. E., Mittermeier, R. A.) 395–551(2018). Best, T. L. Family Erinaceidae (Hedgehogs and Gymnures). in Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 8. Insectivores, Sloths and Colugos. (ed. Wilson, D. E., Mittermeier, R. A.) 288–330(2018). Ai, H. S. et al. Taxonomic revision of the genus Mesechinus (Mammalia: Erinaceidae) with description of a new species. Zool. Res , 39 , 335–347 (2018). Hoffmann, R. S. & Lunde, D. Order Soricomorpha. in A Guide to the Mammals of China (ed. Smith, A.T., Xie, Y.)297–327(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008). Kryštufek, B. & Motokawa, M. Family Talpidae (Moles, Desmans, Star-nosed moles and Shrew moles). in Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 8. Insectivores, Sloths and Colugos. (ed. Wilson, D.E., Mittermeier, R. A.) 552–619(2018). Chen, S. et al. Molecular phylogenetics and phylogeographic structure of Sorex bedfordiae based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol , 84 , 245–253 (2015). Chen, Z. Z. et al. Integrative systematic analyses of the genus Chodsigoa (Mammalia: Eulipotyphla: Soricidae), with descriptions of new species. Zool. J. Linn. Soc , 180 , 64–713 (2017). Wan, T. et al. Climate niche conservatism and complex topography illuminate the cryptic diversification of Asian shrew-like moles. J. Biogeogr , 45 , 2400–2414 (2018). Lin, W. & Min, Z. L. A study on karyotypes of two species of genus Hemiechinus (H. dauuricus and H. hughi). J. Northwest Univ , 19 , 69–72 (1989). Pavlova, S. V. et al. First cytogenetic analysis of lesser gymnures (Mammalia, Galericidae, Hylomys) from Vietnam. Comp. Cytogenet , 12 , 361–372 (2018). Zaitsev, M. V., Voyta, L. L. & Sheftel, B. I. The Mammals of Russia and adjacent territories. Lipotyphlans(2014). Motokawa, M., Wu, Y. & Harada, M. Karyotypes of six soricomorph species from Emei shan, Sichuan province, China. Zoolog. Sci , 26 , 791–797 (2009). Bulatova, N. S., Biltueva, L. S., Pavlova, S. V., Zhdanova, N. S. & Zima, J. Chromosomal differentiation in the common shrew and related species. in Shrews, Chromosomes and Speciation (Cambridge Studies in Morphology and Molecules: New Paradigms in Evolutionary Bio (ed. Searle, J.B., Polly, P.D., Zima, J.) 134–184(Cambridge University Press, 2019). Ye, J. et al. Cross-species chromosome painting unveils cytogenetic signatures for the Eulipotyphla and evidence for the polyphyly of Insectivora. Chromosom. Res , 14 , 151–159 (2006). Zima, J. & Lukacova, L., M. M. Chromosomal evolution in shrews. in Evolution of shrews (ed. Wojcik, J. M., Wolsan, M.)175–218(Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Science, 1998). Rieseberg, L. H. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol , 16 , 351–358 (2001). Pavlova, S. V. & Searle, J. B. Chromosomes and speciation in mammals. in Mammalian Evolution, Diversity and Systematics (eds. Zachos, F. & Asher, R.)17–38(De Gruyter, 2018). doi:doi: 10.1515/9783110341553-002 . Motokawa, M., Harada, M., Lin, L. K. & Wu, Y. Geographic differences in karyotypes of the mole-shrew Anourosorex squamipes (Insectivore, Soricidae). Mamm. Biol , 69 , 197–201 (2004). Hutterer, R. Order Soricomorpha. in Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, Volume 1 (ed. Wilson, D.E., Reeder, D. M.)220–311(The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005). Wan, T., He, K. & Jiang, X. L. Multilocus phylogeny and cryptic diversity in Asian shrew-like moles (Uropsilus, Talpidae): Implications for taxonomy and conservation. BMC Evol. Biol , 13 , 1–13 (2013). Hu, T. L. et al. Description of a new species of the genus Uropsilus (Eulipotyphla: Talpidae: Uropsilinae) from the Dabie Mountains, Anhui, Eastern China. Zool. Res , 42 , 294–299 (2021). Kawada, S., Li, S., Wang, Y. & Oda, S. Karyological study of Nasillus gracilis (Insectivora, Talpidae, Uropsilinae). Mamm. Biol , 71 , 115–119 (2006). Hoffmann, R. S. A Review of the Shrew-moles (Genus Uropsilus) of China and Burma. J. Mammal. Soc. Japan , 10 , 69–80 (1984). Bannikova, A. A. et al. Evolutionary history of the genus Sorex (Soricidae, Eulipotyphla) as inferred from multigene data. Zool. Scr , 47 , 518–538 (2018). Moribe, J., Li, S., Wang, Y., Kobayashi, S. & Oda, S. Sorex bedfordiae has the smallest diploid chromosomme number of the XY Group in the Genus Sorex (Mammalia, Soricidae). Cytologia (Tokyo). 74, 95–99(2009). Sheftel, B. I. et al. Notes on the Fauna, Systematics, and Ecology of Small Mammals in Southern Gansu, China. Biol. Bull , 45 , 898–912 (2018). Ivanitzkaya, E., Kozlovsky, A. I., Orlov, V. N., Kovalskaya, Y. M. & Baskevich, M. I. New data on karyotypes of common shrews (Sorex, Soricidae, Insectivora) in fauna of the USSR. Zool. Zhurnal , 65 , 1228–1236 (1986). Tada, T. & Obara, Y. Karyological Relationships among Four and Subspecies of Sorex Revealed Differential Staining Techniques. J. Mamm. Soc. Japan , 13 , 21–31 (1988). Moribe, J., Noro, T., Kobayashi, S. & Oda, S. I. The karyotype of the Azumi shrew Sorex hosonoi. Acta Theriol. (Warsz) , 52 , 69–74 (2007). Halkka, O., Skaren, U. & Halkka, L. The karyotypes of Sorex isodon Turov and S. minutissimus Zimm. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A, IV Biol. 1–51(1970). Orlov, V. N. & Kozlovsky, A. I. A synopsis of chromosome complements of shrews of the genus Sorex. Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Biol. i Počvovedenie 12–16(1971). Zima, J. & Kral, B. Karyotypes of European mammals. 1. Acta Sci. Nat. Brn , 18 , 1–51 (1984). Fedyk, S. & Ivanitskaya, E. Y. Chromosomes of Siberian shrews. Acta Theriol. (Warsz) , 36 , 475–492 (1972). Biltueva, L. S. et al. Comparative chromosome analysis in three Sorex species: S.raddei, S.minutus and S.caecutiens. vol. 45 119–130(2000). Harada, M. & Takada, S. Karyotypes of two species of insectivora from Taiwan (Insectivora, Soricidae)., 41 , 510–511 (1985). Kawada, S., Kurihara, N., Tominaga, N. & Endo, H. The First Record of Anourosorex (Insectivora, Soricidae) from Western Myanmar, with Special Reference to Identification and Karyological Characters. Bull. Natl. Museum Nat. Sci. Ser. A , 40 , 105–109 (2014). Motokawa, M., Harada, M., Lin, L. K., Cheng, H. C. & Koyasu, K. Karyological differentiation between two Soriculus (Insectivora: Soricidae) from Taiwan., 62 , 541–547 (1998). Motokawa, M., Harada, M., Mekada, K. & Shrestha, K. C. Karyotypes of three shrew species (Soriculus nigrescens, Episoriculus caudatus and Episoriculus sacratus) from Nepal. Integr. Zool , 3 , 180–185 (2008). Headl, W. F. Sky islands of Arizona. Nat. Hist , 60 , 56–63 (1951). He, K. & Jiang, X. Sky islands of southwest China. I: an overview of phylogeographic patterns. Chinese Sci. Bull , 59 , 585–597 (2014). Shchipanov, N. A. On the ecology of lesser white-toothed shrew (Crocidura suaveolens). Zool. Zhurnal , 66 , 1051–1060 (1986). Shchipanov, N. A., Litvinov, Y. N. & Sheftel, B. I. Rapid method for estimating local biodiversity of a community of small mammals. Contemp. Probl. Ecol , 1 , 596 (2008). Pavlova, S. V., Borisov, S. A., Timoshenko, A. F. & Sheftel, B. I. ‘European’ race-specific metacentrics in East Siberian common shrews (Sorex araneus): A description of two new chromosomal races, Irkutsk and Zima. Comp. Cytogenet , 11 , 797–806 (2017). Freshney, R. I. Culture of animal cells: a manual of basic technique and specialized applications (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010). Seabright, M. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomese., 2 , 971–972 (1971). Sumner, A. T. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp. Cell Res , 75 , 304–306 (1972). Howell, W. M. & Black, D. A. Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method., 36 , 1014–1015 (1980). Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 01 Dec, 2021 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revision 26 Oct, 2021 Reviews received at journal 23 Oct, 2021 Reviewers agreed at journal 23 Oct, 2021 Reviewers invited by journal 23 Oct, 2021 Editor assigned by journal 20 Oct, 2021 Editor invited by journal 17 Aug, 2021 Submission checks completed at journal 17 Aug, 2021 First submitted to journal 08 Aug, 2021 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-793070","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":46423108,"identity":"6ba9ff1e-09da-4ba3-b7c7-2ad0c598f9eb","order_by":0,"name":"Svetlana V. Pavlova","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Svetlana","middleName":"V.","lastName":"Pavlova","suffix":""},{"id":46423109,"identity":"4725ac30-52b9-4f1e-a8af-ca84270c2c50","order_by":1,"name":"Vladimir S. Lebedev","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zoological Museum, Moscow State University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Vladimir","middleName":"S.","lastName":"Lebedev","suffix":""},{"id":46423110,"identity":"e2f14a1a-a84e-47d1-adeb-ab83723990ce","order_by":2,"name":"Vasily D. Yakushov","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Vasily","middleName":"D.","lastName":"Yakushov","suffix":""},{"id":46423112,"identity":"55a1d9eb-f54c-40c5-a9a1-f6163c0dc494","order_by":3,"name":"Yongke Zhu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Science","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yongke","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhu","suffix":""},{"id":46423114,"identity":"7e517a52-8455-4aac-9cfd-0013493f91d4","order_by":4,"name":"Yun Fang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Science","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yun","middleName":"","lastName":"Fang","suffix":""},{"id":46423117,"identity":"757370b6-f432-4b33-87c0-acf285135f00","order_by":5,"name":"Yue-Hua Sun","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Science","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yue-Hua","middleName":"","lastName":"Sun","suffix":""},{"id":46423119,"identity":"7fcff46d-0773-4496-9a98-b071244217e4","order_by":6,"name":"Boris I. Sheftel","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Boris","middleName":"I.","lastName":"Sheftel","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2021-08-08 12:28:59","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-793070/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-793070/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03809-4","type":"published","date":"2021-12-01T11:54:47+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":12577993,"identity":"a4b0fcd3-a388-4db7-a17f-5e50d5af2877","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-19 13:52:30","extension":"jpeg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1396327,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"The map of the sampling sites of the karyotyped small mammals in China. (1) Taizishan National Nature Reserve, Hubei County, Gansu Province, 2500 m a.s.l., N35°14', E103°25'; (2) Lianhuashan National Nature Reserve, Gansu Province, 3100 m a.s.l. N34°55', E 103°44'; (3) Zhuoni County, Gansu Province, right bank of Tao River, 2600 m a.s.l., N34°34', E103°27'; (4) Hongxing town (Langmusi), Songpan County, Sichuan Province, 3450 m a.s.l., N34°04', E102°37'; (5) Banioucun, Zoige County, Sichuan Province, 3400 m a.s.l., N33°35', E103°09'; (6) Chuanzhusi town, Songpan County, Sichuan Province, 3300 m a.s.l., N32°45', E103°38'; (7) Xiaobaosi vil., Songpan County, Sichuan Province, 3000 m a.s.l., N32°29', E103°35'.","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-793070/v1/4541adde74ead8719c539260.jpeg"},{"id":12577996,"identity":"3b710473-70d3-4382-858f-0cbe718d6ced","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-19 13:52:30","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":263737,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"A male karyotype of Uropsilus soricipes from Sichuan Province (Zoige). (a) Conventional staining, (b) G-banding, (c) C-banding and (d) silver nitrate staining. Arrows indicate nucleolus organiser regions (NORs). 2n=36, NFa=54. XY: sex chromosomes.","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-793070/v1/f601b82c68cbc28b54790df2.png"},{"id":12578017,"identity":"893f606b-e1c0-4c00-adba-16be8f025c50","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-19 13:55:30","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":95661,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"A male karyotype of Sorex bedfordiae from Sichuan Province (Songpan County, Xiaobaosi vil.): (a) G-banding, (b) silver nitrate staining. 2n=26, NFa=44. XY: sex chromosomes.","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-793070/v1/f3b073be975b73175e8ee607.png"},{"id":12578018,"identity":"f7234fa4-04d5-402f-95a7-5f6ed997404c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-19 13:55:30","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":173669,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Conventionally stained karyotypes. (a) Sorex thibetanus from Gansu Province (Lianhuashan), 2n=42, NFa=60; (b) Sorex cansulus from Sichuan Province (Songpan County), 2n=42, NFa=64. XX: female sex chromosomes. Male sex chromosomes XY are boxed. Pairs bearing NORs in both karyotypes are boxed.","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-793070/v1/271a24a9f56208fb4fbad8f3.png"},{"id":12577994,"identity":"72781532-07ad-45c0-9eef-f65195fe1d91","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-19 13:52:30","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":476948,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"A male karyotype of Chodsigoa hypsibia from Gansu Province (Zhuoni County). (a) Conventional staining; (b) C-banding; 2n=65, NFa=66 (including a B chromosome); (c) silver staining. Black arrows indicate the locations of NORs. Asterisks indicate possible chromosome variants (see the main text for details). XY: sex chromosomes. ","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-793070/v1/64f60fde6f22916bdf96c75b.png"},{"id":12577998,"identity":"56607ebf-586b-4dc0-a605-0bde211a1bb1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-19 13:52:30","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":161917,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Conventionally stained male karyotypes. (a) Anourosorex squamipes from Gansu Province (Zhuoni), 2n=48, NFa=92; (b) Crocidura suaveolens from Sichuan Province (Zoige city), 2n=40, NFa=44. XY: sex chromosomes. ","description":"","filename":"floatimage6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-793070/v1/8f0caafc4120143724a3933f.png"},{"id":12577992,"identity":"3746f13e-d1db-46e1-adec-01f9ed2c0f58","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-19 13:52:29","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":151398,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"G-band matching between Sorex bedfordiae karyotypes. Homologous chromosomes of the 2n=26 specimen presented in this paper are on the left, while those of a 2n=24 specimen (taken from ref.13) are on the right and marked by an asterisk. Homologous regions are indicated by vertical lines. XX: sex chromosomes.","description":"","filename":"floatimage7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-793070/v1/791d1b84dbc73996d543be13.png"},{"id":16864681,"identity":"d70afb88-d4af-45a4-850c-455eef3169bb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-12-30 11:54:54","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1763046,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-793070/v1/d31fa6d0-e577-47b0-9a87-00f109944bf6.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eHigh Diversity of Small Insectivorous Mammals on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and First Description of Karyotype for four Endemics of China\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe territory of China is characterised by high species diversity of insectivorous mammals (Eulipotyphla) including 13 genera of shrews (Soricomorpha), seven genera of moles (Talpomorpha) and six genera of hedgehogs and gymnures (Erinaceomorpha)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR2 CR3 CR4 CR5\" citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, some of which are relict representatives of highly divergent ancient lineages (e.g. \u003cem\u003eUropsilus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAnourosorex\u003c/em\u003e). At the same time, certain genera (e.g. \u003cem\u003eChodsigoa\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eEpisoriculus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eUropsilus\u003c/em\u003e) have their centres of extensive radiation in southern and central China\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e; this observation explains high richness and endemism at the species level. In recent years, the rate of new species discovery increased substantially. According to seminal \u0026lsquo;A Guide to the Mammals of China\u0026rsquo; (2008)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Chinese fauna includes only 72 eulipotyphlan species (seven species of hedgehogs, 15 species of moles and 50 species of shrews), while \u0026lsquo;The Mammals of the World\u0026rsquo; published in 2018 lists as many as 87 species (nine species of hedgehogs, 20 species of moles and 58 shrews)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, not including two more species of hedgehogs (\u003cem\u003eMesechinus miodon\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eM. wangi\u003c/em\u003e), which were recognised and described in a later revision\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, and a recently reported new monotypic genus of scalopine moles (\u003cem\u003eAlpiscaptulus\u003c/em\u003e)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMost of the newly described species have been discovered in China by molecular genetic methods, which continue to play an increasingly important role in the identification of cryptic species\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR8\" citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Nonetheless, variation in other characteristics that can be informative for taxonomic purposes is still studied insufficiently, including parameters of karyotypes. Currently, there are no published cytogenetic data on 40% of species of Chinese shrews (23 species) and moles (nine species), while all species of hedgehogs inhabiting China are already karyotyped\u003csup\u003e3,10\u0026minus;12\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChromosomal information on many autochthonous species has been unavailable, including endemics and sub-endemics of China (for example, members of genera \u003cem\u003eSorex\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eUropsilus\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eNectogale\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eChimarrogale\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eEuroscaptor\u003c/em\u003e). For cytogenetically analysed species, often only routinely stained sets of chromosomes are reported (for example, for \u003cem\u003eAnourosorex squamipes\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eUropsilus andersoni\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eScaptonyx fusicaudus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eEpisoriculus sacratus\u003c/em\u003e); this is certainly not enough to establish relationships between closely related species\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. It should be emphasised that cytogenetic data have greatly contributed to the progress in the systematics\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR15\" citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e of many groups of Eulipotyphla (e.g. \u003cem\u003eSorex\u003c/em\u003e). A high rate of chromosomal rearrangements can facilitate speciation via fixation of incompatible chromosomal variants in geographically isolated populations\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Considering that complex topography and climatic history of the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) have definitely promoted habitat fragmentation and population isolation, one may expect that at least in some groups, there would be high levels of chromosomal variation among otherwise cryptic lineages. Accordingly, the aim of our work was to present new cytogenetic data along with the first description of karyotypes of several insectivores from the eastern edge of the QTP, by focusing on Minshan. Some of these species are narrow-range local endemics (\u003cem\u003eSorex cansulus\u003c/em\u003e), while others belong to species complexes occurring throughout Hengduan and adjacent territories (\u003cem\u003eS. bedfordiae\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eUropsilus\u003c/em\u003e sp. and \u003cem\u003eA. squamipes\u003c/em\u003e) or even across Eurasia (\u003cem\u003eCrocidura ex gr. suaveolens\u003c/em\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eSeven insectivorous species belonging to five genera and two families, Talpidae and Soricidae, were cytogenetically studied. Karyotypes of four endemics of China (\u003cem\u003eUropsilus aff. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eSorex thibetanus\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eS. cansulus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eChodsigoa hypsibia\u003c/em\u003e) are described for the first time; as for the remaining species, new additional information is provided (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e \u0026nbsp;\u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA summary of karyotypes of the analysed species collected in China. Only a female individual of \u003cem\u003eSorex thibetanus\u003c/em\u003e was karyotyped, and therefore sex chromosomes could not be identified. N, sample size; 2n, diploid chromosomal number; NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e, fundamental number of autosome arms; M/SM, metacentric or submetacentric; ST, subtelocentric; A, acrocentric; B, B chromosome; X and Y, sex chromosome. Species karyotyped for the first time are highlighted in bold.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSpecies\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2n\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eM/SM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eST\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eY\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFamily Talpidae\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003eUropsilus aff. soricipes\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003edot A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFamily Soricidae\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSorex bedfordiae\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003eSorex thibetanus\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e60\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e?\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003eSorex cansulus\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e64\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003edot A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAnourosorex squamipes\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e92\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eST\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003eChodsigoa hypsibia\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e65\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e66\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0/1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCrocidura suaveolens\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eST\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eFamily Talpidae\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOne male individual of the Chinese shrew mole \u003cem\u003eU. aff. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e Milne-Edwards, 1871, endemic to China (G18-213), was collected at site No. 3. The karyotype is presented for the first time: 2n=36, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e=54 (Figure 2a). The autosomal set consists of 10 bi-armed and seven single-armed chromosomes: one large metacentric pair (chromosome 1) and one mid-size submetacentric pair (chromosome 4), eight large-to-small subtelocentric pairs (chromosomes 2, 3 and 5\u0026ndash;10) and seven large-to-small acrocentric pairs (chromosomes 11\u0026ndash;17). After the G-banding pattern was assessed, the small metacentric and smallest acrocentric were identified as X and Y chromosomes, respectively (Table 1, Figure 2b).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSilver-positive dots were tentatively registered close to centromeres in one mid-size subtelocentric pair, chromosome 4\u0026nbsp;(Figure 2c).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eC-positive heterochromatic blocks were found to be located in centromeric regions of all autosomes except for two subtelocentric pairs, chromosomes 2 and 8, which have fully heterochromatic short p-arms. Visible C-blocks were revealed at a terminal position of q-arms in two autosome pairs, chromosomes 4 and 14. Less darkly stained C-bands were visible at interstitial positions of pair number 8. The X chromosome is C-negative, whereas the Y chromosome stains positively throughout the entire chromosome arm (Figure 2d).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eFamily Soricidae\u0026nbsp;\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs for lesser striped shrews (\u003cem\u003eSorex bedfordiae\u003c/em\u003e Thomas, 1911), nine specimens (G17-77, G17-81, G17-82, G17-83, G17-86, G17-89, G18-171, G18-172, G18-175 and G18-176) were collected at all sites except No. 3 and 4. The diploid chromosome number in all the karyotypes is 2n=26, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e=44 (Figure 3a). The autosomal set consists of eight large-to-small meta- or submetacentric pairs (chromosomes 1\u0026ndash;8), one small and one large subtelocentric pair (chromosomes 9 and 10) and one large (chromosome 11) and one smallest (chromosome 12) acrocentric pair (Table 1). The X and Y chromosomes are represented by the mid-size and small acrocentrics, respectively. Silver nitrate staining revealed terminal localisation of nucleolus organiser regions (NORs) on short p-arms of the large acrocentric pair (chromosome 11) only (Figure 3b).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOne female individual of the Tibetan shrew \u003cem\u003eS. thibetanus\u003c/em\u003e Kastschenko, 1905 (G18-2), endemic to China, was collected at site No. 2. The karyotype is presented for the first time: 2n=42, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e=60 (Figure 4a). The autosomal set consists of nine large-to-small meta- or submetacentric pairs (chromosome\u0026nbsp;1\u0026ndash;9), one large subtelocentric pair (chromosome\u0026nbsp;10) and 10 medium-to-small acrocentric pairs (chromosomes\u0026nbsp;11\u0026ndash;20). Two mid-size acrocentrics were identified as X chromosomes. Silver nitrate staining revealed terminal localisation of NORs on short p-arms of a small acrocentric pair only (Figure 4a, inset).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the Gansu shrew \u003cem\u003eS. cansulus\u003c/em\u003e Thomas, 1912, endemic to China, three specimens (G17-72, G18-79 and G18-80) were collected at sites No. 4 and 5. The karyotype is presented for the first time: 2n=42, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e=64 (Figure 4b). The autosomal set is composed of 20 bi-armed and eight single-armed autosomes. Among them, there are five large metacentric pairs (chromosomes 1\u0026ndash;5) and one small metacentric pair (chromosome 6), four large (chromosomes 7\u0026ndash;10) and two small (chromosomes 11 and 12) submetacentric pairs and eight medium-to-smallest subtelocentric pairs (chromosomes 13\u0026ndash;20). Two large acrocentrics and a dot-like acrocentric are XX and Y chromosomes, respectively (Figure 4b, inset). Silver nitrate staining revealed terminal localisation of NORs on short p-arms of two small bi-armed pairs (Figure 4b, inset).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs for De Winton\u0026rsquo;s shrew\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;Ch. hypsibia\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(de Winton, 1899),\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eendemic to China, one male (G18-290) was collected at site No. 3. The karyotype is presented for the first time: 2n=65, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e=66. The autosomal set consists of 30 large-to-small acrocentric pairs (chromosomes 1\u0026ndash;30) gradually decreasing in size, one small metacentric pair (chromosome 31) and an unpaired small metacentric chromosome, which apparently is a B chromosome (Figure 5a).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eC-heterochromatic blocks were revealed in pericentromeric regions of 27 acrocentric pairs (chromosomes 3\u0026ndash;29). Two large acrocentric pairs (chromosomes 1 and 2) and one smallest acrocentric pair (chromosome 30) as well as the small metacentric pair are C-negative. Slightly visible blocks of interstitial heterochromatin were noted on the B chromosome. Because one acrocentric chromosome has a large pericentromeric C-block, we identified it as an X chromosome (Figure 5b). The Y chromosome was tentatively identified as an acrocentric chromosome and therefore is marked by an asterisk (as is the B chromosome). Silver nitrate staining uncovered centromeric localisation of NORs in three medium-to-small acrocentrics (Figure 5c).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTwo specimens of the Chinese mole shrew \u003cem\u003eA. squamipes\u003c/em\u003e Milne-Edwards, 1872 (G17-140 and G18-336), were collected at sites No. 1 and 3. The studied male and female karyotypes do not differ from those reported previously\u003csup\u003e19\u003c/sup\u003e: 2n=48, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e=92. The autosomal set is composed of 23 large-to-small meta- or submetacentric pairs gradually decreasing in size. In a male karyotype, the largest metacentric and small subtelocentric were identified as the X chromosome and Y chromosome, respectively (Figure 6a).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA male individual of the lesser white-toothed shrew \u003cem\u003eC. suaveolens\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ePallas, 1811\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(G17-68), was caught at site No. 5. The diploid chromosome number was found to be 2n=40, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e=44 (Figure 6b). The autosomal set consists of three bi-armed pairs (chromosomes 1\u0026ndash;3) and 16 single-armed pairs (chromosomes 4\u0026ndash;19). The X chromosome is represented by a medium subtelocentric chromosome, and the Y chromosome by a small acrocentric.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eAmong the seven studied species of the order Eulipotyphla from southern Gansu and northern Sichuan Provinces, China, four species were analysed cytogenetically for the first time (\u003cem\u003eU. aff. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eCh. hypsibia\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eS. thibetanus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eS. cansulus\u003c/em\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn Talpidae, the most primitive subfamily Uropsilinae includes a single genus (\u003cem\u003eUropsilus\u003c/em\u003e), which formerly consisted of \u003cem\u003eUropsilus andersoni\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eU. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eU. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eU. investigator\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eU. aequodonenia\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e; later, \u003cem\u003eU. nivatus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eU. atronates\u003c/em\u003e were also recognised as valid species\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. One more new species, \u003cem\u003eU. dabieshanensis\u003c/em\u003e sp. nov., was recently described based on morphological and molecular genetic data\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e; thus, now the genus is thought to comprise seven species. At least 15 monophyletic lineages of \u003cem\u003eUropsilus\u003c/em\u003e have been recognised using molecular markers, and it seems that the taxonomic diversity of this genus may still be underestimated\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Until now, karyotypes of only two species, \u003cem\u003eU. nivatus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eU. andersoni\u003c/em\u003e, have been reported. Note that during the description of the karyotype\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, \u003cem\u003eU. nivatus\u003c/em\u003e was regarded as a subspecies of \u003cem\u003eU. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e but was later elevated to full species rank\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The karyotype was described for an individual from an area inhabited only by \u003cem\u003eU. nivatus\u003c/em\u003e; therefore, we use this name for the species, whose karyotype has been reported by Kawada et al.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Despite the same 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;34, these karyotypes differ in chromosomal morphology as evidenced by a difference in NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e, which is 46 and 52 in \u003cem\u003eU. nivatus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eU. andersoni\u003c/em\u003e, respectively\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. This variation is caused by a difference in the number of the subtelo- and acrocentric autosomes. Because only the conventional karyotype is reported for \u003cem\u003eU. andersoni\u003c/em\u003e, it is difficult to compare the homologous arms and determine possible rearrangements between these two species. Moreover, the variation in the size of the short arms can be a consequence of some nuances of obtaining the chromosome preparations and then can lead to incorrect determination of NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e. Altogether, the authors\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e concluded that the karyotype of \u003cem\u003eU. andersoni\u003c/em\u003e is similar to that of \u003cem\u003eU. nivatus.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe \u003cem\u003eU. aff. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e karyotype (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;36, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;56), described here for the first time, differs from those of the two species mentioned above by smaller numbers of meta- and submetacentric pairs (two pairs instead of four in both \u003cem\u003eU. nivatus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eU. andersoni\u003c/em\u003e) and a larger number of subtelo- and acrocentric pairs (in total, 15 pairs instead of 12). The comparison of homologous chromosome arms between the \u003cem\u003eU. nivatus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eU. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e karyotypes indicates that all chromosome arms match between the two species, judging by the G-band pattern. Two small acrocentric pairs (chromosomes 15 and 16) in \u003cem\u003eU. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e correspond to metacentric pair No. 2 in the \u003cem\u003eU. nivatus\u003c/em\u003e karyotype. Accordingly, the lower 2n in \u003cem\u003eU. nivatus\u003c/em\u003e, and apparently in \u003cem\u003eU. andersoni\u003c/em\u003e, can be explained by a single Robertsonian fusion resulting in a new metacentric pair. Moreover, these species show a difference in the size of the acrocentric Y chromosome, which is larger in \u003cem\u003eU. aff. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e than in the other two species. The silver nitrate staining performed on \u003cem\u003eU. nivatus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eU. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e chromosomes did not reveal any differences between the karyotypes (the NOR is located within a secondary constriction in subtelocentric pair No. 3 in both species). Thus, more detailed cytogenetic data are needed to investigate karyotype evolution within the genus \u003cem\u003eUropsilus.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHere we present new findings about the karyotypes of six species of soricids, three of them are described karyotypically for the first time: \u003cem\u003eCh. hypsibia\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eS. thibetanus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eS. cansulus.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eS. bedfordiae\u003c/em\u003e belongs to the east Tibetan group of striped shrews, which includes \u003cem\u003eS. cylindricauda\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eS. excelsus\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Previous cytogenetic research has uncovered intraspecific karyotypic variation within \u003cem\u003eS. bedfordiae\u003c/em\u003e; 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;24\u0026ndash;26 and 28 have been reported (Yunnan\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e; Sichuan\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e; southern Gansu\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e). In the present study, we found no polymorphic variants among the nine karyotyped individuals; all the shrews have equal chromosome sets: 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;26, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;46. In our previous work, karyotypes of two females from Lianhuashan Natural Reserve (site No. 2) were reported\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e to contain a smaller number of chromosomal arms: 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;26, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;44. After re-checking of that material, it turned out that those two individuals are characterised by the same karyotype structure (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;26, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;46) as the three shrews described here.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreviously, karyotypes with 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;26, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;46 were detected in three \u003cem\u003eS. bedfordiae\u003c/em\u003e individuals from Mt. Laojun (3900 m a.s.l.), Lijiang District in northern Yunnan province\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. With the exception of one much larger subtelocentric pair (chromosome 10), those karyotypes were very similar to those described here. The lack of G-banded karyograms for the individuals from Yunnan makes it impossible to compare the homology of chromosomes between them in more detail. Additionally, these authors identified a 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;28 karyotype with an additional pair of small metacentrics. Nevertheless, they hypothesised that either it belongs to another species that closely resembles \u003cem\u003eS. bedfordiae\u003c/em\u003e, e.g. \u003cem\u003eSorex cylindricauda\u003c/em\u003e, or the additional metacentric pair is the B chromosome.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmong the eight \u003cem\u003eS. bedfordiae\u003c/em\u003e specimens from Mount Emei (3000 m a.s.l.) in central Sichuan Province\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, two karyotype variants have been found: \u0026lsquo;2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;24, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;46\u0026rsquo; and \u0026lsquo;2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;25, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;48\u0026rsquo;, which differ from each other by the presence of a supernumerary (B) metacentric chromosome in the latter. Besides a lack of B chromosomes, all the 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;26, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;46 karyotypes described in our study are characterised by the presence of an additional small acrocentric pair (chromosome 12) and a different length of one subtelocentric pair (chromosome 9, Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA comparison of homologous chromosome arms between these G-banded karyotypes (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;24/25 and 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;26 from this study) indicated that they differ by structural rearrangements in three autosome pairs. The chromosomal rearrangements consist of a pericentric inversion and possible centromeric shift in the largest pair No. 1 and a Robertsonian translocation between telocentric pairs No. 11 and 12, which led to the formation of a large subtelocentric pair (chromosome 9). A tandem fusion between a small metacentric (pair No. 8) and a part of the p-arm of large metacentric No. 2 gave rise to a large subtelocentric pair (No. 11) in 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;24/25 karyotypes (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMolecular genetic studies point to the existence of eight highly divergent mitochondrial lineages among the shrews affiliated with the \u0026lsquo;cylindricauda\u0026rsquo; group (five within \u003cem\u003eS. bedfordiae\u003c/em\u003e, two in \u003cem\u003eS. excelsus\u003c/em\u003e and one in \u003cem\u003eS. cylindricauda\u003c/em\u003e) occurring on the eastern and southeastern edge of the QTP\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. We did not aim to revise the intraspecific taxonomy of this group; however, it is worth noting that on the basis of the geographic origin and published genetic data\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, all the karyotyped individuals presented here correspond to clade B, while those that have been reported by Moribe et al.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and Motokawa et al.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e belong to other mitochondrial clades. Therefore, in this case, the molecular genetic differences match the karyotypic ones.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAccording to the recent phylogenetic analysis\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, the Tibetan shrew belongs to the \u0026lsquo;\u003cem\u003eminutus\u003c/em\u003e s.l.\u0026rsquo; group together with \u003cem\u003eS. minutissimus\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eS. gracillimus\u003c/em\u003e and a species endemic to Honshu Island, \u003cem\u003eS. hosonoi\u003c/em\u003e. Nonetheless, karyotypic characteristics of \u003cem\u003eS. gracillimus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eS. minutissimus\u003c/em\u003e are close to those of the \u0026lsquo;caecutiens\u0026rsquo; group but not those of the \u0026lsquo;\u003cem\u003eminutus\u003c/em\u003e s.str.\u0026rsquo; group\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Among these four species, \u003cem\u003eS. gracillimus\u003c/em\u003e has a lower diploid number of chromosomes, 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;36, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;60\u003csup\u003e29\u003c/sup\u003e, whereas both \u003cem\u003eS. hosonoi\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and the \u003cem\u003eS. thibetanus\u003c/em\u003e described here are characterised by the same number, 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;42, but differ in NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e: at 60 and 66, respectively. The karyotypic status of \u003cem\u003eS. minutissimus\u003c/em\u003e is still not clear; 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38 and 42 have been reported for the species from two distinct areas, Finland\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and Siberia\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Despite the absence of a 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;42 karyogram, in both cases, those authors reported\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e that the karyotypes consist of mostly bi-armed autosomes and single-armed sex chromosomes with the same NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e, 72. It is worth noting that the \u003cem\u003eS. thibetanus\u003c/em\u003e karyotype contains 10 bi-armed autosomes, which is the smallest number of these among the other three species. Except for our results on \u003cem\u003eS. thibetanus\u003c/em\u003e, there are no data on the localisation of NORs in these species.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the basis of molecular data, the Tibetan shrew has been estimated to have diverged from other members of \u0026lsquo;\u003cem\u003eminutus\u003c/em\u003e s.l.\u0026rsquo; (most likely from \u003cem\u003eS. gracillimus\u003c/em\u003e) 2.0\u0026ndash;2.5\u0026nbsp;million years ago (Mya)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. This age corresponds to the earliest possible time of QTP colonisation by the Tibetan shrew. The karyotypic data overall match the data from molecular genetic analysis indicating that \u003cem\u003eS. thibetanus\u003c/em\u003e is affiliated with the eastern branch of the \u0026lsquo;\u003cem\u003eminutus\u003c/em\u003e s.l.\u0026rsquo; group\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe latest multilocus nuclear and mitochondrial phylogeny\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e of the nominal subgenus \u003cem\u003eSorex\u003c/em\u003e s.str. revealed that the \u0026lsquo;\u003cem\u003ecaecutiens\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rsquo; species group is composed of five members: \u003cem\u003eS. caecutiens\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eS. isodon\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eS. unguiculatus\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eS. shinto\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eS. cansulus.\u003c/em\u003e Among them, karyotypes of the first four species are known to be very similar (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;42, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;64\u0026ndash;66)\u003csup\u003e16,34,35\u003c/sup\u003e. The chromosomal set of the Gansu shrew \u003cem\u003eS. cansulus\u003c/em\u003e has been unknown; here, for the first time, we demonstrated that this species has the same number of chromosomes, 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;42. A conventionally stained \u003cem\u003eS. cansulus\u003c/em\u003e karyotype (NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;64) turned out to be quite similar in its morphological structure to species with NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;64 (\u003cem\u003eS. isodon\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eS. unguiculatus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eS. shinto).\u003c/em\u003e It has been documented that G-banding patterns are very conserved among \u003cem\u003eS. caecutiens\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eS. shinto\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eS. unguiculatus\u003c/em\u003e karyotypes, which differ from each other by pericentric inversions\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The karyotype of \u003cem\u003eS. caecutiens\u003c/em\u003e (NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;66) differs\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e from these species by an additional pericentric inversion in pair No. 8 and a centromeric shift in pair No. 12. There are no data on differentially stained karyotypes of the other species.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn \u003cem\u003eS. cansulus\u003c/em\u003e, NORs were detected for the first time in satellite regions of two small telocentric pairs, No. 19 and 20. The same localisation of NORs has been found in \u003cem\u003eS. unguiculatus\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. As Zima et al.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e have mentioned, \u0026lsquo;all species of this group with 42 chromosomes possess pronounced satellites in two small autosomal pairs\u0026rsquo;. Evidently, these autosomes bear NORs in all species, but only \u003cem\u003eS. cansulus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eS. unguiculatus\u003c/em\u003e karyotypes have been stained.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAccording to molecular data, the Gansu shrew separated from its most probable sister group (\u003cem\u003eS. caecutiens\u003c/em\u003e) 1.5\u0026ndash;2.0 Mya\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, which is somewhat later in comparison with \u003cem\u003eS. thibetanus\u003c/em\u003e. Consequently, one may theorise that the Gansu shrew is a more recent coloniser than the Tibetan shrew. Our karyotypic data overall match the data from molecular genetic analysis suggesting that \u003cem\u003eS. cansulus\u003c/em\u003e belongs to the eastern branch of the \u0026lsquo;\u003cem\u003ecaecutiens\u003c/em\u003e s.l.\u0026rsquo; group\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWithin the subfamily \u003cem\u003eSoricinae\u003c/em\u003e, the tribe \u003cem\u003eAnourosoricini\u003c/em\u003e is composed of four species\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e: \u003cem\u003eAnourosorex assamensis\u003c/em\u003e Anderson, 1875, \u003cem\u003eA. schmidi\u003c/em\u003e Petter, 1963, \u003cem\u003eA. squamipes\u003c/em\u003e Milne-Edwards, 1872, and \u003cem\u003eA. yamashinai\u003c/em\u003e Kuroda, 1935. Among them, karyotypic data have not been published for \u003cem\u003eA. schmidi\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eA. yamashinai\u003c/em\u003e, endemic to Taiwan, has been studied using a set of differential stains and has 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;50, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;96\u003csup\u003e36\u003c/sup\u003e, whereas only conventionally stained karyograms are available for \u003cem\u003eA. squamipes\u003c/em\u003e (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;48, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;92) collected in Fuleshan, Mianyang-shi, Sichuan Province, China\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, and for \u003cem\u003eA. assamensis\u003c/em\u003e from Tiddim Town of Chin State, western Myanmar (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;50, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;96)\u003csup\u003e37\u003c/sup\u003e. Our results show that the structure of the \u003cem\u003eA. squamipes\u003c/em\u003e routine karyotype does not differ from that reported previously: 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;48, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;92. It has been demonstrated that the \u003cem\u003eA. yamashinai\u003c/em\u003e karyotype\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e contains two pairs of the large subtelocentrics that are missing in \u003cem\u003eA. squamipes.\u003c/em\u003e Thus, species of the genus \u003cem\u003eAnourosorex\u003c/em\u003e share a similarity of the karyotype, even though they are geographically distant from each other, as is the case, for example, for \u003cem\u003eA. yamashinai\u003c/em\u003e (Taiwan) and \u003cem\u003eA. assamensis\u003c/em\u003e (south-western China, south-eastern Tibet, north-eastern India and west-central Myanmar).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe taxonomic status of shrews of the genus \u003cem\u003eChodsigoa\u003c/em\u003e has changed many times. Previously, eight species have been recognised in the genus\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, then new species, \u003cem\u003eChodsigoa hoffmanni\u003c/em\u003e sp. nov., was described on the basis of sequencing data from one mitochondrial and two nuclear genes\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Now nine species are attributed to the genus.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDe Winton\u0026rsquo;s shrew \u003cem\u003eCh. hypsibia\u003c/em\u003e is endemic to China and occurs in central and southern provinces: south-eastern Qinghai, southern Gansu, southern Shaanxi, eastern Tibet, Sichuan, northern Yunnan and southern Anhui\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. So far, karyotypic data on the genus \u003cem\u003eChodsigoa\u003c/em\u003e have been limited to one chromosome set that is described for a species endemic to Taiwan, \u003cem\u003eChodsigoa sodalis\u003c/em\u003e (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;44, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;88)\u003csup\u003e38\u003c/sup\u003e. The conventionally stained karyotype of this species consists of all bi-armed chromosomes; sex chromosomes have not been identified. The \u003cem\u003eCh. hypsibia\u003c/em\u003e karyotype stands out because all chromosomes are acrocentrics except one small metacentric pair of autosomes (chromosome 31) and an unpaired metacentric B chromosome (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;65, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;66). On the basis of C-banding patterns, the X and Y sex chromosomes in the studied male were identified as a large acrocentric and medium acrocentric, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe large differences between the \u003cem\u003eCh. hypsibia\u003c/em\u003e (almost completely acrocentric) and \u003cem\u003eCh. sodalis\u003c/em\u003e (almost completely metacentric) karyotypes may be explained by the more ancient origin of \u003cem\u003eCh. hypsibia\u003c/em\u003e. To some extent, this notion is confirmed by large molecular genetic differences between \u003cem\u003eCh. hypsibia\u003c/em\u003e and most of other species of this genus. In the genus \u003cem\u003eEpisoriculus\u003c/em\u003e, closely related to \u003cem\u003eChodsigoa\u003c/em\u003e, there are also large differences in the number of metacentric and acrocentric chromosomes between \u003cem\u003eE. caudatus\u003c/em\u003e with 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;60, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;118 (M\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;SM\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;19, ST\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;9, A\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1) and \u003cem\u003eE. soluensis\u003c/em\u003e with 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;74, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;126 (M\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;SM\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;12, ST\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;13, A\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;11)\u003csup\u003e39\u003c/sup\u003e. Those authors consider \u003cem\u003eE. soluensis\u003c/em\u003e a subspecies of \u003cem\u003eE. saсratus soluensis\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe lesser white-toothed shrew \u003cem\u003eC. suaveolens\u003c/em\u003e inhabits a huge area, from Europe to Asia. The species is characterised by a mostly stable karyotype with 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;40, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;50, but some authors have reported chromosome sets 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;41\u0026ndash;42, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;52, 54, which result from the presence of supernumerary (B) chromosomes (see review\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e). In a previous work, a 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;40, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;50 karyotype was identified in a female individual of \u003cem\u003eC. suaveolens\u003c/em\u003e from the vicinity of the Goin Ba village in southern Gansu Province\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The specimen described here has 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;40 but a smaller number of chromosomal arms, NF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;48, owing to three bi-armed chromosome pairs instead of four. Unfortunately, highly condensed chromosomal arms in a low-quality chromosomal suspension did not allow us to clearly distinguish a possible fourth pair of bi-armed chromosomes. Thus, we cannot be completely sure that this specimen differs by a lower fundamental number of arms from those reported previously.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn a previous report, we showed that lesser white-toothed shrews from the QTP are close relatives of \u003cem\u003eCr. suaveolens s.str.\u003c/em\u003e (p-distance\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;3%)\u003csup\u003e27\u003c/sup\u003e. Therefore, we can assume that this species is a relatively recent coloniser of the QTP and has not managed to achieve considerable genetic differentiation.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion: The Qtp Is A Natural Laboratory Of Speciation","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe eastern edge of the QTP features high species diversity of small mammals, including insectivores (Eulipotyphla); this phenomenon can be attributed to high habitat richness of this relatively small area. This effect is caused by the alternation of mountain ranges with well-defined high-altitude vegetation belts as well as by low mountains with elements of subtropical vegetation. On the tops of some ridges directly connected to the QTP, there are plateaus with steppe and tundra vegetation, while the high-altitude parts of other remote ridges are isolated and form the so-called sky island\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOn the one hand, the high species diversity is a product of multiple faunal exchange events between the QTP and more northerly areas. In our case, Tibetan and Gansu shrews as well as the lesser white-toothed shrew belong to phyletic lineages that have their centres of origin in Northern Eurasia (Siberia and Amur Oblast). At present, geographic ranges of Tibetan and Gansu shrews are separated from those of their closest sister groups by a gap of 1000\u0026ndash;1500 km. It must be pointed out that colonisation from the north can hardly be a one-time event; the exact dispersal routes remain to be elucidated.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOn the other hand, autochthonous taxa showed high inter- and intraspecific diversity in our study (\u003cem\u003eChodsigoa\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eUropsilus\u003c/em\u003e and the \u003cem\u003eSorex cylindricauda\u003c/em\u003e species group), consistently with long-term persistence of these species at the eastern edge of the QTP resulting in the presence of forms at different stages of speciation. In contrast to autochthonous species, no intraspecific variation was detected among the recent colonisers. This also applies to the Tibetan shrew, whose separation from the \u0026lsquo;\u003cem\u003eminutus\u003c/em\u003e s.l.\u0026rsquo; group occurred more than 2 Mya. This observation suggests that autochthonous species have inhabited this area much longer.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe mountains at the eastern edge of the QTP can be called a natural laboratory of speciation, where both genetic and chromosomal alterations may promote the formation of new species. Further comprehensive comparative analyses of chromosomal and genetic variation within species groups of this region will enable an investigator to evaluate their contributions to barriers to gene flow. For instance, the genus \u003cem\u003eAnourosorex\u003c/em\u003e features stable karyotypes and significantly lower genetic diversity than that in the other groups of species possessing similar geographic ranges, e.g. the \u0026lsquo;\u003cem\u003ecylindricauda\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rsquo; group. Nevertheless, this phenomenon may be explained alternatively as follows: representatives of the genus \u003cem\u003eAnourosorex\u003c/em\u003e are more eurytopic, and the boundaries between habitats, including the \u0026lsquo;sky of islands\u0026rsquo;, are less important for them than for other groups. In any case, we propose that the high species diversity of the QTP derives from the combined effects of genetic and ecological processes.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials And Methods","content":"\u003ch2\u003eCompliance with ethical standards \u0026nbsp;\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the Care and Use of Animals were followed. The collection of animals and the trapping method complied with the guidelines of the A.N. Severtsov IEE, RAS (Moscow), and the Institute of Zoology, CAS (Beijing). The experimental protocols were approved by the Bioethical Committee on Animal and Human Research of the A.N. Severtsov IEE, RAS (permission No. 30 issued on February 27, 2019), following all relevant guidelines and regulations. This article does not contain any experiments on human subjects performed by any of the coauthors.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eSpecimen collection and identification\u0026nbsp;\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnimals were caught alive at seven sites in Gansu and Sichuan Provinces of China during a joint Russian\u0026ndash;Chinese scientific expedition conducted as part of scientific project \u0026lsquo;RFBR\u0026ndash;NSFC\u0026rsquo; in September\u0026ndash;October 2017\u0026ndash;2018 using home-made live-traps\u003csup\u003e42\u003c/sup\u003e. These traps work well for assessing the species diversity of small mammals\u003csup\u003e43\u003c/sup\u003e. Capture locations were determined via a GPS (Garmin) personal navigation system (Figure 1).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRegarding the Chinese shrew mole, on the basis of morphological characteristics and the geographic location, we tentatively assigned the found individual to \u003cem\u003eU. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e5\u003c/sup\u003e. Given that recent studies showed that the number of species in the genus \u003cem\u003eUropsilus\u003c/em\u003e may be much larger than is currently known\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csup\u003e,\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e, we cannot be confident that this individual is a true \u003cem\u003eU. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e. In this study, it is referred to as \u003cem\u003eU. aff. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e. Further molecular genetic research is needed to clarify its true identity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eCytological preparations \u0026nbsp;\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEighteen specimens belonging to seven species were karyotyped. Mitotic chromosome suspensions were made in the field from short-term culture of bone marrow and/or spleen after colchicine treatment in vivo as described previously\u003csup\u003e44\u003c/sup\u003e. For \u003cem\u003eU. aff. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e, a chromosome suspension from primary fibroblast culture was prepared following the standard technique\u003csup\u003e45\u003c/sup\u003e. Air-dried chromosome spreads of all the specimens were conventionally stained with 2% Giemsa for 1\u0026ndash;2 minutes and sequentially subjected to differential staining.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe standard trypsin/Giemsa staining procedure was carried out for the identification of each chromosome arm by G-bands\u003csup\u003e46\u003c/sup\u003e. C-banding was performed by the classic technique\u003csup\u003e47\u003c/sup\u003e. NORs were detected by silver nitrate staining\u003csup\u003e48\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA Leica DFC-295 CCD camera mounted on a DM1000 (Leica) microscope or a Metasystems CCD (Zeiss) camera mounted on an AxioScope 2 (Zeiss) microscope was employed to capture images using MetaSystems Ikaros ver.5.3 and Leica Application ver.3.2 software packages, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgements\u0026nbsp;\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe English language was corrected and certified by shevchuk-editing.com.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contributions\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eS.V.P. prepared the chromosome suspensions, carried out the banding and microscopy analysis, and wrote the manuscript. V.S.L., V.D.Y., Y.Z., S.V.P. and B.I.S. collected the materials. Y.F. organised the fieldwork in China and determined the most promising sampling sites. B.I.S. and Y.Н.S. designed and supervised the study. V.D.Y. contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. B.I.S. and V.S.L. discussed the results with S.V.P. and revised the manuscript. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eConflicts of Interest\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eFunding\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe project was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-RFBR grant No. 32011530077 to Y.H.S) and Russian Foundation for Basic Research grant No. 20-54-53003 GFEN_a. \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen, Z. Z. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Morphology and phylogeny of scalopine moles (Eulipotyphla: Talpidae: Scalopini) from the eastern Himalayas, with descriptions of a new genus and species. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. zlaa172(2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBurgin, C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Family Soricidae (Shrews). in Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol.\u0026nbsp;8. Insectivores, Sloths and Colugos (ed. Wilson, D. E., Mittermeier, R. A.) 395\u0026ndash;551(2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBest, T. L. Family Erinaceidae (Hedgehogs and Gymnures). in Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol.\u0026nbsp;8. Insectivores, Sloths and Colugos. (ed. Wilson, D. E., Mittermeier, R. A.) 288\u0026ndash;330(2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAi, H. S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Taxonomic revision of the genus Mesechinus (Mammalia: Erinaceidae) with description of a new species. \u003cem\u003eZool. Res\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e39\u003c/b\u003e, 335\u0026ndash;347 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoffmann, R. S. \u0026amp; Lunde, D. Order Soricomorpha. in A Guide to the Mammals of China (ed. Smith, A.T., Xie, Y.)297\u0026ndash;327(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKryštufek, B. \u0026amp; Motokawa, M. Family Talpidae (Moles, Desmans, Star-nosed moles and Shrew moles). in Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol.\u0026nbsp;8. Insectivores, Sloths and Colugos. (ed. Wilson, D.E., Mittermeier, R. A.) 552\u0026ndash;619(2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Molecular phylogenetics and phylogeographic structure of Sorex bedfordiae based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. \u003cem\u003eMol. Phylogenet. Evol\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e84\u003c/b\u003e, 245\u0026ndash;253 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen, Z. Z. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Integrative systematic analyses of the genus Chodsigoa (Mammalia: Eulipotyphla: Soricidae), with descriptions of new species. \u003cem\u003eZool. J. Linn. Soc\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e180\u003c/b\u003e, 64\u0026ndash;713 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWan, T. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Climate niche conservatism and complex topography illuminate the cryptic diversification of Asian shrew-like moles. \u003cem\u003eJ. Biogeogr\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e45\u003c/b\u003e, 2400\u0026ndash;2414 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLin, W. \u0026amp; Min, Z. L. A study on karyotypes of two species of genus Hemiechinus (H. dauuricus and H. hughi). \u003cem\u003eJ. Northwest Univ\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e19\u003c/b\u003e, 69\u0026ndash;72 (1989).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePavlova, S. V. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e First cytogenetic analysis of lesser gymnures (Mammalia, Galericidae, Hylomys) from Vietnam. \u003cem\u003eComp. Cytogenet\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e12\u003c/b\u003e, 361\u0026ndash;372 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZaitsev, M. V., Voyta, L. L. \u0026amp; Sheftel, B. I. The Mammals of Russia and adjacent territories. Lipotyphlans(2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMotokawa, M., Wu, Y. \u0026amp; Harada, M. Karyotypes of six soricomorph species from Emei shan, Sichuan province, China. \u003cem\u003eZoolog. Sci\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e26\u003c/b\u003e, 791\u0026ndash;797 (2009).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBulatova, N. S., Biltueva, L. S., Pavlova, S. V., Zhdanova, N. S. \u0026amp; Zima, J. Chromosomal differentiation in the common shrew and related species. in Shrews, Chromosomes and Speciation (Cambridge Studies in Morphology and Molecules: New Paradigms in Evolutionary Bio (ed. Searle, J.B., Polly, P.D., Zima, J.) 134\u0026ndash;184(Cambridge University Press, 2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYe, J. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Cross-species chromosome painting unveils cytogenetic signatures for the Eulipotyphla and evidence for the polyphyly of Insectivora. \u003cem\u003eChromosom. Res\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e14\u003c/b\u003e, 151\u0026ndash;159 (2006).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZima, J. \u0026amp; Lukacova, L., M. M. Chromosomal evolution in shrews. in Evolution of shrews (ed. Wojcik, J. M., Wolsan, M.)175\u0026ndash;218(Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Science, 1998).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRieseberg, L. H. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. \u003cem\u003eTrends Ecol. Evol\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e16\u003c/b\u003e, 351\u0026ndash;358 (2001).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePavlova, S. V. \u0026amp; Searle, J. B. Chromosomes and speciation in mammals. in Mammalian Evolution, Diversity and Systematics (eds. Zachos, F. \u0026amp; Asher, R.)17\u0026ndash;38(De Gruyter, 2018). doi:doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1515/9783110341553-002\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMotokawa, M., Harada, M., Lin, L. K. \u0026amp; Wu, Y. Geographic differences in karyotypes of the mole-shrew Anourosorex squamipes (Insectivore, Soricidae). \u003cem\u003eMamm. Biol\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e69\u003c/b\u003e, 197\u0026ndash;201 (2004).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHutterer, R. Order Soricomorpha. in Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, Volume\u0026nbsp;1 (ed. Wilson, D.E., Reeder, D. M.)220\u0026ndash;311(The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWan, T., He, K. \u0026amp; Jiang, X. L. Multilocus phylogeny and cryptic diversity in Asian shrew-like moles (Uropsilus, Talpidae): Implications for taxonomy and conservation. \u003cem\u003eBMC Evol. Biol\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e13\u003c/b\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;13 (2013).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHu, T. L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Description of a new species of the genus Uropsilus (Eulipotyphla: Talpidae: Uropsilinae) from the Dabie Mountains, Anhui, Eastern China. \u003cem\u003eZool. Res\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e42\u003c/b\u003e, 294\u0026ndash;299 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKawada, S., Li, S., Wang, Y. \u0026amp; Oda, S. Karyological study of Nasillus gracilis (Insectivora, Talpidae, Uropsilinae). \u003cem\u003eMamm. Biol\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e71\u003c/b\u003e, 115\u0026ndash;119 (2006).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoffmann, R. S. A Review of the Shrew-moles (Genus Uropsilus) of China and Burma. \u003cem\u003eJ. Mammal. Soc. Japan\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e10\u003c/b\u003e, 69\u0026ndash;80 (1984).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBannikova, A. A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Evolutionary history of the genus Sorex (Soricidae, Eulipotyphla) as inferred from multigene data. \u003cem\u003eZool. Scr\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e47\u003c/b\u003e, 518\u0026ndash;538 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoribe, J., Li, S., Wang, Y., Kobayashi, S. \u0026amp; Oda, S. Sorex bedfordiae has the smallest diploid chromosomme number of the XY Group in the Genus Sorex (Mammalia, Soricidae). Cytologia (Tokyo). 74, 95\u0026ndash;99(2009).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSheftel, B. I. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Notes on the Fauna, Systematics, and Ecology of Small Mammals in Southern Gansu, China. \u003cem\u003eBiol. Bull\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e45\u003c/b\u003e, 898\u0026ndash;912 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIvanitzkaya, E., Kozlovsky, A. I., Orlov, V. N., Kovalskaya, Y. M. \u0026amp; Baskevich, M. I. New data on karyotypes of common shrews (Sorex, Soricidae, Insectivora) in fauna of the USSR. \u003cem\u003eZool. Zhurnal\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e65\u003c/b\u003e, 1228\u0026ndash;1236 (1986).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTada, T. \u0026amp; Obara, Y. Karyological Relationships among Four and Subspecies of Sorex Revealed Differential Staining Techniques. \u003cem\u003eJ. Mamm. Soc. Japan\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e13\u003c/b\u003e, 21\u0026ndash;31 (1988).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoribe, J., Noro, T., Kobayashi, S. \u0026amp; Oda, S. I. The karyotype of the Azumi shrew Sorex hosonoi. \u003cem\u003eActa Theriol. (Warsz)\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e52\u003c/b\u003e, 69\u0026ndash;74 (2007).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHalkka, O., Skaren, U. \u0026amp; Halkka, L. The karyotypes of Sorex isodon Turov and S. minutissimus Zimm.\u003cem\u003eAnn. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A, IV Biol.\u003c/em\u003e1\u0026ndash;51(1970).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOrlov, V. N. \u0026amp; Kozlovsky, A. I. A synopsis of chromosome complements of shrews of the genus Sorex.\u003cem\u003eVestn. Mosk. Univ. Biol. i Počvovedenie\u003c/em\u003e12\u0026ndash;16(1971).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZima, J. \u0026amp; Kral, B. Karyotypes of European mammals. 1. \u003cem\u003eActa Sci. Nat. Brn\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e18\u003c/b\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;51 (1984).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFedyk, S. \u0026amp; Ivanitskaya, E. Y. Chromosomes of Siberian shrews. \u003cem\u003eActa Theriol. (Warsz)\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e36\u003c/b\u003e, 475\u0026ndash;492 (1972).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBiltueva, L. S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Comparative chromosome analysis in three Sorex species: S.raddei, S.minutus and S.caecutiens. vol.\u0026nbsp;45 119\u0026ndash;130(2000).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHarada, M. \u0026amp; Takada, S. Karyotypes of two species of insectivora from Taiwan (Insectivora, Soricidae)., \u003cb\u003e41\u003c/b\u003e, 510\u0026ndash;511 (1985).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKawada, S., Kurihara, N., Tominaga, N. \u0026amp; Endo, H. The First Record of Anourosorex (Insectivora, Soricidae) from Western Myanmar, with Special Reference to Identification and Karyological Characters. \u003cem\u003eBull. Natl. Museum Nat. Sci. Ser. A\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e40\u003c/b\u003e, 105\u0026ndash;109 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMotokawa, M., Harada, M., Lin, L. K., Cheng, H. C. \u0026amp; Koyasu, K. Karyological differentiation between two Soriculus (Insectivora: Soricidae) from Taiwan., \u003cb\u003e62\u003c/b\u003e, 541\u0026ndash;547 (1998).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMotokawa, M., Harada, M., Mekada, K. \u0026amp; Shrestha, K. C. Karyotypes of three shrew species (Soriculus nigrescens, Episoriculus caudatus and Episoriculus sacratus) from Nepal. \u003cem\u003eIntegr. Zool\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e3\u003c/b\u003e, 180\u0026ndash;185 (2008).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHeadl, W. F. Sky islands of Arizona. \u003cem\u003eNat. Hist\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e60\u003c/b\u003e, 56\u0026ndash;63 (1951).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHe, K. \u0026amp; Jiang, X. Sky islands of southwest China. I: an overview of phylogeographic patterns. \u003cem\u003eChinese Sci. Bull\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e59\u003c/b\u003e, 585\u0026ndash;597 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShchipanov, N. A. On the ecology of lesser white-toothed shrew (Crocidura suaveolens). \u003cem\u003eZool. Zhurnal\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e66\u003c/b\u003e, 1051\u0026ndash;1060 (1986).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShchipanov, N. A., Litvinov, Y. N. \u0026amp; Sheftel, B. I. Rapid method for estimating local biodiversity of a community of small mammals. \u003cem\u003eContemp. Probl. Ecol\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e1\u003c/b\u003e, 596 (2008).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePavlova, S. V., Borisov, S. A., Timoshenko, A. F. \u0026amp; Sheftel, B. I. \u0026lsquo;European\u0026rsquo; race-specific metacentrics in East Siberian common shrews (Sorex araneus): A description of two new chromosomal races, Irkutsk and Zima. \u003cem\u003eComp. Cytogenet\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e11\u003c/b\u003e, 797\u0026ndash;806 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFreshney, R. I. \u003cem\u003eCulture of animal cells: a manual of basic technique and specialized applications\u003c/em\u003e (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSeabright, M. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomese., \u003cb\u003e2\u003c/b\u003e, 971\u0026ndash;972 (1971).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSumner, A. T. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. \u003cem\u003eExp. Cell Res\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e75\u003c/b\u003e, 304\u0026ndash;306 (1972).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHowell, W. M. \u0026amp; Black, D. A. Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method., \u003cb\u003e36\u003c/b\u003e, 1014\u0026ndash;1015 (1980).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"chromosome variation, banding, Chinese shrew mole, shrew, autochthonous species, taxonomy","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-793070/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-793070/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eAmong seven species of the order Eulipotyphla (from southern Gansu and northern Sichuan Provinces, Central China) studied cytogenetically, karyotypes of one talpid species, \u003cem\u003eUropsilus aff. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;36, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;54), and three soricid species, \u003cem\u003eChodsigoa hypsibia\u003c/em\u003e (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;65, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;66), \u003cem\u003eSorex cansulus\u003c/em\u003e (2n\u0026thinsp;\u003cem\u003e=\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;42, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u0026thinsp;=\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;64) and \u003cem\u003eSorex thibetanus\u003c/em\u003e (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;42, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;60), are described cytogenetically for the first time. All four species are endemic to China with distribution ranges restricted to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and adjacent mountain ranges. The \u003cem\u003eCh. hypsibia\u003c/em\u003e karyotype consists of mostly acrocentric autosomes and one metacentric pair of autosomes; besides, a B chromosome was identified. No polymorphism was detected among karyotypes of other species, including shrews \u003cem\u003eSorex bedfordiae\u003c/em\u003e (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;26, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;44), \u003cem\u003eAnourosorex squamipes\u003c/em\u003e (2n\u0026thinsp;\u003cem\u003e=\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;48, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u0026thinsp;=\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;92) and \u003cem\u003eCrocidura suaveolens\u003c/em\u003e (2n\u0026thinsp;\u003cem\u003e=\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;40, NF\u003cem\u003ea\u0026thinsp;=\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;44). The Chinese shrew mole \u003cem\u003eU. aff. soricipes\u003c/em\u003e and three shrew species (\u003cem\u003eS. bedfordiae\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eCh. hypsibia\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eA. squamipes\u003c/em\u003e) represent autochthonous fauna of Central/Western China, whereas \u003cem\u003eS. thibetanus\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eS. cansulus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eC. suaveolens\u003c/em\u003e belong to phylogenetic groups occurring mostly to the north and west from China; therefore, they should be considered relatively recent colonisers. Thus, considering the relationships of the species within phylogenetic groups, our results on karyotypes are in good agreement with molecular genetic data.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"High Diversity of Small Insectivorous Mammals on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and First Description of Karyotype for four Endemics of China","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2021-08-19 13:52:28","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-793070/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revision","date":"2021-10-26T12:27:23+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2021-10-23T15:34:34+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"e6dd760d-7bc8-4141-b405-9f8a17fc265f","date":"2021-10-23T15:23:52+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2021-10-23T06:07:25+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2021-10-20T16:05:16+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2021-08-17T21:24:29+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2021-08-17T21:10:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2021-08-08T12:14:09+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"c8443656-3bc0-4ee3-bdad-edb5e34d4e4b","owner":[],"postedDate":"August 19th, 2021","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":6555574,"name":"Scientific Communication"},{"id":6555575,"name":"Evolutionary Biology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-12-30T11:54:47+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-793070","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03809-4","journal":{"identity":"scientific-reports","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Reports"},"publishedOn":"2021-12-01 11:54:47","publishedOnDateReadable":"December 1st, 2021"},"versionCreatedAt":"2021-08-19 13:52:28","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41598-021-03809-4","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03809-4","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-793070","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-793070","identity":"rs-793070","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"WrCJVZZCHTDjtuVLN7oU0","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}