Elimusertib enhances cytotoxic effects of conventional chemotherapy and sensitizes to radiation in preclinical Ewing sarcoma models

Elimusertib enhances cytotoxic effects of conventional chemotherapy and sensitizes to radiation in preclinical Ewing sarcoma models | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Elimusertib enhances cytotoxic effects of conventional chemotherapy and sensitizes to radiation in preclinical Ewing sarcoma models Leonhard Koch, Maximilian Kerkhoff, Maximilian Bretschneider, and 11 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7879443/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 27 Mar, 2026 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted 11 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Ewing Sarcoma (EwS) is a highly aggressive malignancy predominantly affecting young individuals, with poor prognosis in metastatic or relapsed cases. This study investigates the therapeutic potential of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) inhibition using the selective small-molecule inhibitor elimusertib, both as a monotherapy and in combination with cytotoxic drugs or radiotherapy. Elimusertib significantly inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in EwS cell lines. In a chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model, elimusertib suppressed tumor initiation and reduced tumor volume. Notably, elimusertib exhibited synergistic effects with standard chemotherapeutics and radiation, enhancing antitumor efficacy. These preclinical findings suggest that ATR inhibition by elimusertib may enhance current EwS therapies and enable dose reduction of cytotoxic drugs. Further clinical evaluation is warranted to validate these findings and explore elimusertib’s translational potential in EwS treatment. Biological sciences/Cancer Biological sciences/Drug discovery Health sciences/Oncology Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 INTRODUCTION EwS is a highly aggressive bone and soft tissue cancer that primarily affects children, adolescents, and young adults. Despite advances in multimodal therapies —including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy—the prognosis for patients with metastatic or recurrent EwS remains extremely poor. While the 5-year survival rate for patients with localized disease approaches 70%, it drops to approximately 30% for those with metastatic disease. Around 15% of EwS patients present with metastases at diagnosis, highlighting the urgent need for more effective therapies [ 1 ]. Current treatment protocols typically involve polychemotherapy followed by local therapy, such as surgery and/or radiotherapy. Commonly used chemotherapeutic agents include vincristine, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide, which aim to reduce tumor burden and manage systemic disease [ 2 ]. However, conventional chemotherapy is associated with substantial toxicity to normal tissue, long term health risks, and an elevated risk of secondary malignancies [ 3 – 9 ]. Local control of the primary tumor is critical; surgery is the mainstay when feasible and is often supplemented by radiotherapy to achieve complete tumor eradication or prevent recurrence [ 1 , 10 , 11 ]. For patients with metastatic or relapsed disease, therapeutic options remain limited and largely ineffective [ 1 , 12 , 13 ]. A hallmark of EwS is the presence of the EWSR1:FLI1 fusion protein that drives oncogenesis and promotes cell proliferation, which induces replication stress [ 1 , 14 – 16 ], triggering DNA damage response (DDR), which is primarily regulated by three kinases: ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR), and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). While ATM and DNA-PK primarily respond to double-strand DNA breaks, ATR responds to replication stress involving single-stranded DNA [ 17 – 19 ]. Due to their high level of replication stress, EwS cells are thought to be particularly reliant on ATR signaling for survival, making ATR inhibition a promising therapeutic strategy [ 20 , 21 ]. To systematically evaluate potential targeted therapies, we participated in the FORTRESS experiment, an international drug-screening effort using diverse sarcoma cell lines. In this context, we analyzed six novel agents—elimusertib (ATR inhibitor), niraparib (PARP inhibitor), molibresib (BET inhibitor), borussertib (AKT inhibitor), AZD1390 (ATM inhibitor), and AZD7648 (DNA-PK inhibitor)—in six EwS cell lines. Among these, elimusertib demonstrated the greatest efficacy based on half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀) values and was selected for further preclinical evaluation. This study investigates elimusertib´s potential as a therapeutic agent for EwS, both as monotherapy and in combination with standard chemotherapeutic regimen and radiation. Our findings suggest that ATR inhibition represents a promising strategy to improve therapeutic outcomes in EwS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cell culture The human EwS cell lines TC-32 and TC-71 were obtained from the cell line bank at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, CA, USA. The CADO-ES-1 and MHH-ES-1 EwS cell lines were originally sourced from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). The STA-ET-1 and EW-7 EwS cell lines were provided by Prof. Dr. Heinrich Kovar (Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria). The human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) line 70.2 was provided by PD Dr. Bernd Giebel (Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Essen, Germany). All tumor-derived cell lines were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640) medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS; Biochrom GmbH, Berlin, Germany) at 37°C in 5% CO 2 humidified atmosphere. Cells were cultured in collagen-coated tissue culture flasks (CADO-ES1, TC-32, TC-71) or uncoated flasks (all other cell lines). Subculturing was performed twice weekly by washing the monolayer with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco) followed by detachment with 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA (Gibco) and resuspension in fresh RPMI medium. All cell lines were regularly tested for mycoplasma contamination using the PCR Mycoplasma Detection Kit (AppliChem GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer´s protocol. Compounds and reagents Elimusertib (BAY1895344), AZ-20, berzosertib (VE-822), and ceralasertib (AZD6738) were obtained from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA). Niraparib, molibresib, borussertib, AZD7648, and AZD1390 were kindly provided by Prof. Dr. Sebastian Bauer. Vincristine, ifosfamide, and etoposide were purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) via Biomol (Hamburg, Germany) and doxorubicin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; AppliChem) to prepare stock solutions at 10 mM, except vincristine, which was prepared at 5 mM. Stock solutions were stored at − 20°C. Working solutions were freshly prepared by diluting stocks in the appropriate culture medium. DMSO-only treatments were used as vehicle controls to account for solvent-related effects. Cell viability Assay Cell viability was assessed using either the MTT assay (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; Sigma-Aldrich) or the MTS assay (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium; CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay, Promega). Cells were detached at 70–80% confluence, counted using Trypan Blue exclusion (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and seeded into 96-well plates at densities optimized —based on doubling time —for each cell line. After 24 h of adherence, cells were treated with inhibitors diluted in culture medium at various concentrations and incubated for 72 h. For MTT assays, 10 µL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL in PBS) was added to each well, yielding a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. Plates were incubated for 2 h at 37°C, followed by addition of 100 µL isopropanol to solubilize the resulting formazan crystals. For MTS assays, 15 µL of MTS reagent was added after 72 h of drug treatment, and plates were incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Absorbance was measured using a GENios microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland) at 570 nm for MTT and 490 nm for MTS. Each experiment was performed in technical triplicate and independently repeated at least three times. Flow Cytometry Assay To assess cell death following treatment with specific inhibitors, 1–3 × 10⁵ cells were seeded per well in 6-well plates and allowed to adhere for 24 h. Cells were then treated with inhibitors or vehicle control (DMSO) in culture medium and incubated for 48 or 72 h, depending on the experimental setup. Apoptosis was evaluated using the FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. This assay discriminates between early apoptotic, late apoptotic, and necrotic cell populations. Stained cells were analyzed on a BD Celesta flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data acquisition and analysis were performed using Kaluza 2.1 software (Beckman Coulter). Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Western Blot Western Blot For protein extraction, treated and untreated cell populations were trypsinized, washed with PBS, and lysed as previously described [ 22 , 23 ]. Protein expression was analyzed by western blot using chemiluminescence detection and visualized with a LAS-3000 Imaging System (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Primary antibodies used included phospho-CHK1 (pCHK1; #2348S) and PARP-1 (#9542S), both from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). β-Actin (sc-47778) was used as a loading control and was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies included anti-mouse IgG (#7076; Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-rabbit IgG (#554021; BD Pharmingen). Colony Formation Assay (CFA) To evaluate the long-term effects of radiation and inhibitor treatment on clonogenic survival, a modified spheroidal colony formation assay was performed. EwS cells were seeded into 6-well plates at densities ranging from 3 × 10³ to 1.5 × 10⁴ cells per well, depending on the cell line, and allowed to adhere for 24 h. One hour prior to irradiation, cells were treated with elimusertib (40 nM, approximating the average IC₅₀ from MTT assays) or vehicle (DMSO) and incubated for 72 h. Following treatment, cells were embedded in a semi-solid top layer consisting of 70% RPMI, 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S), and 0.4% soft agar (Biozym), then reseeded into 6-well plates containing a bottom layer composed of 70% RPMI, 20% FBS, and 0.6% soft agar (Biozym). Spheroidal colonies were allowed to form over 14 days. To visualize colonies, 500 µL of MTT solution was added to each well and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Plates were scanned using the Epson Perfection V850 Pro scanner (Epson, Suwa, Nagano, Japan), and colonies with an area of ≥ 20 pixels were quantified using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). Colony counts were normalized to untreated controls (DMSO) and are presented as mean ± SD for clarity. Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Assay The CAM assay was performed as previously described [ 24 , 25 ]. Briefly, fertilized chicken eggs were incubated at 37.8°C and 60% relative humidity, with 12 automatic rotations per day. On embryonic development day 2 (EDD2), a 1.5–2 cm diameter hole was carefully cut into the eggshell and sealed with medical silk tape (Durapore™, 3M, St. Paul, MN, USA). On EDD9, the seal was removed, and the CAM was gently perforated using a scalpel. A total of 100 µL of cell suspension (1 × 10⁶ cells resuspended in 100 µL Matrigel; Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) was applied directly onto the CAM surface. Tumor xenografts were allowed to develop until EDD16. At EDD16, tumors were excised, counted, and measured in three dimensions (length, width, and height). Tumor volume was calculated using the ellipsoid forumula V = (4/3)πabc where a, b and c are the lengths of the three semi-axes of the ellipsoid. Synergy Test To evaluate the combinatorial effects of elimusertib with standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapeutics (VIDE: vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, etoposide), EwS cells were treated with each agent as a single compound and in combination with elimusertib. A concentration matrix was established by preparing serial dilutions of both elimusertib and SOC drugs across a range of concentrations. After 72 h of treatment, cell viability was assessed using the MTS assay as described above. Absorbance values were uploaded to the SynergyFinder 3.0 platform ( https://synergyfinder.fimm.fi ), and synergy was quantified using the Zero Interaction Potency (ZIP) model in accordance with the platform's user guide. The ZIP model compares the dose–response curves of single agents and their combinations to assess drug interaction. A synergy score > 10 was interpreted as synergistic, − 10 to 10 as additive, and < − 10 as antagonistic. Additionally, the most synergistic area (MSA) score—representing the most synergistic 3-by-3 dose window within the matrix—was reported to localize maximal interaction effects [ 26 ]. Radiation To assess the radiosensitizing potential of elimusertib in EwS cells, photon irradiation experiments were performed using an Isovolt 320 X-ray machine (Seifert–Pantak, East Haven, CT, USA) operated at 320 kV and 10 mA, with a 1.65 mm aluminum filter. Irradiations were conducted at the Institute for Medical Radiation Biology, University Hospital Essen. Cells were exposed to radiation doses of 1, 2, or 3 Gy, with non-irradiated cells serving as controls. The dose rate was 1 Gy/min, and cells were briefly maintained at room temperature during irradiation. After exposure, cells were returned to standard culture conditions (37°C, 5% CO₂) and allowed to recover for 48 or 72 h, depending on the experimental design. Statistical analysis All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical comparisons between groups were performed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism, version 10.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). RESULTS ATR inhibition reduces cell viability of Ewing Sarcoma cell lines To assess efficacy of the FORTRESS-inhibitor candidates, we performed MTT assays in multiple EwS cell lines, including CADO-ES1, EW-7, MHH-ES-1, STA-ET-1, TC-32, and TC-71. The compounds tested included elimusertib (ATRi), niraparib (PARPi), molibresib (BETi), borussertib (AKTi), AZD1390 (ATMi), and AZD7648 (DNA-PKi). Among these, elimusertib was the most potent compound tested, with IC₅₀ values ranging from 10 nM (EW-7) to 35 nM (TC-71), followed by niraparib (IC₅₀ range: 46 nM in MHH-ES-1 to 497 nM in CADO-ES1). The remaining inhibitors showed considerably lower efficacy in EwS cells (Fig. 1 A). To evaluate selectivity, we tested elimusertib in the non-malignant hMSC 70.2 cell line, which showed an IC₅₀ of 379 nM (Supplementary Figure S1 ), corresponding to a significantly lower sensitivity, approximately 10-fold, compared to EwS cell lines. This indicates a proncounced selectivity of elimusertib for EwS cells.To benchmark elimusertib against other clinically relevant ATR inhibitors, we compared its potency to that of AZ-20, berzosertib, and ceralasertib, which are currently under investigation for various solid tumors including prostate, pancreatic, and lung cancers [ 27 , 28 ]. Elimusertib and berzosertib emerged as the most potent, with average IC₅₀ values of 25 nM and 46 nM, respectively, while ceralasertib and AZ-20 demonstrated reduced activity, with average IC₅₀ values of 138 nM and 108 nM (Supplementary Table S2). ATR inhibition induces apoptosis in Ewing Sarcoma cell lines We next investigated whether elimusertib induces apoptosis in EwS cells using flow cytometry with Annexin V/PI staining. Cells negative for both markers were classified as viable; Annexin V–positive/PI–negative cells as early apoptotic; PI–positive/Annexin V–negative as necrotic; and double-positive cells as late apoptotic (representative dot plots shown in Fig. 1 B). Consistent with the results of the MTT assay, treatment with 40 nM Elimusertib – significantly reduced the population of viable cells and increased the population late apoptotic cells, ranging from 17% in STA-ET-1 to 37% in EW-7 (Fig. 1 C). To further confirm apoptosis induction, western blot analysis revealed elevated levels of cleaved PARP1, a hallmark of programmed cell death, following elimusertib treatment (Fig. 1 D). Inhibition of ATR reduces tumor formation potential and tumor volume in vivo To evaluate the in vivo efficacy of elimusertib, we performed a CAM assay. EwS cells were pretreated with 40 nM elimusertib for 24 h and implanted onto the CAM at EDD9. Tumors were excised and analyzed at EDD16. Representative tumor images are shown in Fig. 1 E. Both the tumor take rate and tumor volumes were assessed. The take rate was significantly lower in the elimusertib-treated group (36 ± 8.6%) compared to controls (65 ± 6.4%) (p = 0.0161), indicating a notable reduction in tumor-forming potential (Fig. 1 F). Additionally, the average tumor volume in the elimusertib group was significantly reduced, measuring 0.5 ± 0.32 mm³ versus 1.1 ± 0.68 mm³ in the control group (p = 0.0004; Fig. 1 G). Combination of elimusertib with cytotoxic drugs demonstrates synergistic effects We next evaluated the combinatorial efficacy of elimusertib with standard-of-care chemotherapeutic agents—vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide—in EwS cell lines using MTS-based viability assays. Combination treatments consistently led to a greater reduction in cell viability than either agent alone, suggesting potential synergistic effects. For elimusertib combined with ifosfamide, MSA scores ranged from 16.9 to 27.6 across EW-7, STA-ET-1, and TC-71, indicating strong synergy at low-dose combinations (Fig. 2 A–D). Similar synergy was observed with etoposide (MSA scores: 12.6–30.8). In contrast, combinations with vincristine produced lower MSA scores (0.9–6.5), consistent with additive effects. For doxorubicin, effects were cell line–dependent: synergy was observed in TC-71 (23.26), while STA-ET-1 (1.92) and EW-7 (5.38) showed additive responses. Notably, no antagonistic interactions were observed in any cell line or drug combination tested (Fig. 2 E). Combination of elimusertib with radiation demonstrates synergistic effects in apoptosis induction To investigate whether elimusertib enhances the apoptotic response to radiotherapy, we performed flow cytometric apoptosis assays using Annexin V/PI staining. EwS cells were pretreated with 40 nM elimusertib for 1 h and subsequently exposed to increasing doses of X-ray radiation (0, 1, 2, or 3 Gy). Induction of apoptosis was assessed 48 h post-treatment, representative flow cytometry plots for EW-7 cells are shown in Fig. 3 A. Treatment with elimusertib alone led to increased late apoptotic populations across all cell lines: 15.4% in STA-ET-1, 19.8% in TC-71, and similar elevations in EW-7, compared to control (DMSO). Radiation alone also induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. At 1 Gy, late apoptosis reached 5.6% in TC-71, 7.6% in STA-ET-1, and 9.6% in EW-7. These values increased with higher doses, peaking at 8.2%, 12.6%, and 24.5%, respectively, at 3 Gy. The combination of elimusertib and radiation resulted in a significantly decreased viable cell population and a marked increase in late apoptosis in all three cell lines compared to either treatment alone. At 1 Gy, late apoptotic populations rose to 40% in EW-7 (p < 0.0001), 26% in STA-ET-1 (p = 0.0677), and 34% in TC-71 (p = 0.08). At 2 Gy, these values further increased to 52% in EW-7, 31% in STA-ET-1 (p = 0.0347), and 45% in TC-71 (p = 0.0078). The highest induction was observed at 3 Gy combined with elimusertib: 59% in EW-7 (p < 0.0001), 33% in STA-ET-1 (p = 0.0502), and 44% in TC-71 (p = 0.0096) (Fig. 3 B). These apoptotic responses were greater than the sum of effects observed with either treatment alone, indicating a synergistic interaction between elimusertib and radiation in EwS cells. Elimusertib inhibits radiation-induced Checkpoint-Kinase 1 phosphorylation To determine whether elimusertib suppresses activation of the ATR–CHK1 signaling pathway following DNA damage, we measured CHK1 phosphorylation levels in EwS cells exposed to radiation with or without elimusertib. CHK1 functions downstream of ATR, and its phosphorylation is a well-established marker of ATR pathway activation in response to genotoxic stress [ 29 ]. As expected, radiation alone induced a substantial increase in phosphorylated CHK1 (p-CHK1) compared to control (DMSO), confirming the effective activation of the DNA damage response. In contrast, pretreatment with elimusertib reduced radiation-induced CHK1 phosphorylation. Cells exposed to both elimusertib and radiation exhibited much lower p-CHK1 levels compared to those treated with radiation alone (Fig. 3 C). These findings indicate that elimusertib effectively inhibits ATR activity and its downstream target CHK1, thereby suppressing the radiation-induced DNA damage response. Elimusertib and radiation synergistically reduce colony formation To further evaluate the potential synergistic effects of ATR inhibition and radiation on long-term survival and proliferative capacity in EwS cells, a colony formation assay (CFA) was conducted. Cells were treated with 40 nM elimusertib 1 h prior to exposure to increasing doses of X-ray radiation (0, 1, 2, and 3 Gy). Representative images (EW-7) are shown in Fig. 3 D. Elimusertib treatment alone resulted in a moderate reduction in colony formation. Compared to untreated controls, the percentage of colonies formed following elimusertib monotherapy was 39 ± 22% in EW-7, 46 ± 26% in STA-ET-1, and 34 ± 29% in TC-71. Radiation alone also decreased colony numbers in a dose-dependent manner. A 1 Gy dose reduced colony formation to 33 ± 19% in EW-7, 30 ± 21% in STA-ET-1, and 75 ± 8% in TC-71. The combination of elimusertib and radiation led to a substantially greater reduction in colony formation than either treatment alone. Notably, treatment with 40 nM elimusertib combined with 1 Gy irradiation was more effective than 3 Gy radiation alone, reducing colony formation to 6.9 ± 2.9% in EW-7, 4.6 ± 4.6% in STA-ET-1, and 10 ± 6.6% in TC-71 (Fig. 3 E). These findings demonstrate that the combination of elimusertib and radiation reduced colony formation more than the sum of their individual effects, indicating a synergistic interaction. DISCUSSION This study evaluated six targeted inhibitors as part of the FORTRESS initiative, a collaborative drug-screening effort focused on sarcoma models. Among the tested agents, four compounds—borussertib, molibresib, AZD1390, and AZD7648—failed to demonstrate efficacy at clinically relevant concentrations. In contrast, the ATR inhibitor elimusertib and the PARP inhibitor niraparib significantly reduced EwS cell viability. Although PARP inhibitors have shown promise in preclinical EwS models [ 30 , 31 ], their limited clinical efficacy as monotherapies has been well documented [ 32 ]. These limitations led us to further investigate elimusertib, which demonstrated superior potency and selectivity. ATR is a central regulator of the DDR, particularly in response to replication stress and single-stranded DNA lesions [ 33 , 34 ]. ATR activation facilitates cell cycle arrest and DNA repair, enabling tumor cells to survive genotoxic stress. EwS cells, driven by the EWSR1::FLI1 fusion oncogene, are characterized by high levels of replication stress and genomic instability. This dependency renders them particularly vulnerable to ATR inhibition [ 21 ]. Inhibiting ATR induces synthetic lethality by disabling a critical survival pathway in the presence of therapy-induced DNA damage or replication-associated lesions—a therapeutic vulnerability that represents a therapeutically exploitable vulnerability [ 35 ]. Elimusertib treatment alone significantly impaired EwS cell proliferation and induced apoptosis, as confirmed by flow cytometry and PARP1 cleavage. In vivo , elimusertib reduced both tumor take rate and tumor volume in the chorioallantoic membrane model, consistent with previous findings in other tumor models [ 21 , 36 , 37 ]. These data confirm that elimusertib exerts robust antitumor effects as a monotherapy in EwS, both in vitro and in a biologically relevant in vivo setting. The potential of ATR inhibitors, such as elimusertib, to enhance chemotherapy efficacy is a topic of great interest across various cancer types, both in vitro and in vivo [ 38 – 44 ]. This strategy has been proven to be effective in several clinical trials that combined ATR inhibitors with DNA-damaging agents [ 45 – 48 ]. In EwS cell-derived xenografts low-dose cisplatin has been shown to synergize with ATR inhibition [ 49 ]. However, preclinical data on combining ATR inhibitors with standard of care therapies in EwS were lacking. To fill this void and assess the potential risks of antagonistic interactions in a clinical trial context, we conducted a synergy experiment. We observed consistent synergy between elimusertib and low-dose ifosfamide and etoposide, with additive effects for doxorubicin and vincristine. No antagonistic interactions were detected, suggesting that elimusertib can be safely integrated into existing chemotherapy regimens. These effects were evident at clinically achievable doses of elimusertib (2.5–20 nM) [ 50 , 51 ], highlighting its translational potential and supporting its advancement toward clinical evaluation. In relapsed or refractory disease—where outcomes with standard therapy remain poor—combining elimusertib with DNA-damaging agents may offer a rational and impactful therapeutic strategy [ 1 ]. The synergy we observed is mechanistically plausible. These agents primarily induce various forms of DNA damage—strand breaks, crosslinks, and intercalation—that trigger ATR activation. Inhibiting ATR in this context blocks damage sensing and repair, thereby enhancing cytotoxicity [ 35 ]. Vincristine, in contrast, disrupts microtubule dynamics without directly damaging DNA, which may explain its additive interaction with elimusertib. This mechanistic alignment reinforces the rationale for combining ATR inhibitors with DNA-damaging agents in EwS. Radiotherapy is integral to EwS management, particularly when surgical resection is infeasible [ 1 , 11 ]. However, re-irradiation is often contraindicated due to toxicity, and young patients face elevated risks of long-term complications and secondary malignancies [ 10 , 50 , 51 ]. Since radiation induces DNA damage that activates ATR, inhibiting ATR is a rational strategy for radiosensitization [ 52 ]. This concept has demonstrated efficacy in other cancer types [ 53 , 54 ]. Our results showed that combining 40 nM elimusertib with 1 Gy of radiation exceeded the effect of 3 Gy radiation alone, reducing clonogenic survival and increasing apoptosis in a synergistic manner. These findings suggest that elimusertib may enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy and/or enable dose de-escalation, with important implications for improving safety and long-term outcomes. Multiple ATR inhibitors—elimusertib, berzosertib, ceralasertib, and gartisertib—are currently in clinical trials for solid tumors [ 35 , 55 , 56 ]. These agents have been shown to be orally bioavailable and well tolerated, including in combination regimens [ 35 , 57 , 58 ]. Our findings add to this growing body of evidence, suggesting that ATR inhibition is not only feasible in EwS but may broaden the therapeutic index of existing treatment strategies. Future work should focus on optimizing combination dosing regimens and identifying biomarkers predictive of ATR inhibitor sensitivity. Additionally, while ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) inhibition did not yield significant monotherapeutic activity in our study, its role in radiation-induced double-strand break repair via the ATM–CHK2 pathway remains of interest [ 19 , 59 , 60 ]. Dual targeting of ATR and ATM may warrant further exploration, especially in the context of high-dose or fractionated radiation [ 33 ]. Clinical trials will be essential to validate these preclinical findings and to assess the safety and efficacy of elimusertib in patients with EwS. In summary, these findings demonstrate that elimusertib exerts potent anticancer activity in EwS models and synergizes with both DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics and radiation. Our findings support the integration of ATR inhibitors into EwS treatment protocols and provide a compelling rationale for their continued clinical development. Declarations CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study. FUNDING This work was supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF 01KD2207A) to U. Dirksen and S. Bauer; the Deutsche Krebshilfe (70113419) and the BILD hilft e.V. „Ein Herz für Kinder“ (PÄ-40605) to U. Dirksen; the Reichert-Alanod Foundation to M. Kerkhoff and U. Dirksen; and the Stichting Ewing Sarkoma to P. Plaumann and U. Dirksen. The funders played no role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the writing of this manuscript. Author Contribution The project was conceived by U.D. L.K. designed and conducted the study, performed all experiments except the CAM assay, analyzed the data, prepared all figures, and wrote the manuscript. M.Ke. performed and designed the CAM assay experiments, assisted with experimental setup, contributed to figure design, and provided feedback on the manuscript. C.S. supervised experiments, supported figure design, and contributed to manuscript preparation and feedback. M.B., S.D., P.P., E.M., and E.H. assisted with cell culturing and experiments. M.Ku. assisted with the design and interpretation of FACS experiments. D.R. provided the BET inhibitor borussertib and expertise in small-molecule chemistry. S.G. provided expertise in cell culturing and cell line models. S.B. provided conceptual guidance for the project. C.v.N. contributed to the design and interpretation of radiation experiments and provided valuable feedback on the manuscript. U.D. provided overall supervision and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript. Acknowledgement The authors gratefully acknowledge Hatice Önder for her valuable technical assistance throughout this study Data Availability The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. References Grünewald, T. P. et al. Ewing sarcoma. Nat. Reviews Disease Primers . 4 (1), 5–undefined (2018). Zöllner, S. K. et al. Ewing Sarcoma-Diagnosis, Treatment, Clinical Challenges and Future Perspectives . J. Clin. Med. , 10 (8). (2021). Herradón, E. et al. Cardiovascular Toxicity Induced by Chronic Vincristine Treatment. Front. Pharmacol. 12 , undefined–undefined (2021). Yang, Q. Y. et al. Vincristine-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Genetic Variation as a Potential Risk Factor. Front. Pharmacol. 12 , undefined–undefined (2021). Dulf, P. et al. Doxorubicin-induced acute cardiotoxicity is associated with increased oxidative stress, autophagy, and inflammation in a murine model. Naunyn. Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 396 (6), 1105–1115 (2023). Sinkule, J. A. Etoposide: a semisynthetic epipodophyllotoxin. Chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, adverse effects and use as an antineoplastic agent. Pharmacotherapy 4 (2), 61–73 (1984). Klastersky, J. Side effects of ifosfamide. Oncology 65 (Suppl 2), 7–10 (2003). Thorn, C. F. et al. Doxorubicin pathways: pharmacodynamics and adverse effects. Pharmacogenet Genomics . 21 (7), 440–446 (2011). Zahnreich, S. & Schmidberger, H. Childhood Cancer: Occurrence, Treatment and Risk of Second Primary Malignancies. Cancers 13 (11), 2607 (2021). Ahmed, S. K. et al. Analysis of Local Control Outcomes and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Localized Pelvic Ewing Sarcoma Patients Treated With Radiation Therapy: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 115 (2), 337–346 (2023). DuBois, S. G. et al. Comparative evaluation of local control strategies in localized Ewing sarcoma of bone: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Cancer 121 (3), 467–475 (2015). Stahl, M. et al. Risk of recurrence and survival after relapse in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Pediatr. Blood Cancer . 57 (4), 549–553 (2011). Paulussen, M. et al. Primary metastatic (stage IV) Ewing tumor: survival analysis of 171 patients from the EICESS studies. European Intergroup Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Studies. Ann. Oncol. 9 (3), 275–281 (1998). Ghargi, G. & Yustein, J. T. EWS-FLI1 Regulates Genotoxic Stress Response in Ewing . (2015). Yasir, M., Park, J. & Chun, W. EWS/FLI1 Characterization, Activation, Repression, Target Genes and Therapeutic Opportunities in Ewing Sarcoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (20), 15173 (2023). Halazonetis, T. D., Gorgoulis, V. G. & Bartek, J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 319 (5868), 1352–1355 (2008). Cimprich, K. A. & Cortez, D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9 (8), 616–627 (2008). Zeman, M. K. & Cimprich, K. A. Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat. Cell. Biol. 16 (1), 2–9 (2014). Weber, A. M. & Ryan, A. J. ATM and ATR as therapeutic targets in cancer. Pharmacol. Ther. 149 , 124–138 (2015). da Costa, A. et al. Targeting replication stress in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov . 22 (1), 38–58 (2023). Nieto-Soler, M. et al. Efficacy of ATR inhibitors as single agents in Ewing sarcoma. Oncotarget 7 (37), 58759–58767 (2016). Potratz, J. et al. Synthetic Lethality Screens Reveal RPS6 and MST1R as Modifiers of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Receptor Inhibitor Activity in Childhood Sarcomas. Cancer Res. 70 (21), 8770–8781 (2010). Potratz, J. et al. Receptor tyrosine kinase gene expression profiles of Ewing sarcomas reveal ROR1 as a potential therapeutic target in metastatic disease. Mol. Oncol. 10 (5), 677–692 (2015). Guder, W. et al. 5-ALA-mediated fluorescence of musculoskeletal tumors in a chick chorio-allantoic membrane model: preclinical in vivo qualification analysis as a fluorescence-guided surgery agent in Orthopedic Oncology. J. Orthop. Surg, Res. 17 (1), 34–undefined (2022). Kerkhoff, M. et al. Evaluation of the Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on CAM-Grown Sarcomas. Bioengineering 10 (4), 464–undefined (2023). Ianevski, A., Giri, A. K. & Aittokallio, T. SynergyFinder 3.0: an interactive analysis and consensus interpretation of multi-drug synergies across multiple samples. Nucleic Acids Res. 50 (W1), W739–W743 (2022). Yap, T. et al. Ceralasertib (AZD6738), an Oral ATR Kinase Inhibitor, in Combination with Carboplatin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase I Study. Clin. Cancer Res. 27 (19), 5213–5224 (2021). Kim, R. et al. Phase II study of ceralasertib (AZD6738) in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma who have failed prior anti-PD-1 therapy. Ann. Oncol. 33 (2), 193–203 (2022). Morgan, M. A. et al. Mechanism of radiosensitization by the Chk1/2 inhibitor AZD7762 involves abrogation of the G2 checkpoint and inhibition of homologous recombinational DNA repair. Cancer Res. 70 (12), 4972–4981 (2010). Brenner, J. C. et al. PARP-1 Inhibition as a Targeted Strategy to Treat Ewing's Sarcoma. Cancer Res. 72 (7), 1608–1613 (2012). Garnett, M. J. et al. Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells. Nature 483 (7391), 570–575 (2012). Choy, E. et al. Phase II study of olaparib in patients with refractory Ewing sarcoma following failure of standard chemotherapy. BMC Cancer . 14 (1), 813 (2014). Blackford, A. & Jackson, S. ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage Response. Mol. Cell . 66 (6), 801–817 (2017). Maréchal, A. & Zou, L. DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases . Cold Spring Harb Perspect. Biol. , 5 (9). (2013). Bradbury, A. et al. Targeting ATR as Cancer Therapy: A new era for synthetic lethality and synergistic combinations? Vol. 207, p. 107450 (Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2020). Pusch, F. et al. Elimusertib outperforms standard of care chemotherapy in preclinical patient-derived pediatric solid tumor models. bioRxiv, : p. 2022.11.10.515290. (2022). Pusch, F. et al. Elimusertib has Antitumor Activity in Preclinical Patient-Derived Pediatric Solid Tumor Models. Mol. Cancer Ther. 23 (4), 507–519 (2024). Jette, N. R. et al. Combined poly-ADP ribose polymerase and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated/Rad3-related inhibition targets ataxia-telangiectasia mutated-deficient lung cancer cells. Br. J. Cancer . 121 (7), 600–610 (2019). Lloyd, R. L. et al. Combined PARP and ATR inhibition potentiates genome instability and cell death in ATM-deficient cancer cells. Oncogene 39 (25), 4869–4883 (2020). Liu, S. et al. Inhibition of ATR potentiates the cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine on pancreatic cancer cells through enhancement of DNA damage and abrogation of ribonucleotide reductase induction by gemcitabine. Oncol. Rep. 37 (6), 3377–3386 (2017). Jossé, R. et al. ATR inhibitors VE-821 and VX-970 sensitize cancer cells to topoisomerase i inhibitors by disabling DNA replication initiation and fork elongation responses. Cancer Res. 74 (23), 6968–6979 (2014). Vendetti, F. P. et al. The orally active and bioavailable ATR kinase inhibitor AZD6738 potentiates the anti-tumor effects of cisplatin to resolve ATM-deficient non-small cell lung cancer in vivo. Oncotarget 6 (42), 44289–44305 (2015). Kim, H. J. et al. Anti-tumor activity of the ATR inhibitor AZD6738 in HER2 positive breast cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer . 140 (1), 109–119 (2017). Wallez, Y. et al. The ATR Inhibitor AZD6738 Synergizes with Gemcitabine In Vitro and In Vivo to Induce Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Regression. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 17(8): pp. 1670–1682. (2018). Thomas, A. et al. Phase I Study of ATR Inhibitor M6620 in Combination With Topotecan in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. (JCO) . 36 (16), 1594–1602 (2018). Wethington, S. et al. C ombination A TR (ceralasertib) and P A R P (olaparib) I nhibitor (CAPRI) Trial in Acquired PARP Inhibitor–Resistant Homologous Recombination–Deficient Ovarian Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 29 (15), 2800–2807 (2023). Yap, T. A. et al. 1LBA - Phase I modular study of AZD6738, a novel oral, potent and selective ataxia telangiectasia Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor in combination (combo) with carboplatin, olaparib or durvalumab in patients (pts) with advanced cancers. Eur. J. Cancer . 69 , S2 (2016). O'Carrigan, B. et al. Phase I trial of a first-in-class ATR inhibitor VX-970 as monotherapy (mono) or in combination (combo) with carboplatin (CP) incorporating pharmacodynamics (PD) studies. J. Clin. Oncol. 34 (15_suppl), 2504–2504 (2016). Ohmura, S. & Grünewald, T. P. Optimizing ATR Inhibition and Cisplatin Synergy in Ewing Sarcoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 30 (16), 3358–3360 (2024). Guder, W. K. et al. Pelvic Ewing sarcoma: a retrospective outcome analysis of 104 patients who underwent pelvic tumor resection at a single supra-regional center. J. Orthop. Surg, Res. 15 (1), 534 (2020). Kaiser, I. et al. Secondary Malignancies after Ewing Sarcoma—Epidemiological and Clinical Analysis of an International Trial Registry. Cancers 14 (23), 5920 (2022). Dillon, M. et al. Radiosensitization by the ATR Inhibitor AZD6738 through Generation of Acentric Micronuclei. Mol. Cancer Ther. 16 (1), 25–34 (2017). Tu, X. et al. ATR Inhibition Is a Promising Radiosensitizing Strategy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 17 (11), 2462–2472 (2018). Fokas, E. et al. Targeting ATR in vivo using the novel inhibitor VE-822 results in selective sensitization of pancreatic tumors to radiation. Cell. Death Dis. 3 (12), e441 (2012). Ortiz, M. et al. A phase 1/2 study of bay 18953444 (Elimusertib) in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors: Initial report of the phase 1 results of PEPN2112. J. Clin. Oncol. (JCO) . 41 (16_suppl), e15131–undefined (2023). Yap, T. A. et al. Abstract PR14: Phase I trial of first-in-class ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor VX-970 as monotherapy (mono) or in combination with carboplatin (CP) in advanced cancer patients (pts) with preliminary evidence of target modulation and antitumor activity. Mol. Cancer Ther. 14 (12_Supplement_2), PR14–PR14 (2015). Yap, T. A. et al. First-in-Human Trial of the Oral Ataxia Telangiectasia and RAD3-Related (ATR) Inhibitor BAY 1895344 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Cancer Discov . 11 (1), 80–91 (2021). Yap, T. A. et al. Abstract CT006: Phase Ib expansion trial of the safety and efficacy of the oral ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor elimusertib in advanced solid tumors with DNA damage response (DDR) defects. Cancer Res. 82 (12_Supplement), CT006–CT006 (2022). Qiu, Z., Oleinick, N. L. & Zhang, J. ATR/CHK1 inhibitors and cancer therapy. Radiother Oncol. 126 (3), 450–464 (2018). Zannini, L., Delia, D. & Buscemi, G. CHK2 kinase in the DNA damage response and beyond. J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6 (6), 442–457 (2014). Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files SupplementaryMaterialv3.pdf Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 27 Mar, 2026 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 01 Dec, 2025 Reviews received at journal 26 Nov, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 23 Nov, 2025 Reviews received at journal 12 Nov, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 30 Oct, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 29 Oct, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 28 Oct, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 28 Oct, 2025 Editor invited by journal 24 Oct, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 23 Oct, 2025 First submitted to journal 23 Oct, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7879443","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":538840879,"identity":"6e63bc6f-4558-4b9d-aaf9-8a6c5e5c35b8","order_by":0,"name":"Leonhard Koch","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Leonhard","middleName":"","lastName":"Koch","suffix":""},{"id":538840880,"identity":"4f1eda2e-035f-4be5-8e9a-12468a1bc22d","order_by":1,"name":"Maximilian Kerkhoff","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maximilian","middleName":"","lastName":"Kerkhoff","suffix":""},{"id":538840882,"identity":"d15021e3-d8c9-40cd-99cd-df9dcd455e24","order_by":2,"name":"Maximilian Bretschneider","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maximilian","middleName":"","lastName":"Bretschneider","suffix":""},{"id":538840883,"identity":"d9da622a-4a25-4bfa-9e6a-33f1158052be","order_by":3,"name":"Samet Dayi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Samet","middleName":"","lastName":"Dayi","suffix":""},{"id":538840884,"identity":"dd991b95-d1df-4cdf-8054-369903e22db6","order_by":4,"name":"Pauline Plaumann","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Pauline","middleName":"","lastName":"Plaumann","suffix":""},{"id":538840885,"identity":"827f38b6-c1cd-480d-9448-4750b0f35d11","order_by":5,"name":"Emilia Hillesheim","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Emilia","middleName":"","lastName":"Hillesheim","suffix":""},{"id":538840886,"identity":"58add834-f673-4e87-9380-9fd09de116a1","order_by":6,"name":"Emma Maaßen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Emma","middleName":"","lastName":"Maaßen","suffix":""},{"id":538840887,"identity":"2a13303f-4be8-423b-b569-0b489236771a","order_by":7,"name":"Marc Kuballa","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Marc","middleName":"","lastName":"Kuballa","suffix":""},{"id":538840888,"identity":"cb3cfbc5-4ebc-4d48-a4d7-ee821cdfc821","order_by":8,"name":"Christiane Schaefer","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Christiane","middleName":"","lastName":"Schaefer","suffix":""},{"id":538840890,"identity":"feb56d0a-54f3-4cad-9eb4-66de2cdc838e","order_by":9,"name":"Daniel Rauh","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"TU Dortmund University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Daniel","middleName":"","lastName":"Rauh","suffix":""},{"id":538840891,"identity":"09a96e0a-6556-464a-a94f-cb39bfa3a430","order_by":10,"name":"Susanne Grunewald","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Susanne","middleName":"","lastName":"Grunewald","suffix":""},{"id":538840892,"identity":"f734092a-9dd2-4c88-89aa-9109890f55c2","order_by":11,"name":"Sebastian Bauer","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sebastian","middleName":"","lastName":"Bauer","suffix":""},{"id":538840894,"identity":"935ad47a-98a0-4b5c-8a72-46c3d1e11c1f","order_by":12,"name":"Cläre von Neubeck","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Cläre","middleName":"","lastName":"von Neubeck","suffix":""},{"id":538840896,"identity":"4c7e208e-d484-4f74-a82f-6d26845dc049","order_by":13,"name":"Uta Dirksen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Essen University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Uta","middleName":"","lastName":"Dirksen","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-10-16 15:53:15","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7879443/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7879443/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41751-5","type":"published","date":"2026-03-27T16:12:22+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":95529726,"identity":"77027961-19c4-46bd-936a-7ad252735d04","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 10:17:26","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":4052662,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ElimusertibenhancescytotoxiceffectsofconventionalchemotherapyandsensitizestoradiationinpreclinicalEwingsarcomamodelsv8.0LK.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/8d45a6c8621576b30a14da35.docx"},{"id":95502561,"identity":"b5bf9ae6-b82e-44d4-aa05-cb72c3423107","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 05:37:04","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":13857,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ed03c32adac04290aaec697986027eaf.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/c3ed95e7dfa245824257a2b6.json"},{"id":95502567,"identity":"bb0dbdb1-8f7a-44d6-85f3-dfad1850906e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 05:37:04","extension":"pdf","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":492777,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryMaterialv3.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/c4ac45495ce0970b4884f0ad.pdf"},{"id":95502566,"identity":"10df68ee-5dff-4b5a-82e6-eecff2974368","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 05:37:04","extension":"xml","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":120791,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ed03c32adac04290aaec697986027eaf1enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/3a6e22003abb39ebfce70c22.xml"},{"id":95502560,"identity":"dd371857-544c-4061-902c-295f2aaa93de","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 05:37:04","extension":"eps","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":359,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"drawingimage1.eps","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/a0ef39f70df22413cc0629bc.eps"},{"id":95502565,"identity":"8d1dbe57-b12d-49b7-be63-0e5b85c0104b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 05:37:04","extension":"eps","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":602,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"drawingimage2.eps","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/6fa727d39e59abd2ba2f89fa.eps"},{"id":95502569,"identity":"85da8dfb-8ebc-43c4-bbae-0177a4a2bb2f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 05:37:05","extension":"jpeg","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":919669,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/47347b6dc2314bfa1a2a8271.jpeg"},{"id":95502575,"identity":"a04775b5-cdee-4b06-9438-116e046f64d8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 05:37:05","extension":"jpeg","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1349958,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/3089ce08e9a95844921fe538.jpeg"},{"id":95502572,"identity":"0436d79c-9461-429d-abec-e392047dfddb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 05:37:05","extension":"jpeg","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1451428,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/be8f2c1a9bdf10e995ea3a66.jpeg"},{"id":95528957,"identity":"c39074bc-64b9-4e6e-9a44-07eb8527e1f3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 10:16:38","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":196221,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/63fd8faabc94a791c444d338.png"},{"id":95528838,"identity":"9cd2b133-7d67-4ec4-9812-728ebc88cd6a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 10:16:32","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":157879,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/a36e852dee8e85b318cefdee.png"},{"id":95502573,"identity":"d973e464-0954-4036-b402-772a225ca26d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 05:37:05","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":144020,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/9b46a48ab871d55d59cadd17.png"},{"id":95529521,"identity":"f9952360-0d7a-4c70-a5a1-ca38cb95c4f1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 10:17:12","extension":"xml","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":117992,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ed03c32adac04290aaec697986027eaf1structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/087065184bbe91c6f929c59a.xml"},{"id":95502570,"identity":"c920a90f-0712-475f-b905-c69fee93b259","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 05:37:05","extension":"html","order_by":13,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":132979,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/04f6bcbe19198e33395fcf42.html"},{"id":95502558,"identity":"13de6a96-e0c8-4cfc-9463-3e1301758dad","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 05:37:04","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":504933,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAntitumor effects of elimusertib monotherapy on EwS cells \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ein vitro\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eand \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ein vivo\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e. A\u003c/strong\u003e, Heatmap of IC₅₀ values for six FORTRESS inhibitors in EwS cell viability assays after treatment for 72 hours. \u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e, Representative dot plot from Annexin V/PI flow cytometry analysis showing apoptosis induction following treatment with 40 nM elimusertib for 72 h. \u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e, Quantification of Annexin V/PI flow cytometry data, indicating apoptosis levels in elimusertib-treated EwS cells. \u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e, Representative western blot analysis showing cleaved PARP1 levels in EwS cells following following treatment with 40 nM elimusertib for 72 h. ß-Actin was used as loading control. Full-length blots are provided in the supplementary material. \u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e,\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eRepresentative images of cell-derived tumor xenografts on the CAM at EDD16. \u003cstrong\u003eF-G\u003c/strong\u003e, Quantification of tumor take rate (\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e) and tumor volume (\u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e) of tumors harvested from the CAM model. All experiments were independently repeated at least three times. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test and is indicated as follows: p \u0026lt; 0.05 (*), p \u0026lt; 0.01 (**), p \u0026lt; 0.001 (***), and p \u0026lt; 0.0001 (****)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/6fddd019626c8f004d561642.png"},{"id":95502564,"identity":"a6f3baf7-a6fb-41df-9d01-3fc24291bf8f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 05:37:04","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":564651,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSynergistic and additive effects of elimusertib in combination with standard of care drugs.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eA-D\u003c/strong\u003e, representative 2D and 3D synergy maps illustrating synergistic dose regions in red, antagonistic regions in green and the most synergistic area (MSA; most synergistic 3x3 dose window (indicated by the white square)) for the combinations of elimusertib with ifosfamide (A), etoposide (B), vincristine (C) and doxorubicin (D) in EwS cells. \u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e, table summarizing the overall synergy score (average across all doses) and MSA scores for all drug combinations and Ewing sarcoma cell lines. Synergy defined as ZIP \u0026gt; 10 was highlighted in red. Each experiment was independently repeated at least three times.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/3e6c6b2fec1c31e9fa9eae71.png"},{"id":95528011,"identity":"59d35d07-b32c-4eab-94f7-7e33a59725f0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 10:15:23","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":599882,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRadiosensitizing effects of elimusertib in EwS. A\u003c/strong\u003e, Representative dot plots from Annexin V/PI flow cytometry analysis showing apoptosis induction in EW-7 cells at increasing radiation doses (0-3 Gy), with or without \u0026nbsp;40 nm elimusertib for 48 h. \u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e, Quantification of Annexin V/PI FACS data, illustrating apoptosis levels across radiation doses, with or without elimusertib. \u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e, Representative western blot analysis showing elevated levels of p-CHK in cells subjected to radiation alone, and reduced levels of p-CHK when ATR was inhibited by elimusertib in Ew-7 cells following following treatment with 40 nM elimusertib for 72 h. ß-Actin was used as loading control. Full-length blots are provided in the supplementary material. \u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e, Representative images (EW-7) from a colony formation assay after radiation (1–3 Gy), with (bottom row) and without (top row) elimusertib taken after 14 days \u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e, Quantification of colony formation, comparing the number of colonies following radiation alone versus in combination with elimusertib. All experiments were independently repeated at least three times. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test and is indicated as follows: p \u0026lt; 0.05 (*), p \u0026lt; 0.01 (**), p \u0026lt; 0.001 (***), and p \u0026lt; 0.0001 (****).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/8236538a8b36d43e2833789c.png"},{"id":105755566,"identity":"612e2115-7d5b-459e-82ad-39f7084486fa","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-30 16:28:04","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2534121,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/0e812e52-e764-40f9-870d-05bf3cd287dc.pdf"},{"id":95529735,"identity":"ff421975-6d9a-446c-a942-2a9d23865407","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-10 10:17:27","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":492777,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryMaterialv3.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7879443/v1/18d718e713c66acb07c89fd0.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Elimusertib enhances cytotoxic effects of conventional chemotherapy and sensitizes to radiation in preclinical Ewing sarcoma models","fulltext":[{"header":"INTRODUCTION","content":"\u003cp\u003eEwS is a highly aggressive bone and soft tissue cancer that primarily affects children, adolescents, and young adults. Despite advances in multimodal therapies \u0026mdash;including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy\u0026mdash;the prognosis for patients with metastatic or recurrent EwS remains extremely poor. While the 5-year survival rate for patients with localized disease approaches 70%, it drops to approximately 30% for those with metastatic disease. Around 15% of EwS patients present with metastases at diagnosis, highlighting the urgent need for more effective therapies [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. Current treatment protocols typically involve polychemotherapy followed by local therapy, such as surgery and/or radiotherapy. Commonly used chemotherapeutic agents include vincristine, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide, which aim to reduce tumor burden and manage systemic disease [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e]. However, conventional chemotherapy is associated with substantial toxicity to normal tissue, long term health risks, and an elevated risk of secondary malignancies [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR4 CR5 CR6 CR7 CR8\" citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. Local control of the primary tumor is critical; surgery is the mainstay when feasible and is often supplemented by radiotherapy to achieve complete tumor eradication or prevent recurrence [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. For patients with metastatic or relapsed disease, therapeutic options remain limited and largely ineffective [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. A hallmark of EwS is the presence of the EWSR1:FLI1 fusion protein that drives oncogenesis and promotes cell proliferation, which induces replication stress [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR15\" citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e], triggering DNA damage response (DDR), which is primarily regulated by three kinases: ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR), and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). While ATM and DNA-PK primarily respond to double-strand DNA breaks, ATR responds to replication stress involving single-stranded DNA [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR18\" citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. Due to their high level of replication stress, EwS cells are thought to be particularly reliant on ATR signaling for survival, making ATR inhibition a promising therapeutic strategy [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. To systematically evaluate potential targeted therapies, we participated in the FORTRESS experiment, an international drug-screening effort using diverse sarcoma cell lines. In this context, we analyzed six novel agents\u0026mdash;elimusertib (ATR inhibitor), niraparib (PARP inhibitor), molibresib (BET inhibitor), borussertib (AKT inhibitor), AZD1390 (ATM inhibitor), and AZD7648 (DNA-PK inhibitor)\u0026mdash;in six EwS cell lines. Among these, elimusertib demonstrated the greatest efficacy based on half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀) values and was selected for further preclinical evaluation. This study investigates elimusertib\u0026acute;s potential as a therapeutic agent for EwS, both as monotherapy and in combination with standard chemotherapeutic regimen and radiation. Our findings suggest that ATR inhibition represents a promising strategy to improve therapeutic outcomes in EwS.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"MATERIALS AND METHODS","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCell culture\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe human EwS cell lines TC-32 and TC-71 were obtained from the cell line bank at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, CA, USA. The CADO-ES-1 and MHH-ES-1 EwS cell lines were originally sourced from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). The STA-ET-1 and EW-7 EwS cell lines were provided by Prof. Dr. Heinrich Kovar (Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria). The human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) line 70.2 was provided by PD Dr. Bernd Giebel (Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Essen, Germany). All tumor-derived cell lines were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640) medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS; Biochrom GmbH, Berlin, Germany) at 37\u0026deg;C in 5% CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e humidified atmosphere. Cells were cultured in collagen-coated tissue culture flasks (CADO-ES1, TC-32, TC-71) or uncoated flasks (all other cell lines). Subculturing was performed twice weekly by washing the monolayer with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco) followed by detachment with 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA (Gibco) and resuspension in fresh RPMI medium. All cell lines were regularly tested for mycoplasma contamination using the PCR Mycoplasma Detection Kit (AppliChem GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer\u0026acute;s protocol.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eCompounds and reagents\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElimusertib (BAY1895344), AZ-20, berzosertib (VE-822), and ceralasertib (AZD6738) were obtained from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA). Niraparib, molibresib, borussertib, AZD7648, and AZD1390 were kindly provided by Prof. Dr. Sebastian Bauer. Vincristine, ifosfamide, and etoposide were purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) via Biomol (Hamburg, Germany) and doxorubicin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; AppliChem) to prepare stock solutions at 10 mM, except vincristine, which was prepared at 5 mM. Stock solutions were stored at \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;20\u0026deg;C. Working solutions were freshly prepared by diluting stocks in the appropriate culture medium. DMSO-only treatments were used as vehicle controls to account for solvent-related effects.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eCell viability Assay\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCell viability was assessed using either the MTT assay (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; Sigma-Aldrich) or the MTS assay (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium; CellTiter 96\u0026reg; AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay, Promega). Cells were detached at 70\u0026ndash;80% confluence, counted using Trypan Blue exclusion (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and seeded into 96-well plates at densities optimized \u0026mdash;based on doubling time \u0026mdash;for each cell line. After 24 h of adherence, cells were treated with inhibitors diluted in culture medium at various concentrations and incubated for 72 h. For MTT assays, 10 \u0026micro;L of MTT solution (5 mg/mL in PBS) was added to each well, yielding a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. Plates were incubated for 2 h at 37\u0026deg;C, followed by addition of 100 \u0026micro;L isopropanol to solubilize the resulting formazan crystals. For MTS assays, 15 \u0026micro;L of MTS reagent was added after 72 h of drug treatment, and plates were incubated for 2 h at 37\u0026deg;C. Absorbance was measured using a GENios microplate reader (Tecan, M\u0026auml;nnedorf, Switzerland) at 570 nm for MTT and 490 nm for MTS. Each experiment was performed in technical triplicate and independently repeated at least three times.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eFlow Cytometry Assay\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo assess cell death following treatment with specific inhibitors, 1\u0026ndash;3 \u0026times; 10⁵ cells were seeded per well in 6-well plates and allowed to adhere for 24 h. Cells were then treated with inhibitors or vehicle control (DMSO) in culture medium and incubated for 48 or 72 h, depending on the experimental setup. Apoptosis was evaluated using the FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), following the manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s instructions. This assay discriminates between early apoptotic, late apoptotic, and necrotic cell populations. Stained cells were analyzed on a BD Celesta flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data acquisition and analysis were performed using Kaluza 2.1 software (Beckman Coulter). Results are presented as mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;standard deviation (SD).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eWestern Blot\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"Heading\"\u003eWestern Blot\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor protein extraction, treated and untreated cell populations were trypsinized, washed with PBS, and lysed as previously described [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. Protein expression was analyzed by western blot using chemiluminescence detection and visualized with a LAS-3000 Imaging System (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Primary antibodies used included phospho-CHK1 (pCHK1; #2348S) and PARP-1 (#9542S), both from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). β-Actin (sc-47778) was used as a loading control and was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies included anti-mouse IgG (#7076; Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-rabbit IgG (#554021; BD Pharmingen).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eColony Formation Assay (CFA)\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo evaluate the long-term effects of radiation and inhibitor treatment on clonogenic survival, a modified spheroidal colony formation assay was performed. EwS cells were seeded into 6-well plates at densities ranging from 3 \u0026times; 10\u0026sup3; to 1.5 \u0026times; 10⁴ cells per well, depending on the cell line, and allowed to adhere for 24 h. One hour prior to irradiation, cells were treated with elimusertib (40 nM, approximating the average IC₅₀ from MTT assays) or vehicle (DMSO) and incubated for 72 h. Following treatment, cells were embedded in a semi-solid top layer consisting of 70% RPMI, 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S), and 0.4% soft agar (Biozym), then reseeded into 6-well plates containing a bottom layer composed of 70% RPMI, 20% FBS, and 0.6% soft agar (Biozym). Spheroidal colonies were allowed to form over 14 days. To visualize colonies, 500 \u0026micro;L of MTT solution was added to each well and incubated for 2 h at 37\u0026deg;C. Plates were scanned using the Epson Perfection V850 Pro scanner (Epson, Suwa, Nagano, Japan), and colonies with an area of \u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;20 pixels were quantified using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). Colony counts were normalized to untreated controls (DMSO) and are presented as mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD for clarity.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eChorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Assay\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe CAM assay was performed as previously described [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. Briefly, fertilized chicken eggs were incubated at 37.8\u0026deg;C and 60% relative humidity, with 12 automatic rotations per day. On embryonic development day 2 (EDD2), a 1.5\u0026ndash;2 cm diameter hole was carefully cut into the eggshell and sealed with medical silk tape (Durapore\u0026trade;, 3M, St. Paul, MN, USA). On EDD9, the seal was removed, and the CAM was gently perforated using a scalpel. A total of 100 \u0026micro;L of cell suspension (1 \u0026times; 10⁶ cells resuspended in 100 \u0026micro;L Matrigel; Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) was applied directly onto the CAM surface. Tumor xenografts were allowed to develop until EDD16. At EDD16, tumors were excised, counted, and measured in three dimensions (length, width, and height). Tumor volume was calculated using the ellipsoid forumula V = (4/3)πabc where a, b and c are the lengths of the three semi-axes of the ellipsoid.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eSynergy Test\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo evaluate the combinatorial effects of elimusertib with standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapeutics (VIDE: vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, etoposide), EwS cells were treated with each agent as a single compound and in combination with elimusertib. A concentration matrix was established by preparing serial dilutions of both elimusertib and SOC drugs across a range of concentrations. After 72 h of treatment, cell viability was assessed using the MTS assay as described above. Absorbance values were uploaded to the SynergyFinder 3.0 platform (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://synergyfinder.fimm.fi\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://synergyfinder.fimm.fi\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e), and synergy was quantified using the Zero Interaction Potency (ZIP) model in accordance with the platform's user guide. The ZIP model compares the dose\u0026ndash;response curves of single agents and their combinations to assess drug interaction. A synergy score\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;10 was interpreted as synergistic, \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;10 to 10 as additive, and \u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;10 as antagonistic. Additionally, the most synergistic area (MSA) score\u0026mdash;representing the most synergistic 3-by-3 dose window within the matrix\u0026mdash;was reported to localize maximal interaction effects [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eRadiation\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo assess the radiosensitizing potential of elimusertib in EwS cells, photon irradiation experiments were performed using an Isovolt 320 X-ray machine (Seifert\u0026ndash;Pantak, East Haven, CT, USA) operated at 320 kV and 10 mA, with a 1.65 mm aluminum filter. Irradiations were conducted at the Institute for Medical Radiation Biology, University Hospital Essen. Cells were exposed to radiation doses of 1, 2, or 3 Gy, with non-irradiated cells serving as controls. The dose rate was 1 Gy/min, and cells were briefly maintained at room temperature during irradiation. After exposure, cells were returned to standard culture conditions (37\u0026deg;C, 5% CO₂) and allowed to recover for 48 or 72 h, depending on the experimental design.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll data are presented as mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD. Statistical comparisons between groups were performed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A p-value of \u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism, version 10.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"RESULTS","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eATR inhibition reduces cell viability of Ewing Sarcoma cell lines\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo assess efficacy of the FORTRESS-inhibitor candidates, we performed MTT assays in multiple EwS cell lines, including CADO-ES1, EW-7, MHH-ES-1, STA-ET-1, TC-32, and TC-71. The compounds tested included elimusertib (ATRi), niraparib (PARPi), molibresib (BETi), borussertib (AKTi), AZD1390 (ATMi), and AZD7648 (DNA-PKi). Among these, elimusertib was the most potent compound tested, with IC₅₀ values ranging from 10 nM (EW-7) to 35 nM (TC-71), followed by niraparib (IC₅₀ range: 46 nM in MHH-ES-1 to 497 nM in CADO-ES1). The remaining inhibitors showed considerably lower efficacy in EwS cells (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eA). To evaluate selectivity, we tested elimusertib in the non-malignant hMSC 70.2 cell line, which showed an IC₅₀ of 379 nM (Supplementary Figure \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e), corresponding to a significantly lower sensitivity, approximately 10-fold, compared to EwS cell lines. This indicates a proncounced selectivity of elimusertib for EwS cells.To benchmark elimusertib against other clinically relevant ATR inhibitors, we compared its potency to that of AZ-20, berzosertib, and ceralasertib, which are currently under investigation for various solid tumors including prostate, pancreatic, and lung cancers [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. Elimusertib and berzosertib emerged as the most potent, with average IC₅₀ values of 25 nM and 46 nM, respectively, while ceralasertib and AZ-20 demonstrated reduced activity, with average IC₅₀ values of 138 nM and 108 nM (Supplementary Table S2).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eATR inhibition induces apoptosis in Ewing Sarcoma cell lines\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe next investigated whether elimusertib induces apoptosis in EwS cells using flow cytometry with Annexin V/PI staining. Cells negative for both markers were classified as viable; Annexin V\u0026ndash;positive/PI\u0026ndash;negative cells as early apoptotic; PI\u0026ndash;positive/Annexin V\u0026ndash;negative as necrotic; and double-positive cells as late apoptotic (representative dot plots shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eB). Consistent with the results of the MTT assay, treatment with 40 nM Elimusertib \u0026ndash; significantly reduced the population of viable cells and increased the population late apoptotic cells, ranging from 17% in STA-ET-1 to 37% in EW-7 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eC). To further confirm apoptosis induction, western blot analysis revealed elevated levels of cleaved PARP1, a hallmark of programmed cell death, following elimusertib treatment (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eD).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eInhibition of ATR reduces tumor formation potential and tumor volume\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003ein vivo\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo evaluate the \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e efficacy of elimusertib, we performed a CAM assay. EwS cells were pretreated with 40 nM elimusertib for 24 h and implanted onto the CAM at EDD9. Tumors were excised and analyzed at EDD16. Representative tumor images are shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eE. Both the tumor take rate and tumor volumes were assessed. The take rate was significantly lower in the elimusertib-treated group (36\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.6%) compared to controls (65\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.4%) (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.0161), indicating a notable reduction in tumor-forming potential (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eF). Additionally, the average tumor volume in the elimusertib group was significantly reduced, measuring 0.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.32 mm\u0026sup3; versus 1.1\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.68 mm\u0026sup3; in the control group (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.0004; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eG).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCombination of elimusertib with cytotoxic drugs demonstrates synergistic effects\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe next evaluated the combinatorial efficacy of elimusertib with standard-of-care chemotherapeutic agents\u0026mdash;vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide\u0026mdash;in EwS cell lines using MTS-based viability assays. Combination treatments consistently led to a greater reduction in cell viability than either agent alone, suggesting potential synergistic effects. For elimusertib combined with ifosfamide, MSA scores ranged from 16.9 to 27.6 across EW-7, STA-ET-1, and TC-71, indicating strong synergy at low-dose combinations (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA\u0026ndash;D). Similar synergy was observed with etoposide (MSA scores: 12.6\u0026ndash;30.8). In contrast, combinations with vincristine produced lower MSA scores (0.9\u0026ndash;6.5), consistent with additive effects. For doxorubicin, effects were cell line\u0026ndash;dependent: synergy was observed in TC-71 (23.26), while STA-ET-1 (1.92) and EW-7 (5.38) showed additive responses. Notably, no antagonistic interactions were observed in any cell line or drug combination tested (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eE).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCombination of elimusertib with radiation demonstrates synergistic effects in apoptosis induction\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo investigate whether elimusertib enhances the apoptotic response to radiotherapy, we performed flow cytometric apoptosis assays using Annexin V/PI staining. EwS cells were pretreated with 40 nM elimusertib for 1 h and subsequently exposed to increasing doses of X-ray radiation (0, 1, 2, or 3 Gy). Induction of apoptosis was assessed 48 h post-treatment, representative flow cytometry plots for EW-7 cells are shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA. Treatment with elimusertib alone led to increased late apoptotic populations across all cell lines: 15.4% in STA-ET-1, 19.8% in TC-71, and similar elevations in EW-7, compared to control (DMSO). Radiation alone also induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. At 1 Gy, late apoptosis reached 5.6% in TC-71, 7.6% in STA-ET-1, and 9.6% in EW-7. These values increased with higher doses, peaking at 8.2%, 12.6%, and 24.5%, respectively, at 3 Gy. The combination of elimusertib and radiation resulted in a significantly decreased viable cell population and a marked increase in late apoptosis in all three cell lines compared to either treatment alone. At 1 Gy, late apoptotic populations rose to 40% in EW-7 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001), 26% in STA-ET-1 (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.0677), and 34% in TC-71 (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.08). At 2 Gy, these values further increased to 52% in EW-7, 31% in STA-ET-1 (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.0347), and 45% in TC-71 (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.0078). The highest induction was observed at 3 Gy combined with elimusertib: 59% in EW-7 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001), 33% in STA-ET-1 (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.0502), and 44% in TC-71 (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.0096) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB). These apoptotic responses were greater than the sum of effects observed with either treatment alone, indicating a synergistic interaction between elimusertib and radiation in EwS cells.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eElimusertib inhibits radiation-induced Checkpoint-Kinase 1 phosphorylation\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo determine whether elimusertib suppresses activation of the ATR\u0026ndash;CHK1 signaling pathway following DNA damage, we measured CHK1 phosphorylation levels in EwS cells exposed to radiation with or without elimusertib. CHK1 functions downstream of ATR, and its phosphorylation is a well-established marker of ATR pathway activation in response to genotoxic stress [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e]. As expected, radiation alone induced a substantial increase in phosphorylated CHK1 (p-CHK1) compared to control (DMSO), confirming the effective activation of the DNA damage response. In contrast, pretreatment with elimusertib reduced radiation-induced CHK1 phosphorylation. Cells exposed to both elimusertib and radiation exhibited much lower p-CHK1 levels compared to those treated with radiation alone (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eC). These findings indicate that elimusertib effectively inhibits ATR activity and its downstream target CHK1, thereby suppressing the radiation-induced DNA damage response.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eElimusertib and radiation synergistically reduce colony formation\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo further evaluate the potential synergistic effects of ATR inhibition and radiation on long-term survival and proliferative capacity in EwS cells, a colony formation assay (CFA) was conducted. Cells were treated with 40 nM elimusertib 1 h prior to exposure to increasing doses of X-ray radiation (0, 1, 2, and 3 Gy). Representative images (EW-7) are shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD. Elimusertib treatment alone resulted in a moderate reduction in colony formation. Compared to untreated controls, the percentage of colonies formed following elimusertib monotherapy was 39\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;22% in EW-7, 46\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;26% in STA-ET-1, and 34\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;29% in TC-71. Radiation alone also decreased colony numbers in a dose-dependent manner. A 1 Gy dose reduced colony formation to 33\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;19% in EW-7, 30\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;21% in STA-ET-1, and 75\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8% in TC-71. The combination of elimusertib and radiation led to a substantially greater reduction in colony formation than either treatment alone. Notably, treatment with 40 nM elimusertib combined with 1 Gy irradiation was more effective than 3 Gy radiation alone, reducing colony formation to 6.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.9% in EW-7, 4.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.6% in STA-ET-1, and 10\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.6% in TC-71 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eE). These findings demonstrate that the combination of elimusertib and radiation reduced colony formation more than the sum of their individual effects, indicating a synergistic interaction.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"DISCUSSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study evaluated six targeted inhibitors as part of the FORTRESS initiative, a collaborative drug-screening effort focused on sarcoma models. Among the tested agents, four compounds\u0026mdash;borussertib, molibresib, AZD1390, and AZD7648\u0026mdash;failed to demonstrate efficacy at clinically relevant concentrations. In contrast, the ATR inhibitor elimusertib and the PARP inhibitor niraparib significantly reduced EwS cell viability. Although PARP inhibitors have shown promise in preclinical EwS models [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e], their limited clinical efficacy as monotherapies has been well documented [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e]. These limitations led us to further investigate elimusertib, which demonstrated superior potency and selectivity. ATR is a central regulator of the DDR, particularly in response to replication stress and single-stranded DNA lesions [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. ATR activation facilitates cell cycle arrest and DNA repair, enabling tumor cells to survive genotoxic stress. EwS cells, driven by the EWSR1::FLI1 fusion oncogene, are characterized by high levels of replication stress and genomic instability. This dependency renders them particularly vulnerable to ATR inhibition [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. Inhibiting ATR induces synthetic lethality by disabling a critical survival pathway in the presence of therapy-induced DNA damage or replication-associated lesions\u0026mdash;a therapeutic vulnerability that represents a therapeutically exploitable vulnerability [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e]. Elimusertib treatment alone significantly impaired EwS cell proliferation and induced apoptosis, as confirmed by flow cytometry and PARP1 cleavage. \u003cem\u003eIn vivo\u003c/em\u003e, elimusertib reduced both tumor take rate and tumor volume in the chorioallantoic membrane model, consistent with previous findings in other tumor models [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e]. These data confirm that elimusertib exerts robust antitumor effects as a monotherapy in EwS, both \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e and in a biologically relevant \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e setting. The potential of ATR inhibitors, such as elimusertib, to enhance chemotherapy efficacy is a topic of great interest across various cancer types, both \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR39 CR40 CR41 CR42 CR43\" citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. This strategy has been proven to be effective in several clinical trials that combined ATR inhibitors with DNA-damaging agents [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR46 CR47\" citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e]. In EwS cell-derived xenografts low-dose cisplatin has been shown to synergize with ATR inhibition [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e]. However, preclinical data on combining ATR inhibitors with standard of care therapies in EwS were lacking. To fill this void and assess the potential risks of antagonistic interactions in a clinical trial context, we conducted a synergy experiment. We observed consistent synergy between elimusertib and low-dose ifosfamide and etoposide, with additive effects for doxorubicin and vincristine. No antagonistic interactions were detected, suggesting that elimusertib can be safely integrated into existing chemotherapy regimens. These effects were evident at clinically achievable doses of elimusertib (2.5\u0026ndash;20 nM) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e], highlighting its translational potential and supporting its advancement toward clinical evaluation. In relapsed or refractory disease\u0026mdash;where outcomes with standard therapy remain poor\u0026mdash;combining elimusertib with DNA-damaging agents may offer a rational and impactful therapeutic strategy [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. The synergy we observed is mechanistically plausible. These agents primarily induce various forms of DNA damage\u0026mdash;strand breaks, crosslinks, and intercalation\u0026mdash;that trigger ATR activation. Inhibiting ATR in this context blocks damage sensing and repair, thereby enhancing cytotoxicity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e]. Vincristine, in contrast, disrupts microtubule dynamics without directly damaging DNA, which may explain its additive interaction with elimusertib. This mechanistic alignment reinforces the rationale for combining ATR inhibitors with DNA-damaging agents in EwS. Radiotherapy is integral to EwS management, particularly when surgical resection is infeasible [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. However, re-irradiation is often contraindicated due to toxicity, and young patients face elevated risks of long-term complications and secondary malignancies [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e]. Since radiation induces DNA damage that activates ATR, inhibiting ATR is a rational strategy for radiosensitization [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e]. This concept has demonstrated efficacy in other cancer types [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e]. Our results showed that combining 40 nM elimusertib with 1 Gy of radiation exceeded the effect of 3 Gy radiation alone, reducing clonogenic survival and increasing apoptosis in a synergistic manner. These findings suggest that elimusertib may enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy and/or enable dose de-escalation, with important implications for improving safety and long-term outcomes. Multiple ATR inhibitors\u0026mdash;elimusertib, berzosertib, ceralasertib, and gartisertib\u0026mdash;are currently in clinical trials for solid tumors [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e]. These agents have been shown to be orally bioavailable and well tolerated, including in combination regimens [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e]. Our findings add to this growing body of evidence, suggesting that ATR inhibition is not only feasible in EwS but may broaden the therapeutic index of existing treatment strategies. Future work should focus on optimizing combination dosing regimens and identifying biomarkers predictive of ATR inhibitor sensitivity. Additionally, while ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) inhibition did not yield significant monotherapeutic activity in our study, its role in radiation-induced double-strand break repair via the ATM\u0026ndash;CHK2 pathway remains of interest [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e]. Dual targeting of ATR and ATM may warrant further exploration, especially in the context of high-dose or fractionated radiation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]. Clinical trials will be essential to validate these preclinical findings and to assess the safety and efficacy of elimusertib in patients with EwS. In summary, these findings demonstrate that elimusertib exerts potent anticancer activity in EwS models and synergizes with both DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics and radiation. Our findings support the integration of ATR inhibitors into EwS treatment protocols and provide a compelling rationale for their continued clinical development.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCONFLICTS OF INTEREST\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFUNDING\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis work was supported by the Bundesministerium f\u0026uuml;r Bildung und Forschung (BMBF 01KD2207A) to U. Dirksen and S. Bauer; the Deutsche Krebshilfe (70113419) and the BILD hilft e.V. \u0026bdquo;Ein Herz f\u0026uuml;r Kinder\u0026ldquo; (P\u0026Auml;-40605) to U. Dirksen; the Reichert-Alanod Foundation to M. Kerkhoff and U. Dirksen; and the Stichting Ewing Sarkoma to P. Plaumann and U. Dirksen. The funders played no role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the writing of this manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe project was conceived by U.D. L.K. designed and conducted the study, performed all experiments except the CAM assay, analyzed the data, prepared all figures, and wrote the manuscript. M.Ke. performed and designed the CAM assay experiments, assisted with experimental setup, contributed to figure design, and provided feedback on the manuscript. C.S. supervised experiments, supported figure design, and contributed to manuscript preparation and feedback. M.B., S.D., P.P., E.M., and E.H. assisted with cell culturing and experiments. M.Ku. assisted with the design and interpretation of FACS experiments. D.R. provided the BET inhibitor borussertib and expertise in small-molecule chemistry. S.G. provided expertise in cell culturing and cell line models. S.B. provided conceptual guidance for the project. C.v.N. contributed to the design and interpretation of radiation experiments and provided valuable feedback on the manuscript. U.D. provided overall supervision and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgement\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe authors gratefully acknowledge Hatice \u0026Ouml;nder for her valuable technical assistance throughout this study\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData Availability\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGr\u0026uuml;newald, T. P. et al. Ewing sarcoma. \u003cem\u003eNat. Reviews Disease Primers\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e4\u003c/b\u003e (1), 5\u0026ndash;undefined (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZ\u0026ouml;llner, S. K. et al. \u003cem\u003eEwing Sarcoma-Diagnosis, Treatment, Clinical Challenges and Future Perspectives\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eJ. Clin. Med.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e10\u003c/b\u003e(8). (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHerrad\u0026oacute;n, E. et al. Cardiovascular Toxicity Induced by Chronic Vincristine Treatment. \u003cem\u003eFront. Pharmacol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e12\u003c/b\u003e, undefined\u0026ndash;undefined (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYang, Q. Y. et al. Vincristine-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Genetic Variation as a Potential Risk Factor. \u003cem\u003eFront. Pharmacol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e12\u003c/b\u003e, undefined\u0026ndash;undefined (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDulf, P. et al. Doxorubicin-induced acute cardiotoxicity is associated with increased oxidative stress, autophagy, and inflammation in a murine model. \u003cem\u003eNaunyn. Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e396\u003c/b\u003e (6), 1105\u0026ndash;1115 (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSinkule, J. A. Etoposide: a semisynthetic epipodophyllotoxin. Chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, adverse effects and use as an antineoplastic agent. \u003cem\u003ePharmacotherapy\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e4\u003c/b\u003e (2), 61\u0026ndash;73 (1984).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKlastersky, J. Side effects of ifosfamide. \u003cem\u003eOncology\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e65\u003c/b\u003e (Suppl 2), 7\u0026ndash;10 (2003).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThorn, C. F. et al. Doxorubicin pathways: pharmacodynamics and adverse effects. \u003cem\u003ePharmacogenet Genomics\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e21\u003c/b\u003e (7), 440\u0026ndash;446 (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZahnreich, S. \u0026amp; Schmidberger, H. Childhood Cancer: Occurrence, Treatment and Risk of Second Primary Malignancies. \u003cem\u003eCancers\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e13\u003c/b\u003e (11), 2607 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAhmed, S. K. et al. Analysis of Local Control Outcomes and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Localized Pelvic Ewing Sarcoma Patients Treated With Radiation Therapy: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e115\u003c/b\u003e (2), 337\u0026ndash;346 (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDuBois, S. G. et al. Comparative evaluation of local control strategies in localized Ewing sarcoma of bone: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. \u003cem\u003eCancer\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e121\u003c/b\u003e (3), 467\u0026ndash;475 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStahl, M. et al. Risk of recurrence and survival after relapse in patients with Ewing sarcoma. \u003cem\u003ePediatr. Blood Cancer\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e57\u003c/b\u003e (4), 549\u0026ndash;553 (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePaulussen, M. et al. Primary metastatic (stage IV) Ewing tumor: survival analysis of 171 patients from the EICESS studies. European Intergroup Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Studies. \u003cem\u003eAnn. Oncol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e9\u003c/b\u003e (3), 275\u0026ndash;281 (1998).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGhargi, G. \u0026amp; Yustein, J. T. \u003cem\u003eEWS-FLI1 Regulates Genotoxic Stress Response in Ewing\u003c/em\u003e. (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYasir, M., Park, J. \u0026amp; Chun, W. EWS/FLI1 Characterization, Activation, Repression, Target Genes and Therapeutic Opportunities in Ewing Sarcoma. \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Mol. Sci.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e24\u003c/b\u003e (20), 15173 (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHalazonetis, T. D., Gorgoulis, V. G. \u0026amp; Bartek, J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. \u003cem\u003eScience\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e319\u003c/b\u003e (5868), 1352\u0026ndash;1355 (2008).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCimprich, K. A. \u0026amp; Cortez, D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. \u003cem\u003eNat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e9\u003c/b\u003e (8), 616\u0026ndash;627 (2008).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZeman, M. K. \u0026amp; Cimprich, K. A. Causes and consequences of replication stress. \u003cem\u003eNat. Cell. Biol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e16\u003c/b\u003e (1), 2\u0026ndash;9 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWeber, A. M. \u0026amp; Ryan, A. J. ATM and ATR as therapeutic targets in cancer. \u003cem\u003ePharmacol. Ther.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e149\u003c/b\u003e, 124\u0026ndash;138 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eda Costa, A. et al. Targeting replication stress in cancer therapy. \u003cem\u003eNat. Rev. Drug Discov\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e22\u003c/b\u003e (1), 38\u0026ndash;58 (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNieto-Soler, M. et al. Efficacy of ATR inhibitors as single agents in Ewing sarcoma. \u003cem\u003eOncotarget\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e7\u003c/b\u003e (37), 58759\u0026ndash;58767 (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePotratz, J. et al. Synthetic Lethality Screens Reveal RPS6 and MST1R as Modifiers of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Receptor Inhibitor Activity in Childhood Sarcomas. \u003cem\u003eCancer Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e70\u003c/b\u003e (21), 8770\u0026ndash;8781 (2010).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePotratz, J. et al. Receptor tyrosine kinase gene expression profiles of Ewing sarcomas reveal ROR1 as a potential therapeutic target in metastatic disease. \u003cem\u003eMol. Oncol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e10\u003c/b\u003e (5), 677\u0026ndash;692 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGuder, W. et al. 5-ALA-mediated fluorescence of musculoskeletal tumors in a chick chorio-allantoic membrane model: preclinical in vivo qualification analysis as a fluorescence-guided surgery agent in Orthopedic Oncology. \u003cem\u003eJ. Orthop. Surg, Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e17\u003c/b\u003e (1), 34\u0026ndash;undefined (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKerkhoff, M. et al. Evaluation of the Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on CAM-Grown Sarcomas. \u003cem\u003eBioengineering\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e10\u003c/b\u003e (4), 464\u0026ndash;undefined (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIanevski, A., Giri, A. K. \u0026amp; Aittokallio, T. SynergyFinder 3.0: an interactive analysis and consensus interpretation of multi-drug synergies across multiple samples. \u003cem\u003eNucleic Acids Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e50\u003c/b\u003e (W1), W739\u0026ndash;W743 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYap, T. et al. Ceralasertib (AZD6738), an Oral ATR Kinase Inhibitor, in Combination with Carboplatin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase I Study. \u003cem\u003eClin. Cancer Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e27\u003c/b\u003e (19), 5213\u0026ndash;5224 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim, R. et al. Phase II study of ceralasertib (AZD6738) in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma who have failed prior anti-PD-1 therapy. \u003cem\u003eAnn. Oncol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e33\u003c/b\u003e (2), 193\u0026ndash;203 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMorgan, M. A. et al. Mechanism of radiosensitization by the Chk1/2 inhibitor AZD7762 involves abrogation of the G2 checkpoint and inhibition of homologous recombinational DNA repair. \u003cem\u003eCancer Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e70\u003c/b\u003e (12), 4972\u0026ndash;4981 (2010).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrenner, J. C. et al. PARP-1 Inhibition as a Targeted Strategy to Treat Ewing's Sarcoma. \u003cem\u003eCancer Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e72\u003c/b\u003e (7), 1608\u0026ndash;1613 (2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarnett, M. J. et al. Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells. \u003cem\u003eNature\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e483\u003c/b\u003e (7391), 570\u0026ndash;575 (2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChoy, E. et al. Phase II study of olaparib in patients with refractory Ewing sarcoma following failure of standard chemotherapy. \u003cem\u003eBMC Cancer\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e14\u003c/b\u003e (1), 813 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBlackford, A. \u0026amp; Jackson, S. ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage Response. \u003cem\u003eMol. Cell\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e66\u003c/b\u003e (6), 801\u0026ndash;817 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMar\u0026eacute;chal, A. \u0026amp; Zou, L. \u003cem\u003eDNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eCold Spring Harb Perspect. Biol.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e5\u003c/b\u003e(9). (2013).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBradbury, A. et al. \u003cem\u003eTargeting ATR as Cancer Therapy: A new era for synthetic lethality and synergistic combinations?\u003c/em\u003e Vol. 207, p. 107450 (Pharmacology \u0026amp; Therapeutics, 2020).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePusch, F. et al. \u003cem\u003eElimusertib outperforms standard of care chemotherapy in preclinical patient-derived pediatric solid tumor models.\u003c/em\u003e bioRxiv, : p. 2022.11.10.515290. (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePusch, F. et al. Elimusertib has Antitumor Activity in Preclinical Patient-Derived Pediatric Solid Tumor Models. \u003cem\u003eMol. Cancer Ther.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e23\u003c/b\u003e (4), 507\u0026ndash;519 (2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJette, N. R. et al. Combined poly-ADP ribose polymerase and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated/Rad3-related inhibition targets ataxia-telangiectasia mutated-deficient lung cancer cells. \u003cem\u003eBr. J. Cancer\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e121\u003c/b\u003e (7), 600\u0026ndash;610 (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLloyd, R. L. et al. Combined PARP and ATR inhibition potentiates genome instability and cell death in ATM-deficient cancer cells. \u003cem\u003eOncogene\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e39\u003c/b\u003e (25), 4869\u0026ndash;4883 (2020).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu, S. et al. Inhibition of ATR potentiates the cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine on pancreatic cancer cells through enhancement of DNA damage and abrogation of ribonucleotide reductase induction by gemcitabine. \u003cem\u003eOncol. Rep.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e37\u003c/b\u003e (6), 3377\u0026ndash;3386 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJoss\u0026eacute;, R. et al. ATR inhibitors VE-821 and VX-970 sensitize cancer cells to topoisomerase i inhibitors by disabling DNA replication initiation and fork elongation responses. \u003cem\u003eCancer Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e74\u003c/b\u003e (23), 6968\u0026ndash;6979 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVendetti, F. P. et al. The orally active and bioavailable ATR kinase inhibitor AZD6738 potentiates the anti-tumor effects of cisplatin to resolve ATM-deficient non-small cell lung cancer in vivo. \u003cem\u003eOncotarget\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e6\u003c/b\u003e (42), 44289\u0026ndash;44305 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim, H. J. et al. Anti-tumor activity of the ATR inhibitor AZD6738 in HER2 positive breast cancer cells. \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Cancer\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e140\u003c/b\u003e (1), 109\u0026ndash;119 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWallez, Y. et al. \u003cem\u003eThe ATR Inhibitor AZD6738 Synergizes with Gemcitabine In Vitro and In Vivo to Induce Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Regression.\u003c/em\u003e Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 17(8): pp. 1670\u0026ndash;1682. (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThomas, A. et al. Phase I Study of ATR Inhibitor M6620 in Combination With Topotecan in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. \u003cem\u003eJ. Clin. Oncol. (JCO)\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e36\u003c/b\u003e (16), 1594\u0026ndash;1602 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWethington, S. et al. C ombination A TR (ceralasertib) and P A R P (olaparib) I nhibitor (CAPRI) Trial in Acquired PARP Inhibitor\u0026ndash;Resistant Homologous Recombination\u0026ndash;Deficient Ovarian Cancer. \u003cem\u003eClin. Cancer Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e29\u003c/b\u003e (15), 2800\u0026ndash;2807 (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYap, T. A. et al. 1LBA - Phase I modular study of AZD6738, a novel oral, potent and selective ataxia telangiectasia Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor in combination (combo) with carboplatin, olaparib or durvalumab in patients (pts) with advanced cancers. \u003cem\u003eEur. J. Cancer\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e69\u003c/b\u003e, S2 (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eO'Carrigan, B. et al. Phase I trial of a first-in-class ATR inhibitor VX-970 as monotherapy (mono) or in combination (combo) with carboplatin (CP) incorporating pharmacodynamics (PD) studies. \u003cem\u003eJ. Clin. Oncol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e34\u003c/b\u003e (15_suppl), 2504\u0026ndash;2504 (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOhmura, S. \u0026amp; Gr\u0026uuml;newald, T. P. Optimizing ATR Inhibition and Cisplatin Synergy in Ewing Sarcoma. \u003cem\u003eClin. Cancer Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e30\u003c/b\u003e (16), 3358\u0026ndash;3360 (2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGuder, W. K. et al. Pelvic Ewing sarcoma: a retrospective outcome analysis of 104 patients who underwent pelvic tumor resection at a single supra-regional center. \u003cem\u003eJ. Orthop. Surg, Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e15\u003c/b\u003e (1), 534 (2020).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKaiser, I. et al. Secondary Malignancies after Ewing Sarcoma\u0026mdash;Epidemiological and Clinical Analysis of an International Trial Registry. \u003cem\u003eCancers\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e14\u003c/b\u003e (23), 5920 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDillon, M. et al. Radiosensitization by the ATR Inhibitor AZD6738 through Generation of Acentric Micronuclei. \u003cem\u003eMol. Cancer Ther.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e16\u003c/b\u003e (1), 25\u0026ndash;34 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTu, X. et al. ATR Inhibition Is a Promising Radiosensitizing Strategy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. \u003cem\u003eMol. Cancer Ther.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e17\u003c/b\u003e (11), 2462\u0026ndash;2472 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFokas, E. et al. Targeting ATR in vivo using the novel inhibitor VE-822 results in selective sensitization of pancreatic tumors to radiation. \u003cem\u003eCell. Death Dis.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e3\u003c/b\u003e (12), e441 (2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOrtiz, M. et al. A phase 1/2 study of bay 18953444 (Elimusertib) in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors: Initial report of the phase 1 results of PEPN2112. \u003cem\u003eJ. Clin. Oncol. (JCO)\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e41\u003c/b\u003e (16_suppl), e15131\u0026ndash;undefined (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYap, T. A. et al. Abstract PR14: Phase I trial of first-in-class ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor VX-970 as monotherapy (mono) or in combination with carboplatin (CP) in advanced cancer patients (pts) with preliminary evidence of target modulation and antitumor activity. \u003cem\u003eMol. Cancer Ther.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e14\u003c/b\u003e (12_Supplement_2), PR14\u0026ndash;PR14 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYap, T. A. et al. First-in-Human Trial of the Oral Ataxia Telangiectasia and RAD3-Related (ATR) Inhibitor BAY 1895344 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. \u003cem\u003eCancer Discov\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e11\u003c/b\u003e (1), 80\u0026ndash;91 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYap, T. A. et al. Abstract CT006: Phase Ib expansion trial of the safety and efficacy of the oral ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor elimusertib in advanced solid tumors with DNA damage response (DDR) defects. \u003cem\u003eCancer Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e82\u003c/b\u003e (12_Supplement), CT006\u0026ndash;CT006 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQiu, Z., Oleinick, N. L. \u0026amp; Zhang, J. ATR/CHK1 inhibitors and cancer therapy. \u003cem\u003eRadiother Oncol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e126\u003c/b\u003e (3), 450\u0026ndash;464 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZannini, L., Delia, D. \u0026amp; Buscemi, G. CHK2 kinase in the DNA damage response and beyond. \u003cem\u003eJ. Mol. Cell. Biol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e6\u003c/b\u003e (6), 442\u0026ndash;457 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7879443/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7879443/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eEwing Sarcoma (EwS) is a highly aggressive malignancy predominantly affecting young individuals, with poor prognosis in metastatic or relapsed cases. This study investigates the therapeutic potential of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) inhibition using the selective small-molecule inhibitor elimusertib, both as a monotherapy and in combination with cytotoxic drugs or radiotherapy. Elimusertib significantly inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in EwS cell lines. In a chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model, elimusertib suppressed tumor initiation and reduced tumor volume. Notably, elimusertib exhibited synergistic effects with standard chemotherapeutics and radiation, enhancing antitumor efficacy. These preclinical findings suggest that ATR inhibition by elimusertib may enhance current EwS therapies and enable dose reduction of cytotoxic drugs. Further clinical evaluation is warranted to validate these findings and explore elimusertib\u0026rsquo;s translational potential in EwS treatment.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Elimusertib enhances cytotoxic effects of conventional chemotherapy and sensitizes to radiation in preclinical Ewing sarcoma models","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-11-10 05:36:59","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7879443/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-12-01T06:24:41+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-11-26T17:38:51+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"40780009026733343603760542002502267288","date":"2025-11-23T21:30:15+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-11-12T22:45:14+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"231238182012725304866035624424996784210","date":"2025-10-30T15:42:10+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"37504876328972615386489106541581104817","date":"2025-10-30T02:54:36+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-10-28T15:34:15+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-10-28T15:26:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2025-10-24T12:07:17+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-10-23T18:07:33+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2025-10-23T18:04:01+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"d2ea761a-35a2-456e-b811-e42dc7eaae71","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 10th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":57303423,"name":"Biological sciences/Cancer"},{"id":57303424,"name":"Biological sciences/Drug discovery"},{"id":57303425,"name":"Health sciences/Oncology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-03-30T16:19:14+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-7879443","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41751-5","journal":{"identity":"scientific-reports","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Reports"},"publishedOn":"2026-03-27 16:12:22","publishedOnDateReadable":"March 27th, 2026"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-11-10 05:36:59","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41598-026-41751-5","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41751-5","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7879443","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7879443","identity":"rs-7879443","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}