Abstract
Purpose: National guidelines recommend next generation sequencing (NGS) of tumors in
patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) to identify potential actionable
alterations. We sought to describe the spectrum and frequency of alterations in PCa-related
genes and pathways, as well as associations with self-identified race/ethnicity, and overall
survival in US Veterans.
Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included Non-Hispanic Black (NHB)
and Non-Hispanic white (NHW) Veterans with mPCa who obtained NGS through the Veterans
Affairs National Precision Oncology Program. 45 genes in seven canonical or targetable mPCa
pathways were evaluated in addition to TMB and MSI status. Multivariable logistic regression
evaluated associations between race/ethnicity and genomic alteration frequencies. Cox
proportional hazards models were used to determine associations between race/ethnicity,
specific gene/pathway alteration, and overall survival.
Results
5,015 Veterans with mPCa who had NGS conducted were included (1,784 NHB, 3,231
NHW). NHB Veterans were younger, had higher PSA at diagnosis, were less likely to report
Agent Orange exposure, and resided in more deprived neighborhoods compared to NHW
Veterans. Nine of the top ten most commonly altered genes were the same in NHB v NHW
Veterans; however, the frequencies of alterations varied by race/ethnicity. NHB race/ethnicity
was associated with higher odds of genomic alterations in SPOP (OR 1.7 [1.2-2.6]) as well as
immunotherapy targets (OR 1.7 [1.1-2.7]) including MSI high status (OR 3.1 [1.1-9.4]).
Furthermore, NHB race/ethnicity was significantly associated with lower odds of genomic
alterations in the AKT/PI3K pathway (OR 0.6 [0.4-0.7]), AR axis (OR 0.7 [0.5-0.9]), and tumor
suppressor genes (OR 0.7 [0.5-0.8]). Cox proportional hazards modelling stratified by
race/ethnicity demonstrated alterations in tumor suppressor genes including TP53 were
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
associated with shorter OS in both NHB (HR 1.54 [1.13-2.11] and NHW individuals (HR 1.52
[1.25-1.85]).
Conclusion
In the equal access VA healthcare setting, Veterans undergoing NGS for mPCa
exhibited differences in alteration frequencies in both actionable and non-actionable pathways
that may be associated with survival. This analysis affirms the utility of genomic testing for
identifying candidates irrespective of race/ethnicity for precision oncology treatments, which
could contribute to equitable outcomes in patients with mPCa.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
Introduction
The goal of precision oncology is to personalize prognostication and treatment for
individual patients and to identify candidates for life-prolonging targeted therapies. Access to
next generation sequencing (NGS) is essential to identify candidates for precision oncology
approaches who are diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa), and national guidelines
strongly recommend NGS in this heterogeneous patient population.
Racial disparities in PCa incidence and outcomes are well documented1–4. In the equal
access Veterans Administration (VA) healthcare system, self-identified non-Hispanic Black
(NHB) Veterans experience a higher incidence of localized and metastatic prostate cancer
compared to non-Hispanic white (NHW) Veterans5,6. However, differences in survival remain
unclear, especially in those with advanced disease5,7 . NHB men are notably underrepresented
in precision medicine cohorts8 including those that report genomic alteration frequencies9,10.
The National Precision Oncology Program within the Veterans Health Administration
provisions NGS for Veterans with metastatic cancers11 and represents an unparalleled platform
for assessing the landscape of alteration rates in mPCa across self-identified racial/ethnic
groups in the diverse US Veteran population. In previous unadjusted analyses, differential rates
of actionable alterations based on self-identified race/ethnicity could not be identified12.
Herein, we report an analysis of alteration rates in both individual genes as well as
hallmark prostate cancer pathways and actionable gene groupings in NHB and NHW Veterans
diagnosed with mPCa within the VA Healthcare System. Our goal was to evaluate the frequency
of commonly reported genomic alterations, as well as associations with overall survival after
adjusting for patient demographic, clinical, pathological, and social determinants of health
indices.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
Methods
Patients
This is a retrospective cohort study of US Veterans who underwent somatic tumor
testing for mPCa between January 2015-December 2023. DNA sequencing data from tissue or
plasma were eligible for inclusion. Tissue biospecimens included prostate biopsies, radical
prostatectomy specimens, and prostate cancer metastases. All specimens were sequenced with
the Foundation Medicine platform (FoundationOne® CDx or FoundationOne®Liquid CDx).
When multiple specimens from the same patient were sequenced (n = 232), the first sequenced
specimen was selected for analysis. Genomic data and prostate cancer clinical and pathological
data from VA clinical sources were co-analyzed under VA Central IRB approved Study
#1729212, with data elements imported from Study #1612627.
Race and ethnicity were self-reported by Veterans and race categories for the purpose
of this analysis were defined as non-Hispanic Black/African American (NHB) and non-Hispanic
White (NHW). For one patient, race was known but sample sequenced was not, so this patient
was excluded from analyses involving tissue type.
Genomic Analyses
Short variant, copy number alteration and rearrangement variant calls were provided by
Foundation Medicine to the National Precision Oncology Program, annotated and classified by
oncogenicity (Supplemental Table 1). Oncogenic alteration rates were determined for each
gene and for groupings of genes into hallmark oncogenic pathways in prostate cancer
(Supplemental Table 2). These included mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency genes,
immunotherapy targets, DNA repair pathways, prostate cancer-specific PARP inhibitor (PARPi)
targets, the AKT/PI3K pathway, AR signaling pathways, tumor suppressor pathways, and other
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
known targetable pathways... Alterations affecting fewer than 11 patients were not reported to
protect Veteran privacy.
Statistical Analysis
Alteration frequencies were calculated by dividing the number of alterations identified for
a specific gene or gene grouping by the total number of patients tested for that gene or gene
grouping. Fisher’s exact testing was used to compare alteration frequencies based on Veteran
self-identified race and specimen tested in our univariate analysis. p-values underwent false
discovery rate correction for both the individual gene and gene grouping analysis, to account for
multiple comparisons.
For genes where significant differences in alteration frequencies were identified between
NHB and NHW Veterans, multivariable logistic regression was then carried out on those
individual genes and their associated pathways to identify differential associations between race
and alteration frequencies among all samples tested. Covariates that were adjusted for included
sample type, age at diagnosis, age at sample collection, de novo metastatic status, castration
resistance status, PSA level at diagnosis, Gleason grade, military exposures, pathological
diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Area Deprivation Index (ADI), smoking status, and
marital status.
Adjusted overall survival estimates were evaluated using a Cox regression model,
stratified by race and adjusted for the same above-mentioned covariates.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
Results
Among a total of 6498 patients with a PCa diagnosis who received NGS testing through
NPOP , 5559 patients self-identified as either NHB or NHW. After excluding 544 patients with
non-metastatic disease using a natural language processing algorithm (previously described13),
and one patient for lack of annotation of tissue type (primary vs metastatic site), sequencing
data from 5015 Veterans with mPCa were available for analysis (Supplemental Figure 2).
Patient and disease characteristics from both the time of diagnosis are shown in Table
1. Patient and disease characteristics in relation to the time of NGS specimen collection are
shown in Supplemental Table 3. 1,784 patients self-identified as NHB and 3,231 self-identified
as NHW. NHB Veterans were significantly younger at the time of diagnoses, presented with
higher PSAs at diagnosis, were less likely to have Agent Orange exposure, resided in state
block groups with higher ADI, and were less likely to be deceased at the time of our analysis.
In an unadjusted analysis of all NGS analyte results combined, NHW Veterans were
significantly more likely to harbor alterations in AKT/PI3K pathway genes (30% vs 20%,
p<0.001), AR signaling axis genes (44% vs 35%, p<0.001), DNA repair genes (22% vs 17%,
p<0.001), prostate cancer-specific PARPi targets (25% vs 22%, p=0.03), and tumor suppressor
genes (52% vs 38%, p<0.001) (Supplemental Figure 2A and Supplemental Table 4). By
contrast, NHB Veterans were significantly more likely to harbor alterations in immunotherapy
targets (11% vs 7.2%, p<0.001), MMR genes (4.6% vs 3.0%, p<0.01), and were more frequently
MSI high (4.7% vs 2.7%, p=0.029). There were no significant differences in TMB status or
alterations in other targeted therapy pathways.
Upon interrogating alteration frequency by N GS analyte (plasma vs tissue) and tissue of
origin (primary prostate vs metastatic site) without stratifying for self-identified race, we
observed significant differences in alterations within the hallmark pathways, with metastases
significantly more likely to harbor alterations in all pathways compared to primary tumor tissue
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
(Supplemental Table 5). Plasma specimens were also more likely to demonstrate DNA repair
alterations (30% vs 15%, p<0.001), prostate cancer-specific PARPi target alterations (31% vs
19%, p<0.001) and MSI high status (21% vs 2.3%, p<0.001) but significantly less likely to
harbor alterations targetable by immunotherapy (6.0% vs 9.0%, p<0.001), AKT/PI3K pathway
alterations (15% vs 29%, p<0.001), and AR signaling alterations (32% vs 42%, p<0.001)
compared to primary tumors. Alterations in MMR, tumor suppressor genes, and other targetable
pathways were no different between plasma and primary tissue. TMB status was low and no
different across analytes (Supplemental Figure 2B, Supplemental Table 5).
Given the importance of race and NGS analyte on alteration frequencies, we carried out
an aggregate comparison of alteration frequency stratified by both race and tissue type
sampled, focusing on genomic alterations that were significantly different in the separate race
and tissue-based analyses above. The most commonly altered genes were similar between
NHB v NHW Veterans stratified by NGS analyte type, but the oncogenic alteration rates were
significantly different between NHB v NHW Veterans for multiple genes (Supplemental Figures
3-5; Supplemental Table 6). AR axis alterations were significantly more likely to be identified in
NHW samples derived from primary (46% vs 35%, p<0.001) and metastatic (56% vs 40%,
p<0.001) tissue, however no differences were uncovered in plasma samples (33% vs 31%,
p=0.61). The same trends of significance emerged for alterations in the AKT/PI3K Pathway
(Figure 1A, Supplemental Table 5=6). By contrast, only in sequenced plasma samples was a
significant increase in prostate cancer-specific PARPi target alterations (34% vs 27%, p=0.01)
observed in NHW men. Alterations in DNA repair genes were more common in NHW Veterans
compared to NHB Veterans when primary tissue (16% vs 11%, p=0.001) and plasma (33% vs
25%, p=0.005) were tested. Regarding alterations in tumor suppressor genes, NHW patients
were significantly more likely to harbor alterations in this group of genes compared to NHB
patients in all tissue types tested. Alterations in immunotherapy pathways (13% vs 6.8%,
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
p<0.001), dMMR (5.3% vs 2.4%, p<0.001), and other known targetable pathways (10% vs
5.9%, p<0.001), were all significantly more likely in NHB patients, but only when the primary
tumor was tested (Figure 1A, Supplemental Table 6).
When considering alterations in the individual genetic components of the previously
described oncogenic pathways that were significantly different by race, it becomes clear that AR
signaling differences are likely driven by alteration rates in TMPRSS2 rather than SPOP (Figure
1B). TP53 and PTEN alterations appear to contribute similarly to the lower tumor suppressor
alteration frequency in NHB Veterans, while dMMR and CDK12 alterations appear to contribute
similarly to the increase in immunotherapy targets in NHB individuals (Figure 1B).
Since analyte and race can both impact alteration frequencies, multivariate analysis was
pursued to better understand the association between race and alteration frequency. After
multivariable adjustment for patient and tumor-related characteristics including NGS analyte,
clinicopathologic features, and social determinants of health (SDOH) covariates, alteration
frequencies in NHB Veterans were found to be significantly lower in AR axis genes (OR 0.7,
p<0.01), tumor suppressor genes (OR 0.7, p<0.001), DNA repair genes (OR 0.7, p<0.01), and
AKT/PI3K pathway genes (OR 0.6, p<0.001), but significantly elevated in targets for
immunotherapy (OR 1.7, p=0.02) (Figure 2, Supplemental Table 7).
Survival has been previously reported to be similar in NHB vs NHW Veterans who
receive their care within the Veterans Health Administration5,14. In our adjusted Cox model for
overall survival, tumor suppressor alterations (driven by TP53 alterations), immunotherapy
targets (driven by mismatch repair alterations and MSI high status), and AR axis alterations all
increased the hazard of death in NHW Veterans, whereas tumor suppressor alterations (again
driven by TP53 alterations) and CDK12 alterations all increased the hazard of death in NHB
Veterans (Figure 3, Supplemental Table 8).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
Discussion
This report describes alteration frequencies in key PCa pathways and genes, including
those that are known to be targetable with precision oncology interventions in a large cohort of
NHB and NHW Veterans with mPCa. Absolute and proportional (36%) representation of NHB
individuals on this study was markedly higher than previous reports9,10,15,16. The observed
increased frequency of potential immunotherapy targets in NHB individuals is of interest
because of potential actionability in this population and underscores the continued need for
equitable application of precision medicine efforts in mPCa, as this could be one of many factors
that can mitigate disparities in PCa outcome.
Associations between responsiveness to immunotherapy and patient race have been
previously reported from real-world PROCEED registry data17, where OS was significantly
higher in Black men with mCRPC who were treated with the first FDA approved cellular
immunotherapy, sipuleucel-T. Examples of associations between MSI high status and complete
response to sipuleucel-T have been reported in the literature, and MSI high status is also a
marker for responsiveness to PD-1 axis inhibition18, so it is possible that the higher frequency of
alterations in immunotherapy targets in NHB men, driven by higher MSI, may be contributing to
enhanced immunogenicity of tumors in this population. Consequently, this heightened
immunogenicity could potentially lead to more favorable responses to immunotherapy. Of note,
TMB, a known predictor of response to checkpoint inhibition, was not significantly different
between NHW and NHB Veterans. Our finding that NHW men with PCa have a higher
frequency of TP53 alterations aligns with the hypothesis proposed by Halabi and colleagues
suggesting an interaction between an intact TP53 pathway and the efficacy of docetaxel as a
plausible explanation for the improved outcomes observed in Black men treated with the wild-
type p53 dependent drug, docetaxel
19.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
In addition to our findings related to immunotherapy targets, NHW individuals were more
likely to harbor alterations in AR signaling than NHB individuals. This may contribute to
decreased responsiveness to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) in NHW compared
to NHB patients – an observation which has been reported in individuals with castrate resistant
disease who received abiraterone as first line therapy20. This work also raises the possibility that
while canonical AR activity may be lower in NHB patients, the activity of non-canonical AR
pathways may be increased in NHB individuals, a possibility that requires further research.
Our report also underscores the fact that the source of tumor DNA (ie primary vs
metastatic vs plasma) submitted for NGS testing can influence the frequency of specific
alterations and confound comparisons between race, and thus remains an important control for
analyses of this nature. Accordingly, sequencing results used by clinicians should always be
considered in the context of the analyte tested. For example, our findings highlight that plasma
evaluating cfDNA may not be as sensitive as tumor tissue for the identification of actionable
immunotherapy targets; indeed, <10% of the plasma samples tested in this study reported
microsatellite status. Plasma may also over-report frequencies of alterations in actionable DNA
damage repair (DDR) genes (e.g. of ATM or CHEK2), which may be derived from clonal
hematopoiesis especially in elderly patients21 such as Veterans with metastatic prostate cancer.
Conversely, alterations in CDKN2A, ERBB2, PTEN, RB1, and TMPRSS2 were found at lower
frequencies in plasma, likely due to challenges identifying copy number variants and
rearrangements in cfDNA versus tissue.
It has also been previously reported that many actionable PCa alterations, including
DDR alterations, are truncal in nature22, and that their frequencies are therefore similar in both
primary and metastatic tissue. Our work is largely consistent with this observation, and while
metastases were significantly more likely to yield actionable alterations in DNA repair genes
than primary tissue, this difference was small (24% vs 20%).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
Prior unadjusted analyses have suggested that actionable alterations appear at similar
rates between NHB and NHW Veterans whereas this larger adjusted analysis confirms DDR
alteration frequencies are lower in NHB individuals, consistent with similar findings in the
germline23. This adjusted analysis also suggests that immunotherapy targets are more frequent
in NHB men. While this was certainly the case for MSI high status, the picture is less clear for
CDK12 alterations, which are known to be associated with aggressive PCa phenotypes. Our
previous work revealed similar CDK12 alteration rates between NHB and NHW Veterans 12, and
while there was a higher frequency of these alterations in NHB Veterans in our univariate
analysis, this difference disappeared after multivariable adjustment. Nevertheless, CDK12 may
still remain a consequential target for NHB men with mPCa, and we echo others24,25 in
highlighting the fact that therapeutic targeting of CDK12 may serve as an avenue for improving
outcomes for NHB patients.
A limitation of our anal ysis is the lack of matched germline data for these patients, which
complicates interpretation of plasma results. Additionally, by analyzing the first specimen sent
for NGS testing, there is a possibility of false negative reporting in the minority of patients who
had multiple samples sent for NGS testing over the course of their disease, although the low
frequency of these false negative cases would not significantly change our results or their
interpretation.
Overall, this work emphasizes the notion that personalized precision medicine-driven
approaches will be essential to maximally leverage our understanding of a patient's specific
tumor biology in order to improve oncologic outcomes. Even in scenarios where non-targetable
alterations are identified (such as the case of tumor suppressor alterations including TP53),
knowledge of the deleterious implications of these alterations on survival (consistent with
previously reported work from Velez and colleagues
26) can have wide implications for the
management of both NHB and NHW men with mPCa and result in changes in treatment.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
Specifically, given the observation that high-risk alterations (including TP53, RB1, and PTEN)
can promote lineage plasticity, resulting in radiographic progression in the absence of PSA
progression 27,28, the presence of these pathogenic alterations may have implications for the
optimal cadence and modality of disease monitoring. Knowledge of these alterations may also
assist in patient selection for metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) with stereotactic body
radiotherapy (SBRT) in the oligometastatic setting, given the results of a recent pooled analysis
that demonstrated a high-risk mutational signature consisting of alterations in BRCA1/2, ATM,
TP53, or Rb1 were independently predictive of relative benefit and prognostic29 for response to
MDT. And finally, this work implicitly advocates for the intentional design of precision medicine
studies that do not exclude groups of patients that have been historically under-represented in
clinical trials.
Precision oncology enables the individualization of treatment decisions without having to
rely on imprecise characteristics such as self-identified race. We demonstrate that alteration
frequencies in several hallmark oncogenic pathways in mPCa vary by race and that the
association between specific alterations (e.g. CDK12, AR axis, dMMR) and survival, when
stratified by race, is also variable. Thus, we did not identify any genetic alterations or biomarkers
that should not be tested in prostate cancer on the basis of patient self-identified race. While
individuals may exhibit different biological aggressiveness and associated outcomes from PCa
treatment, precision-based testing and treatment approaches remain critical for personalizing
care, optimizing outcomes, informing the design of equitable clinical trials, and narrowing
disparities in outcomes for PCa.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
FIGURE LEGENDS
Figure 1: Association of genomics, race and survival in metastatic prostate cancer patients. a.
Rates of oncogenic alterations in genes from cancer-related pathways in three different tissues
(primary tumors, metastatic lesions and plaslmasamples), separated by patient self-identified
race in individuals with metastatic prostate cancer. Differences in rates of oncogenic alterations
between NHB and NHW patients were compared by Fisher’s exact test for each of the three
tissue types. b.Percent change in oncogenic alteration rates in pathways their constituent genes
within those pathways in NHB compared to NHW patients in three tissue types. NHB = non-
Hispanic Black; NHW = non-Hispanic White, AR = androgen receptor, PCS = prostate cancer
specific, PARPi= PARP inhibitor.
Figure 2: Association of race and alteration frequency in metastatic prostate cancer patients.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association of oncogenic alterations in
pathways and genes in those pathways with self-identified race, controlling for multiple clinical
factors. Pathways and genes were tested if statistically significantly difference in rates between
Blacks and Whites in univariate analyses. NHB = non-Hispanic Black; NHW = non-Hispanic
White, AR = androgen receptor, MSI = microsatellite instability, PCS = prostate cancer specific,
PARPi = PARP inhibitor, OR = Odds Ratio.
Figure 3: Association of genomics, race and survival in metastatic prostate cancer patients. Cox
proportional hazards modeling to test the association of oncogenic alterations in pathways and
genes in those pathways with overall survival, controlling for clinical factors and stratified by
race, NHB = non-Hispanic Black; NHW = non-Hispanic White, AR = androgen receptor, MSI =
microsatellite instability, PCS = prostate cancer specific, PARPi = PARP inhibitor, HR = Hazard
Ratio.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
Table 1: Patient and Disease Characteristics of Self-identified non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and
non-Hispanic White (NHW) Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer and NGS Tumor Testing
Entire Cohort
Non-Hispanic
Black
Non-Hispanic
White p
Patient and Disease Characteristics at Diagnosis n=5015 n=1784 n=3231
Age at PCa Diagnosis <0.001
Mean (SD) 67.4 9 64.8 8.8 68.8 8.8
Median (IQR) 67 61,73 64 59,70 69 63,74
Minimum,Maximum 31 97 31 97 42 95
Age Group at PCa Diagnosis 80 491 9.8% 105 5.9% 386 11.9%
Year of PCa Diagnosis 0.6
2000-2012 1,317 26% 489 27.4% 828 25.6%
2013-2018 1,218 24% 432 24.2% 786 24.3%
2018-2023 2,193 44% 770 43.2% 1,423 44.0%
Pre-2000 90 2% 30 1.7% 60 1.9%
Unknown 197 4% 63 3.5% 134 4.1%
PSA Value at PCa Diagnosis <0.001
20 2,589 51.6% 997 55.9% 1,592 49.3%
Grade Group Closest to PCa Diagnosis 0.068
Grade 1 436 8.7% 165 9.2% 271 8.4%
Grade 2 560 11.2% 230 12.9% 330 10.2%
Grade 3 520 10.4% 178 10.0% 342 10.6%
Grade 4 940 18.7% 345 19.3% 595 18.4%
Grade 5 1,565 31.2% 543 30.4% 1,022 31.6%
Unknown 994 19.8% 323 18.1% 671 20.8%
Military Exposure <0.001
Agent Orange 1,186 24.0% 293 16.0% 893 28.0%
Agent Orange + Camp Lejeune 19 0.4% 5 0.3% 14 0.4%
Camp Lejeune 42 0.8% 14 0.8% 28 0.9%
None/Unknown 3,768 75.0% 1,472 83.0% 2,296 71.0%
Period of Service <0.001
Korean/Post-Korean 484 9.7% 115 6.4% 369 11.4%
Vietnam/post-vietnam 4,118 82.1% 1,447 81.1% 2,671 82.7%
Middle East 374 7.5% 211 11.8% 163 5.0%
Other 39 0.8% 11 0.6% 28 0.9%
State Block Group ADI at PCa Diagnosis <0.001
Mean (SD) 5.66 2.78 6.42 2.72 5.23 2.72
Median (25%,75%) 6.00 3.00,8.00 7.00 4.00,9.00 5.00 3.00,7.25
Minimum,Maximum 1.00 10.00 1.00 10.00 1.00 10.00
CCI at baseline >0.9
Mean (SD) 2.3 1.67 2.37 1.82 2.27 2
Median (25%,75% 2 1.00,3.00 2 1.00,3.00 2 1.00,3.00
Minimum,Maximum 1.00 11.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 11.00
De Novo Metastasis (regional or distant) 1,920 38.3% 667 37.4% 1,253 38.8% 0.3
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
References
1. McKay RR, Sarkar RR, Kumar A, et al. Outcomes of Black men with prostate cancer treated
with radiation therapy in the Veterans Health Administration. Cancer. 2021;127(3):403-411.
doi:10.1002/cncr.33224
2. Dess RT, Hartman HE, Mahal BA, et al. Association of Black Race With Prostate Cancer-
Specific and Other-Cause Mortality. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(7):975-983.
doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0826
3. DeSantis CE, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Cancer statistics for African
Americans, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(3):211-233. doi:10.3322/caac.21555
4. DeSantis CE, Siegel RL, Sauer AG, et al. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016:
Progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):290-
308. doi:10.3322/caac.21340
5. Yamoah K, Lee KM, Awasthi S, et al. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Prostate Cancer
Outcomes in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. JAMA Netw Open.
2022;5(1):e2144027. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44027
6. Schafer EJ, Jemal A, Wiese D, et al. Disparities and Trends in Genitourinary Cancer
Incidence and Mortality in the USA. Eur Urol. 2023;84(1):117-126.
doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.023
7. Riviere P, Luterstein E, Kumar A, et al. Survival of African American and non-Hispanic white
men with prostate cancer in an equal-access health care system. Cancer.
2020;126(8):1683-1690. doi:10.1002/cncr.32666
8. Spratt DE, Chan T, Waldron L, et al. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Genomic Sequencing.
JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(8):1070-1074. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1854
9. Stopsack KH, Nandakumar S, Arora K, et al. Differences in Prostate Cancer Genomes by
Self-reported Race: Contributions of Genetic Ancestry, Modifiable Cancer Risk Factors, and
Clinical Factors. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(2):318-326. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-
2577
10. Mahal BA, Alshalalfa M, Kensler KH, et al. Racial Differences in Genomic Profiling of
Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(11):1083-1085. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2000069
11. Kelley MJ. VA National Precision Oncology Program. Fed Pract. 2020;37(Suppl 4):S22-S27.
doi:10.12788/fp.0037
12. Valle LF, Nickols NG, Hausler R, et al. Actionable Genomic Alterations in Prostate Cancer
Among Black and White United States Veterans. Oncologist. 2023;28(6):e473-e477.
doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyad042
13. Alba PR, Gao A, Lee KM, et al. Ascertainment of Veterans With Metastatic Prostate Cancer
in Electronic Health Records: Demonstrating the Case for Natural Language Processing.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021;5:1005-1014. doi:10.1200/CCI.21.00030
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
14. Courtney PT, Deka R, Kotha NV, et al. Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate
cancer in African American and non-Hispanic White men. Cancer. 2021;127(23):4403-4412.
doi:10.1002/cncr.33824
15. Koga Y, Song H, Chalmers ZR, et al. Genomic Profiling of Prostate Cancers from Men with
African and European Ancestry. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(17):4651-4660.
doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-4112
16. Yuan J, Kensler KH, Hu Z, et al. Integrative comparison of the genomic and transcriptomic
landscape between prostate cancer patients of predominantly African or European genetic
ancestry. PLoS Genet. 2020;16(2):e1008641. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008641
17. Sartor O, Armstrong AJ, Ahaghotu C, et al. Survival of African-American and Caucasian men
after sipuleucel-T immunotherapy: outcomes from the PROCEED registry. Prostate Cancer
Prostatic Dis. 2020;23(3):517-526. doi:10.1038/s41391-020-0213-7
18. Marabelle A, Le DT, Ascierto PA, et al. Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Patients With
Noncolorectal High Microsatellite Instability/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Cancer: Results
From the Phase II KEYNOTE-158 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(1):1-10.
doi:10.1200/JCO.19.02105
19. Halabi S, Dutta S, Tangen CM, et al. Overall Survival of Black and White Men With
Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Docetaxel. J Clin Oncol.
2019;37(5):403-410. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.01279
20. Marar M, Long Q, Mamtani R, Narayan V, Vapiwala N, Parikh RB. Outcomes Among African
American and Non-Hispanic White Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate
Cancer With First-Line Abiraterone. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(1):e2142093.
doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42093
21. Jensen K, Konnick EQ, Schweizer MT, et al. Association of Clonal Hematopoiesis in DNA
Repair Genes With Prostate Cancer Plasma Cell-free DNA Testing Interference. JAMA
Oncol. 2021;7(1):107-110. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5161
22. Schweizer MT, Sivakumar S, Tukachinsky H, et al. Concordance of DNA Repair Gene
Mutations in Paired Primary Prostate Cancer Samples and Metastatic Tissue or Cell-Free
DNA. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(9):1-5. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2350
23. Lee DJ, Hausler R, Le AN, et al. Association of Inherited Mutations in DNA Repair Genes
with Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2022;81(6):559-567.
doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.09.029
24. Sartor O, Jang A, Ledet E. Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic Somatic CDK12 Mutations in
Black Men With Prostate Cancer. Oncologist. 2023;28(11):e1127-e1128.
doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyad240
25. Valle LF, Nickols NG, Yamoah K, Garraway IP , Maxwell KN, Lynch JA. In Reply to
“Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic Somatic CDK12 Mutations in Black Men With Prostate
Cancer.” Oncologist. 2023;28(11):e1129-e1130. doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyad264
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
26. Velez MG, Kosiorek HE, Egan JB, et al. Differential impact of tumor suppressor gene (TP53,
PTEN, RB1) alterations and treatment outcomes in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate
cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022;25(3):479-483. doi:10.1038/s41391-021-00430-
4
27. Imamura J, Ganguly S, Muskara A, et al. Lineage plasticity and treatment resistance in
prostate cancer: the intersection of genetics, epigenetics, and evolution. Front Endocrinol
(Lausanne). 2023;14:1191311. doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1191311
28. Chan JM, Zaidi S, Love JR, et al. Lineage plasticity in prostate cancer depends on
JAK/STAT inflammatory signaling. Science. 2022;377(6611):1180-1191.
doi:10.1126/science.abn0478
29. Deek MP, Van der Eecken K, Sutera P, et al. Long-Term Outcomes and Genetic Predictors
of Response to Metastasis-Directed Therapy Versus Observation in Oligometastatic
Prostate Cancer: Analysis of STOMP and ORIOLE Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(29):3377-
3382. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.00644
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 1
a.
b.
* p<0.05
** p<0.01
**
**
**
*
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
Primary
Metastasis
Plasma
NHW, Metastasis, n=695
NHB, Metastasis, n=316
NHW, Plasma, n=1015
NHB, Plasma, n=629
NHW, Primary, n=1521
NHB, Primary, n=838
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 2
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 3
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 25, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620071doi: bioRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.