To Reduce Bias, Marinate for 11 Days? A Randomized Controlled Evaluation of a Multi-Day Racial Equity Challenge

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 10,320 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
To Reduce Bias, Marinate for 11 Days? A Randomized Controlled Evaluation of a Multi-Day Racial Equity Challenge | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article To Reduce Bias, Marinate for 11 Days? A Randomized Controlled Evaluation of a Multi-Day Racial Equity Challenge Sean Darling-Hammond This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5822909/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Racial bias trainings are ubiquitous. Yet, they rarely deviate from a standard formula, and are rarely evaluated using rigorous research methods. This pre-registered study uses a randomized controlled trial design to estimate the causal impact of employee participation in the Racial Equity Challenge—a scaffolded, eleven-day antibias training that allows participants to explore a variety of topics through readings, videos, and activities. We find that while the Racial Equity Challenge did not impact motivation to reduce bias, it caused statistically significant increases in employees’ knowledge of bias, ability to navigate ambiguous workplace situations in ways that might reduce bias, belief that they know how to combat bias, and willingness to donate to the Black Lives Matter Foundation. We present implications regarding how to design and refine trainings so that they might reduce bias and enhance equity in workplaces and beyond. Social science/Psychology/Human behaviour Social science/Sociology antibias training diversity training racial bias inclusive intentions Full Text Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Statement of ethics approval: Because all data was collected by the City and County of Denver and our research team was analyzing this data as part of Quality Assessment and Quality Improvement (QA/QI) support efforts, the research presented in this article was deemed exempt from review by the Office for Protection of Human Subjects (OPHS) at the University of California, Berkeley. This determination was communicated by OPHS via an email to our research team that was sent on September 23, 2020. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5822909","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":405739909,"identity":"22547bae-9aa7-4b92-90ae-e4dd366ccf8a","order_by":0,"name":"Sean Darling-Hammond","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6353-4670","institution":"University of California, Berkeley","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sean","middleName":"","lastName":"Darling-Hammond","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-01-13 23:25:27","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5822909/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5822909/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":79825352,"identity":"21ca8e5e-82b6-4708-83a7-df52c7e1f633","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-03 09:24:00","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":702756,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Article File","description":"","filename":"RECRCTBlindedManuscriptandSupplementaryMaterials1.13.25.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5822909/v1_covered_3bc577f9-2dc0-41f2-b6f5-f5bdb227624d.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"\u003cp\u003eThere is \u003cstrong\u003eNO\u003c/strong\u003e Competing Interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStatement of ethics approval: Because all data was collected by the City and County of Denver and our research team was analyzing this data as part of Quality Assessment and Quality Improvement (QA/QI) support efforts, the research presented in this article was deemed exempt from review by the Office for Protection of Human Subjects (OPHS) at the University of California, Berkeley. This determination was communicated by OPHS via an email to our research team that was sent on September 23, 2020.\u003c/p\u003e","formattedTitle":"To Reduce Bias, Marinate for 11 Days? A Randomized Controlled Evaluation of a Multi-Day Racial Equity Challenge","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"antibias training, diversity training, racial bias, inclusive intentions","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5822909/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5822909/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Racial bias trainings are ubiquitous. Yet, they rarely deviate from a standard formula, and are rarely evaluated using rigorous research methods. This pre-registered study uses a randomized controlled trial design to estimate the causal impact of employee participation in the Racial Equity Challenge—a scaffolded, eleven-day antibias training that allows participants to explore a variety of topics through readings, videos, and activities. We find that while the Racial Equity Challenge did not impact motivation to reduce bias, it caused statistically significant increases in employees’ knowledge of bias, ability to navigate ambiguous workplace situations in ways that might reduce bias, belief that they know how to combat bias, and willingness to donate to the Black Lives Matter Foundation. We present implications regarding how to design and refine trainings so that they might reduce bias and enhance equity in workplaces and beyond.","manuscriptTitle":"To Reduce Bias, Marinate for 11 Days? A Randomized Controlled Evaluation of a Multi-Day Racial Equity Challenge","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-02-12 05:26:41","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5822909/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"80cdb467-5deb-4107-a82d-cd126342b87f","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 12th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":43263808,"name":"Social science/Psychology/Human behaviour"},{"id":43263809,"name":"Social science/Sociology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-04-03T09:15:52+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-02-12 05:26:41","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5822909","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5822909","identity":"rs-5822909","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00