Redox Regulation and Oxidative Stress in Mammalian Oocytes and Embryos Developed In Vivo and In Vitro.

ROS is a term used to describe oxygen-containing molecules that are highly reactive and electron-accepting [ 15 ]. Due to the fact the 2 lone electrons in the outer-most orbital of molecular oxygen, O 2 , have the same spin quantum number, it can only accept one electron at a time as it is reduced to H 2 O [ 8 ]. This results in the production of a series of intermediates, namely the free-radical superoxide anion (O 2 · − ), non-radical hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), and the free-radical hydroxyl ion (OH·) [ 8 ]. (The formation of highly reactive singlet oxygen, 1 O 2 , an electronically excited form of O 2 , and its conversion to the powerful oxidising agent ozone, O 3 , also occurs in animals. For a review, see Ref. [ 16 ]). ROS production is ubiquitous in cells and, under conditions of oxidative eustress, ROS are now known to play an increasingly large number of roles in normal organismal physiology [ 5 ]. However, supraphysiological concentrations of ROS—i.e., the excessive production of ROS that cannot be counteracted by the cell’s natural antioxidant systems [ 17 ]—results in oxidative distress [ 4 ]. This oxidative stress can lead to a large variety of cellular-mechanism dysfunctions culminating, for example, in growth arrest and premature cell death [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. ROS are generated in many ways at physiologically relevant rates including: (i) Directly by enzyme-catalysed reactions. There are over 40 enzymes that generate O 2 · − /H 2 O 2 (see Table 1 [ 4 ]) chief among them the NOX family of multi-subunit NADPH oxidases, the transmembrane components of which are responsible for transporting electrons across biological membranes: The oxidation of NADPH (to NADP + and H + ) on one side of the membrane results in concerted reduction of O 2 to O 2 · − (or H 2 O 2 ) on the other [ 21 ] ( Figure 2 ). In addition to NOX, which are found principally in the plasma, nuclear and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes, peroxisomes and lysosomes are major generators of ROS [ 18 , 20 ]. ROS are also produced in the plasma membrane following oxidation of arachidonic acid by cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase [ 22 ]. Other sources include ROS production from amino-acid metabolism and the reduction of hypoxanthine to xanthine by xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR), which generates O 2 · − [ 23 ] ( Figure 2 ). (ii) As a ‘by-product’ of electron transport chain (ETC) flux. 0.12–2% of the O 2 consumed by a cell in vitro is converted to O 2 · − in the ETC [ 7 , 8 , 24 , 25 , 26 ], though the values in vivo are likely to be lower [ 8 , 26 ]. ETC-generated O 2 · − can spontaneously dismutate to H 2 O 2 but the rate is much slower than in the presence of physiological concentrations of mitochondrial superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) [ 26 , 27 ]. As a result, the concentration of O 2 · − in mitochondria is as little as 10–200 pM [ 28 ], while physiologically relevant concentrations of H 2 O 2 are maintained in the low nanomolar range (roughly 1–10 nM) [ 4 ]. There are at least 11 sites in the ETC where O 2 · − /H 2 O 2 are produced. The principle sites are Complexes I–III where, in certain cellular states, generation can also occur by reverse electron transport [ 24 , 26 ]. Production can also occur via functional and physical interactions of enzymes, such as proline oxidase (POX), with ETC complexes [ 29 ]. For example, POX itself, which oxidises proline to pyrroline-5-carboxylate (P5C) doesn’t produce ROS but rather directs high-energy electrons into the ETC in the form of FADH 2 through its coupling to Complex II [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Overexpression of POX and/or its increased activity in the presence of proline results in an acute burst of ROS via the ETC [ 8 , 26 , 29 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. The balance of generation of ROS from mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial sources will depend on the cell type as well as its metabolic status at the time. In resting mouse skeletal muscle-derived myoblasts, there is roughly equal generation of H 2 O 2 from each (~45% from the ETC and ~40% from NOX) [ 36 ]. Cellular sources of ROS and antioxidants, and the effects of oxidative distress. Numerous cellular enzymes (yellow discs) produce ROS (shown in yellow sunbursts), whose homeostatic concentrations are controlled by a comprehensive system of antioxidants (only GSH is shown here) and antioxidant enzymes (blue discs) [ 37 ]. Principal sources are NOX, Complexes I–III of the mitochondrial electron transport chain due primarily to electron leakage [ 8 , 26 ], and to various enzymes (not shown), such as proline oxidase, which are coupled to Complex II [ 8 , 26 ]. The principal ROS signalling molecule is H 2 O 2 (physiological concentration ≈1–10 nM [ 8 , 26 ]), which can penetrate membranes directly or (more efficiently) by transmembrane transporters (green disks). Oxidative distress occurs when the antioxidant system cannot maintain homeostatic concentrations of ROS, which can lead to a range of cellular dysfunctions (red boxes), frequently resulting in growth arrest and apoptosis. ACOX, acyl coenzyme A oxidase; AQP, aquaporin; CAT, catalase, CuZnSOD, copper–zinc superoxide dismutase; DAO, diamine oxidase; γ-GCS, γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GRx, glutathione reductase; GS, glutathione synthetase; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; NOX, NADPH oxidase; VDAC, voltage-dependent anion channel; XOR, xanthine oxidoreductase. Although once deemed a toxic by-product of aerobic respiration that cells must remove in order to maintain normal function, the physiological roles of ROS have, more recently, come to the fore [ 4 , 20 , 38 ]. Levels of ROS generated from various enzymes and adventitious production from the ETC are held within homeostatic concentration ranges by a closely coupled system of antioxidants (e.g., glutathione (GSH), thioredoxin (Trx), vitamins C and E) and redox-regulating enzymes ( Figure 2 ) [ 37 , 39 , 40 ]. This close coupling of generation and removal is exploited by cells in variety of ways: (i) Highly reactive ROS (in particular, H 2 O 2 ) act as second messengers to modulate the activity of a variety of cellular macromolecules, including metabolic and signalling-pathway enzymes and components of cytoskeletal networks [ 4 , 41 , 42 ]. (ii) Growth factors and other molecules can stimulate signalling which generate ROS to initiate cellular response to environmental cues [ 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. Collectively, ROS control a pleiotropic range of homeostatic cellular responses including aspects of the hypoxic response, stress response, antioxidant response, autophagy and metabolic adaptation [ 4 , 8 , 26 , 42 ], all of which are important for normal oocyte maturation and preimplantation embryo development. In particular, metabolic adaptation includes negative feedback by ETC-generated H 2 O 2 to fine-tune control of mitochondrial respiration, the balance of molecular sources (e.g., fatty acids, amino acids and carbohydrates) that feed into the TCA cycle and ETC, and the balance of ATP production accorded to anaerobic and aerobic metabolism [ 4 , 8 , 26 ], and these switches occur at critical times in early development. The most common target of ROS and redox-mediated signalling is reversible thiol oxidation of specific redox-sensitive proteinaceous cysteines, generally to form intra- and inter-protein disulphide bonds [ 41 , 42 ]. Many of these signalling mechanisms and targets play homeostatic roles in early development where changes in O 2 tension and bursts of ROS production are frequent ( Figure 3 ). Oxidative distress, however, can occur, especially during in vitro culture of oocytes/embryos where maternal control systems are absent and those of the oocyte/embryo compromised. These redox-regulated signalling pathways include the NRF2 oxidative stress-response pathway [ 4 ]. NRF2 is normally targeted for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation through its interactions with redox-sensing KEAP1 (the adaptor protein of the Cul3 ubiquitin ligase complex). Oxidant-mediated intermolecular disulphide bond formation between the monomers of the KEAP1 homodimer result in stabilisation of NRF2, which is now free to move to the nucleus and bind antioxidant response elements (AREs). This stimulates expression of a number of genes whose products enzymatically and non-enzymatically reduce the imposed oxidative stress [ 47 ]. Analogously, hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF-1α, HIF-2α and HIF-3α) are key transcription factors regulating cellular responses under hypoxic conditions. HIF-α is normally rapidly degraded under high O 2 tension through hydroxylation of key prolines by the oxidant- and oxygen-sensitive HIF prolyl hydroxylases [ 48 , 49 ]. This targets HIF-α for ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation. On the other hand, decreased prolyl hydroxylase activity promotes HIF-α stabilisation, movement to the nucleus, binding to hypoxia response elements (HREs), and the upregulation of expression of more than 70 genes, including redox-regulating enzymes, and those which help switch energy demand towards glucose metabolism and away from oxidative phosphorylation [ 50 ]. The energy switch away from mitochondria and O 2 usage under hypoxic conditions can result in the generation of ROS due to the leakage of electrons from the ETC [ 26 ]. In a complex interplay, expression of the redox modulator enzyme, Ref-1, is unregulated in the presence of H 2 O 2 . Ref-1 then stimulates gene expression of HIF-1α, which in turn upregulates the expression of HIF prolyl hydroxylases resulting in negative feedback control of HIF-1α activity, even while H 2 O 2 induces disulphide bond-mediated dimerisation and inactivation of the HIF prolyl hydroxylases [ 48 ]. Ref-1 can also reduce disulphide bonds in a number of transcription factors, including HIF-1α, the presence of which generally suppresses their transcriptional activity [ 51 ]. The complexity of these homeostatic and interconnected redox-dependent mechanisms, which have been elucidated to some extent in various cellular systems, have been much less explored in oocyte/embryo systems where, nevertheless, O 2 tension and ROS are known to play major roles. The FoxO class of transcription factors is a target of redox-mediated signalling and, in turn, a mediator of response to ROS: Growth factor- and signalling-mediated increases in ROS lead to phosphorylation of specific FoxO serines and threonines and result in increased expression of genes whose protein products are responsible for redox regulation, including MnSOD, PRx3 and 5, GPx1, mitochondrial thioredoxin, mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase and catalase. In addition, H 2 O 2 -mediated FoxO activation occurs under conditions of nutrient deprivation and results in upregulation of expression of other key genes including those for autophagy [ 43 , 44 , 45 ]. Whilst oxidative eustress represents the cellular responses to homeostatic levels of ROS, excessive levels of ROS result in oxidative distress and a range of cellular pathologies, often resulting in growth arrest and apoptosis [ 4 ]. In contrast, increased ROS are also associated with a downregulation of tumour suppressor genes and an increase in pro-survival pathways [ 52 , 53 ]. Aberrant upregulation of expression of NADPH oxidase genes can result in various pathologies [ 54 ] including those linked to cancer, diabetes, and a number of inflammatory disorders [ 20 , 53 ]. Dysregulation of redox status during oxidative stress can contribute to the formation of metabolic diseases, hinder cellular metabolism, and block cellular antioxidant defence mechanisms [ 20 , 55 , 56 ]. ROS and Ca 2+ signalling are interlinked. Ca 2+ is mainly stored within cells in the ER and release of Ca 2+ into the cytoplasm is involved in numerous cellular functions. Ca 2+ release is also directly coupled to Ca 2+ levels within the mitochondria, due to physical and functional coupling of Ca 2+ channels in the ER and mitochondria (e.g., IP3R and VDAC, respectively) [ 57 ]. An increase in cytosolic Ca 2+ due to release through IP3R causes an increase in mitochondrial Ca 2+ which activates oxidative phosphorylation and thus ROS production. Ca 2+ also activates MnSOD, which helps abate excessive ROS accumulation and maintain ROS homeostasis. Nevertheless, sustained elevation of cytosolic Ca 2+ due to ROS-induced ER stress can disturb the transfer of Ca 2+ from ER to mitochondria and cause aberrant mitochondrial metabolism and apoptosis [ 58 ]. In addition, oxidative distress causes post-translational modifications of proteins responsible for Ca 2+ signalling [ 58 ]. For example, thiol oxidants and ROS can inhibit functioning of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca 2+ -transport ATPase (SERCA), preventing uptake of Ca 2+ into the ER and restoration of resting cytosolic Ca 2+ levels [ 59 ]. ROS and glucose metabolism are also linked: Skeletal muscle cells exposed to exogenous H 2 O 2 have increased glucose uptake [ 60 ], and the expression of the glucose transporter, GLUT1, is upregulated in L6 muscle cells when exposed to continuous exogenous ROS-generating systems (xanthine/xanthine oxidase and glucose/glucose oxidase) [ 61 ].

Oocyte maturation, fertilisation and embryo development in the reproductive system take place in a highly complex milieu of factors from the mother and the oocyte/embryo itself. During folliculogenesis there is a steady decline in O 2 tension in the follicular fluid [ 62 , 63 ] and around the time of ovulation there is a decrease in blood flow to the ovary, thus subjecting the oocyte to decreasing O 2 tension from the primary follicle stage to the point of ovulation [ 62 , 63 , 64 ]. There is also a decrease in O 2 tension from the top of the oviduct (~8%), where fertilisation takes place, to the uterus (~2%), at the time of blastocyst formation and implantation [ 63 , 65 ] ( Figure 3 ). ROS are generated under these conditions, sometimes in acute bursts required for developmental progression but, overall, ROS concentrations are normally maintained within their homeostatic ranges by the maternal environment [ 11 , 66 , 67 ], the maturing and ovulated oocyte, and pre-implantation embryo [ 11 , 66 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. In stark contrast, culture media for oocyte maturation, fertilisation, and embryo development are extremely simple, consisting of little more than buffers, basic salts, and energy sources (generally a combination of lactate, pyruvate and glucose) [ 72 , 73 , 74 ]. The inclusion of HEPES buffer in culture media, such as those used for fertilisation, drives production of O 2 .− and, subsequently, production of H 2 O 2 [ 75 ]. Many culture media also contain serum as a protein source for embryo development and/or serum albumin, which reduces adhesion of embryos to surfaces and promotes hatching [ 76 , 77 ]. However, both are a source of ROS generation [ 11 , 75 , 78 ]. These differences between the in vivo and in vitro situations present many challenges for assisted reproduction. Some of these challenges and solutions are explored below. Sources of ROS and antioxidants during in vivo embryo development. The preimplantation embryo develops over 5 days in the mouse in vivo. The maternal reproductive tract is an environment low in oxygen, with an oxygen gradient of approximately 8% to 2% from the oviduct to the uterus. This, along with a number of antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes, supports redox homeostasis and helps prevent irreversible oxidative damage. During oocyte maturation and preimplantation embryo development, there are numerous oxidative stressors including at ovulation, fertilisation, cellular division, and hatching. Some examples of the control of the action of these stressors by redox enzymes (in black) and antioxidants (in blue) are shown. References are shown in square brackets. The follicular fluid in which oocytes are bathed is rich in antioxidants (including vitamin E (α-tocopherol), β-carotene and GSH) and redox-controlling enzymes (including glutathione peroxidase (GPx) 3, superoxide dismutases (CuZnSOD, MnSOD, SOD3), catalase, glutathione S -transferase (GST), and glutathione reductase (GRx) [ 67 , 79 ]. In addition, cumulus cells provide the oocyte with GSH, as well as cysteine and NADPH for generation of GSH, via gap junctions connecting the cells in the follicle [ 70 , 80 ]. This well-balanced redox system maintains homeostatic levels of ROS and an appropriate environment for folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation [ 67 , 69 , 79 , 81 , 82 , 83 ]. Excess ROS in the follicular fluid results in damage to oocytes, including to the genome and lipid membranes [ 84 ]. In addition, the composition of follicular fluid is dynamic during folliculogenesis: As follicles increase in size, total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (a measure of the amount of ROS scavenged by a sample [ 85 ]) increases and H 2 O 2 decreases [ 84 ] . The increase in TAC appears to be required to combat what would otherwise be a rising concentration of H 2 O 2 [ 84 ]. There’s a close correlation between ROS in the follicular fluid on the one hand and oocyte grade on the other [ 86 , 87 , 88 ]: Follicles for which the follicular fluid has an average ROS level ~85 cps/400 μL produce less mature (grade I and II) oocytes, which generally don’t fertilise and, when they do, produce lower quality (grade III and IV) embryos [ 88 ]. An upper control limit of 107 cps/400 μL significantly distinguishes the fertilisation percentage, embryo quality, and the extent of embryo DNA fragmentation regardless of the cause of infertility (surgically removed fallopian tubes, endometriosis or polycystic ovary syndrome) [ 88 ], suggesting that high ROS levels represent a generalised cause of failure for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) regardless of the underlying physiology. Consistent with this, follicles from IVF patients that have a greater percentage of ROS-producing granulosa cells (77% compared to 61%) are less likely to contain an oocyte [ 87 ]. Similarly, blastocysts generated from oocytes where the percentage of ROS-producing granulosa cells are high (70%) do not implant, whereas blastocysts generated from oocytes with only 40% ROS-producing granulosa cells do implant [ 87 ]. Whole-body irradiation of female mice in the pre-ovulatory stage results in a 6-fold increase in chromosomal abnormalities in the metaphase plate of fertilised embryos, which can be partially overcome by intraperitoneal injection of vitamin E prior to irradiation [ 89 ]. The use of cryopreserved gametes presents challenges for ART. Cryopreserved spermatozoa have decreased antioxidant capacity, which leads to increased ROS in embryos [ 90 , 91 ]. Cryopreservation of oocytes subjects them to oxidative stress and makes them more susceptible to oxidative damage [ 92 , 93 , 94 ] and increased risk of failure of IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) [ 93 , 95 ]. Embryos derived from vitrified oocytes have >1000 differentially expressed genes at the 2-cell stage compared to embryos generated from fresh oocytes. Some of the genes whose expression is altered are related to redox pathways. For example, GPx6 expression is increased, possibly as a compensatory mechanism to protect against the effects of oxidative stress that occurred during oocyte vitrification [ 92 ]. Prolonged incubation of spermatozoa and oocytes during IVF also leads to increased environmental ROS due to its release from immature or dead spermatozoa. To some extent, this can be combatted by decreasing incubation time during fertilisation [ 96 ]. During in vivo maturation, oocytes are subjected to decreasing O 2 tension ( Figure 3 ). Despite this, increases in O 2 consumption and ROS levels are required at critical times to promote further development. For example, O 2 consumption increases in oocytes as ovulation approaches, coinciding with a switch in energy source from pyruvate to glucose [ 97 , 98 ]. In addition, an increase in the level of H 2 O 2 (from 66 to 77 ng H 2 O 2 /oocyte) is required for the resumption of meiosis in rat oocytes from the diplotene to MI stage [ 83 ]. The burst in H 2 O 2 modulates signalling by reducing cyclic nucleotide concentrations (cAMP and cGMP) resulting in phosphorylation of CDK1 (at Thr14/15), which in turn destabilises maturation-promoting factor to allow completion of meiosis II [ 99 , 100 ]. Intra-oocyte defence mechanisms during meiotic maturation are important for protecting DNA from oxidative damage. For example, catalase is localised to the nucleus at the germinal vesicle stage and in the peri-chromosomal region following breakdown of the nuclear envelope and thereby protects the DNA from ROS-related damage [ 101 ]. The LH surge, which triggers the final stages of oocyte meiotic maturation, induces an increase in ROS, which is required for EGF receptor-mediated signalling events that are essential for maturation. Thus, exogenous antioxidants, such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) prevent LH-induced activation (by phosphorylation) of the EGF receptor and its downstream effector p42/44 MAPK [ 102 ]. Similarly, if ROS is reduced in vitro using scavengers such as 2(3)- tert -butyl-4-hydroxyanisole or nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA), oocyte maturation is also inhibited [ 83 , 103 ]. On the other hand, oocytes with H 2 O 2 over 90 ng/oocyte undergo apoptosis [ 83 ]. These results show that while bursts in ROS are critical for developmental progression, they must still be carefully controlled. The redox state of oocytes is further altered during fertilisation, with a peak in both O 2 consumption and ROS [ 104 ]. The burst in O 2 · − resulting from increased NADPH oxidase and mitochondrial activity in bovine sperm results in redox-induced efflux of cholesterol from the sperm plasma membrane, and a large global increase in tyrosine phosphorylation driven by cAMP/PKA signalling [ 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 ]. Furthermore, serum or serum albumin promotes a burst of ROS that triggers capacitation (and subsequent fertilising ability) of sperm at the early, intermediate and late stages through activation of an interconnected panoply of signalling pathways including PKA and ERK, and this can be inhibited by incubation of sperm with antioxidant enzymes such SOD and catalase [ 78 ]. Similarly, ROS production in sperm-activated bovine oocytes peaks during sperm penetration/sperm-head decondensation, with subsequent peaks at the initiation of pronuclear formation and at the time of the first mitotic division [ 110 ]. Again, these bursts in ROS are normally kept under appropriate homeostatic control by the antioxidant defence mechanisms of the oviductal fluid, which includes maternal upregulation of the expression of CuZnSOD and GPx [ 11 , 66 , 111 ]. Increased ROS commonly leads to male infertility, with high ROS levels causing DNA damage and reducing fertilisation in vivo and in IVF [ 112 , 113 , 114 ]. During ICSI, using sperm with high levels of ROS can still result in successful fertilisation but embryo quality is compromised and the percentage of live births reduced, presumably in part as a result of increased sperm DNA damage [ 115 ]. The problem is exacerbated as a result of ROS-containing medium being injected into the oocyte along with the sperm [ 116 ]. Female reproductive ageing is tightly linked to a decrease in ovarian antioxidant enzymes and hence an increase in oxidative stress. Granulosa cells in older IVF patients have reduced expression of CuZnSOD, MnSOD and catalase, and morphologically defective mitochondria and ER [ 117 , 118 ]. Aged oocytes show abnormalities in the structure of organelles, consistent with the effects of oxidative stress, including dilated smooth ER and Golgi apparatus, and abnormal mitochondria [ 118 ]. Increased oxidative stress during reproductive ageing results in damage to DNA and organelles leading to increased aneuploidy in the oocyte [ 119 , 120 , 121 ] ROS levels remain relatively constant during the cleavage stages of in vivo pre-implantation development (i.e., 2-cell to 8-cell stages in the mouse) [ 71 ] and, following compaction, the embryo increasingly relies on the use of glucose over pyruvate, which may be required to support the proliferative burst and differentiation that begins at this time [ 122 , 123 ]. Peri-implantation blastocysts produce a burst of O 2 .− and decrease levels of SOD compared to pre- and post-implantation embryos [ 124 ]. In vitro , the addition of O 2 .− around the time of hatching results in thinning of the zona pellucida , suggesting that the burst of ROS production for in vivo blastocysts assists in hatching. Furthermore, a range of O 2 · − scavengers used on both in vitro and in vivo blastocysts reduces hatching [ 124 ]. Excessive accumulation of ROS, however, at various times in the life of the preimplantation embryo compromises development, and many problems have been identified that contribute to this in the in vitro environment ( Figure 4 ) [ 125 , 126 ]. Among these are: (i) The simplicity of culture media, including especially their generally poor antioxidant properties. (ii) Culture in, or even brief exposure to, 21% O 2 , which results in generation of excess ROS. (iii) Laboratory light, which stimulates ROS production. Various strategies have been used to overcome, or at least identify, these problems. For example, TAC assays [ 85 ] can be used to quantify the embryo’s ability to cope with oxidative stress. In human IVF cycles, embryos with a higher TAC as measured in culture medium on day 1 had improved fertilisation and cleavage rates, improved development to the blastocyst stage, and less embryonic fragmentation on day 3 of development than those with a lower TAC [ 125 ]. in vitro cultured embryos have higher levels of aneuploidy than their in vivo counterparts and the increased oxidative stress in the laboratory is a contributing factor to this, including culture media components, pH, osmolality, laboratory light and O 2 concentration [ 126 , 127 ]. The maternal reproductive tract provides support for the developing embryo and, consistent with this, co-culture of mouse embryos in vitro with human oviductal epithelial cells improves development: 75, 60, and 40% embryos develop to the 4-8 cell, blastocyst stage and hatching stage, respectively, compared to 20, 3, and 0% in contactless coculture or without coculture [ 128 ]. Coculture eliminates the build-up of O 2 · − in the medium [ 128 ]. In a related study, maternal expression of oviductal microsomal epoxide hydrolase ( Ephx1 ), an enzyme important in detoxifying genotoxic molecules, is upregulated in the oviduct over the first 5 days of mouse embryo development [ 129 ]. In addition, inhibition of human EPHX1 by cyclohexene oxide or 1,1,1-trichloropropene-2,3-oxide in human oviductal cells cocultured with mouse embryos increases ROS and prevents the beneficial effect of co-culture on blastocyst formation and hatching [ 129 ]. Knockout of very few redox-regulating/antioxidant genes pose issues for preimplantation development [ 23 ] presumably, in part, due to mechanistic redundancy. However, mouse embryos knocked out for Trx1 , the gene for the small antioxidant protein Trx, are embryonic lethal at ~E3.5 [ 130 ] and knockout of the redox-modulating enzyme, Ref-1 [ 48 , 51 ], is embryonic lethal shortly after implantation [ 131 ]. Knockout/knockdown of some redox-sensing/regulating transcription factors can also disrupt development at an early stage. Knockdown of FoxO proteins (FoxO1 , FoxO3 and FoxO4) in mice impairs preimplantation embryo development [ 132 ]: The majority of the FoxO knockdown embryos arrest at the 2-cell stage, and blastocyst formation decreases from ~70% to ~25%. ROS in these embryos is elevated 3–4 fold, and in the 2-cell arrested embryos there are 1.5–3 fold increases in Fasl and cleaved caspase 3 (responsible for apoptosis) and p53 and p21 (responsible for cell-cycle arrest) [ 132 ]. In embryo culture media, usually the only antioxidant included is a chelator, such as EDTA, which sequesters redox catalysts such as heavy metal ions. In particular, H 2 O 2 and O 2 · − can react in the Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ Haber-Weiss catalytic cycle to form the highly reactive OH· [ 11 , 133 ], which in many species is responsible for preimplantation block [ 71 , 134 , 135 ]. In mouse, the addition of EDTA to culture medium overcomes the 2-cell block (which occurs at the G2 phase of the cell cycle) predominantly by acting as a chelator [ 134 , 136 ]. Consistent with this, a 30-min exposure of mouse embryos in vitro to exogenously added H 2 O 2 (50 μM) reduces the percentage that pass the block from >70% to 40% [ 137 , 138 ], while addition of the reducing agent N -acetyl-L-cysteine along with H 2 O 2 completely overcomes this [ 137 , 138 ]. The addition of GSH to mouse embryo culture medium reduces ROS in these embryos and increases the percentage of blastocysts [ 139 ]. Similar results were obtained in the porcine [ 140 ] and bovine systems [ 141 ]. Consistent with the importance of GSH, knockout mice for GPx4 [ 142 ], γ-glutamylcysteine ligase [ 143 ] or glutathione synthetase [ 144 ], all of which are required for the formation of GSH, are embryonic lethal. Melatonin, a tryptophan-derived hormone secreted from the pineal gland to regulate circadian rhythm, is also an antioxidant that scavenges a number of ROS, including OH· and H 2 O 2 , and also upregulates the expression of GPx, catalase, SODs and glutathione reductase [ 145 ]. Melatonin improves viability of heat-stressed bovine embryos in culture [ 146 ]. Oocyte retrievals in women treated with melatonin had, on average, double the fertilisation rate compared to previous cycles, while simultaneously having a one-third reduction in the concentration of intrafollicular concentration of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), a biomarker of oxidative stress [ 89 , 147 , 148 ]. The inclusion of melatonin in culture medium for embryo development reduces cleavage times, improves development to the blastocyst stage, and decreases ROS in vitrified embryos [ 94 , 149 ]. Similarly, vitamin C (ascorbic acid) and vitamin E scavenge ROS, and culture medium for porcine embryos supplemented with vitamins C or E reduces the toxic effects of culture under 21% O 2 , increases blastocyst cell numbers, and the percentage of embryos that develop to the blastocyst stage, though there is a complex dependence on concentration of the antioxidants and supplementation timing [ 150 , 151 ]. The addition of vitamin C to culture medium enables embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage even when they are exposed to oxidative stress by incubating them with PMA-activated leukocyte supernatant [ 152 ]. In addition to oxidative stress linked to mitochondria and the cytosol, significant effects can also occur in the ER. ROS accumulation in the embryo can activate the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathways leading to accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER, apoptosis, changes in gene expression, and developmental errors [ 153 , 154 ]. Mouse embryos cultured in the presence of 2% DMSO, which causes oxidative stress, have increased mitochondrial Ca 2+ , resulting in mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis [ 155 ]. In addition, the morula cultured in 2% DMSO upregulate expression of ER stress genes GRP78/BIP and UPR genes including Hspa5 , Hsp90b1 , Ddit3 , and Atf4 which contribute to the increased apoptosis and developmental arrest at the 2-cell, 4-cell, and morula stages in a dose-dependent manner [ 155 ]. Reducing ER stress in cultured bovine embryos using the bile-acid tauroursodeoxycholate decreases ROS and increases the percentage of embryos that reach the blastocyst stage [ 156 ]. A large number of other antioxidants from a variety of sources have been used to promote oocyte and embryo development in vitro , generally with similar success, although determination of the appropriate concentration range for beneficial effect is an issue [ 146 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 ]. Sources of ROS for in vitro cultured oocytes and embryos. Oxidative stress can be induced by a number of laboratory processes, as shown, and a number of antioxidants can be added to the culture medium to combat these excessive ROS levels. The addition of individual and combinations of proteinogenic and other amino acids to culture media is also commonly used due to the presence of amino acids in the oviductal and uterine fluids [ 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 ]. Of these, proline and its close analog pipecolic acid can reduce ROS by a number of possible mechanisms, including: (i) Direct scavenging by the secondary amine of the ring structure [ 32 , 165 , 166 ]. (ii) Metabolism to glutamate, a precursor for GSH production [ 35 , 167 , 168 ]. (iii) Suppression of ETC activity (a major cellular source of ROS) [ 29 , 169 , 170 ]. In this last case, the suppression by proline involves POX, the enzyme that converts proline to P5C [ 33 , 34 ]. While this initially results in acute generation of ROS (due to the physical coupling of POX to Complex II) [ 29 ], the long-term effect is downregulation of the expression of ETC genes, and hence the activity of the ETC [ 29 ]. Proline acts as a cryoprotectant for oocytes [ 93 ] and sperm [ 171 ] in part by acting as a ROS scavenger, which reduces the damage associated with oxidative stress. Proline added to the storage medium for boar sperm also results in increased GSH, and catalase and SOD activity. Upon thawing, sperm parameters improve, including those for motility and acrosome integrity. Oxidative stress upon exposure of thawed semen to H 2 O 2 is also reduced in the presence of L-proline [ 171 ]. The addition of proline or pipecolic acid only during fertilisation reduces mitochondrial activity by 40% and ROS levels by 60%, and improves later development to the blastocyst stage and hatching [ 162 ], consistent with the idea that a metabolically ‘quiet’ oocyte has better developmental potential. Similarly, proline added during embryo culture also improves development to the blastocyst stage [ 163 ]. In the porcine trophectoderm cell line, pTr, proline reduces ROS, the mRNA expressions of glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit and glutathione synthetase increases, as do GSH levels [ 169 ]. Selected other amino acids can sometimes substitute for proline: For example, glutamine and hypotaurine reduce H 2 O 2 levels in porcine embryos, improve blastocyst development and blastocyst cell numbers, and reduce DNA damage [ 172 ]. Though the molecular mechanisms are unclear, those for glutamine (a precursor for glutathione) don’t appear to be glutathione dependent, and it’s notable that the antioxidant, hypotaurine, can’t be synthesised by oocytes/embryos and therefore would normally be supplied from maternal sources [ 172 , 173 ]. However, the effects of amino-acid supplementation of oocyte/embryo culture medium are not easily predictable: While some amino acids are beneficial to maturation/development, other amino acids inhibit their beneficial effects (e.g., by competing for uptake via amino-acid transporters), or are themselves toxic [ 162 , 163 , 174 , 175 ]. For example, supplementation of IVF culture medium with glycine, cysteine and glutamate, the three amino acids required for producing GSH, reduce development of bovine embryos [ 174 ]. Polyamines, such as spermine and spermidine, can scavenge H 2 O 2 -generated OH·, via the Fenton reaction, as well as 1 O 2 [ 176 ] and are essential components of seminal fluid and the female reproductive tract; their absence resulting in male infertility and failed embryogenesis [ 177 ]. The addition of 25 µM spermine or spermidine to culture medium containing high glucose, a condition that induces oxidative stress, reduces lipoperoxidation in mid-gestation rat embryos and reverses developmental defects [ 178 ]. Spermine (10–500 µM) increases GSH concentrations and decreases ROS in in vitro matured porcine oocytes and increases the percentage of blastocysts following parthenogenetic activation [ 179 ]. Given that proline can be a major source for the production of polyamines [ 177 , 180 , 181 ], these data are suggestive of an additional role of this amino acid in developmental processes. Consistent with this, the porcine placenta produces polyamines using proline as the major amino-acid source [ 181 ]. 21% O 2 imposes oxidative stress on embryos, as measured by ROS accumulation and its effects, as well as triggering mechanisms which attempt to reduce the stress. For example, bovine embryos cultured at 21% O 2 have fewer inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) cells than those cultured at 5% O 2 , despite upregulation of expression of oxidant-reducing pathways, such as the NRF2 pathway, and a range of antioxidant enzymes [ 182 , 183 ]. In vitro culture of embryos alters mitochondrial structure, with O 2 tension affecting the extent of this change [ 184 ]. Blastocysts developed in 21% O 2 have more abnormal mitochondria, with more mitochondrial vacuoles and less mitochondrial DNA, compared to blastocysts flushed from the uterus [ 184 ]. These problems are reduced in 5% O 2 [ 184 ]. Similarly, mitochondrial activity in bovine blastocysts improves if O 2 tension is reduced from 21% to 5% [ 183 ]. Consistent with this, addition of 30 μM H 2 O 2 to culture medium of mouse zygotes to induce oxidative stress reduces mitochondrial membrane potential, and mitochondrial activity declines by 40% [ 185 ]. Compared to bovine embryos cultured in 5% O 2 , those cultured in 21% O 2 have increased ROS production. 21% O 2 activates the NRF2 redox-sensitive stress-response pathway from the 8-cell stage through to the blastocyst stage: The expression of NRF2 increases 2-4 fold at these stages while that of the NRF2 inhibitor, KEAP1 , halves [ 183 ]. Consistent with this, the expression of several NRF2-responsive antioxidant genes such as SOD1 ( CuZnSOD ) and PRDX1 increase. Nuclear localisation of NRF2 also increases in blastocysts formed at day 7, consistent with its role as a transcription factor binding to chromosomal antioxidant response elements [ 183 ]. High O 2 tension and oxidative stress in cultured embryos can reduce developmental potential, result in DNA fragmentation, modifies DNA methylation patterns and histones, and the expression of redox-sensitive genes [ 182 , 186 ]. For example, bovine oocyte culture in 21% O 2 leads to downregulation of expression of PAF1 and REST which are important in chromatin organisation and histone modifications as well as for maintaining a state of pluripotency [ 182 ]. Oxidative stress also leads to an upregulation of SOX2 and HP1 , both of which are involved in changes to DNA methylation and chromatin remodelling [ 182 ]. These changes indicate that oxidative stress can alter the epigenetic landscape and interfere with embryo development [ 187 ]. Similarly, there are a large number of gene expression changes (≥2-fold) between embryos cultured in 21% O 2 compared to those cultured at 2–5% O 2 [ 188 , 189 ]. These include genes involved in numerous critical pathways, including biosynthesis, mitochondrial activity, kinase activity, and the microtubule-based cytoskeleton [ 189 ]. Since culture in 21% O 2 can induce oxidative stress [ 190 , 191 ], some ART laboratories culture in 5% O 2 [ 192 ], which improves mitochondrial membrane potential and upregulates the expression of genes encoding for antioxidant enzymes such as MnSOD and PRDx5 [ 193 ]. However, even transient exposure to 21% O 2 at any time during assisted reproduction can compromise the embryo. For example, oocyte culture in 5% O 2 results in higher rates of fertilisation compared to those incubated in 21% O 2 [ 194 ] but switches in O 2 tension and even temporary removal of oocytes and embryos from low O 2 tension to atmospheric causes changes sufficient to induce oxidative stress [ 194 , 195 ]. For example, exposure of mouse zygotes to atmospheric O 2 for 1–2 h reduces the percentage of embryos that reach the blastocyst stage by a third to a half [ 196 ]. Mouse and hamster zygotes exposed to laboratory light for as little as 15 min have increased H 2 O 2 and a variety of developmental deficiencies ensue including, in the mouse, an increased percentage of apoptotic cells in the blastocyst and a reduction in live births and, in the hamster, complete cessation of development to the morula stage [ 197 ]. Embryos exposed to white light also have lower implantation capacity and a higher percentage of apoptosis and DNA fragmentation, both of which are associated with oxidative stress [ 198 ]. Minimising laboratory light poses challenges when performing procedures and monitoring embryo development during IVF and many other forms of ART [ 197 , 199 ].

The developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis (DoHaD) states that inappropriate cues in the embryonic environment can result in cellular reprogramming and transcriptional changes, causing disease in offspring up to an including adulthood, and these transcriptional changes potentially have transgenerational effects [ 200 ]. The suboptimal environment in which oocytes/embryos are cultured can result in oxidative distress having immediate impact not only on the success rates of assisted reproduction but also long-term effects on fetal, child and adult health and, potentially, the offspring of future generations. Consistent with this, there is an increase in epigenetic anomalies in children born via ART, some of which are linked to epigenetic changes and imprinting errors. The lack of antioxidants, and enzyme-mediated antioxidant control, in oocyte/embryo culture media can result in ROS-mediated oxidation of methylcytosine, the necessary precursor to active demethylation of DNA at some CpG islands [ 201 ]. These immediate and aberrant ROS-mediated epigenetic modifications can result in changes to gene expression as well as long-term, including transgenerational, changes [ 13 , 14 ] such as large-offspring syndrome, enlarged organs and metabolic disorders [ 13 ]. Cryopreservation exacerbates ROS production in oocytes [ 93 ]. In the mouse, the first filial generation offspring derived from cryopreserved oocytes compared to fresh oocytes have increased diastolic blood pressure and increased triglyceride levels as adult mice [ 12 ]. Oocytes cryopreserved in the presence of proline have decrease in these transgenerational oxidative stress responses. The mechanisms have not been investigated but proline can act by a number of possible ROS-reducing mechanisms, as outlined above [ 29 , 33 , 34 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 202 , 203 ] The endocrine-disruptor, bisphenol A (BPA), can disrupt development via a number of mechanisms including increasing ROS production, altering embryo metabolism and mediating epigenetic modifications. Exposure of bovine oocytes to BPA causes an increase in ROS, decreases oocyte maturation, increases DNA damage and increases histone modifications [ 204 ]. Oocytes exposed to BPA in the F0 generation can result in behavioural and other phenotype changes for up to 3 generations [ 205 ]. High levels of ROS in sperm can cause epigenetic changes. Obesity results in poorer sperm quality and an increase in spermatic ROS leading to epigenetic changes in the sperm that may be the cause of acquired obesity in future generations [ 206 ]. As oxidative stress intensifies, the genetic and epigenetic effects on the gametes increase: Exposure to low levels of oxidative stress causes oxidation of bases and the generation of abasic sites whereas more intense oxidative stress can result in DNA strand breaks [ 207 ]. These DNA strand breaks and changes pose a mutagenic risk to the gamete and changes in the nucleus and to DNA can result in mutations in future generations [ 207 ]. Collectively, the deficiencies of oocyte/embryo culture media and their inability to properly support protection from oxidative stress, as would normally occur in vivo , results in more frequent changes to the epigenetic landscape [ 201 , 208 ], an increase in the number of offspring with genetic imprinting anomalies, and therefore increased likelihood of transgenerational effects in children and animals born using ART.

Some of the relationships between oxidative stress and antioxidants have been fairly well established in animal models including the testing of oral supplementation of antioxidants to reduce ROS levels in follicular and seminal fluids [ 93 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 ]. Based on this, there have been a number of human clinical trials testing various antioxidants—e.g., melatonin, myoinositol, coenzyme Q10, and multivitamin combinations (principally vitamins C and E)—and their effects on outcomes of assisted reproduction ( Table 1 ). These listed trials were carried out with patients undergoing fertility treatments, including IVF and ICSI. They aimed to reduce oxidative stress in gametes and embryos, as measured by a number of parameters including fertilisation rate, embryo quality, clinical pregnancy rates, sperm motility and morphology, as well as antioxidant measures including TAC, lipid peroxidation (LPO) and antioxidant enzyme levels. Overall, oral supplementation with antioxidants improves the fertilisation rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rate ( Table 1 ). Clinical trials are also being carried out testing the exogenous addition of antioxidants to media for sperm, oocyte maturation, fertilisation and embryo culture and their impact on gametes/embryos ( Table 2 ). They aimed to reduce oxidative stress as measured by a number of parameters, including sperm quality, fertilisation rate, embryo development and blastocyst formation. Overall, addition of antioxidants to media results in improved gamete quality and an increase in clinical pregnancies ( Table 2 ). Given that 21% (atmospheric) O 2 results in increased ROS, many IVF clinics have switched to low-O 2 incubators to more closely mimic O 2 concentrations of 2–8% in the reproductive tract [ 63 , 65 ]. Several clinical trials have been carried out to determine the impact of low concentrations of O 2 on various parameters of fertility [ 226 , 227 , 228 ]. Culture of embryos in 5% O 2 increases the percentage developing to the blastocyst stage and their quality. However, there is limited evidence to show low O 2 improves live-birth rate [ 226 , 227 , 228 ]. Clinical trials using antioxidants, taken orally, in patients undergoing infertility treatment, and their effect on oocyte, sperm, and embryo health. Clinical trials using antioxidants in vitro and their effect on oocyte, sperm, and embryo health.

Preimplantation embryo development requires tight regulation of molecular and physiological processes for optimal blastocyst formation, hatching and implantation. One set of mechanisms that need careful balance in these early stages of development is redox control within the oocyte and embryo, and the surrounding maternal environment [ 1 , 2 ]. The redox state of a cell depends on the ratio of oxidised and reduced molecules [ 3 ] and redox homeostasis (i.e., oxidative eustress) helps maintain normal cellular function [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated by a variety of cellular metabolic activities and, in particular, as a by-product of ATP generation mediated by mitochondrial respiration [ 7 , 8 ]. However, either excessive accumulation of ROS or highly reduced conditions upsets redox homeostasis, results in oxidative distress and, in the embryo, acts to impair development by a variety of mechanisms ( Figure 1 ) [ 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. The sensitivity of the oocyte and preimplantation embryo to oxidative stress also presents challenges for in vitro assisted reproductive technologies (ART), including oocyte maturation, fertilisation, and embryo culture. Redox imbalance during early development can also result in transgenerational effects to the immediate offspring and later generations [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. This review examines the effects of oxidative stress in the oocyte and preimplantation embryo in both the in vivo and in vitro environment, identifies mechanisms responsible for oxidative stress that affect the current oocyte/embryo and effects on future generations, as well as approaches to reduce these problems.

This review highlights that ROS and oxidative eustress contribute to normal cellular homeostasis, with ROS playing direct and indirect roles in a very wide range of physiological processes. In keeping with this, homeostatic levels of ROS, including timed bursts, are necessary for normal oocyte maturation, fertilisation and embryo development. However, excess ROS production results in tipping the redox balance from eustress to distress, leaving oocytes and embryos susceptible to damage, particularly in the in vitro environment where protective maternal factors are absent. Highly simplified culture media, and non-physiological culture conditions (including high oxygen tension and exposure to laboratory light) contribute to reduced success for ART. Oxidative distress disrupts metabolic and signalling pathways, alters the expression of wide range of genes, and changes the epigenetic landscape. These disruptions not only affect the oocyte/embryo but can have transgenerational impacts. Animal models and clinical trials show that judicious exogenous addition of antioxidants to culture media or oral supplementation to diet can mitigate the impact of ROS and improve assisted reproduction outcomes. Similarly, the addition of antioxidants to in vitro media for gamete preparation and cryopreservation can be beneficial to future embryo development. Nevertheless, the extraordinary complexity of the redox circuitry in vivo means much remains to be understood and applied to improve the success in ART.