Response to Individualized vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial

Longobardi S, Salvatore Longobardi, D'Hooghe TM, Thomas M D'Hooghe
Fertility and sterility · 2024 · vol. 121(4) , pp. 706 · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.024 · PMID:38147958
rct OA: bronze public-domain-us
🔓 Open OA copy View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-17 ⓘ

This multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 trial investigated whether individualized ovarian stimulation is noninferior to conventional stimulation for in vitro fertilization outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-16T09:21:09.727480+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-17T06:09:41.369481+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-15T02:00:00.661756+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine