Regarding: "development and validation of MRI-based radiomics model for clinical symptom stratification of extrinsic adenomyosis"

article OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-22

This correspondence addresses the development and validation of an MRI-based radiomics model designed for the clinical symptom stratification of extrinsic adenomyosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-28 · read from full text

This commentary evaluates a study by Sun et al. that developed an MRI-based radiomics model to stratify clinical symptoms in patients with extrinsic adenomyosis. The authors commend the integration of quantitative imaging with clinical parameters but highlight limitations regarding manual region-of-interest delineation, single-center retrospective design, and the biological interpretability of texture features. They recommend future research adopt automated segmentation methods, multicenter validation cohorts, and correlations with histopathological data to enhance reproducibility and generalizability. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 3,946 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Dear Editor We read with great interest the recent article by Sun et al. [Citation1] entitled ‘Development and validation of MRI-based radiomics model for clinical symptom stratification of extrinsic adenomyosis’. This study represents an important advance towards precision gynaecology by integrating quantitative MRI radiomics with clinical parameters to classify symptom heterogeneity in extrinsic adenomyosis. We commend the authors for their innovative work bridging imaging analytics and clinical application. First, while the study effectively demonstrates the potential of radiomics to distinguish among symptom subtypes – pain, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), infertility and asymptomatic cases – the reproducibility of extracted features may be limited by manual region-of-interest (ROI) delineation. As the authors acknowledged, manual segmentation is labour-intensive and subject to interobserver variability. We recommend that future studies adopt semi-automated or deep learning-based segmentation methods, which have proven effective in enhancing reproducibility and efficiency across multicenter MRI datasets [Citation2]. Second, although the proposed clinical–radiomic nomogram achieved robust discriminatory performance, its single-centre retrospective design may introduce overfitting bias. Incorporating external validation cohorts, ideally through multicenter collaboration, would enhance model generalizability and clinical robustness. Additionally, performing calibration and decision curve analyses could further confirm the model’s practical utility in individualized patient management. Third, the biological interpretability of radiomic features – particularly those derived from texture matrices such as GLCM and GLSZM – remains an important challenge. Correlating these imaging biomarkers with histopathological or molecular data, including hormone receptor profiles and extracellular matrix remodelling indicators, could clarify the mechanisms underlying symptom diversity. Visualizing feature importance or applying heatmap-based model interpretation could also increase clinician confidence and facilitate clinical implementation. Finally, this study holds substantial translational promise. A validated, noninvasive MRI-based stratification tool could refine preoperative counselling, guide individualized medical or surgical strategies, and reduce unnecessary interventions. Future research should aim to integrate this model within standardized frameworks, such as the evolving FIGO classification of adenomyosis, to promote cross-institutional comparability and clinical adoption. In summary, Sun et al. have made a valuable contribution to understanding symptom heterogeneity in adenomyosis through advanced radiomics modelling. Further optimization via automated segmentation, multicenter validation and biological correlation will accelerate the translation of this technology from research to clinical practice. Acknowledgment Provenance and peer review. Commentary, internally reviewed. CRediT: Xin Feng: Methodology, Writing – original draft; Huali Xiang: Conceptualization; Yuan Yuan: Validation, Writing – review & editing. Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. Data availability statement Data sharing does not apply to this article, as no data were created or analyzed in this study. Additional information Funding References - Sun M, Wang J, Xu P, et al. Development and validation of MRI-based radiomics model for clinical symptom stratification of extrinsic adenomyosis. Ann Med. 2025;57(1):2534521. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2534521. - Ling T, Zuo Z, Huang M, et al. Stacking classifiers based on integrated machine learning model: fusion of CT radiomics and clinical biomarkers to predict lymph node metastasis in locally advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2025;25(1):834. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14259-w.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-30T09:23:35.175841+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pmc
last seen: 2026-05-13T20:22:03.195721+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-30T06:03:37.151212+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK