Role of sex hormones in modulating breast and ovarian cancer associated pain.

There are two hormones that are mainly associated with breast and ovarian cancers: estrogen and progesterone. These two sex steroid hormones contribute to tumorigenesis, metastasis and cancer prognosis. Estrogen and progesterone also contribute heavily to normal breast, ovarian and uterine development. In this section we will discuss the role of estrogen, progesterone and their role in both breast and ovarian cancers. However, it is important to first understand the developmental role of these hormones in female reproduction and how they influence development in reproductive tissues. Breast development involves three hormonal dependent stages ( Briskin et al., 2015 ; Zolfaroli et al., 2018 ). First, during puberty, oestrogen acts to form the terminal end buds and elongates the ducts ( Briskin et al., 2015 ; Subramani et al., 2017 ). Second, during puberty and young adulthood, progesterone continues to elongate the mammary ducts and begins the side branching ( Lange et al., 2008 ; Valadez-Cosmes et al., 2016 ). Finally, during pregnancy, prolactin stimulates alveolar genesis and lactogenic development ( Briskin et al., 2015 ). The estrogen receptors are nuclear receptors involved in the formation of breast, ovaries and uterine tissues more specifically defined as estrogen receptors (ER) alpha (α) and beta (β). ERα and ERβ are found in the epithelium of the breast, ovaries and uterine tissues ( Cheng et al., 2018 ). ERα are the main source of estrogen in the breast and are associated with the luminal type of breast cancer ( Zolfaroli et al., 2018 ). Estrogen receptors α also play a crucial role in the development of mammary glands. Indeed, preclinical studies as demonstrated that deletion of ERα in the mammary glands of female mice leads to the underdeveloped mammary glands ( Hilton et al., 2018 ). The two isoforms of nuclear progesterone receptors: progesterone receptors A (PRA) and progesterone receptors B (PRB) ( Lange et al., 2008 ) are involved in mammary gland, uterine and ovarian development ( Valadez-Cosmes et al., 2016 ). PRA and PRB are found in the epithelium of breast, ovaries and uterine tissues ( Taraborrelli, 2015 ). PRA and PRB are from the same gene however, they have two different promoters which are nearly identical except that PRB has 164 more amino acids than PRA ( Zolfaroli et al., 2018 ). Functionally, it has been demonstrated in preclinical studies that deletion of PRB induce abnormal mammary formation, while deletion of PRA gene cause abnormal uterine development, but normal development of mammary glands ( Hilton et al., 2018 ). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that PRA and PRB can be expressed by ERα transcription events, but transcription can also happen independently of ERα ( Lange et al., 2008 ). However, ERα is necessary to induce expression of either progesterone receptor in estrogen receptor positive cells ( Jeon et al., 2016 ). Progesterone and estrogen receptors are usually only found in luminal epithelial cells that are non-dividing ( Cheng et al., 2018 ). However, these non-dividing cells are adjacent to proliferating stem cells, showing that estrogen and progesterone can affect cells in a paracrine or autocrine fashion ( Tian et al., 2018 ). Nonetheless, these cells are adjacent to proliferating cells, indicating that these receptors may be growth promoting to the nearby cells using a paracrine pathway ( Briksen et al., 2015 ). Progesterone activated genes in breast cancer are pro-tumor progression and are aggressive ( Lange et al., 2008 ). In vitro , it has been shown that after the initial burst of proliferation (after treatment of breast cancer cells with progesterone), progesterone proliferative effects are stopped ( Lange et al., 2008 ). Indeed, after additional treatment with progesterone, breast cancer cells did not proliferate, but have shown longer survival ( Tian et al., 2018 ). Lastly, in vitro studies have demonstrated that PRB increases cell motility leading to cancer progression and metastasis ( Lange et al., 2008 ). Not surprisingly, estrogen has been shown to regulate breast cancer cell growth via GREB1, which is an early estrogen response gene ( Cheng et al., 2018 ). Moreover, estrogen receptors are able to regulate GREB1 expression which is directly linked to the amount of estrogen in the plasma ( Cheng et al., 2018 ). More evidence have shown that breast cancer patients before menopause (higher estrogen concentration) have a much higher GREB1 expression relative to post-menopausal patients ( Ho et al., 2003 ). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that GREB1 acts as a regulator in the transcription of estrogen receptor target genes ( Cheng et al., 2018 ). Indeed, when immortalized breast cancer cells (MCF-7 cells) do not express GREB1, most of the target genes are no longer expressed ( Cheng et al., 2018 ). GREB1 is an estrogen receptor target gene allowing cancer cells to form colonies and when GREB1 is no longer expressed the cancer cells have impaired colony formation ( Cheng et al., 2018 ). Preclinical studies have shown that estrogen and progesterone have a proliferative effect on breast cancer cells by inducing tumorigenesis and metastasis ( Tian et al., 2018 ). These sex steroid hormones accomplish the effect by inducing cyclin G1 ( Tian et al., 2018 ). Cyclin G1 is the target of p53 (tumor suppression gene) and is responsible for the regulatory action of cell cycle and apoptosis. Studies have used MCF-7 cells to demonstrate that estrogen and progesterone play a role in inducing cyclin G1 by their administration in a dose-dependent manner ( Tian et al., 2018 ). They found increased cell survival, viability and number of cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle as well as an increase in G1 mRNA and protein ( Tian et al., 2018 ). Furthermore, the induction of cyclin G1 causes the cell cycle to be unregulated which is a key condition for tumor growth ( Tian et al., 2018 ). Progesterone induced cell proliferation through cyclin D1 ( Jeon et al., 2016 ). Cyclin D1 is a molecule that blocks cells in the G1 phase of proliferation ( Jeon et al., 2016 ). Moreover, receptor activator of nuclear factor (RANK) kappa B (NF-κB) and its ligand (RANKL) are critical for the development of human breast ( Briskin et al., 2015 ). Recent studies suggest that RANKL is a key paracrine mediator of progesterone mitogenic signal ( Fernandez-Valdivia et al., 2012 ). Indeed, induction of RANKL elicit proliferative and pro-survival signals that are similar and necessary for mammary morphogenesis and tumorigenesis underlying a dual role of RANKL ( Fernandez-Valdivia et al., 2012 ; Tanos et al., 2013 ). In this section, the different types of breast cancers are briefly discussed. Hormone dependent breast cancers are classified according to the presence or absence of hormones and their receptors ( Hilton et al., 2018 ). Indeed, the HER-2 (human growth factor receptor-2) is a type of breast cancer with a very poor prognosis and carry an extra copy of the HER-2 gene ( Subramani, et al., 2017 ). Luminal type A breast cancer is a low-grade cancer, slowly growing identify as an estrogen receptor positive cancer with the best prognosis ( Hilton et al., 2018 ). However, luminal type B is also estrogen receptor positive, but has a very poor prognosis as it grows rapidly ( Zolfaroli et al., 2018 ). Finally, the last type of breast cancer is basal. This type has the worst prognosis as it is triple negative, it has no hormonal receptors and characterized by its poor prognosis ( Briskin et al., 2015 ). It is commonly known that the standard treatments for breast cancer include: surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and hormone therapy ( Maughan et al., 2010 ). Surgical intervention is usually a mastectomy partial or complete, which is the total removal of breast tissue ( Diaby et al., 2015 ). Sometimes nearby lymph nodes are removed in the eventuality that the tumors have metastasized into these tissues ( Carmocan et al., 2017 ). Along with surgery, chemotherapy is used to kill cancer cells and reduce tumors size ( Shufelt et al., 2018 ). As previously mentioned, chemotherapy drugs are highly associated with the induction of pain (chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain) which has been discussed previously ( section 4 ). Radiation therapy is used after surgery and chemotherapy and generally the entire breast area is radiated ( Maughan et al., 2010 ). Hormonal therapy is given during the aforementioned treatments and even after these treatments. It is important to know that active adjuvant hormonal therapy is mandatory for all hormonal receptor positive breast cancers ( Carmocan et al., 2017 ). The first line of defense is tamoxifen, which is an aromatase inhibitors and selective estrogen receptor modulator ( Zalfaroli et al., 2018 ). Aromatase inhibitors block endogenous estrogen production, thus lowering the burden of disease progression ( Hilton et al., 2018 ). Tamoxifen is given to both pre and post-menopausal women. If resistance to tamoxifen occurs there are other options for aromatase inhibitors that are effective, such as: anastrozol, letrozol, exemestan and fluvestrant ( Carmocan et al., 2017 ). There two paths of hormonal therapy, the first is to block estrogen production by ovarian inhibition ( Diaby et al., 2015 ). This can be accomplished by surgical intervention, radiation, chemical (LH-RH analogues), and aromatase inhibitors ( Maughan et al., 2010 ). The second path of hormonal therapy is blocking estrogen in tumor cells, by SERMs and SERDs ( Zolfaroli et al., 2018 ; Shufelt et al., 2018 ). SERMs can act as both estrogen agonists and antagonists depending on the drug targets ( Carmocan et al., 2017 ). SERDs inhibit estrogen receptor activity (fluvestrant) by antagonistic activity ( Francis et al., 2015 ). It should also be mentioned that along with hormone therapy, tocopherols (such as vitamin E) have shown to inhibit estrogen induced stem cell activity ( Bak et al., 2018 ). Estrogen and progesterone have very different effects on ovarian cancer ( Ho et al., 2003 ). Indeed, estrogen stimulated ovarian cell proliferation and enhances epithelial mesenchymal transition ( Jeon et al., 2016 ). Mesenchymal transition is the process in which cells lose polarity, cell-adhesion and induces invasive process leading to metastasis ( Cheng et al., 2018 ). Both estrogen and progesterone are implicated in ovarian carcinogenesis ( Ho et al., 2003 ). Estrogen favors the neoplastic formation of ovarian surface epithelium while progesterone offers protection against ovarian carcinoma ( Ho et al., 2003 ). However, it has been difficult to fully understand their mechanisms of action on the tumorigenic process ( Ho et al., 2003 ). Ovarian cancers are usually not inherited but can rely on BCRA1 and 2 genes ( Diep et al., 2015 ). These genes have shown an increased risk for ovarian cancer ( Ponce et al., 2020 ). Protective effects against ovarian cancer such as pregnancy and breast feeding has been demonstrated ( Francis et al., 2015 ). Studies have shown that estrogen-based contraceptives reduce the risk of ovarian cancer ( Jeon et al., 2016 ) through reduction of the number of ovarian cycles ( Tian et al., 2018 ). Despite tremendous research involving ovarian cancer, it remains among the deadliest types of cancers in women ( Chandara et al., 2019 ). The treatment of ovarian cancer includes surgical removal of tumors, chemotherapy (platinum analogs and taxanes) and radiation treatment ( Roett et al., 2009 ). Surgery treatment usually involves a total hysterectomy, as well as the removal of the pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes and the omentum ( Lheureux et al., 2019 ; Roett et al., 2009 ). If metastasis to the appendix is present, appendectomy is performed after the initial surgery ( Roett et al., 2009 ). The stage of cancer will also determine whether chemotherapy is given before or after surgery ( Orr et al., 2018 ). However, in advanced stages of ovarian cancer, chemotherapy is given before and after surgery ( Orr et al., 2018 ). Studies have showed that the combination of surgery and chemotherapy is more effective at preventing a relapse of cancer than chemotherapy or surgery alone ( Pignata et al., 2017 ). Immuno-therapeutics and other alternatives to chemotherapy have shown a great deal of promise clinically and pre-clinically in the treatment of ovarian cancer ( Chandara et al., 2019 ). The drug bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor (present in high concentrations in late stage of ovarian cancer) and increases survival in ovarian cancer patients ( Lheureux et al., 2019 ).

The current predominant theory of pain is that it comprises three components: sensory-discriminative, affective-motivational and evaluative-cognitive ( Figure 1 ). The sensory component correspond to the intensity of the pain or also referred as sensory (how it feels), including the spatial (location) and temporal characteristics and the quality of pain ( Talbot et al., 2019 ; Guindon and Hohmann, 2009 ) ( Figure 1 ). Secondly, the affective-motivational component is simply identified as the “unpleasantness” or associated with the affective part that captures how bad or how unpleasant the pain and what are the emotions associated to this pain and the motivational part associated with the aspect that induce a protective action toward the pain ( Talbot et al., 2019 ; Guindon and Hohmann, 2009 )( Figure 1 ). Thirdly, the evaluative-cognitive component is the evaluation of the pain and situation engaging cognitive functions to address the situation ( Talbot et al., 2019 ; Guindon et al., 2006 ) ( Figure 1 ). However, pain remains a personal and complex multidimensional experience influenced by social, cultural, environmental, neurophysiological, psychophysical, psychological or neuropsychological aspects ( Melzack and Katz, 1999 ; Price, 1999 ) ( Figure 1 ). Indeed, ovarian and breast cancer will be associated with different types of pain which can be correlated to different types of cancer (chemotherapeutic agents, radiation, surgical removal, hormonal therapy) treatments at different stages of cancer progression (such as metastasis to bone, spinal cord or bowel obstruction). For example, local pain experienced by a tumor compressing a nerve in the breast, post-surgical pain felt after removal of the breast, visceral pain attributed to advanced tumors in the ovaries and potentially abdominal metastasis and finally chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy generated by chemotherapeutic agents given as treatment to stop breast and ovarian cancers growth.

The different types of pain involved in breast and ovarian cancer: local, post-operative/post-surgical, visceral, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic (CIPN) and bone metastatic pain. Limited studies have evaluated the influence of sex (estrogen and progesterone) hormones in the modulation of pain in cancer conditions. Although sex hormones and their relation to pain has been studied more extensively in the past decades, we are still at an early stage and further studies are needed to better understands the role of sex hormones in pain modulation. There a several regions involved in pain responses including the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion. Both the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion contain estrogen and progesterone receptors ( Palmeira et al., 2011 ). It has been shown that changes in estrogen levels due to normal menstrual cycles or hormone replacement therapy has been shown to cause recurrent or chronic pain in women ( Pieretti et al., 2011 ). Estrogen is involved in the modulation of pain via the central nervous system ( Vincent et al., 2008 ). This has been postulated as one of the reasons why women have increased sensitivity to neuropathic pain and why long term effects of CIPN are prominent in ovarian and breast cancer survivors ( Hou et al., 2018 ; Aloisi, 2017 ). Preclinical studies investigating the impact of female sex hormones on pain and anti-nociceptive response have largely focused on estradiol (E2), and to a far lesser extent, progesterone (P4). To address this question, studies commonly employ a surgical ovariectomy model, removing the ovaries, followed by exogenous hormone replacement. Using this approach, it is possible to evaluate differences between normally cycling females versus non-cycling females, as well as the effect of specific hormones, on baseline nociceptive responses, as well as response to various anti-nociceptive compounds. Using this approach estradiol (E2) has been demonstrated to mediate both pro- and anti-nociceptive responses. Estradiol may mediate anti-nociceptive responses through modulation of neuronal, glial, and immune-system processes. Activation of ERβ by synthetic ERβ-selective agonists has been demonstrated to be antinociceptive in rodent models of visceral pain ( Cao et al., 2012 ) and neuropathic pain; both surgical and chemotherapy-induced ( Ma et al., 2016 ). Estradiol has also been found to reduce cell excitability via calcium influx through voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) ( Chaban et al., 2003 ) and activity at the ATP receptor P2X on DRG neurons ( Chaban and Micevych, 2005 ). Inhibition of VGCCs by estradiol was demonstrated to occur via modulation of metabotropic glutamate receptors mGLUR 2/3 ( Chaban et al., 2011 ). Co-administration of estradiol also was found to antagonize the nociceptive response elicited by subcutaneous injection of the P2XR agonist α,β-me-ATP ( Lu et al., 2013 ). Expression of markers associated with pain have also been found to be reduced by estradiol. In ovariectomized rats, estradiol replacement produced an anti-nociceptive response and a decrease in pERK expression, which was upregulated in the pain model ( Stinson et al., 2019 ). Moreover, another study found ovariectomy produced allodynia and hyperalgesia in rats, which was reversed by estradiol and corresponded to a decrease in substance P in DRG neurons ( Sarajari and Oblinger, 2010 ). Estradiol has been demonstrated to modulate neuro-immune and peripheral immune system process, which contribute to sensitization and recovery from pain. Estradiol relieved inflammatory pain and mechanical allodynia in a neuropathic pain model in rats, which corresponded to reduced astrocyte and microglia activation and levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord ( Shivers et al., 2015 ; Lee et al., 2018 ). Expression of pro-inflammatory markers were also reduced in B-cells when treated with estradiol ( Canellada et al., 2008 ). Estrogen has also been demonstrated to produce pro-nociceptive actions through mediation of various G-protein coupled receptors, ligand-gated ion channels, and lipid signaling molecules. Activation of the G-protein coupled estrogen receptor, GPER (formerly GPR30) has been demonstrated to produce both spontaneous pain behaviors ( Deliu et al., 2020 ) as well as potentiate pain responses ( An et al., 2014 ; Alvarez et al., 2014b ) ( Figure 3 ). Activation of GPER in trigeminal ganglion neurons results in increased intracellular calcium, promoting nociceptive signaling ( Fehrenbacher et al., 2009 ). GPER also co-localizes with the ionotropic 5HT3A serotonin receptor in DRG neurons, and activation is associated with a potentiation of visceral pain responses ( Lu et al., 2009 ) ( Figure 3 ). Estradiol may also promote pro-nociceptive activity via modulation of glutamatergic signaling. Estradiol has been found to increase expression of NMDA receptors in the hippocampus ( Weiland et al., 1992 ; Foy et al., 1999 ). Estradiol was found to promote increased NMDA receptor activity and long term potentiation in the formalin inflammatory pain model ( Xiao et al., 2013 ) ( Figure 3 ). Estradiol may also promote nociception through increased expression of the ligand gated cation channels TRPV1 and TRPA1, which were found to be elevated in the peritoneum of women with endometriosis ( Greaves et al., 2014 ), and further confirmed in rat studies to be mediated by estrogen receptor activation ( Pohoczky et al., 2016 ) ( Figure 3 ). In addition to facilitating excitatory neurotransmission, estrogen may also negatively regulate inhibitory neurotransmission. Estrogen has been demonstrated to negatively regulate expression and activity of both ionotropic and metabotropic receptors involved in antinociceptive neurotransmission. Estradiol was found to decrease inhibitory glycine ( Jiang et al., 2009 ) and GABA A (Rudrick et al., 2001) currents ( Figure 3 ). Inhibition of potassium currents by estrogen may also render nociceptors more excitable, and estradiol has been demonstrated to negatively regulate GIRK currents coupled to μ opioid and GABA B receptor activation ( Lagrange et al., 1996 ; Lagrange et al., 1997 ) ( Figure 3 ). Estradiol has been found to negatively regulate expression and activity of the α2-adrenoceptor ( Karkanias et al., 1997 ). Activation of α2-adrenoceptors produces antinociceptive effects, and is suppressed by estradiol ( Nag and Mohka, 2004 ; Nag et al., 2016 ). Estradiol may promote nociception through activities in fat cells. Estradiol was shown to increase pain via positive regulation of leptin production ( Alvarez et al., 2014a ). Moreover, pro-inflammatory cytokines may also stimulate aromatase activity in adipocytes, leading to increased estradiol production ( Velasco et al., 2006 ) ( Figure 3 ). Finally, estradiol can negatively regulate two key antinociceptive systems; the endogenous opioid system and the endocannabinoid system. Estradiol negatively regulates cannabinoid CB 1 receptor density in the amygdala, a key region for pain modulation ( Castelli et al., 2014 ) ( Figure 3 ). The release of endogenous opioids, its activity and opioid receptors are also negatively modulated by estradiol. Estradiol has been found to suppress endomorphin 2 release ( Kumar et al., 2015 ), and desensitize opioid receptors ( Kelly et al., 1999 ), possibly through increased activity of G-protein coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) which can desensitize both opioid and cannabinoid receptors ( Ansonoff et al., 2001 ; Abraham et al., 2018 ; Melief et al., 2010 ; Daigle et al., 2009 ) ( Figure 3 ).

Pain is defined by the International Association of the Study of Pain (IASP) in 2020 as, “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with actual or potential tissue damage” ( Raja et al., 2020 ). This definition has changed over the years from the ancient Greeks associated pain with emotions or appetites to Descartes (1664) who conceived of the pain system as a straight-through channel from the skin (burn) to the brain. Several pain theories followed after that such as Max von Frey identifying the theory of cutaneous senses in 1894 and 1895, followed by Pavlov (1927) associating pain with presentation of food in dogs and several others such as the gate-control theory postulating that perception of pain is determined by the interactions between different types of fibers, both small-diameter pain transmitting and large-diameter nonpain transmitting fibers ( Melczak and Wall, 1965 ). This theory revolutionize the field of pain by asserting that activation of large diameter (fast-conducting) nonpain transmitting fibers could indirectly inhibit signals from small diameter (slow-conducting) pain transmitting fibers and block the transmission and perception of pain ( Melczak and Wall, 1965 ). Melzack refined its former theory to integrate the neurophysiology of phantom limb pain ( Melczak, 1990 , 1999 ) by proposing the body-self matrix theory. This theory is associated with a genetically built-in matrix of neurons for the whole body comprising widely distributed network that incorporates somatosensory, limbic and thalamocortical components. These components contain smaller parallel networks that contribute to sensory-discriminative, affective-motivational and evaluative-cognitive dimensions of pain experience as the neuromatrix ( Melzack, 1990 , 1999 ). The conceptualization of pain is constantly evolving over time through advance in our understanding of pain transmission and modulation and breakthrough discoveries (see review by Borsook et al., 2018 Guindon and Hohmann, 2009 ). In the following sections, we will discuss the three components of pain, the different types of pain experienced and associated or/not with chemotherapy-induced pain in breast and ovarian cancers. We will also review the animal pain models used to improve our understanding of pain pathways in these two cancers and the different mechanisms involved in the modulation of pain and the role of hormones in breast and ovarian cancers.

Different types of pain are involved in breast and ovarian cancer: local, post-operative/post-surgical, visceral, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic (CIPN) and bone metastatic pain. Local pain also referred as localized pain felt in one part of your body, it is localized type of pain that could be felt, for example, in one specific area of the breast ( Guindon and Hohmann, 2009 ; Smith et al., 2019 ) ( Figure 2 ). Post-operative/post-surgical pain will be felt after breast cancer surgical removal such as pain at the incision site and from removal of breast cancer tissues ( Bovbjerg et al., 2019 ; Cheng et al., 2018 ; Ilfeld et al., 2016 )( Figure 2 ). For ovarian cancer, the abdominal incision can caused post-operative/post-surgical pain that will be felt at the site of incision ( Kay et al., 2020 ; Lemoine et al., 2019 ). Visceral pain is defined as pain emanating from the internal thoracic, pelvic or abdominal organs ( Guindon and Hohmann, 2009 )( Figure 2 ). In general, this type of pain will be vague and poorly localized since it is characterized by the hypersensitivity of organ distension ( Guindon and Hohmann, 2009 ). Ovarian cancer patients will experience visceral pain such as abdominal bloating prior and after diagnosis ( Smith, 2006 ). In breast cancer patients, visceral pain is also felt when metastasis of abdominal organs occurred in metastatic breast cancer ( Heo et al., 2019 ; Wood et al., 2017 ). Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is occurring in cancer patients following treatment with the chemotherapeutic agents which are comprised of three classes (platinums, taxanes and vinca alkaloids) ( Bao et al., 2017 ; Jin et al., 2020 ; Nyrop et al., 2019 ; Rivera et al., 2018 ). CIPN commonly manifests in the hands and feet, with symptoms favoring sensory over motor deficits ( Figure 2 ). Sensory deficits may present as a loss of sensation (numbing), a heightened response to pain (hyperalgesia) of painful response to ordinarily innocuous stimulation (allodynia), leading sometimes to chronic pain in cancer patients ( Blanton et al., 2019 ; Hamood et al., 2018 ; Staff et al., 2018 ). Symptoms of CIPN may not abate after discontinuation of the chemotherapy, a phenomenon referred clinically as “coasting” ( Windebank et al., 2008 ). The prevalence of CIPN in cancer patients is estimated between 19 and 85 % ( Fallon, 2013 ). Breast ( Brook et al., 2018 ; Salvador et al., 2019 ; Yin et al., 2005 ) and ovarian ( Kumar et al., 1992 ; Tiwari et al., 2007 ; Zhang et al., 2013 ) cancers can induce bone metastasis that will induce bone pain. In fact, pain from bone metastasis is describe by patients as slowly increasing over a period of time until it becomes unbearable ( Tiwari et al., 2007 ; Zhang et al., 2013 ). Spinal cord metastasis is generating pain and discomfort that will be worst at night or during inactivity (bed rest). However, long bones metastasis (arms and legs) cause pain while during activity or movement, so, in this case, rest will alleviate pain ( Tiwari et al., 2007 ; Zhang et al., 2012 ).

The advancement of diagnosis and treatments (surgical removal, chemotherapeutic agents, radiation, hormonal therapy) of cancer has resulted in a large proportion of cancer patients left with chronic cancer pain alone or associated with chronic non cancer pain ( Manchikanti et al., 2018 ). Traditionally, treatment of breast and ovarian cancer pain consisted mostly of opioids. However, their undesirable side effects such as nausea and vomiting, constipation, development of addiction and analgesic tolerance have led to the development of novel therapeutic strategies to alleviate pain in cancer patients ( Blanton et al., 2019 ; Manchikanti et al., 2018 ). Indeed, endogenous cannabinoid system has shown great promise and efficacy in alleviating cancer-related pain such as CIPN ( Blanton et al., 2019 ). In this section, we will discuss antinociceptive treatment with opioids and cannabinoids. Opioids are drugs that interact with endogenous opioid receptors and result in pain relief ( Paredes et al., 2019 ). Morphine, oxycodone, transdermal fentanyl and transdermal buprenorphine are the four strong opioids commonly used to alleviate breast and ovarian cancer related pain ( Wiffen et al., 2017 ; Bennett et al., 2017 ). These drugs are effective pain relievers in cancer patients by reducing from 3 points on a 0–10 pain rating scale ( Bennett et al., 2017 ). Despite efficacy in relieving breast and ovarian cancer pain, the long-term use of opioids is associated with recognized side effects such as constipation, nausea, vomiting and addiction ( Blake et al., 2017 ; Wiffen et al., 2017 ). It is important to note that there is also unrecognized adverse side effects caused by chronic opioids in cancer patients such as endocrinopathy, neurotoxicity, sleep-disordered breathing and in some circumstances misuse and/or abuse ( Bennett et al., 2017 ). Chronic cancer pain is a complex biopsychosocial phenomenon with a prevalence ranging between 19 and 85 % of cancer patients ( Fallon, 2013 ). Therefore, the need to target novel therapies with long-term efficacy in alleviating chronic cancer pain is necessary. Cannabinoids have shown excellent therapeutic potential in preclinical studies ( Blanton et al., 2019 ). The endocannaboid system plays a crucial role in pain processing and modulation ( Guindon and Hohmann, 2009 ; Blanton et al., 2019 ). Indeed, cannabis and cannabinoid-based pharmacotherapies have generated great amount of enthusiasm in the past decade as a novel treatment for cancer associated-pain such as CIPN ( Blanton et al., 2019 ). Canada and 34 states in the United States have introduced laws to allow medical use of cannabis to treat disease or alleviate symptoms ( Cyr et al., 2018 ; Ware et al., 2015 ). Different types of products are found in the cannabinoid class ranging from whole-plant cannabis flower or cannabis extracts, such as nabiximols (Sativex), to synthetic capsules (nabilone and dronabinol) ( Hazekamp et al., 2013 ). Strong evidence are supporting the use of cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pain in cancer patients ( Blanton et al., 2019 ; Ware et al., 2015 ). Moreover, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine published a report in January 2017 outlining the health effects of cannabinoids and cannabis as medicine in a variety of conditions including chronic pain ( The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, 2017 ). It is obvious that compounds targeting the endocannabinoid system show great promise as a novel class of medications particularly in alleviating pain. In a time of novel treatment being desperately needed, the cannabinoid compounds show great promise in reducing cancer pain. Cannabinoid CB 1 and opioid receptors are both associated with analgesia and both share similar mechanisms of action including inhibitory effect on G protein coupling and presynaptic expression that underlie a neuromodulatory role as inhibitors of neurotransmitter release ( Blanton et al., 2019 ). Whether co-expression of cannabinoid and opioid receptors is required for the analgesic effects of either class of compounds appears to vary based by ligand, dose, and receptor profile, as well as types of pain. Preclinical studies have found that the CB 1 receptor antagonist AM251 blocked mu-opioid-mediated analgesia in the tail flick test ( Da Fonseca Pacheco et al., 2008 ). Moreover, the antinociceptive effects of CB 2 -specific agonist AM1241 were absent in mu opioid knockout mice and inhibited by intraplantar administration of naloxone or anti-serum to β-endorphin ( Ibrahim et al., 2005 ). Therefore, the use of cannabinoid medications either as replacement therapy or opioid-sparing adjuvant therapy is an interesting possibility. Clinical studies also suggest that cannabinoid compounds could be useful in combination with opioids and, therefore, reduce opioid doses, leading to lower side effects ( Abrams et al., 2011 ; Johnson et al., 2013 ). In addition, several studies suggest that either oral Δ 9 -THC ( Narang et al., 2008 ) or smoked cannabis ( Abrams et al., 2011 ) can elicit additive beneficial effects on chronic pain when used in combination with either morphine or oxycodone.

It is obvious that breast and ovarian cancer are the leading causes of death in women and have a devastating social and economic impact. However, less is known about the hormonal influence on breast and ovarian cancer-associated pain following cancer treatments. In this review, we address the role of estrogen and progesterone in the context of pain modulation. This is a new field of study since for years the influence of hormones on pain perception were left unnoticed. Recently, studies are evaluating the impact of hormones on the modulation of pain and therefore research findings are still being debated. In our review, we found evidence showing that estrogen can lead to pro or anti-nociceptive mechanisms of action in response to cancer conditions. Future new studies will shed the light on the influence of sex hormones in the modulation of pain in cancer. We also address the importance of multimodal approaches in alleviating cancer-related pain during cancer treatment as well as chronic pain persisting months after cancer treatment. Opioids are used to alleviate pain in cancer although chronic use is associated with several side effects. There is a great need for novel, highly effective therapeutic agents for cancer-related/chronic pain and the endocannabinoid system is proving to be one of the most promising system. The broad neuromodulatory role of cannabinoids and the diverse library of both natural and synthetic compounds offer a wealth of possible future treatments for cancer-related/cancer pain. Moreover, new preclinical and clinical studies are suggesting that cannabinoids and opioids mechanism of action interacts to alleviate chronic pain. Further studies are needed to better understand the interaction between the opioid and cannabinoid system. This new exciting avenue will lead to improve treatment in our quest to alleviate pain in cancer patients.

The societal and economic impact of cancer is tremendous, accounting for an estimated 1.7 million new diagnoses and 600,000 deaths in 2018 (American Cancer Society). Breast and ovarian cancer are among the leading causes of death for women in the United States. In 2020, breast cancer will be accounted for 276,480 new cases and 42,170 deaths whereas ovarian cancer will be responsible for 21,750 new cases and 13,940 deaths ( NCI, 2020 ). These types of cancer are considered hormone dependent, meaning that the cancer is dependent on the hormone for development and survival ( Jeon et al., 2016 , Subramani et al., 2017 ). The full extent to which ovarian hormones contribute to the development of cancer has yet to be determined, but estrogen has been demonstrated to be a key component. Furthermore, ovarian hormones have also been demonstrated to contribute to pain sensitivity, which may result from the cancers themselves (depending on the location of the tumor; such as on nerves, in bones, abdominal cavity or spinal cord), or the treatment of the cancers. Indeed, the beneficial effect of chemotherapeutic agents on tumor suppression comes with major unwanted side effects such as weight and hair loss, nausea and vomiting and neuropathic pain ( Gaskin and Richard, 2012 ). Standard treatment for cancer-associated pain is opioids, but due to unwanted side effects such as constipation and risk of respiratory depression, new drugs are needed and being developed to combat pain. This includes the emerging field of cannabinoids and the endogenous cannabinoid system. In this review, we will discuss the contribution of ovarian hormones in the development of hormone-dependent cancer, chemotherapy-induced pain associated with hormone-dependent cancer, and response to analgesics.