Estimating the incidence and risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage from the national ENACT network | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Estimating the incidence and risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage from the national ENACT network Malarkodi J. Samayamuthu, Olga Kravchenko, Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic, and 4 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7992461/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 9 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Aggregated counts from electronic health records (EHRs) provide a rich source of real-world data that can be leveraged to investigate critical medical conditions such as postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). We used the Evolve to Next-Gen Accrual to Clinical Trials (ENACT) network, a large, federated network of EHRs, and conducted repeated annual cross-sectional analyses on PPH incidence, risk factors, and maternal comorbidities in a large cohort of 591,375 delivery hospitalizations during the period 2005 to 2022. During this time, there was a statistically significant increasing trend in the incidence of PPH, which is consistent with previous studies. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander women had the highest incidence of PPH (12.14%), followed by Asian (11.04%) and Black or African American (9.36%) women. In PPH deliveries, the top-ranked risk factor was placenta previa or accreta (19.58%), the top-ranked comorbidity was primary cesarean delivery (41.08%), and the commonest cause was uterine atony (76.5%). Health sciences/Diseases Health sciences/Health care Health sciences/Medical research Health sciences/Risk factors Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Introduction Health sciences research often relies on real-world data from various sources to generate evidence on patient health status and healthcare delivery. Electronic health records (EHRs), which record patient contacts, treatments, and clinical activities within healthcare systems, are a valuable source of real-world data and are increasingly used in epidemiological, clinical, and translational studies. Two primary approaches have emerged for assembling EHR data across multiple institutions: centralized and federated. In the centralized approach, EHR data from participating institutions are transferred to a central data repository, where the data are standardized and quality-controlled. This approach facilitates sophisticated analytics with individual-level data. However, there can be significant delays in data availability for analysis and potential scalability issues as data volume grows. Examples of research programs that use a centralized approach include the All of Us Research Program 1 and the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) initiative 2 . In contrast to the centralized approach, the federated approach retains each participating institution's data locally while harmonizing the data across institutions to a common standard. This approach provides access to a larger volume of data with shorter time lags and poses lower security risks to healthcare systems. However, accessing and aggregating data from multiple institutions can be time-consuming or require sophisticated technology to ensure consistency and accuracy. Research programs that use a federated approach include the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) 3 , the Consortium for Clinical Characterization of COVID-19 by EHR (4CE) 4 and the Evolve to Next-Gen Accrual of patients to Clinical Trials (ENACT) network 5 , 6 . The ENACT network is unique because it enables users with no programming knowledge to query the data repositories in the network in an interactive fashion. The institutional EHR data repositories in the network use either the Informatics for Integrating Biology at the Bedside (i2b2) or the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) data models, which are linked via the Shared Health Research Information Network (SHRINE) platform 7 . The network is a collaboration of 57 data-contributing institutions (ENACT sites) affiliated with academic medical research centers. The SHRINE platform facilitates execution of queries that are constructed using medical terms in key domains, including demographics, diagnoses, procedures, medications, laboratory test results, and visit characteristics. To maintain the currentness of data, each site in the network updates its repository at least once a month. While the SHRINE platform enables querying of all sites on the network, not all may respond to every query due to data repository downtime, network traffic, and other technical issues. Furthermore, the set of responding sites may vary with each query, especially when executing a sequence of queries. Additionally, to ensure patient privacy, SHRINE automatically obfuscates the results of queries. While the ENACT network has the potential to accelerate evidence generation from large-scale analysis of EHRs, the first step is to evaluate the alignment of evidence generated from the network with findings from prior research that used individual-level data. We conducted this evaluation using a case study on postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), an obstetric emergency and a critical condition that significantly impacts maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide 8 – 11 . PPH is one of the top five causes of maternal mortality in both resource-abundant and resource-limited countries, although the absolute risk of death from PPH is substantially lower in developed countries. In the United States (US), the incidence of PPH has increased from 2.7% in 2000 to 4.3% in 2019, although maternal mortality from PPH has decreased since the 1980s, with a reduction to 1.7 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2009 11,12 . Despite this decline, in 2019, PPH accounted for 13.7% of pregnancy-related deaths in the US 13 . Our primary goal was to assess the consistency of evidence obtained from SHRINE-generated aggregated data with previously published research employing individual-level data. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) defines PPH as either cumulative blood loss of greater than or equal to 1000 mL or blood loss accompanied by signs or symptoms of hypovolemia within 24 hours of childbirth 14 . The criteria apply to both vaginal and cesarean deliveries. PPH is divided into subtypes based on symptom onset. Primary PPH is hemorrhage that occurs between the third stage of labor (i.e., delivery of the placenta) and 24 hours after fetal delivery, and secondary PPH is bleeding that occurs more than 24 hours after delivery and up to 12 weeks postpartum. The causes of PPH are summarized by the "Four Ts," which include tone (e.g., uterine atony), trauma (e.g., laceration, rupture), tissue (e.g., retained products of conception), and thrombin (e.g., coagulopathies). Uterine atony has been identified as the most common cause, accounting for approximately 80% of PPH deliveries 15 . Treatment of PPH requires prompt recognition and management of the cause of hemorrhage, involving a well-coordinated team effort to address it. Surgical interventions, such as hysterectomy, are used only as a last resort. Key maternal risk factors for PPH include intrinsic factors such as placenta previa, polyhydramnios, multiple gestation, and uterine leiomyomas or factors related to circumstances around labor and delivery such as severe preeclampsia, chorioamnionitis or endometritis, prolonged labor, and prior cesarean 8 , 16 . Additionally, comorbidities and other clinical factors such as pregestational and gestational diabetes, asthma, chronic hypertension, antepartum hemorrhage, or abruption may further increase the risk of PPH 8 . Prevention of PPH includes identifying and managing risk factors and associated comorbidities, as well as active management of labor. Identifying the risk factors is crucial for targeted preventative measures and improving maternal health outcomes 17 . We used the SHRINE platform to obtain a comprehensive set of counts related to hospitalized deliveries and PPH that enabled the estimation of the proportion of deliveries affected by PPH, risk factors, and associated comorbidities. A repeated annual cross-sectional analysis was conducted to examine trends in PPH incidence and the burden of risk factors and comorbidities among affected women. We hypothesized that insights from the ENACT network would be consistent with findings from prior research using individual-level data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ's) National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) 8 . Our study is vital for validating the ENACT network's effectiveness in generating real-world data in health sciences, especially in critical conditions such as PPH. Results Study Population Data for this study were obtained from the ENACT network, comprising counts of women hospitalized for delivery, PPH deliveries, risk factors, and comorbidities. The raw dataset comprised 591,375 unique delivery hospitalizations collected from 8 ENACT active sites from 2005 to 2022. Though there are more sites in the network, we restricted our analyses to data from those sites that returned results for most queries to minimize missingness in the dataset. Table 1 shows the age and racial characteristics, risk factors for PPH, and maternal comorbidities of all, with PPH, and without PPH deliveries. Most of the deliveries occurred in women aged 18 to 54 years (92.09%), with nearly all PPH deliveries (98.73%) occurring within this age range. Due to querying constraints, the maternal age was the woman's age at the time of querying the network, not the age at delivery. Since the age at the time of delivery was unavailable, the breakdown by age provides only an approximate estimate of the percentages of PPH occurring within age groups. Hence, our analyses did not use age breakdown data (see the Methods section). White women had the most deliveries, with 330,335 (55.87%) total deliveries and 24,965 (53.79%) PPH deliveries. Black or African American women had 57,175 (9.67%) total deliveries and 5,130 (11.05%) PPH deliveries. Table 1 Demographic characteristics, risk factors, and comorbidities of all, with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and without PPH delivery groups. The percentages presented for maternal race, risk factors, and comorbidities are "column" percentages, which denote Age* (unique patients) All (≥1 delivery) n = 591,375 With PPH (≥1 event) n = 46,410 Without PPH n = 544,965 55 years 13,140 820 12,320 Maternal race (unique patients) All (≥1 delivery) , n = 591,375 With PPH (≥1 event) , n = 46,410 Without PPH n = 544,965 P-value American Indian or Alaska Native 2,895 (0.49) 245 (0.53) 2,650 (0.49) 0.057 Asian 28,340 (4.79) 3,045 (6.56) 25295 (4.65) < 0.0001 Black or African American 57,175 (9.67) 5,130 (11.05) 52045 (9.55) < 0.0001 Multiple Races 460 (0.08) 90 (0.19) 370 (0.07) < 0.0001 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 1,400 (0.24) 150 (0.32) 1250 (0.23) < 0.0001 Unknown 47,590 (8.05) 3,640 (7.84) 43950 (8.07) 0.021 White 330,335 (55.87) 24,965 (53.79) 305370 (56.06) < 0.0001 Risk factors (unique deliveries) All n = 858,404 With PPH n = 38,270 Without PPH n = 820,134 P-value Prior cesarean (no placenta previa or accreta) 15,540 (1.81) 2,015 (5.27) 13,525 (1.65) < 0.0001 Placenta previa or accreta 44,085 (5.14) 7,495 (19.58) 36,590 (4.46) < 0.0001 Severe eclampsia 22,505 (2.62) 3,695 (9.66) 18,810 (2.29) < 0.0001 Polyhydramnios 17,825 (2.08) 2,460 (6.43) 15,365 (1.87) < 0.0001 Chorioamnionitis or endometritis 37,890 (4.41) 6,615 (17.29) 31,275 (3.81) < 0.0001 Multiple gestation 29,430 (3.43) 3,775 (9.86) 25,655 (3.13) < 0.0001 Uterine leiomyomas 27,770 (3.24) 2,995 (7.83) 24,775 (3.02) < 0.0001 Comorbidities (unique deliveries) All n = 858,404 With PPH n = 38,270 Without PPH n = 820,134 P-value Obesity 138,650 (16.15) 12,875 (33.64) 125,775 (15.34) < 0.0001 Pregestational diabetes 35,050 (4.08) 3,375 (8.82) 31,675 (3.86) < 0.0001 Gestational diabetes 75,005 (8.74) 7,430 (19.41) 67,575 (8.24) < 0.0001 Asthma 76,085 (8.86) 7,440 (19.44) 68,645 (8.37) < 0.0001 Chronic hypertension 65,265 (7.60) 7,015 (18.33) 58,250 (7.10) < 0.0001 Antepartum hemorrhage or abruption 52,845 (6.16) 7,295 (19.06) 45,550 (5.55) < 0.0001 Operative vaginal delivery 17,445 (2.03) 1,995 (5.21) 15,450 (1.88) < 0.0001 Primary cesarean 186,270 (21.70) 15,720 (41.08) 170,550 (20.80) < 0.0001 Incidence, Causes, and Interventions in Postpartum Hemorrhage Table 1 shows the breakdown of PPH rates among racial groups, risk factors, and comorbidities. Among risk factors, women with prior cesarian (no placenta previa or accreta) had a PPH rate of 5.27%, while those with placenta previa or accreta had the highest rate of 19.58%. Women with severe eclampsia had a rate of 9.66%, women with chorioamnionitis or endometritis had a rate of 9.63%, women with polyhydramnios had a rate of 14.94%, and women with multiple gestation had a rate of 17.29%. Among comorbidities, the highest rate of PPH occurred in women with \primary cesarean (41.08%), and women with obesity (33.64%). Table 2 summarizes the incidence of PPH across racial groups, the number of risk factors, and the number of comorbidities. The overall incidence of PPH was 4.46% from 2005 to 2022. PPH incidence varied by race, with the highest rates observed among Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (12.14%) and Asian (11.04%) women, corresponding to crude incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of 1.51 and 1.37, respectively, compared to White women (reference group, 8.03%). Women with at least one risk factor (11.37%, IRR = 1.95) had more than twice the PPH rate of those with none (reference group, 5.82%), and women with at least two risk factors (11.87%, IRR = 2.04) had the highest PPH rate. Similarly, the incidence of PPH was significantly higher among women with at least one comorbidity (9.13%, IRR = 1.45), and it was highest among those with two or more comorbidities (9.62%, IRR = 1.53) relative to those with none (6.29%). These findings demonstrate a clear increase in PPH risk as risk factors and comorbidities accumulate. Table 2 Crude incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) deliveries by race, number of risk factors, and number of comorbidities. Absolute risk (crude incidence rate) is calculated as the proportion of PPH deliveries within each subgroup. Crude IRRs are presented relative to the reference groups: White women (race), those with no PPH risk factors, and those with no comorbidities. Absolute risk for each subgroup (crude incidence rate, %) Crude incidence rate ratio (IRR) Maternal race All n = 858,404 With PPH n = 38,270 All deliveries 858,404 38,270 4.46 American Indian or Alaska Native 2,895 255 8.81 1.10 Asian 28,340 3130 11.04 1.37 Black or African American 57,175 5350 9.36 1.16 Multiple Races 460 95 20.65 2.57 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 1,400 170 12.14 1.51 Unknown 47,590 4020 8.45 1.05 White (Reference) 330,335 26535 8.03 1.00 Risk factors All n = 858,404 With PPH n = 38,270 Deliveries with 0 risk factors 373,915 21,770 5.82 1.00 Deliveries with at least 1 risk factor 217,480 24,720 11.37 1.95 Deliveries with at least 2 risk factors 153,425 18,215 11.87 2.04 Comorbidities All n = 858,404 With PPH n = 38,270 Deliveries with 0 comorbidity 216,135 13,605 6.29 1.00 Deliveries with at least 1 comorbidity 359,805 32,855 9.13 1.45 Deliveries with at least 2 comorbidities 239,405 23,030 9.62 1.53 Figure 1 shows the breakdown of PPH rates among racial groups, risk factors, and comorbidities. Among risk factors, women with prior cesarian (no placenta previa or accreta) had the lowest PPH rate of 2.15%, while those with placenta previa or accreta had the highest rate of 35.09%. Women with severe eclampsia had a rate of 12.18%, women with chorioamnionitis or endometritis had a rate of 20.46%, women with polyhydramnios had a rate of 9.85%, and women with multiple gestation had a rate of 17.02%. Among comorbidities, the highest rate of PPH occurred in women with antepartum hemorrhage or abruption (16.99%) and in women with operative vaginal deliveries (9.87%). Table 3 presents the causes of PPH and interventions. Among the causes, uterine atony was the commonest cause, occurring in 38,185 PPH deliveries, followed by tissue-related causes such as retained placenta, occurring in 15,515 PPH deliveries. Trauma was identified as the cause in 11,240 PPH deliveries, and thrombin-induced PPH occurred in 1,470 PPH deliveries. Among interventions, a surgical procedure was performed in 6,470 deliveries, of which 935 were hysterectomies. Manipulative procedures (e.g., manual removal of retained placenta or blood clots) were performed in 8,045 PPH deliveries, and blood transfusions were given in 3,030 PPH deliveries. The most common intervention was the administration of PPH-specific medications, which occurred in 24,080 deliveries. Table 3 Comorbidity burden in postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). The prevalence of comorbidities in PPH deliveries (blue) and the reciprocal prevalence of PPH in comorbid conditions (orange). Causes PPH n = 69,745 Atony 53,325 (76.46%) Trauma 13,515 (19.38%) Tissue-related 21,945 (31.47%) Thrombin-induced 1,835 (2.63%) Interventions PPH n = 69,745 Hysterectomy 1,280 (2.40%) Surgical procedures (including hysterectomy) 8,920 (12.79%) Manipulative procedures 11,000 (15.77%) Blood transfusion 6,000 (8.60%) Medications 37,720 (54.08%) Trends in Postpartum Hemorrhage Figure 2 shows the trend of PPH from 2005 to 2022. During this period, there was a statistically significant increasing trend, rising from 5,634 to 10,504 PPH per 100,000 deliveries (P trend < 0.001). This trend persisted among women with one or more risk factors (P trend < 0.001) and those with one or more comorbidities (P trend < 0.001). Comorbidities in Postpartum Hemorrhage Figure 3 illustrates the prevalence of various comorbidities in PPH deliveries and the reciprocal prevalence of PPH within those comorbid conditions. Comorbidities such as obesity, gestational diabetes, asthma, chronic hypertension, and antepartum hemorrhage or abruption have a high prevalence in PPH deliveries. The reciprocal prevalence of PPH is particularly high among women with antepartum hemorrhage or abruption (13.80%), operative vaginal deliveries (11.44%), and chronic hypertension (10.75%). While primary cesarean has the highest prevalence of PPH among comorbid conditions (33.85%), the prevalence of PPH in women undergoing primary cesarean is relatively lower at 8.44%. Conversely, obesity, with a high prevalence in PPH deliveries (27.72%), also shows a significant reciprocal PPH prevalence (9.29%). Discussion The main objective of this study was to assess the trends in PPH, risk factors and comorbidities in the US using aggregated counts from the ENACT network. Our analysis revealed a rising trend in PPH, consistent with the trend observed in a previously published study covering the 2009–2019 period. This study relied on the NIS data, which comprises a 20% sample of all delivery hospitalizations in the US and is collected annually by the AHRQ's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project 8 . By including data from before 2009 and after 2019, our study corroborates previously observed trends and shows that the upward trajectory of PPH continues beyond the earlier study period. Given that PPH is life-threatening, our findings underscore the urgent need to identify women at risk of PPH for timely prevention and management. Additionally, the study validates the utility of the data in the ENACT network for conducting research efficiently. Despite the data being available only as aggregate counts, we established reproducible data quality procedures and analysis workflows that confirm the reliability of the data in the network for similar analyses. Our querying methods were refined iteratively after discussions with the ENACT technical team to ensure data accuracy. This validation is significant because it demonstrates that the network's data, when processed using rigorous data quality processes, can be a valuable resource for future research. Based on the incidence rates of PPH across the various races in our results, we found that the Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander women had the highest incidence of PPH (~ 12.1%), followed by Asian women (~ 11%), Black or African American women (~ 9.4%), and American Indian or Alaska Native women (~ 8.8%),. Our findings are consistent with prior studies that confirmed similar disparities using more rigorous statistical methods applied to individual-level EHR data and medical charts 18 – 20 . Our analyses identified the commonest risk factor as placenta previa or accreta (19.6% in PPH) and the commonest comorbidity as antepartum hemorrhage or abruption (19.1% in PPH). In concordance with the results obtained from AHRQ's NIS data 8 , our results show that uterine atony is the commonest cause of PPH. Overall, our analysis yields actionable findings regarding racial disparities, showing that Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Black or African American women have an increasing prevalence of PPH. The rank ordering of comorbidities and risk factors also emphasizes the importance of identifying and managing multiple gestations, prior cesarean, gestational diabetes, and chronic hypertension. These comorbidities and risk factors can help to inform future studies in designing personalized risk prediction models for PPH. Our study has several limitations. First, to preserve patient privacy, the patient counts provided in SHRINE are obfuscated. This obfuscation may introduce some level of inaccuracy in the data, potentially affecting the precision of the analysis results. Because the counts for each query were generally large (in the tens or hundreds of thousands or millions), obfuscation likely did not affect the validity of the results. Second, the technology used in ENACT calculates the number of unique patients meeting query criteria, which may lead to undercounting if multiple occurrences of the same diagnostic code are present. For instance, a count from a query may not account for second, third, or subsequent deliveries in the same woman, which may affect the accuracy of the trends and outcomes related to multiple deliveries. Depending on the research question, this can be mitigated by choosing an appropriate timeframe for querying the condition of interest. Third, the diagnosis of PPH was based only on ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes for diagnosis, which is similar to prior research that used NIS data, to which we compared our results. Including indicators of blood loss, such as changes in hematocrit values or estimated blood loss measurements from the magnitude of the drop in hematocrit values, could potentially improve the accuracy of identifying PPH in EHR data. However, due to the limitations of the SHRINE platform, we were unable to obtain actual hematocrit values, changes in hematocrit values, or vital signs. Fourth, we utilized only ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes for procedures, based on methodologies established in previous studies. Typically, all sites map their procedures to Current Procedural Terminology (CPT-4) codes, but not necessarily to ICD codes. The exclusion of CPT-4 codes may lead to incomplete data capture, potentially missing some delivery procedures. Finally, due to the lack of individual-level data, we could not study women longitudinally, infer temporal relationships, or identify confounding factors to infer causality. Using aggregated count data to evaluate the correlation between PPH, risk factors, and comorbidities does not establish causal relationships. Additionally, drawing race-based conclusions is challenging since the counts of minority groups (e.g., American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander) are small. This case study illustrates the use of aggregated counts from EHRs from a federated network of sites across the US to assess trends in PPH among racial and age groups. We found a clearly increasing trend in PPH incidence from 2005 to 2022, supported by prior research. Further, aggregated counts were adequate to assess maternal risk factors and comorbidities incidence rates, and the findings were concordant with prior research. Data in the ENACT network is updated regularly, which provides the ability to rapidly obtain data for assessing recent trends in critical conditions such as PPH. Our finding underscores the need for better approaches to more accurately identify women at an elevated risk for PPH, while accounting for diverse racial groups. In the future, the limitations of aggregated data will be overcome by conducting studies on cohorts of patients with individual-level data (e.g., the global maternal and newborn health eCohorts 21 ) that will yield more precise data to assess trends in PPH and associated risk factors and comorbidities. Methods Data Sources We used SHRINE to query the ENACT network to obtain patient counts. The EHR data in the network is de-identified to ensure patient privacy and comply with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA) regulations, and SHRINE returns aggregate counts of patients meeting query criteria. To ensure privacy, SHRINE automatically obfuscates a patient count that a query returns by adding or subtracting a number up to 10 and rounds the resulting count to the nearest multiple of five 22 . Due to obfuscation, the same query may return slightly different counts when rerun, though these variations are typically negligible, especially when the counts are high. The University of Pittsburgh's Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved using the ENACT network for a wide range of research under protocol number STUDY19080059. The queries were submitted to all sites on the ENACT network, resulting in adequate responses from 8 active sites; counts obtained from these 8 sites comprised the raw dataset. To qualify for inclusion in the analyses, sites were required to meet specific inclusion criteria, ensuring data quality and completeness. Sites were required to have 20% or less missing annual counts or counts that are at least an order of magnitude lower than adjacent years, allowing for up to two years of imputed counts within the eighteen years from 2005 to 2022 for each query. A considerable reduction in count from one year to the next indicated potential data errors or the absence of relevant EHRs. Study Design and Data Extraction We conducted repeated annual cross-sectional analyses using counts aggregated across all selected sites from 2005 to 2022. First, we identified women with delivery hospitalizations each calendar year using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) diagnosis and procedure codes (see Supplementary information). Next, within this cohort, we identified deliveries with PPH using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes (see Supplementary information). Women with delivery hospitalizations without PPH served as a comparator group. We opted to rely solely on ICD codes for the diagnosis of PPH for several reasons, including prior research that used NIS data to which we compared our results relied on ICD codes, limitations of the SHRINE platform (which did not allow for calculating estimated blood loss by assessing the magnitude of the drop in hematocrit values), and ICD codes have been reported to have high specificity for PPH 23 , 24 . We executed two sequences of queries: one for all delivery hospitalizations and another for delivery hospitalizations with PPH. Outcomes Our primary outcome of interest was the annual incidence rate of PPH among delivery hospitalizations, focusing on examining trends in incidence rates over the entire study period. Because of the potential limitations of obfuscated data, we compared demographics, risk factors, and comorbidities between the two groups: deliveries with PPH and deliveries without PPH. The demographics included women 15–54 years old stratified by 10-year age intervals and race (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, multiple races, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, unknown, and White). Due to constraints in constructing queries in SHRINE, obtaining an individual's age at a specific moment in the past was not possible. Thus, the maternal age we obtained was the woman's age at the time of querying the network, not the age at delivery. Therefore, maternal age was not considered as a variable in our analyses. We assessed several maternal risk factors, including prior cesarean (no placenta previa or accreta), placenta previa or accreta, severe preeclampsia, polyhydramnios, chorioamnionitis or endometritis, multiple gestation, and uterine leiomyomas. In addition, we assessed several comorbidities and other clinical conditions, including obesity, pregestational diabetes, gestational diabetes, asthma, chronic hypertension, antepartum hemorrhage or abruption, operative vaginal delivery, and primary cesarean (or first cesarean delivery). We categorized the causes of PPH according to the "Four Ts" (i.e., tone, trauma, tissue, thrombin) as secondary outcomes. Furthermore, we assessed surgical and medical PPH interventions, such as surgical procedures, including hysterectomy, manipulative procedures, blood transfusion, and medications (see Supplementary information). The PPH incidence, risk factors, and comorbidities were reported as counts and proportions. Data Analyses We imputed missing counts using linear regression when there were two or more consecutive missing years or for a boundary year. For single-year missing counts, the counts for the preceding and subsequent years were averaged. The trends in PPH incidence rates were examined within subgroups defined by race, presence of maternal risk factors, and presence of comorbidities. To assess the significance of the trend in PPH incidence over time, we employed the non-parametric Mann-Kendall trend test 25 . The Mann-Kendall test was chosen for its robustness against data irregularities and its ability to analyze trends without assuming a specific data distribution. Further, we assessed the incidence of PPH in each risk factor and comorbidity subgroup. We computed the prevalence of comorbidities for women who had PPH deliveries (comorbidity | PPH), as well as the reciprocal prevalence of PPH delivery given these comorbidities (PPH | comorbidity). Data analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel version 4.3.2 and Python version 3.7.3. Consent, Ethics, IRB Informed consent is not applicable since only deidentified electronic health record data were used in the study. The Institutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh determined that it met the criteria for exemption under 45 CFR 46.104(d)(4) for secondary research use of existing electronic health record data. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh (STUDY19080059). Human Ethics and Consent to Participate declarations: not applicable. Declarations Code availability The underlying code for this study is not publicly available but may be made available to qualified researchers on reasonable request from the corresponding authors. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Funding The research reported in this publication was supported by the American Board of Family Medicine Foundation under an AI/ML award and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number U24 TR004111. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the American Board of Family Medicine Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. Author Contribution MJS ran queries on the ENACT network, and OK conducted the data analyses. WL and SY contributed to statistical testing and verification of data analyses, while EMS and SV provided resources and scientific guidance. SV and VG conceived the idea and supervised the creation of the queries and analyses. All authors contributed to the writing and extensive editing of the manuscript. Acknowledgements The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers UL1 TR001857 and U24 TR004111. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Data Availability The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient privacy regulations but are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. References Denny, J. C. et al. The "All of Us" Research Program. N Engl J Med 381, 668–676, doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1809937 (2019). Haendel, M. A. et al. The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): Rationale, design, infrastructure, and deployment. J Am Med Inform Assoc 28, 427–443, doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa196 (2021). Fleurence, R. L. et al. Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research network. J Am Med Inform Assoc 21, 578–582, doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002747 (2014). Klann, J. G. et al. Validation of an internationally derived patient severity phenotype to support COVID-19 analytics from electronic health record data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 28, 1411–1420, doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab018 (2021). Visweswaran, S. et al. Accrual to Clinical Trials (ACT): a Clinical and Translational Science Award Consortium Network. JAMIA Open 1, 147–152, doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy033 (2018). Morrato, E. H. et al. The Evolve to Next-Gen ACT Network: an evolving open-access, real-world data resource primed for real-world evidence research across the Clinical and Translational Science Award Consortium. J Clin Transl Sci 7, e224, doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.617 (2023). Weber, G. M. et al. The Shared Health Research Information Network (SHRINE): a prototype federated query tool for clinical data repositories. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16, 624–630, doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3191 (2009). Corbetta-Rastelli, C. M. et al. Postpartum hemorrhage trends and outcomes in the United States, 2000–2019. Obstet Gynecol 141, 152–161, doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004972 (2023). Say, L. et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2, e323-333, doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70227-x (2014). Evensen, A., Anderson, J. M. & Fontaine, P. Postpartum hemorrhage: prevention and treatment. Am Fam Physician 95, 442–449 (2017). Creanga, A. A. et al. Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 23, 3–9, doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4617 (2014). Callaghan, W. M., Mackay, A. P. & Berg, C. J. Identification of severe maternal morbidity during delivery hospitalizations, United States, 1991–2003. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199, 133.e131-138, doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.020 (2008). Trost, S. L. et al. Identifying deaths during and after pregnancy: new approaches to a perennial challenge. Public Health Rep 138, 567–572, doi: 10.1177/00333549221110487 (2023). Aimagambetova, G., Bapayeva, G., Sakhipova, G. & Terzic, M. Management of postpartum hemorrhage in low- and middle-income countries: emergency need for updated approach due to specific circumstances, resources, and availabilities. J Clin Med 13, doi: 10.3390/jcm13237387 (2024). Bienstock, J. L., Eke, A. C. & Hueppchen, N. A. Postpartum hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 384, 1635–1645, doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1513247 (2021). Linde, L. E. et al. Recurrence of postpartum hemorrhage, maternal and paternal contribution, and the effect of offspring birthweight and sex: a population-based cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 306, 1807–1814, doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06374-3 (2022). Ende, H. B. et al. Risk factors for atonic postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 137, 305–323, doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004228 (2021). Harvey, S. A., Lim, E., Gandhi, K. R., Miyamura, J. & Nakagawa, K. Racial-ethnic disparities in postpartum hemorrhage in Native Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders, and Asians. Hawaii J Med Public Health 76, 128–132 (2017). Chalouhi, S. E., Tarutis, J., Barros, G., Starke, R. M. & Mozurkewich, E. L. Risk of postpartum hemorrhage among Native American women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 131, 269–272, doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.05.037 (2015). Bryant, A. et al. The association of maternal race and ethnicity and the risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Anesth Analg 115, 1127–1136, doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182691e62 (2012). Arsenault, C. et al. The maternal and newborn health eCohort to track longitudinal care quality: study protocol and survey development. Glob Health Action 17, 2392352, doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2392352 (2024). Murphy, S. N., Gainer, V., Mendis, M., Churchill, S. & Kohane, I. Strategies for maintaining patient privacy in i2b2. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18 Suppl 1, i103-108, doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000316 (2011). Butwick, A. J., Walsh, E. M., Kuzniewicz, M., Li, S. X. & Escobar, G. J. Accuracy of international classification of diseases, ninth revision, codes for postpartum hemorrhage among women undergoing cesarean delivery. Transfusion 58, 998–1005, doi: 10.1111/trf.14498 (2018). Ladfors, L. V., Muraca, G. M., Butwick, A., Edgren, G. & Stephansson, O. Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 100, 322–330, doi: 10.1111/aogs.13994 (2021). Mann, H. B. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13, 245–259, doi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1907187 (1945). Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files supplementaryinformation.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 04 Dec, 2025 Reviews received at journal 04 Dec, 2025 Reviews received at journal 02 Dec, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 26 Nov, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 13 Nov, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 11 Nov, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 11 Nov, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 10 Nov, 2025 First submitted to journal 30 Oct, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7992461","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":544549263,"identity":"7660b8f9-252b-498d-b888-34a024c5880a","order_by":0,"name":"Malarkodi J. Samayamuthu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Pittsburgh","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Malarkodi","middleName":"J.","lastName":"Samayamuthu","suffix":""},{"id":544549264,"identity":"abad7791-0725-41a1-99c6-628d76966dde","order_by":1,"name":"Olga Kravchenko","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Pittsburgh","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Olga","middleName":"","lastName":"Kravchenko","suffix":""},{"id":544549265,"identity":"73b2cf41-1193-4d5c-bf2b-0a5532efd0f9","order_by":2,"name":"Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Pittsburgh","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Wei-Hsuan","middleName":"","lastName":"Lo-Ciganic","suffix":""},{"id":544549266,"identity":"8788373c-4817-4621-953d-86cbb44d425a","order_by":3,"name":"Eugene M. Sadhu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Pittsburgh","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Eugene","middleName":"M.","lastName":"Sadhu","suffix":""},{"id":544549267,"identity":"2851ef8f-4425-4161-b64c-f91464120943","order_by":4,"name":"Seonkyeong Yang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Pittsburgh","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Seonkyeong","middleName":"","lastName":"Yang","suffix":""},{"id":544549268,"identity":"6429cb2d-5c0f-4cd0-81b0-2d14e8042d66","order_by":5,"name":"Vanathi Gopalakrishnan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Pittsburgh","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Vanathi","middleName":"","lastName":"Gopalakrishnan","suffix":""},{"id":544549269,"identity":"36ccc1a4-7027-41c2-bda0-dc5ccf81686d","order_by":6,"name":"Shyam Visweswaran","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Pittsburgh","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shyam","middleName":"","lastName":"Visweswaran","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-10-30 20:08:17","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7992461/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7992461/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":96492693,"identity":"2acc1ad0-d79f-4dac-8f01-cb8374b14198","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-21 18:10:52","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":320639,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript20251104technicalcheck.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/cdafad1b7b480798b996c8bd.docx"},{"id":96492689,"identity":"813d9e98-9386-4624-a4f4-1d424444f91d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-21 18:10:52","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":7938,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"dfc514122786421b985af3f1b1bdcf50.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/5490152f91c9f2a247b57e61.json"},{"id":96492691,"identity":"6a4fac2a-379b-475c-83b4-87b65968972c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-21 18:10:52","extension":"docx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":34066,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"supplementaryinformation.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/c4c2c474598e1374a778af57.docx"},{"id":96492696,"identity":"ae5f599f-abb2-484f-bd77-00fde168436d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-21 18:10:52","extension":"xml","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":104760,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"dfc514122786421b985af3f1b1bdcf501enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/d7726d8ae6d5695e4bf61919.xml"},{"id":96492690,"identity":"35b565ed-5052-4cc2-9ba9-23c6d9556c51","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-21 18:10:52","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":27073,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/2ef4079aa898a29d45235f50.png"},{"id":96603290,"identity":"58044fc4-c7f4-42f9-b00c-4ff2cb58a624","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-24 09:08:05","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":27098,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/2ecc44815d1d0561f721c578.png"},{"id":96492692,"identity":"81b49622-fca1-4eaf-8a5a-39ce4fced6c0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-21 18:10:52","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":14490,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/3bbf67ad028981d9535e4e2e.png"},{"id":96492694,"identity":"4518fdc5-64e6-4164-b534-0c3521fad989","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-21 18:10:52","extension":"xml","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":103521,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"dfc514122786421b985af3f1b1bdcf501structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/8afce6cf48d0987f5c444e8a.xml"},{"id":96492695,"identity":"ae93ceb4-d628-4026-a8ac-7f5e3153e715","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-21 18:10:52","extension":"html","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":113695,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/3665c60f0c386bb12c2050d4.html"},{"id":96603907,"identity":"5769c827-85a1-4838-a690-618daccf6823","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-24 09:12:01","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":105938,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eIncidence rates of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). PPH rates (given as percentages) are ranked by race (green), risk factor (blue), and comorbidity (red).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/8bc60b10f2e9ffdf5cdd7543.png"},{"id":96492684,"identity":"d18a3792-265f-464a-99fc-43e5e170282c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-21 18:10:52","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":82493,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe trend in postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) incidence from 2005 to 2022. The incidence of PPH per 100,000 deliveries (blue) and the corresponding trend line (dashed red; Ptrend \u0026lt; 0.001).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/cfad7f5ad991c9cf140e26c3.png"},{"id":96492686,"identity":"16b5d7b8-115d-4493-97b5-3ef19247962a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-21 18:10:52","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":35211,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eComorbidity burden in postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). The prevalence of comorbidities in PPH deliveries (blue) and the reciprocal prevalence of PPH in comorbid conditions (orange).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/83db95ba493154763cf0b698.png"},{"id":97135396,"identity":"3064b8cb-c536-437d-8143-e302ba426c5c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-01 09:43:07","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1227118,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/993aebff-305b-4928-92b4-ead66a745b14.pdf"},{"id":96604338,"identity":"7eb7d1aa-20a4-41e8-aaef-5fc515ae346f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-24 09:13:39","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":34066,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"supplementaryinformation.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7992461/v1/7b4f13e50677059a6914c16f.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Estimating the incidence and risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage from the national ENACT network","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eHealth sciences research often relies on real-world data from various sources to generate evidence on patient health status and healthcare delivery. Electronic health records (EHRs), which record patient contacts, treatments, and clinical activities within healthcare systems, are a valuable source of real-world data and are increasingly used in epidemiological, clinical, and translational studies. Two primary approaches have emerged for assembling EHR data across multiple institutions: centralized and federated. In the centralized approach, EHR data from participating institutions are transferred to a central data repository, where the data are standardized and quality-controlled. This approach facilitates sophisticated analytics with individual-level data. However, there can be significant delays in data availability for analysis and potential scalability issues as data volume grows. Examples of research programs that use a centralized approach include the All of Us Research Program\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) initiative\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. In contrast to the centralized approach, the federated approach retains each participating institution's data locally while harmonizing the data across institutions to a common standard. This approach provides access to a larger volume of data with shorter time lags and poses lower security risks to healthcare systems. However, accessing and aggregating data from multiple institutions can be time-consuming or require sophisticated technology to ensure consistency and accuracy. Research programs that use a federated approach include the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, the Consortium for Clinical Characterization of COVID-19 by EHR (4CE)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and the Evolve to Next-Gen Accrual of patients to Clinical Trials (ENACT) network\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe ENACT network is unique because it enables users with no programming knowledge to query the data repositories in the network in an interactive fashion. The institutional EHR data repositories in the network use either the Informatics for Integrating Biology at the Bedside (i2b2) or the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) data models, which are linked via the Shared Health Research Information Network (SHRINE) platform\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The network is a collaboration of 57 data-contributing institutions (ENACT sites) affiliated with academic medical research centers. The SHRINE platform facilitates execution of queries that are constructed using medical terms in key domains, including demographics, diagnoses, procedures, medications, laboratory test results, and visit characteristics. To maintain the currentness of data, each site in the network updates its repository at least once a month. While the SHRINE platform enables querying of all sites on the network, not all may respond to every query due to data repository downtime, network traffic, and other technical issues. Furthermore, the set of responding sites may vary with each query, especially when executing a sequence of queries. Additionally, to ensure patient privacy, SHRINE automatically obfuscates the results of queries. While the ENACT network has the potential to accelerate evidence generation from large-scale analysis of EHRs, the first step is to evaluate the alignment of evidence generated from the network with findings from prior research that used individual-level data.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe conducted this evaluation using a case study on postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), an obstetric emergency and a critical condition that significantly impacts maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR9 CR10\" citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. PPH is one of the top five causes of maternal mortality in both resource-abundant and resource-limited countries, although the absolute risk of death from PPH is substantially lower in developed countries. In the United States (US), the incidence of PPH has increased from 2.7% in 2000 to 4.3% in 2019, although maternal mortality from PPH has decreased since the 1980s, with a reduction to 1.7 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2009\u003csup\u003e11,12\u003c/sup\u003e. Despite this decline, in 2019, PPH accounted for 13.7% of pregnancy-related deaths in the US\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003e. Our primary goal was to assess the consistency of evidence obtained from SHRINE-generated aggregated data with previously published research employing individual-level data.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) defines PPH as either cumulative blood loss of greater than or equal to 1000 mL or blood loss accompanied by signs or symptoms of hypovolemia within 24 hours of childbirth\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The criteria apply to both vaginal and cesarean deliveries. PPH is divided into subtypes based on symptom onset. Primary PPH is hemorrhage that occurs between the third stage of labor (i.e., delivery of the placenta) and 24 hours after fetal delivery, and secondary PPH is bleeding that occurs more than 24 hours after delivery and up to 12 weeks postpartum. The causes of PPH are summarized by the \"Four Ts,\" which include tone (e.g., uterine atony), trauma (e.g., laceration, rupture), tissue (e.g., retained products of conception), and thrombin (e.g., coagulopathies). Uterine atony has been identified as the most common cause, accounting for approximately 80% of PPH deliveries\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Treatment of PPH requires prompt recognition and management of the cause of hemorrhage, involving a well-coordinated team effort to address it. Surgical interventions, such as hysterectomy, are used only as a last resort. Key maternal risk factors for PPH include intrinsic factors such as placenta previa, polyhydramnios, multiple gestation, and uterine leiomyomas or factors related to circumstances around labor and delivery such as severe preeclampsia, chorioamnionitis or endometritis, prolonged labor, and prior cesarean\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Additionally, comorbidities and other clinical factors such as pregestational and gestational diabetes, asthma, chronic hypertension, antepartum hemorrhage, or abruption may further increase the risk of PPH\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Prevention of PPH includes identifying and managing risk factors and associated comorbidities, as well as active management of labor. Identifying the risk factors is crucial for targeted preventative measures and improving maternal health outcomes\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe used the SHRINE platform to obtain a comprehensive set of counts related to hospitalized deliveries and PPH that enabled the estimation of the proportion of deliveries affected by PPH, risk factors, and associated comorbidities. A repeated annual cross-sectional analysis was conducted to examine trends in PPH incidence and the burden of risk factors and comorbidities among affected women. We hypothesized that insights from the ENACT network would be consistent with findings from prior research using individual-level data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ's) National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Our study is vital for validating the ENACT network's effectiveness in generating real-world data in health sciences, especially in critical conditions such as PPH.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eStudy Population\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eData for this study were obtained from the ENACT network, comprising counts of women hospitalized for delivery, PPH deliveries, risk factors, and comorbidities. The raw dataset comprised 591,375 unique delivery hospitalizations collected from 8 ENACT active sites from 2005 to 2022. Though there are more sites in the network, we restricted our analyses to data from those sites that returned results for most queries to minimize missingness in the dataset.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e shows the age and racial characteristics, risk factors for PPH, and maternal comorbidities of all, with PPH, and without PPH deliveries. Most of the deliveries occurred in women aged 18 to 54 years (92.09%), with nearly all PPH deliveries (98.73%) occurring within this age range. Due to querying constraints, the maternal age was the woman's age at the time of querying the network, not the age at delivery. Since the age at the time of delivery was unavailable, the breakdown by age provides only an approximate estimate of the percentages of PPH occurring within age groups. Hence, our analyses did not use age breakdown data (see the Methods section). White women had the most deliveries, with 330,335 (55.87%) total deliveries and 24,965 (53.79%) PPH deliveries. Black or African American women had 57,175 (9.67%) total deliveries and 5,130 (11.05%) PPH deliveries.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDemographic characteristics, risk factors, and comorbidities of all, with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and without PPH delivery groups. The percentages presented for maternal race, risk factors, and comorbidities are \"column\" percentages, which denote\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAge* (unique patients)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e(\u0026ge;1 delivery)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;591,375\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eWith\u0026nbsp;PPH\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e(\u0026ge;1 event)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;46,410\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eWithout PPH\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;544,965\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;18\u0026nbsp;years\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e33,420\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e33,400\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026ge;18\u0026nbsp;years\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e557,745\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e46,405\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e511,340\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e18\u0026ndash;54\u0026nbsp;years\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e544,610\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e45,820\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e498,798\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;55 years\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e13,140\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e820\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12,320\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMaternal race (unique patients)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAll\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e(\u0026ge;1 delivery)\u003c/b\u003e,\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;591,375\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eWith PPH\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e(\u0026ge;1 event)\u003c/b\u003e,\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;46,410\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eWithout PPH\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;544,965\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP-value\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAmerican Indian or Alaska Native\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2,895 (0.49)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e245 (0.53)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2,650 (0.49)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.057\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAsian\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e28,340 (4.79)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3,045 (6.56)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e25295 (4.65)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eBlack or African American\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e57,175 (9.67)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e5,130 (11.05)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e52045 (9.55)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMultiple Races\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e460 (0.08)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e90 (0.19)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e370 (0.07)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eNative Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,400 (0.24)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e150 (0.32)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1250 (0.23)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eUnknown\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e47,590 (8.05)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3,640 (7.84)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e43950 (8.07)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.021\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhite\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e330,335 (55.87)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e24,965 (53.79)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e305370 (56.06)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eRisk factors (unique deliveries)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAll\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;858,404\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eWith PPH\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38,270\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eWithout PPH\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;820,134\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP-value\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePrior cesarean (no placenta previa or accreta)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e15,540 (1.81)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2,015 (5.27)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e13,525 (1.65)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePlacenta previa or accreta\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e44,085 (5.14)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7,495 (19.58)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e36,590 (4.46)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSevere eclampsia\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e22,505 (2.62)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3,695 (9.66)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e18,810 (2.29)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePolyhydramnios\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e17,825 (2.08)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2,460 (6.43)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e15,365 (1.87)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eChorioamnionitis or endometritis\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e37,890 (4.41)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e6,615 (17.29)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e31,275 (3.81)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMultiple gestation\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e29,430 (3.43)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3,775 (9.86)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e25,655 (3.13)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eUterine leiomyomas\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e27,770 (3.24)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2,995 (7.83)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e24,775 (3.02)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eComorbidities (unique deliveries)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAll\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;858,404\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eWith PPH\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38,270\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eWithout PPH\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;820,134\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP-value\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eObesity\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e138,650 (16.15)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12,875 (33.64)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e125,775 (15.34)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePregestational diabetes\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e35,050 (4.08)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3,375 (8.82)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e31,675 (3.86)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eGestational diabetes\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e75,005 (8.74)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7,430 (19.41)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e67,575 (8.24)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAsthma\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e76,085 (8.86)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7,440 (19.44)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e68,645 (8.37)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eChronic hypertension\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e65,265 (7.60)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7,015 (18.33)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e58,250 (7.10)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAntepartum hemorrhage or abruption\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e52,845 (6.16)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7,295 (19.06)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e45,550 (5.55)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eOperative vaginal delivery\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e17,445 (2.03)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,995 (5.21)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e15,450 (1.88)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePrimary cesarean\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e186,270 (21.70)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e15,720 (41.08)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e170,550 (20.80)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eIncidence, Causes, and Interventions in Postpartum Hemorrhage\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e shows the breakdown of PPH rates among racial groups, risk factors, and comorbidities. Among risk factors, women with prior cesarian (no placenta previa or accreta) had a PPH rate of 5.27%, while those with placenta previa or accreta had the highest rate of 19.58%. Women with severe eclampsia had a rate of 9.66%, women with chorioamnionitis or endometritis had a rate of 9.63%, women with polyhydramnios had a rate of 14.94%, and women with multiple gestation had a rate of 17.29%. Among comorbidities, the highest rate of PPH occurred in women with \\primary cesarean (41.08%), and women with obesity (33.64%).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e summarizes the incidence of PPH across racial groups, the number of risk factors, and the number of comorbidities. The overall incidence of PPH was 4.46% from 2005 to 2022. PPH incidence varied by race, with the highest rates observed among Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (12.14%) and Asian (11.04%) women, corresponding to crude incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of 1.51 and 1.37, respectively, compared to White women (reference group, 8.03%). Women with at least one risk factor (11.37%, IRR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.95) had more than twice the PPH rate of those with none (reference group, 5.82%), and women with at least two risk factors (11.87%, IRR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2.04) had the highest PPH rate. Similarly, the incidence of PPH was significantly higher among women with at least one comorbidity (9.13%, IRR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.45), and it was highest among those with two or more comorbidities (9.62%, IRR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.53) relative to those with none (6.29%). These findings demonstrate a clear increase in PPH risk as risk factors and comorbidities accumulate.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCrude incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) deliveries by race, number of risk factors, and number of comorbidities. Absolute risk (crude incidence rate) is calculated as the proportion of PPH deliveries within each subgroup. Crude IRRs are presented relative to the reference groups: White women (race), those with no PPH risk factors, and those with no comorbidities.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAbsolute risk for each subgroup (crude incidence rate, %)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCrude incidence rate ratio (IRR)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMaternal race\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;858,404\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eWith PPH\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38,270\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll deliveries\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e858,404\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e38,270\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.46\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAmerican Indian or Alaska Native\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2,895\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e255\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.81\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.10\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAsian\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e28,340\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3130\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e11.04\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.37\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eBlack or African American\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e57,175\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e5350\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e9.36\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.16\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMultiple Races\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e460\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e95\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e20.65\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2.57\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eNative Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,400\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e170\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12.14\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.51\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eUnknown\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e47,590\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4020\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.45\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.05\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhite (Reference)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e330,335\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e26535\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.03\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eRisk factors\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAll\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;858,404\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eWith PPH\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38,270\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDeliveries with 0 risk factors\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e373,915\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e21,770\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e5.82\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDeliveries with at least 1 risk factor\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e217,480\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e24,720\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e11.37\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.95\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDeliveries with at least 2 risk factors\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e153,425\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e18,215\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e11.87\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2.04\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eComorbidities\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAll\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;858,404\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eWith PPH\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38,270\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDeliveries with 0 comorbidity\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e216,135\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e13,605\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e6.29\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDeliveries with at least 1 comorbidity\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e359,805\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e32,855\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e9.13\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.45\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDeliveries with at least 2 comorbidities\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e239,405\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e23,030\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e9.62\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.53\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e shows the breakdown of PPH rates among racial groups, risk factors, and comorbidities.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAmong risk factors, women with prior cesarian (no placenta previa or accreta) had the lowest PPH rate of 2.15%, while those with placenta previa or accreta had the highest rate of 35.09%. Women with severe eclampsia had a rate of 12.18%, women with chorioamnionitis or endometritis had a rate of 20.46%, women with polyhydramnios had a rate of 9.85%, and women with multiple gestation had a rate of 17.02%. Among comorbidities, the highest rate of PPH occurred in women with antepartum hemorrhage or abruption (16.99%) and in women with operative vaginal deliveries (9.87%).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e presents the causes of PPH and interventions. Among the causes, uterine atony was the commonest cause, occurring in 38,185 PPH deliveries, followed by tissue-related causes such as retained placenta, occurring in 15,515 PPH deliveries. Trauma was identified as the cause in 11,240 PPH deliveries, and thrombin-induced PPH occurred in 1,470 PPH deliveries. Among interventions, a surgical procedure was performed in 6,470 deliveries, of which 935 were hysterectomies. Manipulative procedures (e.g., manual removal of retained placenta or blood clots) were performed in 8,045 PPH deliveries, and blood transfusions were given in 3,030 PPH deliveries. The most common intervention was the administration of PPH-specific medications, which occurred in 24,080 deliveries.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eComorbidity burden in postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). The prevalence of comorbidities in PPH deliveries (blue) and the reciprocal prevalence of PPH in comorbid conditions (orange).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCauses\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePPH\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;69,745\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAtony\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e53,325\u0026nbsp;(76.46%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTrauma\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e13,515\u0026nbsp;(19.38%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTissue-related\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e21,945\u0026nbsp;(31.47%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eThrombin-induced\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,835\u0026nbsp;(2.63%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eInterventions\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePPH\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;69,745\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eHysterectomy\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,280\u0026nbsp;(2.40%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSurgical procedures (including hysterectomy)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8,920\u0026nbsp;(12.79%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eManipulative procedures\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e11,000\u0026nbsp;(15.77%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eBlood transfusion\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e6,000\u0026nbsp;(8.60%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMedications\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e37,720\u0026nbsp;(54.08%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eTrends in Postpartum Hemorrhage\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e shows the trend of PPH from 2005 to 2022. During this period, there was a statistically significant increasing trend, rising from 5,634 to 10,504 PPH per 100,000 deliveries (P\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003etrend\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e \u0026lt; 0.001). This trend persisted among women with one or more risk factors (P\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003etrend\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e \u0026lt; 0.001) and those with one or more comorbidities (P\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003etrend\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e \u0026lt; 0.001).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eComorbidities in Postpartum Hemorrhage\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e illustrates the prevalence of various comorbidities in PPH deliveries and the reciprocal prevalence of PPH within those comorbid conditions. Comorbidities such as obesity, gestational diabetes, asthma, chronic hypertension, and antepartum hemorrhage or abruption have a high prevalence in PPH deliveries. The reciprocal prevalence of PPH is particularly high among women with antepartum hemorrhage or abruption (13.80%), operative vaginal deliveries (11.44%), and chronic hypertension (10.75%). While primary cesarean has the highest prevalence of PPH among comorbid conditions (33.85%), the prevalence of PPH in women undergoing primary cesarean is relatively lower at 8.44%. Conversely, obesity, with a high prevalence in PPH deliveries (27.72%), also shows a significant reciprocal PPH prevalence (9.29%).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe main objective of this study was to assess the trends in PPH, risk factors and comorbidities in the US using aggregated counts from the ENACT network. Our analysis revealed a rising trend in PPH, consistent with the trend observed in a previously published study covering the 2009\u0026ndash;2019 period. This study relied on the NIS data, which comprises a 20% sample of all delivery hospitalizations in the US and is collected annually by the AHRQ's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. By including data from before 2009 and after 2019, our study corroborates previously observed trends and shows that the upward trajectory of PPH continues beyond the earlier study period. Given that PPH is life-threatening, our findings underscore the urgent need to identify women at risk of PPH for timely prevention and management.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, the study validates the utility of the data in the ENACT network for conducting research efficiently. Despite the data being available only as aggregate counts, we established reproducible data quality procedures and analysis workflows that confirm the reliability of the data in the network for similar analyses. Our querying methods were refined iteratively after discussions with the ENACT technical team to ensure data accuracy. This validation is significant because it demonstrates that the network's data, when processed using rigorous data quality processes, can be a valuable resource for future research.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBased on the incidence rates of PPH across the various races in our results, we found that the Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander women had the highest incidence of PPH (~\u0026thinsp;12.1%), followed by Asian women (~\u0026thinsp;11%), Black or African American women (~\u0026thinsp;9.4%), and American Indian or Alaska Native women (~\u0026thinsp;8.8%),. Our findings are consistent with prior studies that confirmed similar disparities using more rigorous statistical methods applied to individual-level EHR data and medical charts\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR19\" citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Our analyses identified the commonest risk factor as placenta previa or accreta (19.6% in PPH) and the commonest comorbidity as antepartum hemorrhage or abruption (19.1% in PPH). In concordance with the results obtained from AHRQ's NIS data\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, our results show that uterine atony is the commonest cause of PPH.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOverall, our analysis yields actionable findings regarding racial disparities, showing that Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Black or African American women have an increasing prevalence of PPH. The rank ordering of comorbidities and risk factors also emphasizes the importance of identifying and managing multiple gestations, prior cesarean, gestational diabetes, and chronic hypertension. These comorbidities and risk factors can help to inform future studies in designing personalized risk prediction models for PPH.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOur study has several limitations. First, to preserve patient privacy, the patient counts provided in SHRINE are obfuscated. This obfuscation may introduce some level of inaccuracy in the data, potentially affecting the precision of the analysis results. Because the counts for each query were generally large (in the tens or hundreds of thousands or millions), obfuscation likely did not affect the validity of the results.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSecond, the technology used in ENACT calculates the number of unique patients meeting query criteria, which may lead to undercounting if multiple occurrences of the same diagnostic code are present. For instance, a count from a query may not account for second, third, or subsequent deliveries in the same woman, which may affect the accuracy of the trends and outcomes related to multiple deliveries. Depending on the research question, this can be mitigated by choosing an appropriate timeframe for querying the condition of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThird, the diagnosis of PPH was based only on ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes for diagnosis, which is similar to prior research that used NIS data, to which we compared our results. Including indicators of blood loss, such as changes in hematocrit values or estimated blood loss measurements from the magnitude of the drop in hematocrit values, could potentially improve the accuracy of identifying PPH in EHR data. However, due to the limitations of the SHRINE platform, we were unable to obtain actual hematocrit values, changes in hematocrit values, or vital signs.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFourth, we utilized only ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes for procedures, based on methodologies established in previous studies. Typically, all sites map their procedures to Current Procedural Terminology (CPT-4) codes, but not necessarily to ICD codes. The exclusion of CPT-4 codes may lead to incomplete data capture, potentially missing some delivery procedures.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFinally, due to the lack of individual-level data, we could not study women longitudinally, infer temporal relationships, or identify confounding factors to infer causality. Using aggregated count data to evaluate the correlation between PPH, risk factors, and comorbidities does not establish causal relationships. Additionally, drawing race-based conclusions is challenging since the counts of minority groups (e.g., American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander) are small.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis case study illustrates the use of aggregated counts from EHRs from a federated network of sites across the US to assess trends in PPH among racial and age groups. We found a clearly increasing trend in PPH incidence from 2005 to 2022, supported by prior research. Further, aggregated counts were adequate to assess maternal risk factors and comorbidities incidence rates, and the findings were concordant with prior research. Data in the ENACT network is updated regularly, which provides the ability to rapidly obtain data for assessing recent trends in critical conditions such as PPH. Our finding underscores the need for better approaches to more accurately identify women at an elevated risk for PPH, while accounting for diverse racial groups. In the future, the limitations of aggregated data will be overcome by conducting studies on cohorts of patients with individual-level data (e.g., the global maternal and newborn health eCohorts\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e) that will yield more precise data to assess trends in PPH and associated risk factors and comorbidities.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData Sources\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe used SHRINE to query the ENACT network to obtain patient counts. The EHR data in the network is de-identified to ensure patient privacy and comply with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA) regulations, and SHRINE returns aggregate counts of patients meeting query criteria. To ensure privacy, SHRINE automatically obfuscates a patient count that a query returns by adding or subtracting a number up to 10 and rounds the resulting count to the nearest multiple of five\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Due to obfuscation, the same query may return slightly different counts when rerun, though these variations are typically negligible, especially when the counts are high. The University of Pittsburgh's Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved using the ENACT network for a wide range of research under protocol number STUDY19080059.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe queries were submitted to all sites on the ENACT network, resulting in adequate responses from 8 active sites; counts obtained from these 8 sites comprised the raw dataset. To qualify for inclusion in the analyses, sites were required to meet specific inclusion criteria, ensuring data quality and completeness. Sites were required to have 20% or less missing annual counts or counts that are at least an order of magnitude lower than adjacent years, allowing for up to two years of imputed counts within the eighteen years from 2005 to 2022 for each query. A considerable reduction in count from one year to the next indicated potential data errors or the absence of relevant EHRs.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eStudy Design and Data Extraction\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe conducted repeated annual cross-sectional analyses using counts aggregated across all selected sites from 2005 to 2022. First, we identified women with delivery hospitalizations each calendar year using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) diagnosis and procedure codes (see Supplementary information). Next, within this cohort, we identified deliveries with PPH using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes (see Supplementary information). Women with delivery hospitalizations without PPH served as a comparator group. We opted to rely solely on ICD codes for the diagnosis of PPH for several reasons, including prior research that used NIS data to which we compared our results relied on ICD codes, limitations of the SHRINE platform (which did not allow for calculating estimated blood loss by assessing the magnitude of the drop in hematocrit values), and ICD codes have been reported to have high specificity for PPH\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. We executed two sequences of queries: one for all delivery hospitalizations and another for delivery hospitalizations with PPH.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eOutcomes\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eOur primary outcome of interest was the annual incidence rate of PPH among delivery hospitalizations, focusing on examining trends in incidence rates over the entire study period. Because of the potential limitations of obfuscated data, we compared demographics, risk factors, and comorbidities between the two groups: deliveries with PPH and deliveries without PPH. The demographics included women 15\u0026ndash;54 years old stratified by 10-year age intervals and race (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, multiple races, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, unknown, and White). Due to constraints in constructing queries in SHRINE, obtaining an individual's age at a specific moment in the past was not possible. Thus, the maternal age we obtained was the woman's age at the time of querying the network, not the age at delivery. Therefore, maternal age was not considered as a variable in our analyses.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe assessed several maternal risk factors, including prior cesarean (no placenta previa or accreta), placenta previa or accreta, severe preeclampsia, polyhydramnios, chorioamnionitis or endometritis, multiple gestation, and uterine leiomyomas. In addition, we assessed several comorbidities and other clinical conditions, including obesity, pregestational diabetes, gestational diabetes, asthma, chronic hypertension, antepartum hemorrhage or abruption, operative vaginal delivery, and primary cesarean (or first cesarean delivery). We categorized the causes of PPH according to the \"Four Ts\" (i.e., tone, trauma, tissue, thrombin) as secondary outcomes. Furthermore, we assessed surgical and medical PPH interventions, such as surgical procedures, including hysterectomy, manipulative procedures, blood transfusion, and medications (see Supplementary information). The PPH incidence, risk factors, and comorbidities were reported as counts and proportions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData Analyses\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe imputed missing counts using linear regression when there were two or more consecutive missing years or for a boundary year. For single-year missing counts, the counts for the preceding and subsequent years were averaged.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe trends in PPH incidence rates were examined within subgroups defined by race, presence of maternal risk factors, and presence of comorbidities. To assess the significance of the trend in PPH incidence over time, we employed the non-parametric Mann-Kendall trend test\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The Mann-Kendall test was chosen for its robustness against data irregularities and its ability to analyze trends without assuming a specific data distribution. Further, we assessed the incidence of PPH in each risk factor and comorbidity subgroup.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe computed the prevalence of comorbidities for women who had PPH deliveries (comorbidity | PPH), as well as the reciprocal prevalence of PPH delivery given these comorbidities (PPH | comorbidity). Data analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel version 4.3.2 and Python version 3.7.3.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConsent, Ethics, IRB\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInformed consent\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eis not applicable since only deidentified electronic health record data were used in the study. The Institutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh determined that it met the criteria for exemption under 45 CFR 46.104(d)(4) for secondary research use of existing electronic health record data. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh (STUDY19080059).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHuman Ethics and Consent to Participate declarations: not applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCode availability\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe underlying code for this study is not publicly available but may be made available to qualified researchers on reasonable request from the corresponding authors.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFunding\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e The research reported in this publication was supported by the American Board of Family Medicine Foundation under an AI/ML award and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number U24 TR004111. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the American Board of Family Medicine Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eMJS ran queries on the ENACT network, and OK conducted the data analyses. WL and SY contributed to statistical testing and verification of data analyses, while EMS and SV provided resources and scientific guidance. SV and VG conceived the idea and supervised the creation of the queries and analyses. All authors contributed to the writing and extensive editing of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers UL1 TR001857 and U24 TR004111. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData Availability\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient privacy regulations but are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDenny, J. C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e The \"All of Us\" Research Program. \u003cem\u003eN Engl J Med\u003c/em\u003e 381, 668\u0026ndash;676, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1056/NEJMsr1809937\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1056/NEJMsr1809937\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHaendel, M. A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): Rationale, design, infrastructure, and deployment. \u003cem\u003eJ Am Med Inform Assoc\u003c/em\u003e 28, 427\u0026ndash;443, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1093/jamia/ocaa196\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/jamia/ocaa196\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFleurence, R. L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research network. \u003cem\u003eJ Am Med Inform Assoc\u003c/em\u003e 21, 578\u0026ndash;582, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002747\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002747\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKlann, J. G. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Validation of an internationally derived patient severity phenotype to support COVID-19 analytics from electronic health record data. \u003cem\u003eJ Am Med Inform Assoc\u003c/em\u003e 28, 1411\u0026ndash;1420, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1093/jamia/ocab018\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/jamia/ocab018\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVisweswaran, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Accrual to Clinical Trials (ACT): a Clinical and Translational Science Award Consortium Network. \u003cem\u003eJAMIA Open\u003c/em\u003e 1, 147\u0026ndash;152, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy033\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy033\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMorrato, E. H. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e The Evolve to Next-Gen ACT Network: an evolving open-access, real-world data resource primed for real-world evidence research across the Clinical and Translational Science Award Consortium. \u003cem\u003eJ Clin Transl Sci\u003c/em\u003e 7, e224, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1017/cts.2023.617\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1017/cts.2023.617\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWeber, G. M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e The Shared Health Research Information Network (SHRINE): a prototype federated query tool for clinical data repositories. \u003cem\u003eJ Am Med Inform Assoc\u003c/em\u003e 16, 624\u0026ndash;630, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1197/jamia.M3191\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1197/jamia.M3191\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2009).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorbetta-Rastelli, C. M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Postpartum hemorrhage trends and outcomes in the United States, 2000\u0026ndash;2019. \u003cem\u003eObstet Gynecol\u003c/em\u003e 141, 152\u0026ndash;161, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1097/aog.0000000000004972\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1097/aog.0000000000004972\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSay, L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. \u003cem\u003eLancet Glob Health\u003c/em\u003e 2, e323-333, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70227-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70227-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEvensen, A., Anderson, J. M. \u0026amp; Fontaine, P. Postpartum hemorrhage: prevention and treatment. \u003cem\u003eAm Fam Physician\u003c/em\u003e 95, 442\u0026ndash;449 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCreanga, A. A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now? \u003cem\u003eJ Womens Health (Larchmt)\u003c/em\u003e 23, 3\u0026ndash;9, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1089/jwh.2013.4617\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1089/jwh.2013.4617\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCallaghan, W. M., Mackay, A. P. \u0026amp; Berg, C. J. Identification of severe maternal morbidity during delivery hospitalizations, United States, 1991\u0026ndash;2003. \u003cem\u003eAm J Obstet Gynecol\u003c/em\u003e 199, 133.e131-138, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.020\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.020\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2008).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTrost, S. L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Identifying deaths during and after pregnancy: new approaches to a perennial challenge. \u003cem\u003ePublic Health Rep\u003c/em\u003e 138, 567\u0026ndash;572, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/00333549221110487\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/00333549221110487\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAimagambetova, G., Bapayeva, G., Sakhipova, G. \u0026amp; Terzic, M. Management of postpartum hemorrhage in low- and middle-income countries: emergency need for updated approach due to specific circumstances, resources, and availabilities. \u003cem\u003eJ Clin Med\u003c/em\u003e 13, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/jcm13237387\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/jcm13237387\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBienstock, J. L., Eke, A. C. \u0026amp; Hueppchen, N. A. Postpartum hemorrhage. \u003cem\u003eN Engl J Med\u003c/em\u003e 384, 1635\u0026ndash;1645, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1056/NEJMra1513247\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1056/NEJMra1513247\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLinde, L. E. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Recurrence of postpartum hemorrhage, maternal and paternal contribution, and the effect of offspring birthweight and sex: a population-based cohort study. \u003cem\u003eArch Gynecol Obstet\u003c/em\u003e 306, 1807\u0026ndash;1814, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s00404-021-06374-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00404-021-06374-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEnde, H. B. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Risk factors for atonic postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. \u003cem\u003eObstet Gynecol\u003c/em\u003e 137, 305\u0026ndash;323, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1097/aog.0000000000004228\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1097/aog.0000000000004228\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHarvey, S. A., Lim, E., Gandhi, K. R., Miyamura, J. \u0026amp; Nakagawa, K. Racial-ethnic disparities in postpartum hemorrhage in Native Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders, and Asians. \u003cem\u003eHawaii J Med Public Health\u003c/em\u003e 76, 128\u0026ndash;132 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChalouhi, S. E., Tarutis, J., Barros, G., Starke, R. M. \u0026amp; Mozurkewich, E. L. Risk of postpartum hemorrhage among Native American women. \u003cem\u003eInt J Gynaecol Obstet\u003c/em\u003e 131, 269\u0026ndash;272, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.05.037\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.05.037\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBryant, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e The association of maternal race and ethnicity and the risk of postpartum hemorrhage. \u003cem\u003eAnesth Analg\u003c/em\u003e 115, 1127\u0026ndash;1136, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182691e62\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182691e62\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eArsenault, C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e The maternal and newborn health eCohort to track longitudinal care quality: study protocol and survey development. \u003cem\u003eGlob Health Action\u003c/em\u003e 17, 2392352, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1080/16549716.2024.2392352\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/16549716.2024.2392352\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMurphy, S. N., Gainer, V., Mendis, M., Churchill, S. \u0026amp; Kohane, I. Strategies for maintaining patient privacy in i2b2. \u003cem\u003eJ Am Med Inform Assoc\u003c/em\u003e 18 Suppl 1, i103-108, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000316\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000316\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eButwick, A. J., Walsh, E. M., Kuzniewicz, M., Li, S. X. \u0026amp; Escobar, G. J. Accuracy of international classification of diseases, ninth revision, codes for postpartum hemorrhage among women undergoing cesarean delivery. \u003cem\u003eTransfusion\u003c/em\u003e 58, 998\u0026ndash;1005, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/trf.14498\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/trf.14498\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLadfors, L. V., Muraca, G. M., Butwick, A., Edgren, G. \u0026amp; Stephansson, O. Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register. \u003cem\u003eActa Obstet Gynecol Scand\u003c/em\u003e 100, 322\u0026ndash;330, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/aogs.13994\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/aogs.13994\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMann, H. B. Nonparametric tests against trend. \u003cem\u003eEconometrica\u003c/em\u003e 13, 245\u0026ndash;259, doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1907187\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.jstor.org/stable/1907187\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (1945).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"npj-health-systems","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"Learn more about [npj Health Systems](https://www.nature.com/npjhealthsyst/)","snPcode":"44401","submissionUrl":"https://submission.springernature.com/new-submission/44401/3","title":"npj Health Systems","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"NPJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7992461/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7992461/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eAggregated counts from electronic health records (EHRs) provide a rich source of real-world data that can be leveraged to investigate critical medical conditions such as postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). We used the Evolve to Next-Gen Accrual to Clinical Trials (ENACT) network, a large, federated network of EHRs, and conducted repeated annual cross-sectional analyses on PPH incidence, risk factors, and maternal comorbidities in a large cohort of 591,375 delivery hospitalizations during the period 2005 to 2022. During this time, there was a statistically significant increasing trend in the incidence of PPH, which is consistent with previous studies. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander women had the highest incidence of PPH (12.14%), followed by Asian (11.04%) and Black or African American (9.36%) women. In PPH deliveries, the top-ranked risk factor was placenta previa or accreta (19.58%), the top-ranked comorbidity was primary cesarean delivery (41.08%), and the commonest cause was uterine atony (76.5%).\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Estimating the incidence and risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage from the national ENACT network","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-11-21 18:10:47","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7992461/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-12-04T18:55:14+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-12-04T17:20:53+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-12-03T01:05:29+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"58958272121434288613838495156953424505","date":"2025-11-27T00:35:29+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"234137231803888449897397466695525416803","date":"2025-11-13T13:00:30+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-11-11T12:55:39+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-11-11T12:53:35+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-11-11T04:57:08+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"npj Health Systems","date":"2025-10-30T20:01:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"npj-health-systems","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"Learn more about [npj Health Systems](https://www.nature.com/npjhealthsyst/)","snPcode":"44401","submissionUrl":"https://submission.springernature.com/new-submission/44401/3","title":"npj Health Systems","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"NPJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"689da8a5-1c2e-449b-9ca6-ae4bc84fcb90","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 21st, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":57938493,"name":"Health sciences/Diseases"},{"id":57938494,"name":"Health sciences/Health care"},{"id":57938495,"name":"Health sciences/Medical research"},{"id":57938496,"name":"Health sciences/Risk factors"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-03-22T14:54:32+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-11-21 18:10:47","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7992461","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7992461","identity":"rs-7992461","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.