ReFair: A Framework for Retention Depolarization in Recommender Systems

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This preprint studied how to mitigate retention disparities between user groups in recommender systems that can drive polarization and harm long-term engagement diversity. It proposed ReFair, a model-based reinforcement learning framework that alternates between learning user retention dynamics in the environment and optimizing recommendation policies under fairness constraints, while accounting for uncertainty in dynamic estimations. The authors report that experiments on real-world datasets show ReFair improves long-term user satisfaction and reduces retention polarization. A key caveat is that the work is a research preprint and not yet peer reviewed, as explicitly stated. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 9,070 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
ReFair: A Framework for Retention Depolarization in Recommender Systems | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article ReFair: A Framework for Retention Depolarization in Recommender Systems Junaid ahmed iqbal This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7994140/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Retention disparities among user groups in recommender systems exacerbate polarization, undermining long-term user engagement and diversity. Addressing this challenge, we propose ReFair, a novel computational framework designed to enhance recommendation algorithms while enforcing retention fairness across the user population. ReFair employs a model-based reinforcement learning approach, iteratively alternating between environment learning for user retention dynamics and fairness-constrained policy optimization. Our method incorporates uncertainties in dynamic estimations to ensure robust performance. Empirical evaluations on real-world datasets demonstrate ReFair's ability to improve long-term user satisfaction and reduce retention polarization effectively. This work introduces new possibilities for fairness in recommender systems, advancing both theoretical and practical objectives. Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7994140","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":549979764,"identity":"1a95f04f-257f-4e0b-bc8e-c4f9f4055aa0","order_by":0,"name":"Junaid ahmed iqbal","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Junaid","middleName":"ahmed","lastName":"iqbal","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-10-31 03:53:30","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7994140/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7994140/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":96965435,"identity":"bd8c3e34-891b-425b-bb4c-215fde30f529","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-28 06:25:25","extension":"json","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":3008,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"841fb99f34e74e8fbaac4019936fa2fe.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7994140/v1/aef015b41bf0d3cc5fd8d2af.json"},{"id":105888614,"identity":"f1997bc0-d9e4-4128-8d88-3f8fa2e0207b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-01 07:44:40","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":323610,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ReFairAFrameworkforRetentionDepolarizationinRecommenderSystems.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7994140/v1_covered_615f9472-ac47-46e6-93ba-35d422601bdf.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"ReFair: A Framework for Retention Depolarization in Recommender Systems","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7994140/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7994140/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eRetention disparities among user groups in recommender systems exacerbate polarization, undermining long-term user engagement and diversity. Addressing this challenge, we propose ReFair, a novel computational framework designed to enhance recommendation algorithms while enforcing retention fairness across the user population. ReFair employs a model-based reinforcement learning approach, iteratively alternating between environment learning for user retention dynamics and fairness-constrained policy optimization. Our method incorporates uncertainties in dynamic estimations to ensure robust performance. Empirical evaluations on real-world datasets demonstrate ReFair's ability to improve long-term user satisfaction and reduce retention polarization effectively. This work introduces new possibilities for fairness in recommender systems, advancing both theoretical and practical objectives.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"ReFair: A Framework for Retention Depolarization in Recommender Systems","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-11-28 06:25:21","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7994140/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"52a5d9c9-64d8-4a5b-8eab-60dc5bfe9da0","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 28th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-01T07:43:56+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-11-28 06:25:21","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7994140","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7994140","identity":"rs-7994140","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00